Title: Michigan
1Michigans Standard of Care Patient Exposure
Values
- Bruce Matkovich
- Radiation Safety Section
- Michigan Department of Community Health
2Exposure at Skin Entrance
- Measure common radiographic projections during
regulatory inspection - Common patient thicknesses
- Measured with MDH X-Ray Monitor
- Monthly workloads collected
3Exposure at Skin Entrance - 2
- Exposure data entered into Radiation Safety Data
System - Recent update distinguishes between digital modes
Computed Radiography (CR) and Direct Radiography
(DR)
4(No Transcript)
5Standard of Care Exposure Values
- Established by advisory committee near the 85th
percentile of ESE data - Last adjustment in 1995
- Mostly based on 200 speed screen-film
- Non-regulatory
6Standard of Care Exposure Values
Michigan
PA Chest (without a grid) 20 mR
PA Chest (with a grid) 25 mR
AP Lumbar Spine 500 mR
AP Cervical Spine 125 mR
DP Foot 35 mR
Hand 15 mR
Dental Cephalometric 25 mR
7Standard of Care Exposure Values and AAPM
Reference Values
Michigan AAPM
PA Chest (without a grid) 20 mR 25 mR
PA Chest (with a grid) 25 mR 25 mR
AP Lumbar Spine 500 mR 500 mR
AP Cervical Spine 125 mR 125 mR
DP Foot 35 mR
Hand 15 mR
Dental Cephalometric 25 mR 25 mR
8Exposures Reported to Facility
- Measured Entrance at Skin Exposure along with the
Standard of Care for that projection - Advised to reduce exposure if over the Standard
of Care - Good cooperation from facilities in reducing
exposures when appropriate
9Exposure Distribution Graphs
- Most recent 5 year period
- Screen-film and digital imaging displayed
separately - Number of machines tested, median exposure, and
85th percentile data included
10(No Transcript)
11(No Transcript)
12(No Transcript)
13(No Transcript)
14(No Transcript)
15(No Transcript)
16(No Transcript)
17Exposure Trends
- The difference between the 85th percentile and
the median exposure is being reduced - Outriders are being becoming less of a problem
18Trend - AP Lumbar Spine
19Trend - AP Cervical Spine
20Trend - PA Chest (without a grid)
21Trend - PA Chest (with a grid)
22Trend - DP Foot
23Trend - Hand
24Trend Dental Cephalometric
25Standard of Care Conclusions
- Standard of Care values or reference values are
effective in controlling exposures - They do not adversely drive exposures below what
is necessary for diagnostic quality images
26For more information
Radiation Safety Section
www.michigan.gov/rss