Measuring Development Outcomes in Low Income Countries - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 12
About This Presentation
Title:

Measuring Development Outcomes in Low Income Countries

Description:

Consistency with country priorities as articulated in national poverty reduction ... In some cases, most recent data are six or seven years old. ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:42
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 13
Provided by: WB1673
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Measuring Development Outcomes in Low Income Countries


1
Measuring Development Outcomes in Low Income
Countries
  • Conference on Improving Statistics
  • for Measuring Development Outcomes
  • June 4-5, 2003
  • Ellen Goldstein
  • Operations Policy and Country Services
  • World Bank

2
Managing for Results Key Questions
  • What do we mean by results?
  • Sustained improvement in development outcomes at
    the country level (e.g., families lifted out of
    poverty).
  • How do we get better results?
  • Improve results by increasing management
    attention to them
  • in countrieswhere results are achieved.
  • within the Bankto be a more relevant and
    effective agency.
  • across agenciesto scale up impact via
    collaborative action.

3
IDA Results Measurement System What is it?
  • IDA13 arrangement calls for an enhanced
    International Development Association (IDA)
    results measurement system as part of a broader,
    Bank-wide results agenda. The IDA system is
    expected to
  • reflect priorities of Poverty Reduction
    Strategies.
  • link clearly to MDG framework.
  • allow aggregation across IDA countries.
  • assess contribution of IDA to results.

4
IDA Results Measurement System What is it?
  • Purpose is to focus IDA donors and borrowers
    attention on the development effectiveness of IDA
    support, through assessment of
  • aggregate development outcomes in IDA countries
  • IDAs contribution to these outcomes through
    results-based country assistance strategies.
  • Does not influence country-specific IDA
    allocations (based on country performance rating
    formula).

5
Guiding Principles in Selecting Aggregate
Outcome Indicators
  • Consistency with country priorities as
    articulated in national poverty reduction
    strategies.
  • Alignment with MDG indicators and other
    international monitoring efforts.
  • Relevance to IDAs activities in borrowing
    countries.
  • Development of monitoring primarily through
    national statistical systems.

6
Monitoring Country Outcomes Proposed Indicators
  • Population below 1/day poverty line
  • Underweight children, under 5
  • Child Mortality, under 5
  • Measles immunization rate
  • HIV prevalence of pregnant women,
  • 15-24
  • Births attended by skilled personnel
  • Ratio of girls to boys in primary and secondary
    school
  • Primary school completion rate
  • Sustainable access to improved water sources
  • Fixed lines and cell phones per 1,000
  • Formal cost required for business start-up
  • Time required for business start-up
  • Public expenditure management
  • Growth of value-added in agriculture
  • Growth of GDP per capita

To be adapted as knowledge base improves
7
Consistency of Proposed Indicators
  • With PRSPs. Coverage of key PRSP priorities,
    taking into account diversity of indicators.
  • With MDGs. 10 of 15 are MDG indicators, others
    are complementary, reflecting activities that
    accelerate growth to reduce poverty.
  • With other international monitoring. Incorporates
    9 of 10 indicators suggested by European
    Commission for monitoring development
    effectiveness.
  • With interim system. Reflects IDAs support for
    activities that accelerate growth (infrastructure
    development, private sector development, and
    public sector management) in order to reduce
    poverty.

8
Monitoring Country Outcomes Data Issues
  • Less than half of IDA countries have data for all
    indicators.
  • In some cases, most recent data are six or seven
    years old.
  • For some indicators, only half the IDA countries
    (or less) can calculate a trend line in the
    1990s based on two data points
  • 43 can calculate underweight children under five
  • 56 can calculate primary school completion rates
  • 44 can calculate proportion of population with
    access to an improved water source
  • Assessing change during a three year PRS or IDA
    cycle is imperfect and sometimes impossible.

9
Monitoring of Country Outcomes Reporting Issues
  • Diversity of PRSP indicators reflects
    country-specific prioritiesbut also lack of
    international norms and/or lack of data in some
    areas.
  • 60 of PRSPs have childhood nutrition as a
    priority but only 35 use underweight children
    indicator.
  • All PRSPs have safe motherhood as a priority but
    only 48 use attended births indicator (none use
    maternal mortality).
  • Highest diversity where norms are still being
    defined private sector development, rural
    development, infrastructure and public sector
    management.

10
Borrowing Countries Perceptions of IDA Results
Measurement System
  • PRS process has enhanced country ownership,
    stakeholder participation and donor alignment.
  • Tracking IDA indicators would not influence PRS
    priorities or alter strategic directions.
  • Proposed indicators are largely consistent with
    PRS priorities (suggestions on transport, private
    sector).
  • they are very relevant because they tend to
    answer critical questions about delivering
    results to the people.
  • Measuring and monitoring across countries was
    encouraged
  • It is useful to measure outcomes across
    countries in similar circumstances to learn from
    others and to see what they are doing in their
    strategies.

11
Borrowing Countries Perceptions (cont.)
  • Capacity to measure and monitor PRS results at
    the country level needs strengthening.
  • Countries beset by multiple, fragmentary and
    duplicative international reporting requirements.
  • Better harmonization of international results
    reporting requirements among agencies is
    essential.
  • Plea for coordinated support to build capacity of
    national statistical institutions and systems.
  • Our enemy is this endeavor is to seek
    perfection. We need flexibility, pragmatism and
    realism.

12
Key Issues for Development Agencies
  • Recognize that managing for results begins at the
    country level and requires statistical demand
    from policy makers.
  • Harmonize international results reporting around
    a manageable set of outcome indicators.
  • Identify data gaps and reporting inefficiencies
    related to this core set.
  • Develop a time-bound and costed global action
    plan to build sustainable institutional capacity
    to generate core indicators.
  • Foster political buy-in within agencies on global
    collaboration to improve statistics for managing
    for results.
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com