Title: Emergency transport and interhospital transfer in STsegment elevation myocardial infarction
1Emergency transport and inter-hospital transfer
in ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction
- Thomas W. Concannon, MA1,
- David M. Kent MD MS2, Sharon-Lise Normand PhD3,
- Joseph P. Newhouse PhD3, Robin Ruthazer MPH2,
- John L Griffith PhD2, Joni R. Beshansky RN MPH2,
- John B. Wong, MD PhD2, Harry P. Selker MD MSPH2
- Funded by the Agency for Healthcare Research and
Quality (RO1 HS010282 and T32 HS00060-12) - PhD Program in Health Policy, Harvard University
- Institute for Clinical Research and Health Policy
Studies, Tufts-New England Medical Center - Division of Health Care Policy Research and
Education, Harvard Medical School
2Background
Heart attack may be caused by the formation of a
blood clot that blocks normal blood flow to heart
muscle
- ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction
(STEMI)
3Background
- May be treated with
- Angioplasty, involving the insertion of a
catheter into the affected blood vessel and
inflation of a balloon to manually clear the clot - Thrombolytic therapy, involving the
administration of a clot-busting drug
4Background
- Angioplasty can only be performed in specialized
hospital settings - Thrombolysis can be performed in any hospital
emergency department -
5Background Thrombolysis or Angioplasty?
- Angioplasty yields superior outcomes in average
30-day mortality and in other clinical endpoints - However, thrombolysis remains the standard of
care in most settings
6Background - Study Question
- What is the impact on mortality of targeting
angioplasty to high benefit patients?
7Methods - Objective
- Evaluate 3 Policy Options
- Closest Hospital Policy
- Transport to closest hospital, treat with
locally available therapy - Universal Angioplasty Policy
- Transport to closest angioplasty-capable
hospital, treat with angioplasty - Targeted Angioplasty Policy
- Transport to closest hospital, evaluate, treat
locally or transfer for angioplasty
8Methods - Outcomes of Interest
- Primary Outcome
- Patient 30 day mortality
- Secondary Outcome
- Hospital volume
9Methods - Predictive Model
- Recently developed and validated predictive
instrument - Predicts 30-day mortality with angioplasty and
with thrombolysis - Easily obtainable characteristics of patients
- Incorporated onto the output of an EKG
10Methods - Predictive Model
11.3
Probability of 30-day mortality with thrombolysis
11Methods - Predictive Model
7.3
Probability of 30-day mortality with angioplasty
12Methods - Predictive Model
149 minutes
Maximum time delay at which the benefit with
angioplasty disappears
13Methods Simulation Model
- C-PORT Patient 183
- Age 79
- Systolic blood pressure 116
- No history of diabetes
- Moderately severe heart attack
- 93 minutes from symptom onset to Emergency
Department arrival
Location Census block 2010 Time Monday at
330 am
14Closest Hospital Policy
Methods
Treated with thrombolysis Probability of death
.095
503 am
Monday 330 am
93 minutes
15Universal Angioplasty Policy
Methods
525 am
115 minutes
Treated with angioplasty Probability of death
.0733
Monday 330 am
16Targeted Angioplasty Policy
Methods
531 am
28 minutes
Treated with angioplasty Probability of death
.0738
Monday 330 am
93 minutes
17Results - 30-Day Mortality
18Results - Hospital Volumes Closest Hospital Policy
Full-time
Part-time
No Angioplasty
19Results - Hospital Volumes Universal Angioplasty
Policy
20Results - Hospital Volumes Targeted Angioplasty
Policy
21Results - Summary
- A policy of targeting angioplasty to high
benefit patients could capture much or all of the
procedures potential benefit while avoiding
dramatic effects on hospital volumes
22Conclusions
- Inter-patient variation in the risks and benefits
of angioplasty may be an important factor in
decisions about the appropriate course of
treatment. - More information is needed on how this variation
affects the tradeoff between early treatment and
specialized treatment - Further study is needed to determine the best
approach for allocating angioplasty