Title: Pedestrian Timing Strategies at Large Signalized Intersections
1Pedestrian Timing Strategies at Large Signalized
Intersections
- Zong Tian, Ph.D., P.E.
- Department of Civil Environmental Engineering
- University of Nevada Reno
- Reno, NV 89557
2OVERVIEW
- Safety Efficiency Issue
- Impact of pedestrian timing on signal operations
- Pedestrian Timing Strategies
- Two-stage crossing
- Split phasing
- Exclusive ped phase
- Summary and Conclusions
3PED. CROSSING AT TRAFFIC SIGNALS
- Pedestrian crossing concurrent with parallel
vehicle movement - Sufficient time must be provided to allow ped
safely crossing - Green gt WALK FDW
- Conflict with turning vehicles
4SAFETY VS. EFFICIENCY
- Safety Efficiency
- Long WALK FDW Long Green (Minor St.)
Less Green (Main St.) - Ped. Protected Phase Increased Lost
Time(Separate Ped and Vehicles) Less Capacity
Efficiency
Safety
5LARGE INTERSECTIONS
Minor St.
6ISSUES
- Low vehicle demand but long ped time
- Two-stage crossing longer ped delay
- Significant impact under split phasing
- Coordination issue (ped time treatments)
7TWO-STAGE PEDESTRIAN CROSSING
8TWO-STAGE PEDESTRIAN CROSSING
9TWO-STAGE PEDESTRIAN CROSSING
10TWO-STAGE PEDESTRIAN CROSSING
11TWO-STAGE PEDESTRIAN CROSSING
12TWO-STAGE PEDESTRIAN CROSSING
13PEDESTRIAN TIMING SCENARIOS
- Pedestrian Delay Models at Signalized
Intersections Considering Signal Phasing and
Pedestrian Treatment Alternatives (09-2537) by
Wang et al. - One-stage crossing
- Current two-stage without overlaps
- Two-stage with overlaps
14SPLIT PHASING
- Sequentially providing green and serving the two
opposite approaches
15PED. TREATMENT UNDER SPLIT PHASING
- Left-turn green arrow
- (Protected LT)
- No left-turn arrow
- (Permitted LT)
- Dynamic display
- (Protected/Permitted)
Acknowledgement Some of the following pictures
were borrowed from a presentation by Scott
Wainwright of FHWA
16PROTECTED LEFT TURN
N
17Total Vehicle Need 45 Total Ped Need 70
SB Vehicles Need 30 Green per Cycle
Peds Need 5 Walk 30 FDW
NB Vehicles Need 15 Green
18PERMITTED LEFT TURN
Total Vehicle Need 45 Total Ped Need 35
One Pedestrian Split
N
19PROTECTED/PERMITTED LEFT TURN
Total Vehicle Need 45 Total Ped Need 35
One Pedestrian Split
20PROTECTED/PERMITTED LEFT TURN
One Pedestrian Split
21PROTECTED/PERMITTED LEFT TURN
N
22(No Transcript)
23Back Panel Wiring
24NO PED ON WEST LAG CROSSWALK(NB GREEN ARROW)
West Lag
NB Approach
25WITH WEST LAG PED (NB GREEN BALL)
NB Approach
26STATIC OR DYNAMIC SIGN
27LAS VEGAS PROTECTED/PERMITTED
28TWO-STAGE CROSSING
Reduced Pedestrian Splits
29EXCLUSIVE/SCRAMBLE
Tian, Z., Urbanik, T., Engelbrecht, R., and
Balke, K. Pedestrian Timing Alternatives and
Impacts on Coordinated Signal Systems Under Split
Phasing Operations Transportation Research
Record 1748, pp. 46-54, 2001.
30EXCLUSIVE VS. PROTECTED LT MODEL
31COORDINATED SIGNALS
- Two timing alternatives to handle pedestrians
- Ped timing accommodation
- Longer cycle
- No ped timing accommodation
- Out of synch/Transition
Tian et al. (2000) . Pedestrian Timing
Treatment on Coordinated Signal Systems,
Proceedings of ICTTS2000, ASCE, Beijing, China.
32SUMMARY AND CONCLUSIONS
- Efficiency Safety
- Two-stage crossing strategies
- Split phasing
- Exclusive/scramble phase
- Coordinated signals (to be continued)
33 Tians website at UNR http//unr.edu/homepage/z
ongt