Title: The Impact of European Integration and
1The Impact of European Integration and
Enlargement on Regional Structural Change and
Cohesion Dr. Iulia Traistaru Center for European
Integration Studies, University of Bonn E-mail
traistaru_at_uni-bonn.de Tel. 49-228-73 1886 Fax
49-228-73 1809
2Overview
- Objectives
- Research Questions
- Theoretical Framework
- Policy Relevance
- Value Added
- Project Structure
- Partnership
- Research Output
- Main Results
3Objectives
Overall Objective Empirical analysis of the
impact of economic integration on regional
structural change and cohesion in the enlarged EU
Detailed Objectives Patterns and changes in
regional production structures and economic
performance in EU-15, NMS and AC The role of
FDI in fostering regional structural
change Policy challenges for cohesion in the
enlarged EU
4Research Questions
- To what extent does economic integration affect
- regional production structures?
- How does regional structural change affect
regional - performance?
- What role does FDI play in regional structural
change? - Which types of regions are more affected by
structural change? -
- What policy implications for cohesion in an
enlarged EU?
5Theoretical Framework
- Traditional Trade Theory
- New Economic Geography
- Neo-classical Growth Theory
-
- Endogenous Growth Theory
6Policy Relevance
- Regional production structures changes impact on
welfare - Probability of asymmetric shocks in an enlarged
EU - Achieving economic cohesion at the EU and
national levels
7Value Added
- Novel empirical evidence on spatial implications
of integration (via trade and FDI) from EU-27
regions - Novel data sets dissagregated national data
sets including firm-level data and comparable
EU-25 data sets - International research network on integration
and regional structural change
8Project Structure
Workpackage 1 Theoretical and Methodological
Framework Workpackage 2 Regional Structural
Change in EU 15 Workpackage 3 Regional
Structural Change in NMS and AC Workpackage 4
The Role of FDI Workpackage 5 Research
Lessons and Policy Implications
9Partnership
Coordinator Center for European Integration
Studies, University of Bonn (ZEI) Partners Insti
tute for World Economics, University of Kiel
(IfW) University Luigi Bocconi, Milan
(UNIBOC) Economic and Social Research
Institute, Dublin (ESRI) University of
Thessaly, Volos (UTH) Institute of World
Economics, Hungarian Academy of Sciences
(IWE) Institute of Economics, Bulgarian
Academy of Sciences (BAS)
10Cooperation
WP1 Coordinator ZEI Partners IfW, UNIBOC,
ESRI, UTH, IWE, BAS WP2 Coordinator
IfW Partners ZEI, UNIBOC, ESRI,
UTH WP3 Coordinator UTH Partners ZEI, IWE,
BAS WP4 Coordinator UNIBOC Partners ZEI
ESRI, IWE, BAS WP5 Coordinator ESRI Partne
rs ZEI, IfW, UNIBOC, UTH, IWE, BAS
11Research Output
WP1 State-of-the-art (Literature review) WP2
Country papers EU-15 (A, GE, F, P, SP, IRL, IT,
GR) Cross-contry report EU-15 Analytical
studies EU 15 (14 analytical studies) WP3
Country papers NMS and AC (HU, PL, BG, RO, CZ,
SK) Cross-country report NMS Analytical
studies NMS (11 analytical studies) WP4 Countr
y papers (HU, PL, RO, BG, CZ) Cross-country
report FDI in NMS Analytical studies (10
analytical studies) WP5 Policy paper on
spatial implications of economic
integration Policy paper on FDI and regional
development Edited book The Impact of
European Integration on Regional Structural
Change and Cohesion (forthcoming from
Routledge)
12Main Results
- Regional structural change in EU-15
- Slow changes of regional production structures
- Convergence of regional industrial structures
- Poor economic performance of regions specialised
in - agriculture and resource intensive
industries - Diversified regions performed better
- Trade integration has had a direct positive
effect on growth - cycle correlations and a negative indirect
effect via regional - specialisation
13Main Results
- Regional structural change in NMS and AC
- Deep structural change, increasing regional
inequalities - Core - periphery patterns are evident
- Regions highly integrated and close to EU-15
performed better -
- Regions specialised according to comparative
advantages - performed better
- Regions with diversified economic structures
similar - with EU-15 performed better
14Main Results
- FDI and regional development in NMS
- Highly concentrated in capitals and western
border regions - One third of FDI is high tech, the rest is low
tech - High tech FDI locate in advanced NMS, low tech in
less - developed
- FDI location choice determined by economic
factors rather - than incentives
- FDI choose to locate in specifc regions rather
than countries