Classifications of Spine Injuries - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

About This Presentation
Title:

Classifications of Spine Injuries

Description:

Ramsay CR et al: Statistical assessment of the learning curves ... Laminectomy. Unilateral: 37 cases. Bilateral: 4 cases. Contralateral decompression. 16 cases ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:127
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 27
Provided by: koc75
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Classifications of Spine Injuries


1
Analysis of Learning Curve for Minimally Invasive
Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion
Byung-Joon Shin, Jae Chul Lee, Hae-Dong
Chang, Su-Jin Yun, Yon-Il Kim
Spine Center Department of Orthopaedic Surgery
Soonchunhyang University Hospital Seoul, Korea
2
Introduction
  • Minimally Invasive TLIF
  • Advantages
  • Decreased soft tissue injury
  • Unilateral exposure less muscle dissection
  • Preservation of contralateral structure
  • Decreased operative bleeding
  • Disadvantages
  • Technically demanding
  • Increased operative time

Steep learning curve
Peng et al., Spine, 2009 Scheufler et al.,
Neurosurg, 2007 Schizas, Int Orthop, 2008
3
Introduction
  • New vs. Gold standard procedure
  • False negative result
  • Too early assessment
  • Indifferent result
  • Positive result

When?
New
Old
(Gold standard)
Learning curve for MIS TLIF?
Ramsay CR et al Statistical assessment of the
learning curves of health technologies. Health
Technol Assess 5179, 2001
4
Materials
  • Prospective analysis of
  • The first 41 cases of MIS TLIF procedure
  • Degenerative lumbar disease treated by
  • Decompression thru tubular retractor
  • Obliquely inserted a PEEK cage
  • Percutaneous pedicle screw fixation and fusion
  • F/U gt minimum 1yr

5
Materials
  • Patients characteristics
  • Average age 57 yrs (36-76)
  • Average F/U 21 m
  • Etiology
  • Spinal stenosis 24 cases
  • Spondylolisthsis 12 cases
  • HIVD 3 cases
  • IDD 1 case
  • Seg. Instability 1 case

6
Materials
  • Procedure (41 patients)
  • No. of operated levels
  • 1 level TLIF 31 cases
  • 1 level TLIF 1 level decomp 8 cases
  • 2 level TLIF 2 cases
  • Laminectomy
  • Unilateral 37 cases
  • Bilateral 4 cases
  • Contralateral decompression
  • 16 cases

7
Methods
  • Assessing parameters of learning curve
  • Length of operative time
  • Amount of bleeding
  • Intraoperative bleeding
  • H-vac drain
  • Total perioperative bleeding
  • Starting day of ambulation
  • Transfusion incidence
  • Occurrence of complications
  • Clinical outcome
  • Oswestry disability index
  • Visual analogue scale
  • Low back pain
  • Radiating pain to legs

Learning curve
8
Statistical analysis
  • Regression analysis for learning curve
  • Bivariate analysis
  • Case vs. parameters (operative time, bleeding)
  • Logarithmic curve-fit
  • Former 20 vs. Latter 21 cases
  • Student T-test
  • Operative time, Blood loss, Start of ambulation
  • Chi-square test
  • Transfusion need, Occurrence of complications
  • SPSS (ver.13.0)
  • plt0.05

9
Results
  • Operative time (F/U gt 1yr n41)

Min

p0.000
Case
10
Results
  • Operative time (Whole series 72 cases)

Min
Asymptote
Case
11
Results
  • Operative time


Mean Op. Time
Case 1-20 249
Case 21-41 198

p0.000
12
Results
Mean Op. Time
Case 1-20 250
Case 21-41 198
Case 42-72 185
  • Operative time



198
185

P lt 0.05

P gt 0.05

13
Results
Amount of Bleeding
  • Intraoperative Bleeding

ml

p0.005
Case
14
Results
Amount of Bleeding
  • Postoperative H-vac Drain

ml

p0.547
Case
15
Results
Amount of Bleeding
  • Perioperative Blood Loss (Intraop Drain)

ml

p0.004
Case
16
Results
  • Amount of Bleeding

p0.000


p0.190


17
Results
  • Start of ambulation

PO Day
X 1
Ambulation
Case 1-20 2.80.6
Case 21-41 2.00.5
X 13
X 2
X 6
X 17
X 2

p0.000
Case 1-20
Case 21-41
18
Results
  • Transfusion incidence

Yes No
Case 1-20 6 14
Case 21-41 0 21

p0.009
19
Results
  • Occurrence of Complications

Yes
Case 10 Deep infection 24 Bone graft frag.
extrusion from the cage 25 Screw
malposition 41 Minimal dural tear
No
20
Results
  • Oswestry Disability Index

ODI
PreOp. 24
Final 7
21
Results
  • VAS for Low Back Pain

LBP
PreOp. 5.1
Final 1.7
22
Results
  • VAS for Radiating Pain to Legs

RP
PreOp. 6.9
Final 0.8
23
Results
  • Case 1-20 versus Case 21-41





Plt0.05
24
Summary and Conclusions
  • Learning curve for minimally invasive TLIF was
    steep, but acceptable. Asymptote of the curve was
    approximately 35-40 cases.
  • Operative time was significantly decreased with a
    surgeons experience.

Mean Op. time
Case 1-20 249 min
Case 21-41 198 min
25
Summary and Conclusions
  • Amount of bleeding and needs for transfusion
    also significantly decreased with a learning
    curve.
  • Minimally invasive TLIF can be an effective
    method treating degenerative lumbar diseases,
    provided appropriate training is obtained.

Intraop.Bleeding Perioperative B
Case 1-20 506 ml 689 ml
Case 21-41 272 ml 382 ml
26
Thank you very much.
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com