Title: Business 303 Sheppard
1Business 303 Sheppard
- Business Society Ethics, Week 2
- Can we trust the governance structure?
2BUSINESS, SOCIETY ETHICS WEEK 2 MAIN QUESTIONS
- What are the basic features of the corp.?
- Whats the Received Legal Model?
- Whats the Managerial Domination Model?
- What are ways to increase the corp.'s
responsiveness to stockholders. - What are the individual failures
that lead to corporate problems?
At a minimum shouldnt we be responsible to
at least to the shareholder?
32. Background on the Corporation
- The necessary legal fiction
- Legal lets pretend England / church 1100 AD
- Incorporate to promote the public good
- The incorporated city England 1500 AD
- Dutch English trading ventures
- Capital pooling Holland / U.K. 1600 AD
- Public works to promote public good
- Govt. Corp.s / canals U.K. / Hol. / U.S. 1700 AD
- Incorporation to business ventures
- Private corp. for mfg. U.K., Hol. U.S. 1800 AD
- Incorporation to holding companies
- Co. owns other co. N.J. ? Del. ? Intl. 1900 AD
43. What is the Corporation? (1/2)
- Characteristics of Corporations
- Legal entity
- Artificial being, invisible, intangible,
- existing only in the contemplation of law
- Creature of the state
- Owes its existence to the government
- Allows for free transfer of ownership
- Limited liability
- Perpetual existence
- Moral Agent?
- CID, Corp. Culture, Imprison-able?
53. What is the Corporation? (2/2)
- Powers of the Corporation
- Expressed powers in a corp. charter
- Implied powers (free speech)
- Limits legalities the changing face
of the law - Responsibilities Corporate Liability
- Civil Liability Corp. has deep pockets
- Criminal Liability The courts would like to
arrest someone!
64. Stockholders (1/3)
- Who are they?
- Individual Investors
- Institutional Investors
- Why are they so important?
- As residual claimants, if shareholders needs are
met then in theory all other stakeholder needs
are met. Jay Barney - Fact is, if shareholders needs are not met, few
other stakeholder needs are likely to be met. - They may also have a desire for the corporation
to behave ethically
7 4. Stockholders (2/3)
- Shareholders vote on
- Mergers / Consolidations
- Important shareholders
investment decisions - Disposing of most corp. assets
- Dissolving the corp. / re-incorporation
- Charter and Bylaw Changes
- Proposals by Stockholders to force corp. to act
- Elections of Directors
- Who should act on corp.s shareholders behalf
8 4. Stockholders (3/3)
- Shareholders Legal Rights
- Shareholder Suits
- Individual Suits
- Derivative Suits On the corporations behalf
- Corporate Disclosure
- The Annual Report
- Want More and itll cost!
- Selling the Shares
95. The Received Legal Model (1/3)
- How the Corporation is run by law
Annuit Coeptis
S h a r e h o l d e r s
B o a r d o f D i r e c t o r s
M a n a g e r s a n d O f f i c e r s
W o r k e
r s
105. The Received Legal Model (2/3)
- Governmental Power to Charter Regulate
- Fiduciary Duty of Directors to
the company the Stockholders - Obedience
- Fiduciary Duty of Loyalty
- Liability under some conditions
- Insolvency CDN wages
- Whenever theres a buyout
- Pollution
- Due Diligence
- Oversight which would be used by a
responsible director in a similar position
115. The Received Legal Model (2/3)
- The Board of Directors
- Number Type
- Inside Directors in-house directors
- Outside Directors out-house directors
- Election
- Majority takes all the board (this is the slate
of candidates vote yes or no) OR - Cumulative Voting
one vote for
each share times the number of directors being
elected such that shareholders with a large
minority can elect a director - Staggered Term Boards
e.g. only elect 2 members
/ year for a 3 year term on a 6 member board for
continuity
126. Managerial Domination Model (1/5)
- How the Corporation is really run?
Num Me V e x o
Management
Govern-m e n t
Share-holders
Board of Directors
Workers
136. Managerial Domination Model (2/5)
- Management Influences on Government
- Competition for chartering
- More a U.S. international problem
- Political influence Lindblom
- Why government must cater to big business
- Capital Mobility
- Ability to pick places for the 'right'
regulations - Pick government you want to be regulated by
- Pick several for a range of regulations
146. Managerial Domination Model (3/5)
- Picking several governments at once
- 11/13/02 A 15m hole opens in the oil tanker
Prestige, - Nearby France, Spain Portugal block
entry. - 11/19/02 The tanker breaks in half and sinks,
- Oil spoils 600km of Spanish French
coast, - Est. Damage of about 3 billion.
- Who was responsible?
- Tanker was Japanese built, Liberian owned,
- Bahamian registered, Greek operated,
- Swiss-based Corp. chartered as a sub. of a
Russian industrial company and - Classified seaworthy by U.S. shipping auth.s.
- Where do you begin, or end?
156. Managerial Domination Model (4/5)
- Management Influences on Shareholders
- Information
- Shareholders Lists
- Money
- Proxy Process
- Greenmail
- Disbursed Shareholders
- with little real power
- Berle Means
- Different Classes of Stock
- with Different Voting Rights
166. Managerial Domination Model (5/5)
- Management Influences on the Board
- The Proxy Process
- Staggered Boards
- Treating Outside Directors
Like Mushrooms - Outhouse directors
- Liability Insurance
- Non-Cumulative Voting
- Management Influences on the Workers
- Lack of Access to the Board
177. The Corp. Governance Critique (1/3)
- So what about the Mgr. Dom. Model?
- Firms behave in inefficiently
- Owners that should rid themselves
of poor management don't - (Capital) Market forces that should
have great influence
dont - Uncontrolled managers wield great influence
- The largest corporations and the assent of
people to the top - Conflict with democracy? (Lindblom again)
187. The Corp. Governance Critique (2/3)
- New Issue Summary
- Management autocracy 583-4
- The board as rubber-stamp 585
- Or source of policies 592
- Consent of the governed 588
- Growth of firms
- Berle Means again
- Owner-management decline 595 too
- Rise in social expectations
- The principle agent problem
19Agency Theory
7. The Corp. Governance Critique (3/3)
An agency relationship exists when
Managerial Decision-Making Specialist (Agent)
20596-605
8. How we Control the Corporation
Shareholder Democracy
219. Shareholder Democracy (1/7)
- Reforming the Board
- Professional, Full Time Directors
- Ethics Public Affairs Committees
- Separate Post of Board Chair Pres.
- Poor idea when fast action is needed
- Increasing Director's Liability
- Barbarians at the gates
- Full Disclosure on Corp. Takeovers.
- Concentrated Ownership
- Annual meetings that allow for real votes on
shareholder initiatives.
22Adoption of TSE Corp. Governance Guidelines by
TSE listed Companies
8e. Shareholder Democracy (2/7)
From R.M Corbin, 1999, Report on Corporate
Governance, 1999, Five Years to the Dey, Toronto
Stock Exchange,
23Executive Compensation
8e. Shareholder Democracy (3/7)
- They do increase the likelihood that managers
- will do the things for which they are rewarded
248e. Shareholder Democracy (4/7)
- Corporate Raiders Takeover Artists
- Help get Rid of Bad Management
- Downside Effects
Management destroying value via - Management concentrating on short run
profits to avoid a raid - Greenmail
- Golden Parachutes
- Poison Pills
258e. Shareholder Democracy (5/7)
- Sensible Defences against Corporate Raiders
Takeover Artists - Restrictions to min. effects of
Raiders vs. Managers on stockholders - All anti-takeover devices to be
approved/renewed periodically - Board approval for purchase of more than X
of a company - If the board doesn't approve,
buyer must offer to buy
whole corp.
268e. Shareholder Democracy (6/7)
- LBOs to address Principle/Agent Prob.
- A Buyout gives former investors cash that can put
it to productive use - Managers make efficient resource use due to need
to meet interest payments - Management incentives are greater they
own a bigger slice of the company - Big Sums in Union Retirement Funds
- These stockholders are forced to take an active
interest in the corporation
27Ownership Concentration
8e. Shareholder Democracy (7/7)
- In Canada such shareholders account for 65 to
. 70 of publicly traded stocks (59 in the U.S.)
(though financial institutions are legally
forbidden from directly holding board seats)
28 B y e B y e