Chromospheric Evaporation - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

About This Presentation
Title:

Chromospheric Evaporation

Description:

Locarno, 8 June 2005. Peter Gallagher (UCD) Chromospheric Evaporation ... Locarno, 8 June 2005. Peter Gallagher (UCD) CDS and TRACE: 26 March 2002 Flare. SOHO/CDS ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:57
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 16
Provided by: PeterGa
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Chromospheric Evaporation


1
Chromospheric Evaporation
  • Peter Gallagher
  • University College Dublin
  • Ryan Milligan
  • Queens University Belfast

2
Chromospheric Evaporation
  • Non-thermal electrons supply the necessary energy
    to heat the plasma and cause flows.
  • Enonthermal -gt Ethermal Ekinetic

3
Chromospheric Response
  • How does the chromosphere respond to nonthermal
    electrons?
  • Assume power-law electron spectrum
  • F(E) (E/Ec)-? electrons cm-2 s-1
  • Chromospheric response depends on
  • properties of accelerated electrons
  • Low-energy cut-off (Ec).
  • Power-law index (?).
  • Total flux.

Loop leg
Density
4
  • Gentle
  • Chromosphere heated directly by non-thermal
    electrons
  • Velocities lt 300 km/s
  • Flux lt 1010 ergs cm-2 s-1
  • Explosive
  • Chromosphere unable to radiate energy deposited
    by non-thermal electrons
  • Velocities gt 400 km/s
  • Flux gt 1010 ergs cm-2 s-1

Threshold?
v/2.35cs
Gentle
Explosive
Log F (ergs s-1 cm-2)
5
CDS and TRACE 26 March 2002 Flare
  • SOHO/CDS
  • He I (0.03 MK)
  • O V (0.25 MK)
  • Mg X (1.1 MK)
  • Fe XVI (2.5 MK)
  • Fe XIX (8 MK)
  • TRACE 17.1 nm
  • Fe IX/X (1.0 MK)

6
Footpoint Downflows
  • Loops are not static
  • Maximum downflow 110 km/sec
  • Loops cool via conduction, radiation, and flows.
    (SHOW MOVIE)

7
RHESSI Integrated Spectrum
8
M2.2 Flare CDS/EIT/GOES
9
6 - 12 keV (dashed line) Thermal
25 50 keV (solid line) Non-thermal
10
RHESSI Lightcurve
11
RHESSI Spectrum
  • Thermal
  • T 20 MK
  • EM 1049 cm-3
  • Nonthermal
  • Ec 24 keV
  • ? 7.3
  • HXR Area 1018 cm2
  • gt Nonthermal Electron Flux 2x1010 ergs cm-2 s-1

12
Evidence for Upflows
Doppler shifts measured relative to a stationary
component v/c (?- ? 0)/ ? 0 In Fe XIX v
260 km s-1
13
Flow velocity vs. Temperature
Downflows
Upflows
14
In context
M2.2 flare
15
Future Work
  • How does the chromospheric response depend on the
    nonthermal electron properties?
  • We now have one event!
  • Nonthermal electrons ?7.3, Ec 24 keV, F2x1010
    ergs cm-2 s-1
  • Response 260 km s-1
  • gt need large number of CDS/RHESSI flares
  • Is there a threshold for explosive evaporation?
  • gt need large number of CDS/RHESSI flares
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com