Title: Cities and Regions as Complex Evolving Systems: Spatial MultiAgent Models
1Cities and Regions as Complex Evolving Systems
Spatial Multi-Agent Models
- Peter M. Allen
- Presentation for
- WEHIA Conference, Essex University,
- 13-15th June, 2005
2Origins of Complexity Science - The B-Z Reaction
The Brusselator!!!
A -gt X B X -gt Y D 2X Y -gt 3X X -gt F
A simple non-linear chemical reaction where
spatial and functional structure is triggered by
fluctuations of local density and parameters
The agents are spatially distributed molecules
With feedback interactions. Dialogue with
fluctuations.
3But a brusselator model of a REAL ecosystem
FAILS!!!!
- It is a description of an ecosystem not an
explanation, a description in conflict with
reality.
4The co-evolution of heterogeneous organisms leads
to NATURAL organization
- Dialogue of system with fluctuations and also
with variant individuals leads to Ecosystem
structure. The agents are organisms and we find
a spatial co-evolution - Change occurs when a system cannot restrain its
own fluctuations and experiments - New behaviours that stay, stay, while those that
dont, dont. Over time we get an incredible
assemblage. - This leads to a miraculous diversity
maximisation rather than to an efficient,
functional design.
5Social Science can we do more than describe it
post-hoc? (for Professor Sunder)
Structure??? Structural Change Structural
Stability Stationarity
NO LEARNING!!
Dictionary
Take out the detail the non-average
Decontextualise
Complexity
Post Modernists
Strategy
Freedom
Constraints
Operations
Simplicity
1 2 3
4 5
Boundary Classification average types
average events
6Economics what drives Market Organization?
- What market structures of qualities, and price
strategies emerge? Is the INVISIBLE HAND really
there? - Multi-agent models consider how the exploration
of strategy space leads to an ecology of agents
(Allen, 1978) - There is no BEST STRATEGY for an agent, but
there can be good and bad ecologies to co-evolve
in. - Selection operates through the choices of buyers,
but for agents this is both about competition and
co-operation or niche division among them
Strategy Space
Changing Demand
6 interacting firms/agents Evolving supply
7Agents seek complementary strategies How?
- Base version Darwinian market. (death and
replacement) Firms/Agents are launched with
random strategies. They do not modify this, but
if they die they are replaced other with random
strategies - Agents start with a loss and cannot calculate
expected profits. They BELIEVE. - Or, agents imitate winning strategies, or
explore strategy space actively, or have
response rules depending on what happens. - Free Marketeers do not mind which operates.
Market Structure Diversity
Selection Emergent structure depends on Luck
8What evolves in P/Q Strategy Space?
6 Darwinian Firms random re-launch
6 Firms as before, but Firm 1 is an imitator.
Model 1
Model 2
6 Firms but 5 imitators.
All imitators...
Model 3
Model 4
Firm 1 can Learn
All Firms learn
Model 5
Model 6
Mixed Strategies
Model 7
9Overall sector value depends on chance4
different strategies show mix of learning
imitation is best.
Market structure and even the overall
profitability of a sector depends on the
non-linear parameters, and on LUCK.
10Multi Agent, Spatial Dynamic Models 1980!!!
- Different types of actor at each zone, with
characteristic needs to be fulfilled - These characteristic needs are stable, but the
behaviour of actors depends on the changing
circumstances - The spatial distributions of the different types
of job and different kinds of people affect each
other as the potential for housing demands,
commercial activities and for travel affect and
are affected by transportation and land-use.
11The Interaction mechanisms of Brussaville..
Different types of agent distributed over
spatial zones
NETWORKS Transport Networks Road, Rail,
Buses, trams, walking Endogenous Flows on all
links of all networks as dynamic output of the
model. Impacts of changed infrastructure,
with feedbacks..
Each Agent Type is a distribution of origins,
with others as destinations
But they share the different transport networks
12Multi-Agent Urban or Regional Model
- Each type of Economic Agent has characteristic
- labour requirements
- Revenues/m2
- Economies of scale
- Input patterns and costs
- Distributed customers
- Output patterns and costs
- Each Residential Agent type has characteristic
- Income
- Consumer preferences
- Patterns of job and other destinations
- Locational preferences
- Demographic parameters
- Each located agent is BOTH an origin and a
destination as they decide - on the network path and travel mode for people
and goods.
13Emergent Brussaville spatial co-evolution.
Spatially distributed agents interact and
simultaneously create structures and flows of
communications, people and goods.
14Evolving Brussaville.
Onwards with existing structure channelling the
future
15Retail Strategies.
History and timing matter equilibrium doesnt do
it!
Launching 40 units at t10 SUCCEEDS.. Launching
40 units at t 20 FAILS Launching 50 units at
t20 SUCCEEDS Launching 40 units at
a Different location at t 20 SUCCEEDS
16Changing Transport Infrastructure A New Metro
System
Without the New Metro
With the New Metro
Changed distribution of tertiary services, and of
residents. Changed house and land prices,
commuting patterns, traffic flows, Congestion and
pollution.
17Shopping Centres..
Simultaneous Development At 4 sites
No Intervention
Successive Development of Same 4 sites
Maximum Possible..
18Self-Organizing, dynamic spatial models
- Taylor and Francis, ISBN -9056990705 and
9056990713 A Great Read!!! - 1975- 1995 Urban, Regional models linking
land-use and transportation - Spatially distributed interacting heterogeneous
agents in the 1980s - Also, links to environmental factors (air, water,
land, etc.) - Unfortunately, still not used in the UK.
19Example Consequences of improved Transport
Infrastructure for West Bengal (2003)
- Work with Asian Development Bank for West Bengal
- Survey by Halcrow Consultants of the current
flows of goods on the roads - Transport Infrastructure projects effects on
transport costs. - Economic gains lead to increased consumption and
production. Spatial multipliers on jobs created
allows calculation of the impact on poverty
where and how much extra employment and wealth
created
202025 Jobs Created Poverty Reduction.
Jobs in Agriculture, Industry and Services
Savings made by Poor, Medium and Rich
21Urban and Regional Spatial models
- The equations used in these models can also be
written using cellular automata, which allow very
detailed models. - They can find spatial rules of interaction that
generate the current patterns and then can be run
into the future, or they can be related to the
rules of multiple, spatially distributed agents.
(White and Engelen, 2000)
22Model Interactions
System Interactions
Transport Network
23LocalConstrained Cellular Automata
- 250 m resolution
- 17 identical and coupled CA models1 per Region
- Neighbourhood 8 cell-radius, 196 cells
- Overall growth of each function is determined at
the Regional level
- 18 land-use classes
- 8 Function states
- 8 Feature states
- 2 Vacant states
This model calculates on a yearly basis the
changing land use for 225,000 cells (250 m
resolution, 18 land use categories)
24Recent Complex Spatial dynamics, RIKS
Puerto Rico
Mutual interdependence of multi-actor system,
flows of goods, services, energy, water.. Can
calculate emissions, traffic, Patterns of
service demand etc
Dublin
25DTI Foresight Intelligent Infrastructure Study
- The objectives are
- Consider the Gateshead transport model, and
develop a Smart trading scheme for traffic slot
allocation (Essex and Newcastle) - For this area consider the changing patterns of
locations of both residential, leisure and
employment locations and their generation of
travel demand - Consider the effects of intelligence and
communications on the patterns of demand, in
order to see how patterns of demand may change.
New definition of work and workplace, of
internet shopping, virtual businesses etc. - Include the effects of better travel management
systems such as smart market multi-agent models
on these patterns of demand, and inversely, of
the changing patterns of demand on the
intelligent management systems proposed.
26Multi-agents within multi-agents
Longer term change in travel demand impacts of
ICT, of demographics, of Work and workplace
Multi-agent distributed responses
Slow Dynamic
Origins Destinations Travel timing and choices
Rapid Dynamic
Daily use of smart market to get slots on routes
and Experience the evolution of costs
27The Gateshead Zones and Road Network
- Chopwell Rowlands
- Crawcrook Green side
- Ryton
- Winlaton
- Blaydon
- Whickham South
- Whickham North
- Dunstan
- Lamesley
- Teams
- Bensham
- Saltwell
- Low Fell
- Chowdene
- Bede
- Deckham
- High Fell
- Birtley
- Felling
3
5
15
2
19
21
11
7
8
16
4
12
22
10
17
13
14
20
6
1
9
18
28NOISE Affects the results !
Conclusions
- Complex systems evolve structurally and generate
emergent, co-operative organization, with
multiple scales. - Complex, multi-agent models can be used to help
imagine how a system may evolve in future, and
repeated runs with noise and different
scenarios can can indicate and the stability of
different possible trajectories - This provides the basis for a new type of
integrated model for policy exploration linking - Economic activities
- Households and population
- Transport and travel demand and flows
- Environmental impacts
- Public service provision and social implications
Comments p.m.allen_at_cranfield.ac.uk