Evaluating Health Promotion: Why Does Context Matter - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 23
About This Presentation
Title:

Evaluating Health Promotion: Why Does Context Matter

Description:

Sherri L. Bisset, PhD candidate (U. de Montr al) whose thesis provides empirical ... Relational materiality: ' Entities take their form and acquire their attributes ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:54
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 24
Provided by: louise121
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Evaluating Health Promotion: Why Does Context Matter


1
Evaluating Health Promotion Why Does Context
Matter?
  • Louise Potvin, PhD
  • Chair Community Approaches and Health
    Inequalities
  • Université de Montréal
  • 2nd Brazilian Seminar on Health Promotion
    Effectiveness
  • Rio de Janeiro, May 14th 2008

2
Acknowledgements
  • Sherri L. Bisset, PhD candidate (U. de Montréal)
    whose thesis provides empirical illustrations for
    this presentation
  • Contributors to Health Promotion Evaluation
    Practice in the Americas Values and Research
    (forthcoming). New York Springer.

3
Thesis
  • Health promotion programs are systems of actions
    that operate as socio-technical networks they
    produce innovations by creating and strengthening
    new linkages between technical devices and local
    actors
  • The role of evaluation is to produce knowledge to
    guide future action regarding parts of the
    socio-technical network, in the same or other
    contexts
  • Evaluations important role is to document links
    between technical devices, local actors,
    conditions and actions, and changes in local
    context

4
Plan
  • Programs in context health promotion as a
    socio-technical network
  • Program implementation Operating the expansion
    and consolidation of a socio-technical network
  • Program evaluation context matters

5
Part 1Health Promotion as Socio-Technical
Network
6
The Ottawa Charter Two Innovations
  • Definition of health
  • Health is produced in every day life linked to
    access to local resources/conditions
  • Principles of action
  • Participation Empowerment legitimacy of non
    expert, local knowledge
  • Intersectoral health producing resources are
    accessible through non health sector providers

7
A Social Definition of Program
  • Programs are social constructions a tinkering of
    previously unrelated (or loosely related), and
    disparate human and non human components
  • Knowledge (model of action best practice local
    culture)
  • People (staff target population partners)
  • Problem (determinants, consequences)
  • Technical devices (compound manual meeting
    minutes)
  • Activities (meetings courses celebrations)
  • Resources (financial material human)
  • A mix of local and imported elements
  • Need a social process to explain how such
    heterogeneous elements can hold together

8
The Actor-Network Theory (ANT)
  • Michel Callon Bruno Latour John Law
  • Two underlying stories (J. Law)
  • Relational materiality  Entities take their
    form and acquire their attributes as a result of
    their relations to other things divisions and
    distinctions are understood as effects. They are
    not given in the order of things 
  • Performativity  Entities are preformed in, by,
    and through, those relationships. 

9
Socio-Technical Network
  • Focus on actions and interactions Both actors
    and networks are outcomes and linked through
    action.
  • Actors no ontological rupture between human and
    non-human (technical) entities both are capable
    of agency. Both are defined by, and define, the
    network
  • Two orientations of action stabilising existing
    relations and making new connections
  • Translation links heterogeneous entities into a
    network

10
Socio-Technical Network of Health Promotion
School-Based Nutrition
11
Part 2Expansion and consolidation of a
socio-technical network
12
Translation
  • Operation of linking the networks heterogeneous
    entities
  • Ongoing interpretations/reinterpretations by
    actors of their roles and of the innovative
    product, going from their respective interests
    and their power relations and leading to the
    elaboration of compromises
  • Four operations
  • Problematization
  • Interessement
  • Enrolment
  • Mobilization

13
Problematization
  • Setting in motion of actors around a provisional
    and minimum project
  • Definition of the problem/situation by the
    project or innovation promoters,
  • Identification of affected actors, their
    interests and the issues linking them
  • Assingment of roles and identities
  • HEALTH PROMOTION assigning health meanings to
    non-health entities

14
Interessement
  • Set of strategies adopted by the various actors
    with a view to
  • rallying the other actors around a shared
    objective
  • defining their role
  • Interessement strategies seek to align actors
    new identities and roles with their interests
  • Interessement strategies take shape in material
    devices
  • HEALTH PROMOTION actions and artefacts that
    concretely link existing entities with health
    knowledge, partnership agreements,

15
Enrolment
  • Enrolment occurs when the actors take on a role
    in the network in line with the problematization
  • Successful interessement gives rise to
    negotiation which leads to acceptance of a
    precise role enabling the networks consolidation
  • HEALTH PROMOTION integration of new
    health-related roles and identities by networks
    entities

16
Mobilization
  • Mobilization concerns the involvement of a
    critical mass of actors in the action system so
    that innovation becomes relevant, useful,
    indispensable
  • Actor mobilization, above and beyond their
    representatives, leads to network extension
  • In contrast, the absence of solidity of
    representatives leads to controversies
  • HEALTH PROMOTION capacity to displace entities
    and orient their actions in a health-related
    direction

17
Translation
PROBLEMATIZATION
INTERESSEMENT
MOBILIZATION
ENROLMENT
18
An Example Petits Cuistot-Parents en Réseaux
19
Part 3Context and Program Evaluation
20
Evaluation and Socio-Technical Networks
  • Socio-technical networks are performative they
    acquire reality through action
  • Movements in socio-technical networks
    consolidating existing linkages or expansion
    through new linkages
  • Evaluation systematic knowledge to inform
    movements for consolidation or expansion of
    network

21
Knowledge to Support Consolidating Network
  • Focus on the internal context of programs
  • Modeling existing entities (numbers, identities,
    roles) their links (strength, meaning), actions
    (number, nature, roles) and controversies
    (nature, solutions translations)
  • Methods systematization
  • Complementarity of qualitative and quantitative
    information

22
Knowledge to Support Expanding Network
  • Networks expansion enrolling new entities
    through new or renewed linkages
  • Focus on the link between existing network
    (internal context) and external context
  • The distinction between external and internal is
    contingent

23
Lessons from Health Promotion Evaluation
Practices in the Americas
  • Research methods are not  context-neutral 
    evaluation activities are part of a program
    context and there are meaningful linkages between
    evaluation and program
  • Innovative evaluation practices strengthen links
    between local context, evaluation and program
  • Evaluators have difficulties to reflect on their
    practice beyond the technical aspects of
    cellecting empirical data
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com