Genasense in RelapsedRefractory Chronic Lymphocytic Leukemia - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 67
About This Presentation
Title:

Genasense in RelapsedRefractory Chronic Lymphocytic Leukemia

Description:

CR and nPR Require Normalization. of All Disease Parameters (2 Months ... CR/nPR Significantly More Durable with Genasense/FC. From Date of Initial Response ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:139
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 68
Provided by: fran5
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Genasense in RelapsedRefractory Chronic Lymphocytic Leukemia


1
Genasense in Relapsed/Refractory Chronic
Lymphocytic Leukemia
update Footer w/ current v on handouts
  • Oncologic Drug Advisory Committee
  • September 6, 2006

2
Genasense is a novel therapeutic agent that
augments the activity of chemotherapy by
stimulating apoptosis through downregulation of
Bcl-2
3
Genasense Drug Substance(Oblimersen Sodium,
G3139)
  • Phosphorothioate backbone
  • Selectively targets Bcl-2 RNA
  • Decreases Bcl-2 protein

4
Genasense Indication
  • Genasense in combination with Fludarabine and
    Cyclophosphamide is indicated for the treatment
    of patients with relapsed/refractory CLL

5
Agenda
6
Expert Advisors
Clinical Michael Keating, MB BS Professor of
Medicine Leukemia, MDACC Susan OBrien,
MD Professor of Medicine Leukemia, MDACC Kanti
Rai, MB BS Chief, Division of Hematology/Oncology,
LIJMC Clinical Pharmacology Anthony Tolcher,
MD Director, Clinical Research Cancer Therapy
Research Center Histopathology John Bennett,
MD Prof. of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine,
URCC Cell/Molecular Biology John Reed, MD,
PhD President Chief Executive Officer The
Burnham Institute Biostatistics Richard Kay,
PhD Honorary Lecturer Biostatistics
University
of Cardiff Gary Koch, PhD Professor of
Biostatistics, UNC, Chapel Hill Drug
Administration Margaret Green, RN, OCN Research
Nurse Associate Leukemia Program University of
Chicago MC
7
Criteria for Accelerated Approval
  • Substantial evidence from well-controlled
    clinical trials regarding a surrogate end-point
  • Surrogate end-point reasonably likely to predict
    clinical benefit
  • Serious or life-threatening disease
  • Drug must provide benefit over available therapy
  • Post-marketing studies must verify clinical
    benefit

ODAC Meeting on Accelerated Approvals, March 2003
8
Relapsed/Refractory Chronic Lymphocytic Leukemia
  • Michael Keating, MB, BS

9
CLL Patients Express Bcl-2
ASchena et al. Blood 1992792981, BHanada et al.
Blood 1993151820, CRobertson et al. Leukemia
199610456, DZaja F, Leuk Lymphoma 199828567,
EAviram et al. Eur J Haematol 20006480,
FKlobusicka et al. Neoplasma 200249387,
GMenendez et al. Leukemia 200418491, HTracey et
al. J Pathology 2005206123
10
Relapsed/RefractoryChronic Lymphocytic Leukemia
  • Highly symptomatic
  • Fever, night sweats, weight loss, fatigue,
    lymphadenopathy, splenomegaly
  • Poor Prognosis
  • Fatalities from infection or bleeding
  • Limited treatment options
  • Repeat Fludarabine
  • Alemtuzumab
  • Rituximab (unapproved for CLL)
  • Investigational agents

11
Relapsed/Refractory CLL Treatment
ObjectivePALLIATION IS NO LONGERTHE DESIRED
CLINICAL ENDPOINT
  • Prior to 2000
  • Palliation
  • Partial reduction
  • Tumor volume
  • Symptoms
  • Peripheral blood abnormalities
  • Currently
  • Prolonged Remission
  • Complete resolution
  • Tumor volume
  • Symptoms
  • Peripheral blood abnormalities
  • Durable CR/nPR

12
Prior FDA Approval Studiesin Relapsed/Refractory
CLL
Chlorambucil failure, Non NCI-WG criteria, No
CT Campath ODAC presentation No CT
Silver Bullet
13
CR and nPR Require Normalization of All Disease
Parameters
NCI WG Cheson, Blood, 1996
Silver Bullet
14
Bone Marrow nPR vs. CR
Baseline
nPR with Nodule
CR Clear of Nodules
15
CR and nPR Correlate withIncreased Survival in
CLL
16
Summary
  • Relapsed/Refractory CLL
  • Rapidly progressive
  • Highly symptomatic
  • Resistant to chemotherapy
  • Fatalities due to infection and/or bleeding
  • Limited medical options
  • CR/nPR is the most relevant current endpoint in
    CLL
  • Unmet medical need

17
Clinical Efficacy Safety
  • Loretta Itri, MD

18
Genasense CLL Program
  • Phase 1-2 Single agent (N40)
  • Part A - dose finding
  • Part B - efficacy and safety
  • Phase 3 (N241)
  • Randomized pivotal combination study with
    chemotherapy
  • Safety Database (N1000)

19
Genasense Phase 1-2 (Part A) Relapsed/Refractory
CLL (N14)
  • Established MTD 3mg/kg/day (5-7 day CIV infusion)
  • Dose limiting toxicities
  • Cycle 1 infusion reactions
  • High spiking fever, rigors and hypotension
  • Tumor lysis syndrome
  • Other side effects
  • Nausea, fatigue, thrombocytopenia

20
Genasense Phase 1-2 (Part B) Single Agent
Efficacy Relapsed/Refractory CLL(N26)
Median number of prior regimens 3 Genasense 3
to 7 mg/kg/d x 5-7d OBrien et al., J Clin Oncol,
2005
21
GL303
  • Pivotal Randomized Phase 3 Study of Fludarabine
    and Cyclophosphamide
  • with or without Genasense in Relapsed/Refractory
    CLL

22
GL303 Phase 3 Study Design
  • 241 patients
  • Relapsed/refractory 1 fludarabine regimen
  • Stratification
  • Fludarabine refractory vs. non-refractory
  • No. of prior regimens 1-2 vs. 3
  • Response to last therapy 6 vs. 6 months

23
Fludarabine Sensitivity Criteria
  • Refractory
  • Failure to achieve at least a PR
  • or
  • Recurrence within 6 months of treatment
  • Relapsed
  • Recurrence after PR lasting 6 months

Identical to criteria employed in Alemtuzumab
BLA
24
Protocol Therapy Dosing Regimens
Days
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
Genasense 3mg/kg/day CIV days 1-7
Fludarabine
Fludarabine
Fludarabine
Randomization
CTX
CTX
CTX
Fludarabine 25 mg/m2
1
2
3
Fludarabine
Fludarabine
CTX 250 mg/m2
CTX
CTX
25
Protocol Endpoints
  • Primary endpoint
  • CR nPR
  • NCI-WG criteria
  • CT/US confirmation
  • Central blinded expert review
  • Secondary endpoints
  • Response duration (CR nPR, CR nPR PR)
  • Overall response (CR nPR PR)
  • Time to progression
  • Overall survival
  • Clinical benefit
  • Safety

26
Central Blinded Assessment of Response and
Disease Progression
  • Histopathologic review of bone marrow
  • Dr. Gregory Threatte
  • Clinical response assessment
  • Dr. Kanti Rai
  • Disease progression determination
  • Dr. Kanti Rai

27
Demographics and Baseline Characteristics
28
Baseline Active Disease Signs and Symptoms
P 29
Stratification Factors
30
Prior Chemotherapy Well Balanced
31
Randomized Phase 3 Study Relapsed/Refractory
Chronic Lymphocytic Leukemia
  • Efficacy

32
Primary Endpoint AchievedSignificant Increase in
CR/nPR
17
CR/nPR p0.025 (Chi-Square)
n11
Major Response ()
7
CR
n3
nPR
n9
n5
GFC
FC
Fishers exact test CR/nPR p0.016
CR only p0.03
Silver Bullet
33
CR/nPR Significantly More Durable with
Genasense/FC
GFC
FC
P0.031
From Date of Initial Response
Silver Bullet
34
CR/nPR Duration of Response During Treatment and
Post Treatment
Median Duration Post Chemo GFC Not Reached
(est. 31 mos) FC 20 mos
42
36
30
24
Months
18
12
6
0
FC
GFC
Ongoing
Silver Bullet
35
Four-Fold Increase in CR/nPR in Chemosensitive
Patients
36
Overall Response Rate (ORR) and Response
Duration
GFC
FC
ORR CR/nPR PR
37
Time to Progression Intent-to-Treat Population
GFC
FC
38
TTP 2 Years Correlates with Response (CR/nPRs
Have Greatest Benefit)
Pis number with observed TTP 2 years
39
Overall SurvivalIntent-to-Treat Population
GFC
FC
40
Survival 3 Years Correlates with Response
(CR/nPRs Have Greatest Benefit)
Pis number with observed survival 3 years
41
Durable Symptom Relief Correlates With Response
(CR/nPR Have Longest Symptom Free Duration)
For each time point, PTest of Trend
Includes B-symptoms, fatigue, symptoms due to
hepatosplenomegaly, lymphadenopathy, or other
Silver Bullet
42
GL303Relapsed/Refractory Chronic Lymphocytic
Leukemia
  • Safety

43
Non-Hematologic Adverse Events
Silver Bullet
44
Hematologic Toxicity
Silver Bullet
45
PlateletsMedian and Inter-quartile Range
46
Platelet Transfusions and Bleeding Events
1 grade 3, 1 grade 2 1 grade 1, 1 grade 3
47
Hematologic ParametersMedian and Inter-quartile
Range
48
Deaths and Discontinuations(On Study)
Silver Bullet
49
Infusion Reactions
  • Reaction
  • Spiking fever, nausea, dehydration, rigor, back
    pain, hypotension, renal insufficiency
  • Lymphoid malignancies only
  • Incidence 1.7 at 3 mg/kg
  • Preventive/supportive care
  • Hydration, antiemetics, analgesics and observation

50
Hospitalizations Grade 3-4 AEs
Gr 3-4 AEs 3
51
Catheter-Related Events
  • Protocol catheter requirement for Genasense
  • Infection
  • No grade 4 events
  • Hospitalization GFC - 3, FC - 1
  • Treatment interruption GFC- 1, FC - 1
  • Thrombosis
  • No grade 4 events
  • Two Grade 3 events in GFC arm subclavian vein
    and jugular vein thrombosis

52
Other Complications
Waldenstroms Macroglobulinemia AML, PTCL,
Hodgkins disease, MDS
53
Summary and BenefitRisk Assessment
  • Susan M. OBrien, MD

54
ThrombocytopeniaPlatelet Count by Cycle
55
Adverse Reactions
  • Tumor lysis syndrome
  • Seen with active anti-leukemia agents
  • Infusion-related reactions
  • Common to many CLL therapies
  • 70-80 incidence with monoclonal antibodies

Silver Bullet
56
Genasense Does Not Worsen Neutropenia
57
Approval Studies in CLL
Non NCI-WG criteria GCSF use
Silver Bullet
58
Addition of Genasense Converts PRs into Durable
CR/nPRs
50
40
30
20
10
Sensitization
0
FC
GFC
59
GL303 Relapsed/Refractory CLLCR/nPR Superior
to PR for TTP
CR vs PR p CR vs nPR p 0.21
Proportion of Subjects Without PD
nPR vs PR p 0.0007
Months from Randomization
60
Response Considerations
  • How does the pattern of response compare to that
    seen in other trials in relapsed/refractory CLL?
  • How does the magnitude of improvement compare
    with other trials, and is it clinically important?

61
Response and TTP in Relapsed CLLFlu/Cy vs.
Flu/Cy/Rituximab
Time-to-Progression Responders Only
FCR
No CT
FC
Months
Historical comparison of sequential
studies Adapted from Weirda et al., Cancer 2006
62
Recent Randomized Studies in CLL
63
GL303 Relapsed/Refractory CLL CR/nPR Duration of
Response During Treatment and Post Treatment
Median Duration Post Chemo GFC Not Reached
(est. 31 mos) FC 20 mos
42
36
30
24
Months
18
12
6
0
FC
GFC
Ongoing
Silver Bullet
64
Confirmatory Study in Previously Untreated CLL
  • SPA requested
  • Multicenter, open label study (N722)
  • Primary Endpoint PFS
  • Stratification
  • FISH 17p- vs. 11q- vs. Other
  • Rai stage
  • LDH
  • Investigative center

65
GL303 Relapsed/Refractory CLLCriteria Met for
Accelerated Approval
66
Reduction in Tumor Volume May Serve as a
Surrogate for Clinical Benefit1,2
  • FDA Guidance on Surrogacy of Reduction in Tumor
    Volume3
  • The association of reduction in tumor volume is
    stronger in the setting of
  • Undetectable tumor volume
  • 17 vs. 7 CR/nPR (p0.025)
  • Reduction is durable
  • GFC median duration of response estimated to
    exceed 36 months (not yet reached) vs. 22 months
  • Reduction extends beyond the period of toxic
    agent administration
  • GFC median duration of response estimated to
    exceed 31 months (not yet reached) vs. 20 months

1 Guidance for Industry Providing Clinical
Evidence for Effectiveness for Human Drug and
Biological Product (Oncology Supplement) May
1998 2 Reinventing the Regulation of Cancer Drugs
- March 1996 3 BLA Reference number 99-0786
(Alemtuzumab)
Silver Bullet
67
(No Transcript)
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com