Title: Conditional Probability and Screening Tests
1Conditional Probability and Screening Tests
- Clinical topics
- Mammography and Pap smear
- (screening for cancer)
2What factors determine the effectiveness of
screening?
- The prevalence (risk) of disease.
- The effectiveness of screening in preventing
illness or death. - Is the test any good at detecting
disease/precursor (sensitivity of the test)? - Is the test detecting a clinically relevant
condition? - Is there anything we can do if disease (or
pre-disease) is detected (cures, treatments)? - Does detecting and treating disease at an earlier
stage really result in a better outcome? - The risks of screening, such as false positives
and radiation.
3Cumulative risk of disease
(from your course reader)
4To assess your cumulative risk
- http//bcra.nci.nih.gov/brc/
5Mammography
- Mammography utilizes ionizing radiation to image
breast tissue. - The examination is performed by compressing the
breast firmly between a plastic plate and an
x-ray cassette that contains special x-ray film. - Mammography can identify breast cancers too small
to detect on physical examination, and can also
find ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS), a
noninvasive condition that may or may not
progress to cancer. - Early detection and treatment of breast cancer
(before metastasis) can improve a womans chances
of survival. - Studies show that, among 50-69 year-old women,
screening results in 20-35 reductions in
mortality from breast cancer.
6Mammography
- Controversy exists over the efficacy of
mammography in reducing mortality from breast
cancer in 40-49 year old women. - Mammography has a high rate of false positive
tests that cause anxiety and necessitate further
costly diagnostic procedures. - Mammography exposes a woman to some radiation,
which may slightly increase the risk of mutations
in breast tissue.
7Pap Smear
- In a pap test, a sample of cells from a womans
cervix is collected and spread on a microscope
slide. The cells are examined under a microscope
in order to look for pre-malignant
(before-cancer) or malignant (cancer) changes. - Cellular changes are almost always a result of
infection with high-risk strains of human
papillomavirus (HPV), a common sexually
transmitted infection. - Most cellular abnormalities are not cancer and
will regress spontaneously, but a small percent
will progress to cancer. - It takes an average of 10 years for HPV infection
to lead to invasive cancer early detection and
removal of pre-cancerous lesions prevents cancer
from ever developing.
8Progression to cervical cancer
9Pap smear
- Widespread use of Pap test in the U.S. has been
linked to dramatic reductions in the countrys
incidence of cervical cancer. - However, cervical cancer is the leading cause of
death from cancer among women in developing
countries, because of lack of access to screening
tests and treatment. - However, as with mammography, false positives,
detection of abnormalities of unknown
significance, or detection of low-grade lesions
that are not likely to progress to cancer can
cause anxiety and unnecessary follow-up tests
10Thought Question 1
- A 54-year old woman has an abnormal mammogram
what is the chance that she has breast cancer? - Guesses?
11Thought Question 2
- A 35-year old woman has an abnormal pap smear
what is the chance that she has HSIL or cervical
cancer? - Guesses?
12Key Concepts
- -Independence
- -Conditional probability
- -Sensitivity
- -Specificity
- -Positive Predictive Value
13Independence
- Example if a mother and father both carry one
copy of a recessive disease-causing mutation (d),
there are three possible outcomes for the child
(the sample space) - P(genotypeDD).25
- P(genotypeDd).50
- P(genotypedd).25
14Using a probability tree
15Independence
- Formal definition A and B are independent iff
P(AB)P(A)P(B) - The mothers and fathers alleles are segregating
independently. - P(?D/?D).5 and P(?D/?d).5
Note the conditional probability
- Fathers gamete does not depend on the
mothersdoes not depend on which branch you
start on. - Formally, P(DD).25P(D?)P(D?)
16Characteristics of a diagnostic test
- Sensitivity Probability that, if you truly have
the disease, the diagnostic test will catch it.
P(test/D) - SpecificityProbability that, if you truly do not
have the disease, the test will register
negative. P(test-/D)
Note the conditional probabilities! P(test/D)?P(
test/D)) not independent!
17Thought Question 1
- A 54-year old woman has an abnormal mammogram
what is the chance that she has breast cancer?
18Hypothetical example Mammography
P(BC/test).0027/(.0027.10967)2.4
19Thought Question 1
- The probability that she has cancer given that
she tested abnormal is just 2.4! - This is called the positive predictive value,
or PPV. - The PPV depends on both the characteristics of
the test (sensitivity, specificity) and the
prevalence of the disease.
20Thought Question 2
- A 35-year old woman has an abnormal pap smear
what is the chance that she has HSIL or cervical
cancer?
21Hypothetical example Pap Test
P(CC or HSIL/test).0044/(.0044.10945)3.8
22Thought Question 2
- A 35-year old woman has an abnormal pap smear
what is the chance that she has HSIL or cervical
cancer? - Just 3.8!
23Part II
- Epidemiology is the study of patterns of diseases
in populations.
24Assumptions and aims of epidemiologic studies
- 1) Disease does not occur at random but is
related to environmental and/or personal
characteristics. - 2) Causal and preventive factors for disease can
be identified. - 3) Knowledge of these factors can then be used to
improve health of populations.
25Correlation studies
- Using differences in the rate of diseases between
populations to gather clues as to the cause of
disease is called a correlation study or an
ecologic study.
26Example Patterns of disease and cervical cancer
- Initial examination of the patterns of cervical
cancer gave strong etiologic clues - -high rates among prostitutes
- -absence of cases among nuns
- -higher rates among married and highest rates
among widowed women - ? Suggested sexually transmitted cause
27Problems with correlation studies
- Hypothesis-generating, not hypothesis-testing
- Ecologic fallacy Cannot infer causation
association may not exist at the individual
level. - - Making observations of risk factor and
diseases status on individual subjects is called
analytic epidemiology
28Introduction to Case-Control studies
29Case-Control Studies
- Sample on disease status and ask retrospectively
about exposures (for rare diseases) - Marginal probabilities of exposure for cases and
controls are valid. - Doesnt require knowledge of the absolute risks
of disease - For rare diseases, can approximate relative risk
30Case-Control Studies
Exposed in past
Not exposed
Target population
Exposed
No Disease (Controls)
Not Exposed
31Case-Control Studies in History
- In 1843, Guy compared occupations of men with
pulmonary consumption to those of men with other
diseases (Lilienfeld and Lilienfeld 1979). - Case-control studies identified associations
between lip cancer and pipe smoking (Broders
1920), breast cancer and reproductive history
(Lane-Claypon 1926) and between oral cancer and
pipe smoking (Lombard and Doering 1928). All
rare diseases. - Case-control studies identified an association
between smoking and lung cancer in the 1950s. - You read about two historical case-control
studies for homework.
32Frequency Distributions
- Refer to figure 4, p. 144 of Bimodal age
distributions of mammary cancer. - Histograms, or frequency distributions, plot the
frequency of disease according to categories of a
predictor (such as age).