Philosophy 323 - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 17
About This Presentation
Title:

Philosophy 323

Description:

As we noted in our discussion of rights based theories, talk of rights is an ... Magna Carta: limits to the arbitrary authority of the king. ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:54
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 18
Provided by: PhilipM
Category:
Tags: carta | philosophy

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Philosophy 323


1
Philosophy 323
  • Ethical Treatment of Employees
  • Hiring and Firing

2
The Right to Work?
  • As we noted in our discussion of rights based
    theories, talk of rights is an important element
    of the moral and ethical analysis of the
    employment relationship.
  • While the set of rights that it is reasonable to
    consider will occupy our attention for the next
    few weeks, today we are going to focus our
    attention on a basic one the right to work.

3
Denying the Right to WorkEmployment at Will
  • Employment at Will emerges from common law.
  • Asserts that in the absence of specific law or
    contract, employers have the right to hire,
    promote, demote, and fire whomever and whenever
    they please.
  • Also asserts that employees have parallel rights
    quit whenever they please.
  • Employment at Will is the principle that governs
    the employment of 50-60 of the private
    workforce.
  • Only public employees are uniformly exempted.
  • EaW does not contradict EEOC regulations i.e.
    discrimination based on sex, race, religion,
    nationality, etc.

4
Employment at Will Equal Rights?
  • The strongest ethical justification for EaW is
    based on the apparent equality of the employment
    relationship.
  • Is the relationship really a reciprocal one?
  • The courts clearly dont think so.
  • Laws constraining the employment relationship in
    favor of the employee greatly outnumber those in
    favor of the employer.
  • Who is most vulnerable?

5
Other Justifications for EaW
  • When an employee takes a job they voluntarily
    commit themselves to the terms of that job,
    including the knowledge that they are an
    at-will employee
  • A system of due process will interfere with
    efficiency and productivity of corporations
  • Legislation or regulation will undermine an
    already overregulated economy

6
Criticisms of EaW
  • Firing an employee without providing good reasons
    treats them like a piece of machinery and does
    not show them the respect they are due as
    persons.
  • Loyalty, trust, and respect are expected of
    employees, thus, reciprocal obligations are
    entailed by employers.
  • It is not clear that due process will necessarily
    entail increased costs and decreased efficiency.
  • The right to due process that employees in the
    public sector enjoy is grounded in the property
    rights of workers in their employment.
  • Permanent workers are entitled to their jobs
    unless they show poor work habits.
  • Being fired can often cause substantial damage to
    an employee including making it difficult and
    sometimes impossible to find new employment.

7
Another Alternative Due Process
  • Due Process also has its roots in Common Law.
  • Magna Carta limits to the arbitrary authority of
    the king.
  • Due Process rights protect individuals from the
    arbitrary uses of authority.
  • Based in the principle that even legitimate
    authority requires justification for its
    employment.

8
Due Process In the Workplace
  • When the principle of Due Process is applied in
    the workplace, it typically takes one of two
    forms
  • Substantive right to demand a rationale/reasons
    for decision. Typically takes the form of a
    procedure that must be followed in making
    employment decisions.
  • Procedural right to mechanisms to dispute
    decisions.Examples include written standards,
    appeal process, and established disciplinary
    practices.

9
Justifications for Due Process
  • Arguments in favor of due process rights
    typically invoke the principles of justice and
    fairness.
  • Application of these principles typically refers
    to a distinction between power and authority.
  • Power in this context is the ability to impose
    ones will on another.
  • Authority refers to situations when the exercise
    of power is legitimate.
  • The use of power without authority violates
    standards of justice and fairness. To the extent
    that Due Process guarantees that power is used
    with authority, it is justified by those
    standards.

10
Criticisms of Due Process
  • Critics of Due Process have raised four concerns.
  • Freedom imposition of due process rights
    violates the freedom of participants in the
    employment market.
  • Fairness due process imposes burdens on the
    participants in the employment market.
  • Property Rights due process illegitimately
    restricts the property rights of business owners.
  • Efficiency due process lessens the efficiency of
    our economic institutions.

11
Participation Rights
  • The focus on legitimate uses of power in the
    discussion of Due Process raises another
    question
  • Where does the authority of business owners and
    managers come from?
  • Perhaps we should ask, Where does the authority
    of our political leaders come from?

12
Participation Rights Workplace Democracy
  • Is the analogy to our political context
    appropriate?
  • Both are significant social institutions with
    coercive power in both, power arises from
    ability to grant or deny important goods in
    both, institutional roles specify who has the
    power.
  • If the analogy fits, then there seems to be good
    reason to conclude that authority arises in
    business in way analogous to politics consent of
    the governed.

13
Advantages of Workplace Democracy
  • Makes work more fulfilling.
  • Encourages self-respect.
  • Improves morale.
  • Encourages participation in other public
    institutions.

14
Epstein In Defense
  • Epstein examines the justifications for contract
    (employment) at will.
  • Providing a primarily utilitarian defense of EAW,
    Epstein concludes that EAW is morally justified
    on these grounds.

15
The Argument from Fairness
  • Fairness
  • Freedom of contract is a basic liberty akin to
    our freedom to choose marriage partners or
    religion
  • It is an unacceptable violation of that freedom
    for government to interfere with our ability to
    create our own contracts
  • If terms are unacceptable then that is the
    responsibility of that party since he freely
    entered into the employment relationship, yet
    both retain the freedom to leave the relationship
    at any time.

16
The Argument from Utility
  • For employers
  • MonitoringDiscourages theft, encourages
    productivity
  • Administrative costs cheaper to merely fire
    someone than having a process in place
  • Imperfect information no way to be certain an
    employee will fit when you hire them
  • For employees
  • Imperfect information
  • Mobility easier to explore alternative
    employment options
  • Both sides
  • Reputational losses the risk of reputational
    losses discourages abuses of the system

17
The Argument from Distribution
  • With regard to the principle of distributive
    justice, Epstein argues that there is no clear
    way to show that banning EAW will lead to a more
    fair or just redistribution of wealth.
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com