ALCON LABS - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

About This Presentation
Title:

ALCON LABS

Description:

Madrid's product baseline of 170 SKUs and 12 million units were ... SMU TEAM ALCON. Benjamin Luong. Chris Davis. Cuong Ngo. Cindy Nguyen. Shanta Ramdhanny ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:733
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 27
Provided by: Adm952
Learn more at: https://s2.smu.edu
Category:
Tags: alcon | labs | luong

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: ALCON LABS


1
ALCON LABS
  • Project Chiron
  • SMU TEAM ALCON

2
Project Overview
  • Project Background
  • Problem Description Core Objectives
  • Action and Approach Plan
  • Analysis of Situational Approach
  • Analysis and Managerial Interpretation
  • Recommendations

3
Project Background
  • October 2003 Alcon Madrid manufacturing plant
    closed down
  • Madrids product baseline of 170 SKUs and 12
    million units were transferred to Fort Worth
    headquarters
  • Before the Madrid divesture, the Fort Worth
    manufacturing plant was producing 230 to 250 SKUs
    and 70million units

4
Definition of the Problem
  • Whitestock Lines 1 2
  • Production inefficiency and delays
  • Lagging downtime
  • Line clearances (LC) occupy 20-30 minutes
  • LC occurs 4-5 per day
  • Loss of Capacity

5
Core Objectives
  • Primary objectives
  • Minimizing splits
  • line clearances and/or QA
  • Maximizing utilization of fill rooms
  • Secondary objective
  • Optimizing the facility layout
  • Optimizing the lot size (batch) or economic order
    quantity levels

6
Core Objectives - Benefits
  • Significant cost savings
  • Improved uptime and process efficiency
  • Improved capacity levels
  • Improved overall throughput speed and other
    technical performance measures
  • Reduced or eliminated inventory levels and other
    unnecessary costs
  • Minimized idleness of employees (i.e. employee
    output efficiency)

7
Action Approach Plan
  • Short-term perspective
  • Determine and measure Alcon Labs Manufacturing
    processes to locate source of problem associated
    with LC
  • PAT and SMED method
  • Long-term perspective
  • Converting 2-step process to inline process
  • ProModel Simulation Models

8
Analysis of Situational Approach
  • Short-term approach
  • Whitestock Line 1 2
  • Observed and measured the splits process steps
    for cycle time improvements
  • Recorded the sequence of repeatable activities
    with measurable inputs, value-added activities,
    and measurable outputs

9
Analysis of Situational Approach
  • Short-term approach
  • PAT Method
  • SMED Method
  • Internal and External Setup activities
  • Improve cycle time or changeover/roll-over time
    by reorganizing and reducing setup activities as
    well as resources and inventory waste and
    rescheduling production schedules for low
    quantity batches while sustaining high product
    quality
  • Other benefits of setup reduction include lower
    cost (less inventory), better flexibility, better
    worker utilization, shorter lead time, increased
    capacity, and most importantly, less process
    variability

10
Analysis of Situational Approach
  • SMED Method Process Flow chart

11
Analysis of Situational Approach
  • SMED Method BENEFITS

12
Analysis of Situational Approach
  • Long-term approach
  • Converting 2-step process to inline process
  • Observation Data Collection
  • - process and layout,
  • - setup/changeover times,
  • - speeds and capacity, etc.
  • - ProModel Simulation software
  • Assumptions
  • Current Process Simulation Model
  • New Process Simulation Model

13
Analysis of Situational Approach
  • Long-term approach
  • Variables/Functions
  • - locations
  • - entities
  • - network paths
  • - process/logic
  • - arrivals
  • product differentiation
  • setup downtimes

14
Analysis of Situational Approach
  • Long-term approach Assumptions
  • Setup times for each machine were calculated
    using an average from the statistics provided.
  • Simulation models are programmed to run at
    particular speed as opposed to individual actual
    speeds.
  • Offline filling and storage time and activities
    are not accounted for in the simulation model.
  • The proposed filler speeds and product specifics
    are assumed to be similar to the current
    equipment capabilities
  • When locations and resources appear to be idle,
    setup downtimes are in occurrence.

15
Analysis Managerial Interpretation
  • Short-term Approach
  • Alcon Operation or Process steps
  • Staging (storage) area
  • Line area inspection
  • Changeover
  • Production
  • Finished goods area
  • Reconciliation with Materials Office

16
Analysis Managerial Interpretation
  • Short-term Approach
  • Changeover is the main cause for low efficiency.
  • Steps in setup process
  • Preparation, after-process adjustments, checking
    of materials and tools
  • Mounting and removing blades, tools, parts
  • Measurements, settings, and calibrations
  • Trial runs and adjustments

17
Analysis Managerial Interpretation
  • Short-term Approach
  • Calibration and Trial Runs occupy a total of 85
    of total time (changeover and LC time)!

18
Analysis Managerial Interpretation
  • Short-term Approach
  • Changeover setup adjustments
  • Labelers
  • Cartoners
  • Magazines
  • Ink Jet Coder
  • Wrapper/Packaging
  • Adjustments are made by trial-and-error as well
    as intuition

19
Analysis Managerial Interpretation
  • Short-term Approach Changeover

20
Analysis Managerial Interpretation
  • Short-term Approach
  • Other inefficiencies
  • Incorrect Madrid Translations
  • Disconnected communication across divisions

21
Analysis Managerial Interpretation
  • Long-term Approach
  • Decreased product handling and movement
  • Increased flexibility and capabilities
  • Increased utilization, productivity levels, and
    capacity
  • Automated flex pack line
  • Decreased downtimes

22
Recommendations
  • Long-Term Solution
  • Recommend 1-year further analysis and research
  • - costs
  • - equipment
  • - feasibility requirements
  • - build a more accurate model
  • - implementation

23
Recommendations
  • Short-Term Solution
  • Strongly recommend forming a changeover team of
    4-5 members
  • Labelers
  • Cartoners
  • Magazines
  • Ink Jet Coder
  • Wrapper/Packaging
  • Update changeover team regarding production
    schedules for advanced preparation

24
Recommendations
  • Short-Term Solution
  • Allocate secondary space for storage
  • Color code
  • Next Raw materials red (stop)
  • Current Raw Materials and Finished product
    green (go)

25
Recommendations
  • Short-Term Solution
  • Streamline line clearance to a parallel process
  • Cross-train personnel
  • Require employees to perform other functions in
    the changeover process
  • Ensure prompt arrival of Bill of Materials
  • If items arent available, contingency plan
    should be developed
  • Improve coordination between Marketing, Planning,
    and Production divisions
  • Function standardization
  • Replace bolts with one-time tighteners!
  • Mark individual calibration settings for each
    product on each line for easy adjustments

26
Questions?
  • SMU TEAM ALCON
  • Benjamin Luong
  • Chris Davis
  • Cuong Ngo
  • Cindy Nguyen
  • Shanta Ramdhanny
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com