Title: EPO and Preservice Science Education
1- EPO and Pre-service Science Education
- Astronomical Society of the Pacific Annual
Conference - Pinky Nelson, Western Washington University
- September 18, 2006
2- Introduction / Outline
- Why me?
- Affirmation of EPO people and progress!
- Needs and of preservice Teachers
- Comments about preservice education
- WWU elementary preservice program as an example
- A suggestion for a significant EPO contribution
Sponsored by the National Science Foundation
under Grant No. HER-0315060
3- Needs of Preservice Teachers
- Two recent views Lillian McDermott, Leo Kadanoff
- Deep enough content knowledge of science
disciplines that they will be teaching - Deep understanding of scientific inquiry
- Deep understanding of learning research and
theories - Content Specific Pedagogical Knowledge
- Knowledge of and experience with effective
materials - Knowledge of children (ed psych stuff)
- Knowledge of how to function in a professional
learning community - School knowledge (rules, classroom management)
- Commitment to equity and useful tools
- Confidence in their own ability to learn
Sponsored by the National Science Foundation
under Grant No. HER-0315060
4Comments on Preservice Education
- Current model is failing (sustaining the status
quo) - Elementary students enter with severe deficits
- 75 are not proportional reasoners
- Science knowledge is at grade 6-8 standards
- Secondary students have weak conceptual
understandings, poor (traditional) teaching
models - Students are not dumb, they have been grossly
underserved by the system - Preservice reform must include K-12 reform
- Any reform should plan to evolve
- If we are successful, students will change over
time
Sponsored by the National Science Foundation
under Grant No. HER-0315060
5- An example from Western Washington University
(K-8 endorsement program) - NCOSP Partners
- University with a large teacher preparation
program - Four neighboring two-year colleges
- 28 school districts
- Washington State LASER
- One of the goals
- Help WWU and CC transfer preservice students
become confident science learners
Sponsored by the National Science Foundation
under Grant No. HER-0315060
6- New Requirements for El Ed major
- Five Science Content Classes (quarters)
- 3 quarter sequence--phys, biol, geol
- 1 quarter capstone--Inquire science (chemistry)
- 1quarter nature of science--Science and Society
- Two Science Pedagogy Classes
- Science Methods
- Science practicum
Sponsored by the National Science Foundation
under Grant No. HER-0315060
7- Development Stucture
- GUR Working Group 25 Faculty, 2-3 Teachers on
Special Assignment - 3 Sub-groups Phys, Biol, Geol
- No hierarchy
Sponsored by the National Science Foundation
under Grant No. HER-0315060
8- Guiding Documents
- How People Learn
- Understanding by Design
- Physics Education for Teachers
- Learning Cycle Model
- Purpose
- Initial Ideas
- Collecting and Interpreting Evidence
- Summarizing Questions (Reflection)
Sponsored by the National Science Foundation
under Grant No. HER-0315060
9- Developing the courses
- Issues that we faced
- Staff Development
- Survey course vs. Depth
- Integrated vs. Discipline-based
- Innovated vs. Research-based
- Academic freedom vs. Common Course (including
assessments) - University vs. Two-year faculty
- Full-time faculty vs. Part-time faculty
- Existing vs. Home-grown
Sponsored by the National Science Foundation
under Grant No. HER-0315060
10Initial Course Implementation
Sponsored by the National Science Foundation
under Grant No. HER-0315060
11K-16 Reform-Based Science InstructionNew
Physical Science GUR Course at a Glance
- Participating Institutions (Fall 2005) EVCC,
SVCC, WCC WWU - PET curriculum
- Constructivist based on experiences,
investigations, and discussions in the classroom - No textbook
- Part of a science sequence for elementary
education students - Approximately 80 students participated in Fall
2005 - Data, data, data
- content assessments
- student surveys of students beliefs
- teacher interviews
- student interviews
- observations
12PET Student Assessments
N53
13Students Views of the Nature of Science The
main skill I expect to get out of this course is
to learn how to reason logically about the
physical world.
a lot of the things that I just take for
granted I had to question and then realize that I
was wrong on a lot of the things I thought and
the good thing is that because we did
experiments we had to figure out how to learn it
ourselves and the teacher didnt just tell us how
to think, it counteracted what I thought that was
wrong so it forced me to realize what was wrong
and not go back to what I was thinking
before. -WWU student
14Learning science made me change some of my ideas
about how scientific phenomena can be used to
understand the world around me.
15When learning science people can understand the
material better if they relate it to their own
ideas.
I just learn information like for a test, then
I forget it, then Ill just return back to what I
thought before but this way I remember it
better. -WWU student
16ObservationsUsing HRI Observation Protocol
- Capsule Ratings of Quality of the Lesson
- Level 1 Ineffective Instruction
- Highly Unlikely to contribute to students
understanding. - Level 2Elements of Effective Instruction
- Some evidence of learning but serious problems in
design, implementation, or content. - Level 3Beginning stages of Effective Instruction
- Somewhat limited in its ability to contribute to
students understanding. - Level 4Accomplished Effective Instruction
- Quite likely to contribute to the majority of
students understanding. - Level 5Exemplary Instruction
- Highly likely to contribute to all or most
students understanding and develop capacity to
do science.
- Foci of Observation
- Design
- Implementation
- Content Experienced by Students
- Classroom Culture
17Rating Averages
- Standard GUR
- Design 4
- Implementation 3.7
- Content 3.7
- Culture 3.8
- Capsule 3.2
- New GUR
- Design 4.4
- Implementation 3.8
- Content 4.1
- Culture 3.9
- Capsule 3.9
Standard Physics GUR 6 observations of three
courses New Physics GUR 8 observations of four
courses
18Content As Experienced by Students
- Quotes from Students in Physics Class
- Although it was less than a year ago that I
completed a Physics AP class in High School, I
was surprised by how often my own ideas were
challenged and changed by the basic ideas taught
through this elementary curriculum - of all the courses I took this quarter, I
believe I showed the most growth in SCED 201. It
is amazing to look at the initial ideas in my
binder and see how much progress my ideas and
thoughts have made over just a unit in the
curriculum. I also noted a lot about my own
thought processes and the way that I learn
19Content As Experienced by Student
- I believe that this course will be extremely
useful for me in the future. Even though I am not
going to be a science teacher, I am planning on
being a Spanish teacher. Before taking this
course, I thought that the science GURs would be
useless for my major, and that all science
courses were lecture-based. But, rather than just
teach me something about science in a new way,
this course taught me about how I learn, and
showed me that there are different approaches to
go about teaching materials that can be carried
across the disciplines, which I will be able to
bring into the classroom as a Spanish teacher.
20- Classroom Culture
- At the beginning I was very nervous about it
because I dont feel like Im a strong science
thinker. I was really afraid to verbalize and
vocalize my opinions and what I was thinking on a
topic, but after a week or so I began to become
really comfortable because I realized that the
reason everyones talking about it is to help
everyone learn. And when someone would say
something that was incorrect, no one would care
because we all just wanted to help them
understand what was actually going on soI was
very comfortable by then. - - WWU Student
21Example Selecting the Biology Big Ideas
Taken from Washington State Standards National
Science Education Standards AAAS Benchmarks for
Science Literacy
Sponsored by the National Science Foundation
under Grant No. HER-0315060
22- Content Life Systems Big Ideas
- Food serves as fuel and building materials for an
organism. Sugars are an example of food, but
water, carbon dioxide, and oxygen are not. - Using the energy from light, plants make their
own food - in the form of sugars - from carbon
dioxide (in the air) and water. Nothing else is
required for this process - Plants transform the energy from light into
chemical energy in the sugars. - Animals cannot make their own food, but must
acquire it by consuming plants or other animals
that have consumed plants. - More
Sponsored by the National Science Foundation
under Grant No. HER-0315060
23- Content Life Systems Big Ideas (cont.)
- Organisms grow by breaking down the food and
assembling the breakdown products into their body
structures. - Organisms gain energy for their life processes
breaking down energy-rich food into simpler
substances with less energy. The energy is used
for growth and body functions. Other energy is
released as heat. - If not used immediately for fuel or building
structures, the breakdown products can become
part of body structures that serve as energy
storage for later use.
Sponsored by the National Science Foundation
under Grant No. HER-0315060
24Overarching Scientific Process Big Ideas The
Universe is Understandable Scientific Ideas Are
Subject to Change Scientific Knowledge is
Durable Science Explains and Predicts Science
Cannot Provide Complete Answers to All
Questions Science Demands Evidence Science
is a Blend of Logic and Imagination Science is
not Authoritarian
Sponsored by the National Science Foundation
under Grant No. HER-0315060
25Data from summer pilot 2005Investigating the
Flow and Matter and Energy in Living Systems
- Four Cycles
- What is food for living organisms?
- How do plants get food?
- How do organisms use food?
- How does matter and energy cycle in living
systems?
26HRI Life Science Assessment Pre and Post Scores
Post-test scores significantly greater than
pre-test score (p samples t-test. Effect size 1.39 standard
deviations. Gain score .51. N165
27Comparisons by Grade Level
Controlling for pre-test scores and other
demographics, high school teachers scored
significantly higher than elementary and middle
school teachers (effect sizes of 0.45 and 0.31
standard deviations, respectively). However, no
significant differences between gain scores
(ES.49, MS.48, HS.57). N 87, 42, 36
28Comparisons by Gender
No significant differences by gender. Gain
scores M.54 F.50
29- What have we learned?
- Less is more
- Initial perceptions of academic freedom must be
addressed (student- vs. faculty-centered) - Implementing reformed courses is material, staff,
and faculty intensive w/ implications for
sustainability - Team teaching helps
- Lesson Study helps
- Staff development is key
- Interpersonal relationships are critical
- Course revisions being made based on student and
faculty feedback--methods course. - Cant do it all where is the place for
chemistry, astronomy, environmental science.?
Sponsored by the National Science Foundation
under Grant No. HER-0315060
30- A Suggestion for EPOers
- Assemble teams to develop and test three or more
one-semester astronomy content courses for future
teachers - Solar System and Stars for Elementary
- The Universe for Secondary
- Copy the Physics for Elementary Teachers format
(for example) - Pilot these materials so you know how they
function - Include an instructors guide and staff
development - Use proven development protocols (UBD)
- Start by choosing learning goals (Benchmarks 6-8)
- Create and test assessments
- Design inquiry-based activities
- Include cool simulations and data where it makes
sense - Build in a robust evaluation plan from the start
and pay attention - Dont worry about missions or even NASA--worry
about students learning important ideas
Sponsored by the National Science Foundation
under Grant No. HER-0315060