Systematic Review of Research Methodology in Telemedicine Studies - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 11
About This Presentation
Title:

Systematic Review of Research Methodology in Telemedicine Studies

Description:

Were results presented in qualitative and/or quantitative fashion? Methodology ... explicitly stated RQs prevent true critique of study design. Kuhn Basic Tenet: ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:75
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 12
Provided by: tele78
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Systematic Review of Research Methodology in Telemedicine Studies


1
Systematic Review of Research Methodology in
Telemedicine Studies
  • Pamela Whitten
  • Liv Karen Johannessen
  • Tove Soerensen
  • Deede Gammon
  • Michael Mackert

2
  • Article in press, Journal of Telemedicine and
    Telecare

3
Rationale
  • Review articles struggling to document large
    scale evidence of the positive effect of
    telemedicine on health and cost outcomes
  • Previous review articles claim methodology often
    poor in published papers

4
Research Questions
  • What is the incidence of theory testing in
    telemedicine literature? What theories are
    actually tested?
  • What of studies clearly report specific study
    variables (e.g., objective, hypotheses/RQ, and
    type of subjects, randomization, units of
    analysis, location, time frame)
  • What data collection strategies and analyses were
    employed?
  • Were results presented in qualitative and/or
    quantitative fashion?

5
Methodology
  • Keyword search strategy employed on 15 scientific
    databases
  • Initial search yielded more than 10,000 articles
  • Articles then assessed against inclusion criteria
    (e.g., published post 1990, included data,
    included some form of a methods section, etc.)
  • N1615 articles
  • Inter-rater reliability (Cohens Kappa) exceeded
    .80 for three pairs of coder

6
Results
  • 5 mention theory or paradigmatic approach
  • 96 report overall study aim
  • Seek some form of outcome (80)
  • Test technical feasibility (13)
  • Address hypothetical issues (7)
  • 11 provided explicit hypotheses or research
    questions

7
Results (cont.)
  • 26 did not provide of subjects
  • For those reporting patients as subjects
  • Median 47
  • 65 had sample size of 100 or less
  • For those reporting providers as subjects
  • Median 29
  • 86 had sample size of 100 or less
  • 11 reported randomization for patient studies
    and 4 for provider studies (most papers did not
    even mention subject selection strategies)

8
Results
  • 83 reported location of study
  • 34 in US
  • 24 Europe
  • Data collection
  • Patients
  • 31 multiple data collection strategies
  • Image Transfer (35)
  • Providers
  • 18 multiple data collection strategies
  • Surveys (60)

9
Results
  • Few significant relationships
  • Use of theory and presence of formal research
    questions (r0.25, Plt0.01)
  • Research questions and study aim (r0.067,
    Plt0.01)
  • Inclusion of theory and study based on an actual
    intervention (r-0.069, Plt0.01)

10
Discussion
  • These methodological challenges not owned by
    telemedicine
  • Implications of missing methodological details
    should not be underestimated
  • Time impacts technologies
  • Subject selection and sample size matter
  • Lack of explicitly stated RQs prevent true
    critique of study design

11
Kuhn Basic Tenet
  • The existence of intertwined theoretical beliefs
    and methodological strategies make it possible
    for a field to evaluate its own body of research
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com