Title: Child survival
1Childsurvival how many deaths can we prevent?
Dr SK CHATURVEDI Dr KANURPIYA CHATURVEDI
2Child survival focus
- Issue
- Worldwide over 10 million children under 5 years
of age are dying each year. - What interventions are appropriate for reducing
these deaths, and what would their impact be if
full coverage of the interventions were achieved?
- India contributes nearly 25 to the worldwide
total of under-5 deaths, so a major reduction by
India will have a major worldwide impact.
3Child survival the Lancet approach
- Review the state of evidence for interventions to
reduce mortality for each of the major direct and
underlying causes of death in children under
five. Determine their efficacy and apply to
current situation to assess how many under-5
deaths could be prevented.
- 1st alternative apply at regional level
- 2nd alternative apply at country level
- Compromise apply to each of 42 countries where
90 of worldwide under-5 deaths occur
4Child survival - interventions
- Focus on interventions addressing proximal
determinants of child mortality and those that
can be delivered mainly through the health sector.
- Take each of the main causes of under-5 deaths
and examine the effectiveness of available
interventions for each cause of death
diarrhoea, pneumonia, measles, malaria,
HIV/AIDS, and the underlying causes of
undernutrition for deaths among under-5s, and
asphyxia, preterm delivery, sepsis, and tetanus
for deaths among neonates
5Intervention search strategy
- Estimates of effectiveness of interventions taken
from - either published articles that summarized
earlier research results - or systematic reviews by the authors and
participants in the Bellagio Child Survival Study
Group, together with input from other experts
Included search of MEDLINE, POPLINE, and other
databases, including the Cochrane database of
randomized controlled trials and the WHO
Reproductive Health Library
6Interventions level of evidence
- Each potential intervention was assigned to one
of three levels based on the strength of evidence
for its effect on under-5 mortality
Level 1 sufficient evidence causal
relationship between intervention and reduction
of under-5 mortality established Level 2
limited evidence effect is possible, but data
not sufficient to establish causal
relationship Level 3 inadequate evidence -
includes those that hold promise of substantial
effects on under-5 mortality but have not yet
been fully assessed (ex rotavirus, pneumo.
vaccine, indoor air pollution)
Feasibility for delivery at high coverage levels
is a central criterion for any intervention
intended to reduce child mortality. But what is
feasible varies widely among countries.
Therefore the approach focused on an essential
set judged to be feasible for all countries.
7Interventions by cause - diarrhoea
Treatment
Prevention
Breastfeeding
Exposure to diarrhoea
Water/San/Hygiene
Complementary feeding
Oral rehydration therapy
Zinc
Vitamin A
Diarrhoea
Antibiotics for dysentry
Zinc
Survive
Future rotavirus vaccine
8Interventions by cause - pneumonia
Treatment
Prevention
Exposure to pneumonia
Breastfeeding
Complementary feeding
Zinc
Hib vaccine
Pneumonia
Antibiotics
Survive
Future Pneumococcal vaccine, zinc for therapy,
reduction of indoor air pollution
9Interventions, neonatal - infections
Prevention
Treatment
Clean delivery
Exposure to infections
Antibiotics for premature rupture of membranes
Breastfeeding
Severe bacterial infection
Antibiotics for sepsis
Survive
10Methods and assumptions
- For India, and each of the other 42 countries,
how many deaths from a specific cause could be
prevented were calculated with present coverage
levels increased to universal coverage (99,
except exclusive breastfeeding at 90). Three
types
- Exclusive and continuing breastfeeding
- Complementary feeding
- All other interventions
Components coverage (current and target),
efficacy, affected fraction or population,
evidence level
11Current coverage around 2000
12Current coverage around 2000
Same as for prevention
13Under-5 deaths preventable - results
- Three types of results calculated
- By individual interventions
- By specific causes
- By groups of interventions
14Under-5 deaths preventable through universal
coverage with individual interventions (2000)
India
15Under-5 deaths preventable through universal
coverage with individual interventions (2000)
India
16Under-5 deaths preventable through universal
coverage with individual interventions (2000)
India
17Interventions, neonatal - prematurity
Prevention
Treatment
Antibiotics for premature rupture of membranes
Pregnant
Treated bednets materials Intermittent
preventive therapy
Antinatal steroids
Premature
Newborn temperature management
Survive
Indoor residual spraying may be used as an
alternative
18Under-5 deaths from specific causes preventable
through listed interventions (2000)
India
19Under-5 deaths from specific causes preventable
through listed interventions as percent of
deaths by cause (2000)
India
20Under-5 deaths from specific causes preventable
through listed interventions as percent of
total deaths (2000)
India
21Under-5 deaths preventable with specific groups
of interventions (2000)
India
22Under-5 deaths preventable with specific groups
of interventions (2000)
India
23Further deaths that could be prevented
- Four reasons why these estimates of preventable
under-5 deaths are conservative
- Only interventions for which cause-specific
evidence of effect was available were included
(evidence levels 1 and 2) - Restricted to interventions that are feasible at
high coverage in low-income countries - Excluded promising interventions that are
currently being assessed (e.g. rotavirus) - Limited to interventions that address the major
causes of child death and selected underlying
causes (e.g. did not include anaemia)
24Conclusions on under-5 deaths that could be
prevented in India
- Full coverage of listed interventions is
estimated to result in a 57 reduction in under-5
deaths in India - This is a conservative estimate for reasons given
in previous slide
Next steps ? Review interventions in Indian
context, identify any changes, with supporting
evidence, and reassess impact on reduction of
under-5 deaths