Tracking Changes - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 22
About This Presentation
Title:

Tracking Changes

Description:

Failure to think from audience's pov. Other writing applications ... of medium height, wearing a b ret; a white Pomeranian dog was running behind her. ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:51
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 23
Provided by: greg55
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Tracking Changes


1
Tracking Changes Improving Clarity
  • Greg Zeck, Instructor English DepartmentNormanda
    le Community College

2
Clarity just what do we mean?
  • Tech writing applications
  • Jargon and inappropriate tech terms
  • Passive voice
  • Parallel constructions
  • Failure to think from audiences pov
  • Other writing applications
  • What does my audience know believe?
  • How do I deal with text?
  • How do I make my own ideas clear?

3
MS Words Track Changes feature
  • Revision new eyes
  • Visual cues show changes in a different color
  • Writers and editors changes appear in different
    colors
  • Color shows changes traditional rewrites
  • Showing, not telling, spurs improvements

4
Redaction services
  • Redaction writing, editing, or editing to
    remove sensitive content
  • Redaction, in the classroom, might mean rather
    removing insensitive unclear content

5
Redaction in the classroom
  • A visual and dramatic attempt to show students
    the difference between night day
  • Tech writing objectives include
  • Clarity
  • Conciseness
  • Accuracy
  • Organization

6
Redaction software
  • Freedom of Information Act requires improved
    transparency in government business
    communications
  • What if hidden info in documents leaks out?
  • Legal system now depends on electronic filing of
    court documents and email, so these docs must be
    secure

7
Plodding along vs. hot pursuit
  • Traditional editing
  • Reluctant distracted students in a group
  • Track changes
  • Individual edits own paper
  • Partner one-on-one exchange
  • Group -- discussion, go to Word
  • Credit for individual effort
  • Credit for group effort too

8
One paragraph in search of redactors
  • Tech writing example on D2L
  • Open the document in Word

9
Problems with the redaction paragraph
  • Must understand redaction
  • Must understand the process, as much as possible,
    from the customer point of view
  • Must understand the agents of these steps
  • Must not be confused by passive voice
  • Must try to keep constructions parallel
  • Just whos doing what for whom?

10
May I have the next redaction, please?
  • In Word, turn on Track Changes
  • Put your name at the top of document
  • Notice the color
  • The color of blood, not the color of money
  • Now, redact the passage for clarity

11
Talk about clarity
  • Post your redaction on Discussions
  • Check how we did, and how we fumbled for the
    right words
  • Discuss merits of various redactions

12
My students 1st redactions
  • A few student redactions on D2L
  • Didnt recognize passive voice all the time
  • Didnt always use parallel syntax
  • Didnt always make it clear who was doing what
    (agent)

13
My next step in the classroom
  • Discuss 1st redactions
  • Explain in greater detail the criteria for
    redacting
  • The process
  • Passive voice
  • Agency
  • Parallel syntax

14
And then?
  • Group redactions
  • Students discuss, in small groups, what changes
    are needed
  • May take up specific roles, for example
  • Passive voice
  • Agency
  • Syntax
  • Change tracking posting (on D2L)

15
May we have the results, please
  • Groups used original text
  • I reacted (redacted) with comments
  • Sample group redactions
  • Note improvements
  • Reason for hope

16
Individual approach to tracking changes
  • Student writes (document lastname.rtf)
  • Instructor comments using Track Changes(document
    lastname_read.rtf)
  • Student revises using Track Changes on
    instructors document (document2 lastname.rtf)

17
Group approach to tracking changes
  • Student writes individual paper
  • Instructor comments using Track Changes
  • Group revises posts changes

18
Freshman comp personal group redactions with
Track Changes
  • Read Chekhovs Lady with the Dog
  • Russian story, 1899, tends to enlist moral(istic)
    responses
  • Had students write essayette on D2L
  • What does Chekhov think of the two lovers?
  • What do you think about them?

IT was said that a new person had appeared on the
sea-front a lady with a little dog. Dmitri
Dmitritch Gurov, who had by then been a fortnight
at Yalta, and so was fairly at home there, had
begun to take an interest in new arrivals.
Sitting in Verney's pavilion, he saw, walking on
the sea-front, a fair-haired young lady of medium
height, wearing a béret a white Pomeranian dog
was running behind her.
19
The 1st essays
  • Tended not to be in focus
  • Tended not to use as much evidence as should
  • Relied, instead, too much on personal opinion
    (2nd question)

20
Pedagogical response as redaction
  • My comments via Track Changes
  • Look at 1-2 examples on D2L
  • Something I do in online classes all the time
  • Try to stress same major points for everyone

21
Individual rewrites, optional
  • A few revised their 1st drafts and did much
    better
  • More focused on story
  • More use of in-text evidence
  • Separation of their opinion from authors views
  • Strong subtle perceptions
  • 1-2 examples

22
The methods, then
  • Individual redactions
  • Instructor comments on draft in Track Changes
  • Student revises via Words Track Changes
  • Instructor makes final comments grade
  • Group redactions
  • Groups form
  • Instructor discusses criteria
  • Group discusses work
  • Group redacts via Words Track Changes
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com