Supply chain management II: Interaction in the chain - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 31
About This Presentation
Title:

Supply chain management II: Interaction in the chain

Description:

Deterministic demand: demand is known, and hence a service degree of 100% is easy. ... BV/Q2 PR/2. Zero values: Q= /-sqrt(2VB/PR) Is 2VB/PR a minimum ? ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:103
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 32
Provided by: JD146
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Supply chain management II: Interaction in the chain


1
Supply chain management IIInteraction in the
chain
  • Inventory management

2
Why do firms keep stock?
  • Buffer stock
  • Pipeline stock
  • Safety stock
  • Cycle stock
  • Seasonal stock
  • Speculation stock
  • But remember Inventory is bad!

3
Inventory is bad because
  • Cost
  • Opportunity cost of capital interest cost
  • Maintenance holding cost
  • Inventory looses value obsolescence
  • Inventory hides problems

4
Goals of inventory management
  • Keep inventory costs low
  • Keep cost of the supply chain low
  • Make sure that customer orders are fulfilled
    service degree.

5
What is service degree
  • Percentage of demand that can be supplied from
    stock
  • Percentage of orders that can be supplied from
    stock
  • Percentage of customers whose orders can be
    supplied from stock
  • Probability of going out of stock per month
  • Average time between stock outs

6
Inventory models
  • Deterministic demand demand is known, and hence
    a service degree of 100 is easy. Goal minimize
    cost.
  • Probabilistic demand High revenu requires high
    service degrees which require high inventory and
    therefore high cost The task is to find the
    right balance between cost an revenue.

7
Models
  • Minimize cost for a given service degree
  • Maximize servicegraad for a given cost
  • Optimize a function of service degreeand cost
  • Solution methods analytic optimization or
    simulation

8
Analytical methods
  • The EOQ model which has an exact, provably
    optimal solution
  • Optimizing safety stock with a uniformally
    distributed demand when service degree is
    measured in terms of the costs of non delivery.
    (so that inventory costs and holding costs can be
    added to obtain total cost.)

9
Economic Order Quantity
  • Procurement price P
  • Replenishment cost B
  • Interest rate R
  • Holding cost D
  • Yearly demand volume V
  • Order quantity Q

10
EOQ model
  • When to order and how much to order?
  • Assumption 1 demand is constant and known
  • Assumption 2 ordering is always possible and in
    any quantity
  • Assumption 3 Back log is not permitted
  • Costs 1 Holding costs
  • Cost 2 Replenishment costs
  • Cost 3 Procurement costs
  • Goal Minimize total costs

11
What will be the graph of an optimal inventory
policy?
12
Replenishment costs B V/Q
13
Holding costsQ/2 P R
14
Totale costs
  • P V B V/Q Q/2 P R
  • The EOQ is robust!

15
Optimizing
  • Taking derivate (in Q)
  • -BV/Q2 PR/2
  • Zero values
  • Q /-sqrt(2VB/PR)
  • Is 2VB/PR a minimum ?

16
Homework questions (for Friday)
  • What are the replenishment costs when ordering
    the optimal quantity?
  • What are the holding costs when ordering the
    optimal quantity?
  • Explain the relationship between the two.

17
Model with uncertainty in demand holding cost
versus service degree
  • Cost per day for holding 1 item in inventory 1
  • Service degree in euros cost per item demand
    not fulfilled 2.
  • Demand D per day 0 lt D lt 1.
  • How much to order each day?
  • Is there a constant optimal replenishment
    quantity???

18
Expected costs at inventory level V with uniform
demand between 0 and 1
min
max
1
0
V
19
Expected costs at inventory level V with uniform
demand between 0 and 1
V V/2 1 (1-V) 1/2(1-V) 2
  • P(demandltinventory)
  • expected excess
  • Holding costs
  • P(demandgtinventory)
  • expected shortage
  • (non fulfillment costs)

20
V V/2 1 (1-V) 1/2(1-V) 2 V2/2 (1-V)
(1-V) V2/2 (1-2VV2) 1-2V
3/2V2. Derivative 3V-2.
21
Optimization
  • Optimal strategy
  • Minimize total cost
  • Zero values of derivative.
  • V2/3
  • Is this a minimum?

22
Consequences
  • So what is the optimal replenishment quantity?
  • Indeed, it depends on how much is left from the
    previous day..order the quantity that is
    required to start the day with 2/3 inventory.

23
Determination of the inventory
  • Average demand equals 0.5
  • Inventory equals 2/3 gt1/2)
  • Therefore ½ of inventory is kept to deal with
    expected demand, and 1/6 is kept to protect
    against uncertainty safety stock!

24
Home work question
  • What is de optimal replenishment strategy if
    costs for non fulfillment are a with a gt 1 (a2
    in the previous calculations, so the question is
    to generalize.)

25
5 practical replenishment systems
  • Order the same quantity every day, e.g. the EOQ
    that results when assuming that average demand is
    deterministic demand. Remember that the EOQ is
    robust
  • Notice that this disregards the current inventory
    position!

26
5 (2)
  • 2.(s,Q) order point-order quantity
  • Replenish inventory if level below s, order
    quantity Q
  • Q can be determined using EOQ, taking expected
    demand as deterministic demand.

27
5. (3)
  • 3. (s,S) order point-order up to level
  • Consider the stock position, order up to level S
    if level is below s.
  • It is customary to choose s and S such that
  • S-sEOQ
  • (again EOQ based)

28
5. (4)
4. (R,S) periodic review-order up to
level Consider stock periodically and order up
to level S. Often R and S are chosen such that
the expected replenishment quantity equals the
EOQ (when taking average demand as deterministic
demand)
29
5. (5)
5. (R,s,S) . Consider stock periodically and
order up to level S if level is below s. It is
customary to choose R, s, and S such that the
expected quantity (S-s?) equals the EOQ (when
taking average demand as deterministic demand)
30
The Costs of inventory systems
  • (s,Q) and (s,S) systems require continuous data.
  • Periodic review systems require only periodic
    data, and can therefore be cheaper.
  • But.periodic review systems will entail higher
    costs... Remember Walmart!!

31
A,B,C Classification
  • Divide stock keeping units (SKUs) in categories
    A,B en C.
  • Category A are items that represent 80 of value,
    B and C the rest, where B takes 80 of the rest.
  • For category A SKUs more expensive inventory
    management technology is worth the investment,
    for B and C not.
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com