Title: Case History Los Angeles, California
1Case History Los Angeles, California
2Los Angeles from East LAMetro Gold Line Eastside
Extension(MGLEE, LRT)
3Metro Rail System
- Local and general plan of the Los Angeles LRT
system including the Gold Line Extension into
East Los Angeles
4LA Metro Gold Line Extension
5LA Metro Gold Line Extension
- Underground Segment
- 9,400 feet twin tunnels
- Two portals
- Two cut-and-cover segments
- Two stations
- Twin bored tunnels
- Six cross-passages
- Two sump structures (now combined)
- At-Grade 5 miles
6LA Metro Gold Line Extension
- Overall Planning, Design and Construction
Schedule 20 years!
7Methane Zone Created in 1985
- Ban lifted in 2006 due to EPB/Slurry Technology
8MGLEE Planning Overview
- Originally Planned as A Redline subway
- The Final EIS/EIR Approved in 1994
- Preliminary Final Design 1996-1998
- 1998 MTA suspended work on all rail projects
- Funding Shortfalls
- Prop A and C no local funds for subway
9MGLEE Planning Overview, cont.
- 1999-2001 Major Investment Study authorized for
current project - includes - BRT, Light Rail, Heavy Rail, 8 Alignments
- Preferred Alternative
- LRT, Union Station Alameda First Street,
Indiana, 3rd to Pomona/Woods - Tunnel through Boyle Heights
- State certification February 28, 2002
- Federal ROD March 2002
- IFB July 2004
- Scheduled ROD 2009
10Suspended vs. Current Project
11Project Setting
Los Angeles Union Station
12Platform at Union Station
- Retaining wall at 101 Freeway
13Historic 1st Street Bridge
144th Street Bridge Los Angeles River
151st Street Bridge Retrofitting - 1996
16101 Freeway Overcrossing
171st/Boyle (Mariachi) Station
181st/Soto Station Area
19Soto Street
20Neighborhood Residential, Light Commercial
21MGLEE Design
- Suspended and Current Project
- Geotechnical Investigations
- TBM Specifications
- Tunnel Lining requirements
- Seismic Conditions and Fault crossing
- Gassy Ground
- Building protection
22Geology/Subsurface Conditions
- Tunnel entirely within alluvium (Pleistocene and
Holocene) Interlayered sands and clays - Fine-grained soils predominantly stiff to hard
low plasticity clay and silt - Coarse-grained soils predominantly dense to very
dense silty sand and clayey sand - Occasional Cobbles and potential for boulders
- Underlain by Tertiary age highly weathered
siltstone and claystone bedrock - Former oil field
23Geologic Profile
24Former Oil Producing Area
25Environmental Conditions (GBR)
- Anticipated Tunnelling Conditions
- Soil Approx. 32,000 CY contaminated
- Groundwater 500 gpm at 1st/Soto site
- USTs at 1st/Soto site
- Methane max. 100,000 ppm (LEL is 50,000 ppm)
- H2S none detected (0.2 ppm is the limit of
field detection equipment), but 0.002 ppm can be
detected by smell
26TBM Specifications
- Geologic Profile
- Wide range of conditions including Boulders and
Cobbles - Groundwater levels
- Probing drilling for Gas (OSHA req.) and grouting
- Screw Conveyor only no open mode
- New or Used TBMs
- Compressed Air to access face
27Allowable Surface Settlement
28Differential Settlement, above tunnel
29Tunnel Cross Section
- Precast Concrete Tunnel linings,
- 20 ft Diam.
2.6m (I.D)
30Full Scale Testing at U of I
- Previous Metro Tunnels had initial and final
support with HDPE Gas and Water Barrier - Seismic Conditions
- Gassy Ground
31Gas Leakage Testing of Gaskets
32Developed Double Gasket Design with Convex to
Convex joints
33Convex to Convex Radial Joints
34After Compression Testing
35Cyclic Loading Test and
Subsequent Leakage Test
36Test configuration Cyclic Tests
37Buried Thrust fault Topographic Expression
38Seismic Design Criteria
- Probabilistic
- ODE 200 years
- MDE 2,000 years
- Tectonic 2,800 3,900 years
- Add tectonic movement to shaking distortion
(conservative) - 0.6 inch over 45 feet scaled linearly for length
height of station (MDE)
39Summary of Seismologist and Geotechnical
Investigation
- Oskin et al. 2000
- Blind fault producing Coyote Pass Escarpment is
shallow ( 500 m) - Fault slip rate incremental vertical growth of 2
2.8 feet per seismic event
- ECI investigation
- Alluvial sediments gently folded into a
asymmetric syncline - Sharpness of hinge
40Coyote Pass Feature
41Interpretive Conditions
42Section along Soto Street
43Cross section at Soto Street
44Open Book Model Free-field vs. Soil-Structure
Interaction
45Thrust Model Free Field vs. SSI
46Building Protection
Typical building protection plan along the tunnel
route for the East Side LRT Extension survey of
over 200 bldgs
47Compensation Grouting
- Designed for about 40 Structures
48Compensation Grouting Plan
49Permeation Grouting
- Used at Breakouts and Cross passages
50Construction
51101 New Bridge March 06
52Bridge June 9, 2006
53101 New Bridge February 07
54LA Metro Gold Line Extension
55West Portal Excavation- Cut and Cover
56Mariachi (Boyle) Station Plan
57Initial Excavation at Soto Station
58Deck Beam Placement - Soto
59Precast Concrete Decking
60Mariachi Plaza Excavation and Mining Shaft
61 60 ft Excavation at Mariachi Complete Aug 2005
62TBMs at Herrenknect Plant
63Views of TBM (new)
64Screw Conveyor Fabrication
Fabrication of the screw auger for conveying
tunnel muck from the cutterhead
Fabrication the screw auger barrel in sections
for site assembly
65Screw Conveyor on Machine
Worlds longest
66TBM 60 m screw conveyor
67TBM Assembly
68TBM Assembly in Shaft
69TBM Trailing Gear
70TBM Operators Cabin
71Segment Casting
72Double Gasket Segments at TBM heading
73Muck Handling
74Conditioned Soil
75Tail Seal Grout Ports
Two Ports at four locations around shield
76Wire Brushes after 1st Drive
77TBM Hole Through Nov 06, 2007
78West Bound Machine Dec 2007
79TBM Disassembly
80TBM Disassembly
81Lifting Shield from Shaft
82Cutterhead Transport
83Cross Passage Excavation
84Pipe Arch Drilling
85Cross Passage Excavation
86Compensation Grouting Used HDD
87Compensation Grouting - HDD
88Chemical (consolidation) Grouting
89Instrumentation and Monitoring
- Ground surface
- Ground Above Tunnel
- TBM Parameters
90Ground Surface Survey
91Typical Settlement TroughCummings Street
92Instrumentation-ground monitoring with MPBX
93MPBX Monitoring
94Typical Extensometer
95MPBX performance vs Typical
96Earth Pressure
- pH (68.64 Hw) (1.5 .25 ? B), in
which - pH theoretical required pressure
- Hw hydrostatic head
- ? unit weight of the soil
- B diameter of the bore
97Instrumentation, ADS
98Instrumentation, Grout Volumes
99TBM Progress Rates
- Avg EB 37 ft/day, max 91
- Avg WB 44 ft/day, max 96
100The End
101Dewatering
Simulated ground water drawdown at the Soto
Street Station excavation
102Backfill Grout System
103Section thru Crosspassage