Clean%20Development%20Mechanism%20(CDM) - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

About This Presentation
Title:

Clean%20Development%20Mechanism%20(CDM)

Description:

International supervisory and standard setting bodies (CDM EB, JISC) CDM General status ... baseline scenario is the construction of (a) new power plant ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:477
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 10
Provided by: Bj163
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Clean%20Development%20Mechanism%20(CDM)


1
Björn Zapfel UNFCCC Secretariat JI Sub-Programme http//ji.unfccc.int bzapfel_at_unfccc.int Panel discussionLow Carbon Generation Technology Carbon Forum America 2008 San Francisco, USA 26 February 2008
2
Panel discussion LCGT Project-based mechanisms
Clean Development Mechanism (CDM) Credits (CERs)
for emissions avoided through sustainable
development projects in developing
countries Joint Implementation (JI) Credits
(ERUs) for emissions avoided through projects in
Annex I countries
  • Basic principles
  • Market mechanisms
  • Lowest marginal cost of abatement
  • Additionality to any ERs that would occur in the
    absence of the project
  • Bottom-up approach, re-use and broad application
    principles for standards
  • International supervisory and standard setting
    bodies (CDM EB, JISC)

3
Panel discussion LCGT CDM General status
  • CDM General status
  • 948 projects registered to date
  • 49 host countries
  • 121,122,134 CERs issued
  • gt 3000 projects in pipeline
  • 2.7 billion CERs expected to end of 2012

4
Panel discussion LCGT CDM General status II
  • CDM Registered projects by sectoral scope
  • Majority of registeredprojects (gt 50)in scope
    01(energy industries renewable/non-renewable
    sources)
  • (JI PDD pipelinesimilar picture)

5
Panel discussion LCGT CDM Methodologies
  • CDM Methodologies
  • Energy industries- renewable/non-renewable
    sources(37/34 gt 50 of registered projects)
  • Electricity production from renewable energyUse
    of waste heat/gases to generate
    electricityCogenerationElectricity generation
    from captured methane from industrial,municipal
    and agricultural wasteIndustrial fuel switching
    from coal or petroleum fuels to natural
    gasImprovement in heat generation efficiency or
    switch to renewable biomass for heatingExpanding
    grid to isolated grids or less efficient self
    generating consumersIntroduction of centralized
    and efficient district heating systemsBetter/more
    efficient technologies for generating power from
    fossil fuelsManagement systems to optimize power
    generation from hydro resources
  • Manufacturing industries(19/17 ca. 6 of
    registered projects)
  • Mitigation of CH4 emissions in the wood
    carbonization for charcoal productionUse of feed
    stock in pulp and paper production or in bio-oil
    production to avoid emissions from biomass
    wastesReplacement of SF6 with alternate cover
    gas in the magnesium industryPartial
    substitution of fossil fuels with alternative
    fuels or less carbon intensive fuels in cement
    manufactureIncreasing the blend in cement
    production or the use of alternative raw
    materials that do not contain carbonates for
    clinker manufacturing in cement kilns

6
Panel discussion LCGT CDM Methodologies II
  • Waste handling and disposal (12/11 ca. 21 of
    registered projects)
  • Covering project activities that introduce
    technologies for better management of industrial,
    municipal, agricultural waste and capture of
    methane from waste, use of waste handling
    measures that avoid methane generation
    (composting, incineration to generate power,
    making fuel out of waste, using agriculture waste
    as raw material in production of pulp, use of
    aerobic treatment systems, gasification of waste,
    etc), methane capture from waste water, animal
    manure management and methane capture, use of
    captured methane for household/transportation
    use, etc.
  • Chemical industries(13/12 ca. 2 of registered
    projects)
  • Covering project activities such as secondary
    catalytic N2O destruction in nitric acid plants,
    substitution of CO2 from fossil or mineral origin
    by CO2 from renewable sources in the production
    of inorganic compounds or the catalytic N2O
    destruction in the tail gas of nitric acid or
    caprolactam production plants
  • Energy efficiency of equipment and industry
  • Demand side efficiency
  • Transportation
  • Capture of CO2
  • Flared/vented gas
  • Mine methane
  • Biofuels

7
Panel discussion LCGT ACM0013
  • ACM0013 Methodology for new grid connected
    fossil fuel fired power plants using a less
    GHG intensive technology
  • Supports the transformation from (e.g. overcome
    RD barriers) low efficiency technologies to more
    efficient fossil fuel based electricity
    generation technologies
  • Eligible for
  • Construction operation of a new fossil fuel
    fired grid-connected generation plant
  • All possible fossil fuel efficiency improvement
    measures
  • Limited too
  • New electricity generation plants - no retrofit
    or co-generation
  • Most plausible baseline scenario is the
    construction of (a) new power plant(s) using the
    same fossil fuel type
  • Baseline fuel must be used in more than 50 of
    total generation by utilities in the geographical
    area
  • Benchmark emission factor determined based on the
    performance of the top 15 power plants that use
    the same fuel as the project plant and any
    technology available in the geographical area
  • Baseline needs to be reassessed for each
    crediting period
  • Incentive to improve efficiency of fossil fuel
    based electricity generation technologies, but
    decreasing with overall increased efficiency

8
Panel discussion LCGT Technology transfer - trends
  • CDM Technology transfer (trends)
  • Trends of UNFCCC study to be published soon
  • Technology transfer (TT) import of technology or
    knowledge or both
  • Basis Statements of project participants in PDDs
    of projects in pipeline
  • Roughly 40 of all analyzed projects (covering
    64 of annual emission reductions) claim TT
  • Likelihood of TT increases with project size and
    involvement of foreign project participant
  • Pattern heterogeneous by project type, but
    figures relevant for LCGT in many cases above
    average

9
Panel discussion LCGT Conclusion
Conclusion CDM (and JI),as market based
mechanisms using a bottom-up approach,have
proven as a means toenable low carbon generation
technologies, as well as corresponding
technology transfer
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com