Incremental Universalism: The Policy Issues - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

About This Presentation
Title:

Incremental Universalism: The Policy Issues

Description:

Affordability schedule between 3-5 times poverty exclude ... Probably too conservative in long run as premiums rise. Exempt 60,000 persons (15% of uninsured) ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:32
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 21
Provided by: jonat71
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Incremental Universalism: The Policy Issues


1
Incremental Universalism The Policy Issues
  • Jonathan Gruber
  • MIT

2
Setting the Stage
  • 3 key features of any move to universal coverage
  • Pooling
  • Affordability
  • Mandates
  • One extreme single payer
  • Other extreme tax credits

3
Massachusetts Cleaving the Middle
  • Privatized public insurance below 300 of poverty
    Commonwealth Care
  • Choice of four MMCOs
  • Heavily subsidized
  • Very generous benefits package no deductibles,
    low copays

4
Massachusetts Details, Continued
  • Above 300 poverty
  • Merged small group and non-group markets into
    age-rated pool
  • Facilitate insurance purchase through Connector
  • Section 125 mandate

5
Massachusetts Details, Continued
  • Individual mandate
  • All eligible for commonwealth care
  • Everyone above five times poverty
  • Affordability schedule between 3-5 times poverty
    exclude from mandate older persons families
  • Enforced through tax penalty

6
Issue 1 Integration with ESI
  • Low income pool how to treat those with ESI?
    Three alternatives
  • 1) Firewall MA approach but 30,000 are
    excluded from affordable coverage
  • 2) Premium assistance
  • sounds attractive, since many uninsured are
    offered ESI leverage employer dollars
  • But it is actually incredibly expensive

7
Premium Assistance Facts
  • Fact 1 Among those who are offered ESI below
    300 of poverty, vast majority take it
  • Below 100 of poverty of all offered, only 25
    uninsured
  • 100-200 of poverty 13 uninsured
  • 200-300 of poverty 6 uninsured
  • Implication if you offer premium assistance to
    low income populations, most of those eligible
    already have coverage!
  • Great for horizontal equity not for coverage

8
Premium Assistance Facts
  • Fact 2 Among those offered ESI who are
    uninsured, price sensitivity is very low
  • After all, these individuals were already offered
    a very large subsidy and declined!
  • These are folks who dont want insurance
  • Fact 3 If you subsidize employee contributions
    for a sizeable share of employees, employers will
    raise those contributions!

9
Premium Assistance Implications
  • Simple example 1000 persons below 300 of
    poverty offered insurance at 2000/year 100 of
    them are uninsured
  • Offer premium assistance of 1000/person
  • 750 of 900 already taking ESI take assistance
  • 25 of 100 not offered ESI take assistance
  • Cost 775,000
  • Newly covered 25 persons
  • Costs/Newly covered 31,000!
  • Not unreasonable my study of impact of Section
    125 for Federal employees found cost per newly
    insured of 31,000 to 84,000

10
Another Alternative Vouchers
  • Allow employees to come to the pool with employer
    dollars
  • In theory, same as premium assistance
  • In practice, perhaps less expensive because
    employees who are covered are reticent to drop
    that coverage and move to the pool
  • But still expensive per newly insured
  • Hard choices on low income ESI eligible

11
Issue 2 Affordability and Benefits
  • Central question in mandate context what is
    affordable
  • Three tools available to policy makers
  • Subsidies
  • Minimum benefits
  • Mandate exemptions
  • Massachusetts used all three

12
Affordability Subsidies
  • My analysis suggests fairly high levels are
    affordable (see report on my website)
  • Even low income individuals devote sizeable share
    of budget to non-necessities
  • Even low income individuals buy ESI if it is
    offered even when expensive
  • We ended up free below 150 of poverty, rising to
    typical cost of ESI at 300 of poverty
  • Remember health care is 16 of GDP! Someone has
    to pay

13
Affordability Minimum Benefits
  • Evidence is clear the ideal cost-effective
    insurance plan has three features
  • High initial cost-sharing (deductible or
    coinsurance)
  • Income-related out of pocket cap
  • Up front coverage of chronic care maintenance
    (maybe prevention)
  • All available evidence suggests that such a plan
    will minimize costs without sacrificing health
    see my RAND HIE study for KFF
  • MA 2000 deductible, 5000 OOP max, doc visits
    generic drugs with copay only

14
Affordability OOP Costs
  • Should OOP costs count towards affordability
    standards? No
  • Uninsured individuals typically have little OOP
    costs 0 is median for individuals
  • So any new OOP costs are simply because they are
    using more care
  • Cant say insurance is unaffordable simply
    because individuals get more care!
  • But need to have OOP limits that are reasonable
    relative to income e.g. 2000 deductible plan
    not sensible for someone earning 10,000

15
Affordability Exemptions
  • Compromise on initial schedule
  • Comm Care premiums to 300 of poverty 4.5 to
    6.7 of income
  • Rises to 8.6 of income at 400-500 of poverty
  • Affordable for all above 500 of poverty
  • Probably too conservative in long run as premiums
    rise
  • Exempt 60,000 persons (15 of uninsured)
  • 30,000 below 300 offered ESI
  • 30,000 above 300
  • But nice feature exemptions apply to older
    individuals and large families who will most
    value insurance still mandating the young
    healthies

16
Issue 3 Role of the Connector
  • Lot of attention to the Connector
  • But this is really only important as an element
    of reform not as the only reform
  • Connector is just a portal through which
    individuals purchase insurance in reformed market
  • Anchor store in new insurance mall
  • Sets standards and offers choice, but nothing
    transformative

17
Connector Only?
  • Is the Connector alone enough?
  • Would help small businesses and individuals shop
  • But unlikely to do much without subsidies and,
    especially, mandate
  • In the end, it is about price compulsion
  • Voluntarism alone hasnt been very successful in
    general across states

18
Issue 4 Governance
  • Bill that passed in MA very vague
  • Subsidies to 300 of poverty, but levels not
    specified
  • Affordability exemption from mandate, but levels
    not specified
  • Minimum benefit level not specified
  • Decisions left to 10 person connector board
  • Three appointees by Republic governor
  • Three by Democratic AG
  • Four administration ex-oficio
  • Thus far, complete consensus

19
Issue 5 Cost Control
  • States are moving ahead on coverage without
    fundamental cost control
  • Im here to say that is OK!
  • We know how to move to universal coverage we
    dont know how to significantly control costs
  • Dont let comprehensive reform be the enemy of
    (politically acceptable) universal coverage

20
Final Message Im Here to Help!
  • Modeling 10 years of experience critical role
    in MA and CA debates
  • Economics understanding and explaining the role
    of key policy levers
  • Policy making member of Connector board
  • Let me know how I can help!
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com