The Mangled Extremity - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 47
About This Presentation
Title:

The Mangled Extremity

Description:

Admission to debridement. Infected 6.5 hours. Not ... Unreamed IM Nail. Laboratory benefit of improved cortical perfusion ... smoking day of injury ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:2144
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 48
Provided by: robert284
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: The Mangled Extremity


1
The Mangled Extremity
  • Steven Ogden, M.D.
  • LSU Shreveport Orthopaedics
  • Case Presentation 8/1/2006

2
History
  • 22 y.o. male roughneck, smoker with good family
    support sustained R Gr IIIC open distal 1/3
    tibial shaft fracture from on-the-job injury
    offshore. Metal pipe crushed R leg. Immediately
    transported via Lifeair to nearest ED and then to
    LSU. Taken emergently by vascular to OR,
    orthopaedics consulted intra-op.

3
Physical Exam
  • Vital signs without evidence of hypotension
  • Right leg with near circumferential soft tissue
    injury with small 3 cm anterior skin bridge
  • Complete laceration through anterior and lateral
    compartments of leg
  • Cool pulseless extremity lt 6 hours until flow
    restored
  • Neurological exam indeterminate
  • Posterior tibial nerve in continuity
  • Gross contamination noted

4
X-rays
5
MESS
  • Limb ischemia 2
  • Pulseless, diminished cap refill lt 6 hours
  • Skeletal/soft tissue 4
  • Very high energy with gross contamination
  • Shock 0
  • SBP always gt 90
  • Age 0
  • lt 30
  • Total 6

6
History
  • Time of injury/ischemia time
  • Comorbidities
  • Smoking
  • DM
  • Concomitant injuries
  • Social support

7
Physical Exam
  • Given subcutaneous nature of tibia, deformity and
    open wound usually readily apparent
  • Circumferential inspection
  • Lacerations
  • Ecchymosis
  • Swelling
  • Tissue turgidity

8
Physical Exam
  • Neurologic and vascular exam
  • Ankle-Brachial Index if needed
  • Grading of wound done at time of surgical
    debridement
  • Cover wound, avoid multiple exams

-Mills, J. Trauma 2004
9
Gustilo and Anderson Classification
  • Type I - skin opening of 1cm or less, minimal
    muscle contusion, usually inside out mechanism
  • Type II - skin laceration 1-10cm, extensive soft
    tissue damage
  • Type IIIA - extensive soft tissue
    laceration(10cm) but adequate bone coverage
  • Type IIIB - extensive soft tissue injury with
    requiring flap advancement or free flap
  • Type IIIC - vascular injury requiring repair

Gustilo, JBJS 1976
10
Tscherne Classification of Soft Tissue Injury
  • Grade 0- negligible soft tissue injury
  • Grade 1- superficial abrasion or contusion
  • Grade 2- deep contusion from direct trauma
  • Grade 3- Extensive contusion and crush injury
    with possible severe muscle injury, compartment
    syndrome

11
Compartment Syndrome
  • Diagnosis same as in closed tibial fractures
  • Common with high energy tibia fractures
  • Treatment is 4 compartment fasciotomies

12
Mangled Extremity Severity Index
MESI gt 20 amputation Lower extremity trauma Not
all info present at time of injury Sensitivity
6 Specificity 90 to 100
Gregory et al J Trauma 1985 Roessler et al Arch
Surg 1991
13
Mangled Extremity Severity Score
14
MESS
  • Combined orthopaedic and vascular injuries
  • Validated by prospective trial
  • MESS lt 7 predicted salvage with 100 accuracy in
    both trials
  • MESS lt 4 100 salvage gt 7 100 amputation
    McNamara 1994
  • Bonanni et al Sens 22 Spec 53

Johansen et al J Trauma 1990
15
Predictive Salvage Index
  • Combined orthopaedic and vascular injuries
  • Salvage if PSI lt 8
  • Sensitivity 33 to 78
  • Specificity 70 to 100
  • All information not available in ED

Howe 1987 Bonanni 1993
16
LSI
  • Limb trauma and vascular injury
  • LSI lt 6 salvage
  • Sensitivity 56-78
  • Specificity 79-100
  • Extensive surgery required for scoring
  • Definitive outcome needed for scoring skin

Russell 1991, Bosse 2001 Bonanni 1993
17
NISSSA
  • Modification of MESS
  • Open tibial fractures
  • Salvage lt 11
  • Splits Skeletal and soft tissue components
  • Adds nerve injury
  • 1 retrospective study more sensitive and specific
    than MESS

McNamara JOT 1994
18
What does all that mean?
  • 100 sensitive for amputation ( threshold)
  • Predicts amputation need
  • Only small number of unsalvagable limbs salvaged
    with high sensitivity
  • 100 specific for salvage (lt threshold)
  • Predicts salvage potential
  • Only small number of salvageable limbs amputated
    with high specificity

19
Indications for Amputation of Grade IIIC Open
Tibial Fractures
  • Absolute
  • Anatomically complete disruption of Posterior
    tibial nerve in adult
  • Crush injury with warm ischemia gt6 hours
  • Relative
  • Serious associated polytrauma
  • Severe ipsilateral foot trauma
  • Anticipated protracted course to obtain
    soft-tissue coverage and tibial reconstruction

Lange, RH J trauma 1985
20
Does the insensate foot amputation?
  • Tibial nerve dysfunction on physical exam not
    equivalent to nerve disruption
  • 67 of insensate feet had normal sensation at 2
    years
  • Insensate limb at initial presentation not
    predictive of outcome

Bosse JBJS 2005
21
Limb Salvage vs. Amputation
  • Saving a functional
  • limb versus saving
  • the patient

22
Treatment Objectives
  • Prevent Infection
  • Soft tissue coverage
  • Union
  • Function
  • Often requires staged treatment over several
    months

23
Limb Salvage vs. Amputation
  • Host factors
  • Type A healthy
  • Type B minimal comorbidities
  • Type C Multiple comorbidites, tobacco use, poor
    social support
  • The four Ds
  • Disabled
  • Destitute
  • Drunk
  • Divorced

24
Bilateral Injuries
  • Bilateral amputation group best initial scores
  • All three groups equalized over 1 yr
  • Bilateral salvage group had best
    outcomes/improvement at 2 years
  • Rec salvage limb unless absolute indication for
    amputation

Smith, Joel J, et. al 2003 LEAP symp
25
Initial Treatment
  • ER superficial evaluation
  • Sterile dressing
  • Reduction splint
  • Tetanus prophylaxis
  • Antibiotics
  • I cefazolin
  • II, III Add Aminoglycoside
  • Soil contaminant add PCN
  • Antibiotic spectrum changing based on local
    bacterial spectrum

26
Treatment of Soft Tissue Injury
  • Meticulous debridement
  • Explore/Extend wound
  • Deliver bone ends for full exposure
  • Excise all foreign material, necrotic muscle,
    unattached bone fragments, exposed fat and fascia
  • Infection 21 vs 9 w/ improved debridement
  • Fasciotomy as indicated

-Edwards, CORR 1988 -Patzakis, JAAOS 2003
27
Role of Irrigation
  • D I Debridement Irrigation
  • No consensus on volume required
  • Pulse lavage
  • May remove debris vs. harmful to osteoblasts
  • Antibiotics vs. Soap

-Anglen, JBJS 2005
28
Timing of Surgical Debridement
  • Controversial issue
  • Classically lt6hrs
  • Currently urgent, not emergent
  • Early antibiotics may be more critical
  • More wound contamination requires more urgency
    and more frequency

-Bosse, JAAOS, 2002 -Skaggs, JBJS 2005
29
Timing of Treatment Versus Infection
  • Injury until debridement
  • Infected 11.5 hours
  • Not infected 11.4 hours
  • Admission to debridement
  • Infected 6.5 hours
  • Not infected 8.0 hours
  • Injury until trauma center admission
  • Infected 5.2 hours
  • Not infected 3.5 hours (plt0.01)

Pollak, AN 2003 LEAP symp
30
Fracture Stabilization
  • Reduces risk of infection
  • External Fixation
  • uniplane vs. multiplane
  • provisional vs. definitive tx
  • Intramedullary nail
  • Plate fixation

31
Advantages of External Fixator
  • Can be applied quickly in polytrauma patient
  • Allows easy monitoring of soft tissues and
    compartments

32
Outcomes of External Fixation
  • 95 union rate for group of closed and open tibia
    fractures
  • 20 malunion rate
  • Loss of reduction associated with removing frame
    prior to union
  • Risk of pin track infection

Anderson et al. Clin Orthop 1974 Edge and Denham
JBJSBr 1981
33
Reamed vs. Nonreamed Nails
  • Reamings (osteogenic)
  • Larger Nails ( locking bolts)
  • Hardware failure rare w/ newer nail designs
  • Damage to endosteal blood supply?
  • Clinically proven safe even in open fx

Finkemeier, et.al. JOT 2000 Forster, et.al.
Injury Mar 2005 Bhandari, et.al., JOT 2000
34
Unreamed IM Nail
  • Laboratory benefit of improved cortical perfusion
  • Good results
  • 9 delayed union
  • 5 deep infection in Type III fractures

-Schemitsch, J. Trauma 1998 -Gaebler, JOT 2001
35
Reamed Tibial Nailing
  • Good results in Open Fx
  • time to union 26wks
  • deep infection rate 3.5
  • Complications increased with Type IIIB fractures
  • time to union 50 weeks
  • infection rate 23

-Court-Brown JBJS 1991
36
Blachut JBJS 79A
Reamed vs. Nonreamed Nails
  • Reamed Non-Reamed
  • pts. 73 63
  • Nonunion 4 11
  • Malunion 4 3
  • Broken Bolts 3 16

37
Outcome
  • Early amputation
  • All returned to work within 6 months
  • Better functional scores and quality of life
  • Delayed amputation
  • Return to work at mean of 36 months
  • Salvage
  • Return to work at mean of 18 months

Fairhurst CORR 1994 Grade III tibia fx
38
Outcome
  • Limb salvage with free flap
  • 16/20 successful
  • More surgery, higher cost, more complications and
    longer hospital stay
  • 3/16 returned to work
  • 12 considered themselves too disabled to work
  • Primary amputation
  • 18 patients
  • 9 returned to work full time
  • 4 considered themselves too disabled to work

Georgiadis JBJS 1993
39
LEAP Study
  • Multicenter observational prospective trial
  • 569 patients
  • LEISS not predictive of amputation
  • Low scores do predict limb salvage potential
  • At 2 years 7 years F/U no difference in outcome
    scores (SIP) or return to work
  • Limb reconstruction more likely to require
    rehospitalization for revision procedures.

-Bosse, et.al.
40
Cost analysis
  • Primary amputation (lt24 hours)
  • 1.6 surgeries
  • 22 inpatient days
  • 29,000
  • No deaths
  • Delayed amputation (gt24)
  • 7 surgical procedures
  • 53 inpatient days
  • 53,000
  • 21 death rate

Bondurant J trauma 1988
41
True cost analysis
  • Amputation
  • 30,148
  • Lifetime prosthetic cost 21,960-151,000
    (2,196)(5,695)(4,218)
  • Salvage
  • 59,214

Williams CORR 1994
42
Conclusions
  • Outcome most affected by severity of soft tissue
    and neurovascular injury
  • Aggressive, staged treatment improves results
  • Most studies show major change in results between
    Type IIIA and IIIB/C fractures
  • Early soft tissue coverage improves results
  • 72 hours to 1 week should be goal

43
Conclusions
  • LEISSS are classically designed for injuries
    below the knee
  • LEISSS have limited usefulness and cannot be used
    as sole criterion for which amputation decisions
    are made

44
Treatment Course
  • Patient stopped smoking day of injury
  • Treated with serial Lavage and debridement
    external fixator stabilization and 2 vessel
    vascular repair.
  • Over next 2 weeks, most of anterior and lateral
    compartment debrided, and had revision of graft
  • Skin grafts placed when no necrotic tissue
    present at debridement (approx 2 -3 weeks out)
  • Pt sought second opinion, decided on salvage
  • Conversion to Nail 8 weeks out
  • Bone grafted 3 months later, ICBG and BMP

45
Conversion to IMN
46
3 Months After IMN
47
Latest Radiographs pod 20
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com