RADIOCOMMUNICATION BUREAU - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 23
About This Presentation
Title:

RADIOCOMMUNICATION BUREAU

Description:

Digital modulation only. Data elements submitted using Appendix 4. Non-monopolisation provisions ... 15 year time limit. Use of assignments on a non ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:74
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 24
Provided by: markgr6
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: RADIOCOMMUNICATION BUREAU


1
RADIOCOMMUNICATION BUREAU
  • BROADCASTING-SATELLITE SERVICE
  • PLANS AND LISTS
  • by Mark Griffin
  • BR/SSD/SNP

2
Outline
  • Introduction
  • Frequency Bands
  • Plans
  • Lists
  • Compatibility Criteria
  • Main Regulatory Aspects
  • Processing of Article 4 Submissions

3
FREQUENCY BANDS
  • The BSS Plans and Lists cover the following
    bands
  • Region 1 11.7 - 12.5 GHz (space-to-Earth)
  • 14.5 - 14.8 GHz (Earth-to-space)
  • 17.3 - 18.1 GHz (Earth-to-space)
  • Region 2 12.2 - 12.7 GHz (space-to-Earth)
  • 17.3 - 17.8 GHz (Earth-to-space)
  • Region 3 11.7 - 12.2 GHz (space-to-Earth)
  • 14.5 - 14.8 GHz (Earth-to-space)
  • 17.3 - 18.1 GHz (Earth-to-space)

4
BSS PLANS
  • Appendix 30 Downlink Plans (12 GHz)- Regions 1
    and 3 Plan (234 beams) - Region 2 Plan (238
    beams)
  • Appendix 30A Feeder-link Plans (14 17 GHz)-
    Regions 1 and 3 Plans (308 beams)- Region 2 Plan
    (238 beams)

5
APPENDICES 30 30A PLANS
  • PLAN REGION FREQ.(GHz) YEAR
  • Downlink 2 12.2 - 12.7 1983 / 85
  • Downlink 1 11.7 - 12.5 1977/2000
  • Downlink 3 11.7 - 12.2 1977/2000
  • Feeder-link 2 17.3 - 17.8 1983 / 85
  • Feeder-link 1 3 14.5 - 14.8 1988/2000
  • Feeder-link 1 3 17.3 - 18.1 1988/2000

6
ELEMENTS OF PLANS
  • National assignments are included in
  • Articles 10 11 of Ap. 30 (downlink)
  • Articles 9 9A of Ap. 30A (feeder-link)
  • These Articles describeorbital position,
    channels, polarisation, power levels, antenna
    patterns, emission designation, beam coverage,
    grouping ...

7
Plan List Beams
8
WRC-2000 PLAN
  • WRC-2000 developed a new Plan that included
  • 10 channels in Region 1 and 12 channels in Region
    3
  • new national beams/assignments for East Timor and
    the Seychelles
  • 5 extended-coverage national beams for 15
    administrations
  • 30 "composite" beams
  • new protection ratios and other technical
    parameters
  • orbital position preferences for 63
    administrations and
  • 20 other national preferences.

9
REGIONS 1 AND 3 LISTS
  • Regions 1 and 3 Lists of additional uses
  • Downlink List- 12 GHz List (currently 28
    networks/204 beams)
  • Feeder-link Lists- 14 GHz List (currently 1
    network/1 beam) - 17 GHz List (currently 24
    networks/160 beams)

10
ELEMENTS OF LISTS
  • Created at WRC-2000.
  • Separated from the Plans and annexed to the
    Master Register (MIFR).
  • Lists are evolving and will be updated and
    published periodically by the BR.
  • Assignments in the Lists must be compatible with
    the Plans and other services.

11
ELEMENTS OF LISTS (contd)
  • Digital modulation only
  • Data elements submitted using Appendix 4
  • Non-monopolisation provisions
  • 15 year time limit
  • Use of assignments on a non-interference basis in
    case of disagreements
  • Provision to accommodate assignments for new ITU
    Member States

12
COMPATIBILITY BETWEEN PLAN AND LIST ASSIGNMENTS
  • Plan assignments
  • Regions 1 3 Plan based on EPM
  • Region 2 Plan based on OEPM
  • List assignments
  • Regions 1 3 List based on EPM and also PFD for
    the downlink.

13
Compatibility Criteria forRegions 1 3 Plan
Assignments
  • Equivalent Protection Margin (EPM) is used as
    compatibility criteria for the Regions 1 3
    Plans as follows
  • Mi protection margin
    (dB)
  • i interference type (1co-channel, 2 3
    upper lower first adjacent
    channels)
  • PRi protection ratio for a given interference
    type i.

14
Compatibility Criteria forRegion 2 Plan
Assignments
  • Overall Equivalent Protection Margin (OEPM) is
    used as compatibility criteria for the Region 2
    Plan as follows
  • Mi protection margin
    (dB)
  • i interference type (1co-channel, 23upper
    lower first adjacent channels, 45 upper
    lower second adjacent channels)
  • PRi protection ratio for a given interference
    type i.

15
Compatibility Criteria forRegions 1 3 List
Assignments
  • Based on both EPM and PFD criteria.
  • EPM criteria as per the Regions 1 3 Plan
  • PFD criteria also used to identify affected
    assignments as per Annex 1 of Ap 30

16
MAIN REGULATORY ASPECTS
  • BSS Downlink/ Feeder-link- Modification/addition
    (Article 4) - Notification/Implementation
    (Article 5)
  • Terrestrial - Coordination/Notification (Article
    6)
  • FSS - Coordination/Notification (Article 7)

17
ARTICLE 5 EXAMINATION
  • conformity with the Convention, Table of
    Allocations, other provisions
  • conformity with the Plan and List (except reduced
    e.i.r.p, reduced coverage etc.)
  • protection of other services in specific cases

18
ARTICLE 4 EXAMINATION (Appendix 30 Regions 1 3)
  • Protection of the Regions 1 3 Plan and List -
    SPS/MSPACE EPM PFD calculations
  • Protection of Region 2 Plan - GIBC(PXT)/GIMS
    PFD
  • Protection of Terrestrial Services - GIBC/GIMS
    PFD
  • Protection of Region 2 and Region 3 FSS -
    GIBC(PXT)/GIMS PFD

19
ARTICLE 4 EXAMINATION (Appendix 30A Regions 13)
  • Protection of Regions 13 Plan and Lists -
    SPS/MSPACE EPM calculation
  • Protection of Region 2 Plan - Appendix 8
    delta T/T
  • Protection of Terrestrial Services - Appendix 7
    Coordination contour
  • Protection of FSS earth station - Annex 4
    Coordination contour

20
Processing of Article 4 Submissions (1)
  • Bureau is currently processing all as yet
    unpublished submissions received under Article 4
    using the revised Appendices 30 and 30A.
  • Special Sections, that contain the filed
    satellite network characteristics and potentially
    affected administrations, are being published in
    BR IFICs.
  • Administrations should examine each BR IFIC to
    see if its assignments are affected and respond
    within 4 months.

21
Processing of Article 4 Submissions (2)
  • Affected administrations that do not comment
    within the 4 month period are deemed to have
    agreed.
  • After the 4 month period has expired, the BR
    prepares a list of coordination agreements
    required.
  • Results of the Bureaus MSPACEg calculations are
    also placed on the BR IFIC.
  • Workshop session will explain this in more detail.

22
Plan and List data
  • All Plan and List assignment data can be found on
    the BR IFIC the ITU website at
  • http//www.itu.int/ITU-R/space/plans/index.html
  • Contained in the SPS database (SRS format).
  • Contains the technical characteristics and
    reference situation for all Plan, List and
    pending Article 4 assignments.
  • The SPS database is evolving and is updated
    regularly.

23
Workshop SessionThursday 14 Nov 1630-1730
  • How to determine if an administration is
    identified as affected by a proposed Article 4
    satellite network in BR Publications.
  • Using the SPS and other BR software applications
    to obtain the technical examination results.
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com