Bez tytulu slajdu

1
CHP promotion in Neisse-Nisa-Nysa Euroregion
Zittau 21-22 January 2002 Phase
2-3-4 Presentation of outputs
Andrzej
Rajkiewicz
National Energy Conservation Agency, Poland
2
Analysis of Barriers

• CHP is not forbidden
• is wide used in old and large capacities
• is not known in small capacities
• is required by Energy Act
• is governed by Energy Regulatory Authority
• - licensing, pricing (for over 1 MWth and 5 MWe)
• is supported by state energy policy
• - 65 principle
• - 25 principle

3
Overcoming the Barriers

• elaboration of the Action Plan coherent with
  environment protection strategy
• identification of suitable places within energy
  planning
• importing of good practices
• selection of best solutions
• creation of regional policy for CHP
• - financing dedicated to energy efficiency
• - utilisation of local resources
• - support for investors

4
Instruments

• establishment of regional energy saving agency in
  addition to existing
• establishment of special energy efficiency fund
  in addition to existing

5
Actions by Euroregion

• approval of the Action Plan
• decision about establishment of the regional
  energy saving agency
• implementation of planned activities

6
Analysis of potential Status quo

• Country No of Electric Heat
• units power power
• MWe MWth
• Czech 33 21
  233
• Germany 19 26
  31
• Poland 4 60
  90
• Total 56 105
  354

7
Analysis of potential Status quo

• Energy data
• Natural gas
• 22 municipalities with gas
• 14476 connections
• 106731 customers
• 179804 dam3 consumption

8
Analysis of potential Status quo

• Energy data
• Electricity
• 140421 customers
• 245220 MWh consumption
• District heating
• larger systems in 6 municipalities
• capacity of 225 MWth
• supply of 40 of housing stock
• 75 for flats
• 15 for communal services
• 10 to industry and others

9
Analysis of potential Status quo

• Municipal heat supply
• example Kamienna Gora
• total heated space 160 513 m2
• total power ordered 26 MWth
• for heating 15 MWth
• for hot water 3 MWth
• for technology 8 MWth
• total consumption 210 000 GJ

10
Analysis of potential Status quo

• boilers
• coal fired
• 2 pcs OR 32 each 29,300 MW (year 1981)
• 2 pcs ERM 6,5 each 4,200MW (year 1992)
• utilisation30
• oil fired
• 2 pcs Paromat Simplex each 720 kW (year 1999)
• 1 pcs Paromat Simplex 345
• utilisation 80

11
Analysis of potential

• CHP pilot projects
• WWTP Jedrzychowice/Zgorzelec
• fuel biogas from sludge
• unit
• KoehlerZiegler GE 2866 SMT, 4 stroke, spark
  ignition gas engine, 2 pcs
• nominal power capacity 127 kW
• nominal heat capacity 207 kW

12
Analysis of potential

• Fuel consumption
• 65 m3/h (nominal capacity)
• 180 000 m3/y
• Utilisation
• 1800 h/y
• Power production
• 0,216 GHh/y
• Heat production
• 1360 GJ/y

13
Analysis of potential

• Costs
• investment 220 000 euro
• fixed OM cost 2000 euro
• marginal operating cost 0,08 euro/kWh
• fuel cost own - not calculated
• Financing PHARE
• Problems high depreciation rate impact

14
Analysis of potential

• CHP pilot projects
• Chemical industry WIZOW/Boleslawiec
• fuel natural gas
• unit
• TUMA TURBOMACH, SOLAR CENTAUR 50
• nominal power capacity 4,1 MWe
• nominal heat capacity 28 MWt

15
Analysis of potential

• Financing
• third party (PERP)
• 20 years contract for power and heat supply
• Problems lack of additional heat market

16
Analysis of potential

• Sector Electric capacity Thermal capacity
• MWe
  MWth
• District heating 5 10
• Health care 1.25
  2.5
• WWTP 4 8
• Solid waste landfills 0.5
  1.5
• Education 0.5
  0.5
• Touristic 0.2
  0.4
• Agriculture 2
  4
• Industry 15 28 40 - 200
• Total 28.45 - 40.95
  66.9 236.4

17
Technology options

• Technical solutions
• Gas engines PZL Wola, Warsaw
• capacity100/160, 180/280, 240/390, 360/555
• overall efficiency 82
• 8000 h/y
• 0,005 euro (kWhekWt)/h
• 5 years working
• emissions according to TA Luft (except 100 kW)

18
Economic potential

• Regulatory issues
• 30 euro/MWhe average price for CHP
• first tariff for new CHP unit accepted
• 45 euro/MWh
• natural gas price constant 20 euro Nm3
• overcapacity of natural gas
• 2003 change of energy law

19
Financing scheme

• PPA with power distribution companies
• HPA with heat customers
• own utilisation of power competitive to existing
  suppliers
• investment subsidies
• - Funds for Environment Protection
• - Foundation Ecofund
• - EU funding
• - bilateral funding

20
Financing scheme

• Financing sources of the gas turbine in City of
  Ostrow (5 MWe)
• GEF 61 (grant)
• National Fund of Environment Protection - 12
  (grant)
• Regional Fund of Environment Protection - 10
  (soft loan) and
• own sources - 17
• Success?