Linguistics 372: Language and Social Identity in the U.S. PowerPoint PPT Presentation

presentation player overlay
1 / 27
About This Presentation
Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Linguistics 372: Language and Social Identity in the U.S.


1
Linguistics 372Language and Social Identity in
the U.S.
  • Day 2

2
What Every Educated Person Should Know About
Language(fundamental assumptions of the field of
linguistics)
3
  • What is language?

4
  • What is language? Language is the systematic,
    conventional use of sounds, signs, (or written
    symbols) in a human society for communication

5
Assumption 1 Language is arbitrary
  • (Linguistic) arbitrariness The connection
    between form and meaning is random. This
    contrasts with Iconicity.

6
Assumption 1 Language is arbitrary
  • (Linguistic) arbitrariness The connection
    between form and meaning is random. This
    contrasts with Iconicity.
  • Iconicity The relationship between form and
    meaning, in which form is dictated by meaning.

7
  • Evidence for arbitrariness
  • 1) Multiple sound sequences for one
    meaning/reference, both within a language and
  • across languages (cross-linguistically)
  • e.g., sofa vs. couch
  • cat vs. gato (Spanish) vs. koshka (Russian)

8
  • Evidence for arbitrariness
  • 1) Multiple sound sequences for one
    meaning/reference, both within a language and
  • across languages (cross-linguistically)
  • e.g., sofa vs. couch
  • cat vs. gato (Spanish) vs. koshka (Russian)
  • 2) One sound sequence for multiple
    meanings/references, both within a language and
    cross-linguistically
  • e.g., bat (baseball vs. flying animal)

9
  • Evidence for arbitrariness
  • 1) Multiple sound sequences for one
    meaning/reference, both within a language and
  • across languages (cross-linguistically)
  • e.g., sofa vs. couch
  • cat vs. gato (Spanish) vs. koshka (Russian)
  • 2) One sound sequence for multiple
    meanings/references, both within a language and
    cross-linguistically
  • e.g., bat (baseball vs. flying animal)
  • 3) Language Change if the connection between
    form and meaning is non-arbitrary, languages
    should never change, but they do.

10
  • Some exceptions
  • Onomatopoeia- Use of words that are imitative of
    sounds occurring in nature.
  • e.g., Cows go moo in many languages (English,
    Greek, Hebrew . . .) Sound symbolism
    Phenomenon by which certain sounds are evocative
    of a particular meaning.
  • e.g., English sl- clusters slick, slippery,
    slide, sleek, slink . . .

11
Assumption 2 Language is rule-governed.
  • Evidence
  • Productivity The ability to produce and
    understand an infinite number of utterances that
    have never been expressed before.

12
Assumption 2 Language is rule-governed.
  • Evidence
  • Productivity The ability to produce and
    understand an infinite number of utterances that
    have never been expressed before.
  • Recursion A property of languages allowing for
    the repeated application of a rule, yielding
    infinitively long sentences or an infinite number
    of sentences.

13
Assumption 2 Language is rule-governed.
  • Evidence
  • Productivity The ability to produce and
    understand an infinite number of utterances that
    have never been expressed before.
  • Recursion A property of languages allowing for
    the repeated application of a rule, yielding
    infinitively long sentences or an infinite number
    of sentences.
  • Regular mistakes in child language acquisition
    (especially
  • Overgeneralization When a word or grammatical
    feature denotes more to a child than an adult)

14
  • But what do we mean by rules? (Prescriptivism vs.
    Descriptivism)
  • Descriptive Grammar- Objective description of a
    speakers knowledge of a language (competence)
    based on their use of the language (performance)
  • Prescriptive Grammar - A set of rules designed
    to give instruction as to the correct or
    proper way to speak. Based in social and
    linguistic prejudice against speakers of
    non-standard dialects. (see Handout 1.2)

15
  • Some ideas from Lippi-Green, Ch.1 to keep in
    mind here (Grammaticality and communicative
    effectiveness are distinct and independent
    issues (p. 10))
  • Linguistic grammaticality
  • Socially-Constructed grammaticality
  • Effectiveness is often times situational
  • TA using slang in the classroom (ineffective?)
  • TA using slang with friends at bar (effective)

16
Assumption 3 Speech should be considered primary
(as opposed to writing).
  • 1) Writing developed after speech (roughly 6,000
    years ago).

17
Assumption 3 Speech should be considered primary
(as opposed to writing).
  • 1) Writing developed after speech (roughly 6,000
    years ago).
  • 2) Not all languages are written (even today).

18
Assumption 3 Speech should be considered primary
(as opposed to writing).
  • 1) Writing developed after speech (roughly 6,000
    years ago).
  • 2) Not all languages are written (even today).
  • 3) Writing must be taught, but children learn to
    speak without overt instruction.

19
Assumption 3 Speech should be considered primary
(as opposed to writing).
  • 1) Writing developed after speech (roughly 6,000
    years ago).
  • 2) Not all languages are written (even today).
  • 3) Writing must be taught, but children learn to
    speak without overt instruction.
  • 4) Neurolingusitic evidence suggests that areas
    in the brain that are involved in the processing
    of written language are overlaid on speech areas.

20
Assumption 3 Speech should be considered primary
(as opposed to writing).
  • 1) Writing developed after speech (roughly 6,000
    years ago).
  • 2) Not all languages are written (even today).
  • 3) Writing must be taught, but children learn to
    speak without overt instruction.
  • 4) Neurolingusitic evidence suggests that areas
    in the brain that are involved in the processing
    of written language are overlaid on speech areas.
  • 5) Not all writing systems represent sounds of
    the language.

21
Assumption 4 All spoken languages change over
time. (L-G, 199710)
  • All areas of the grammar (areas of language use)
    change.
  • Lexicon (vocabulary of a language)
  • Sound structure
  • Tone and rhythm
  • Syntax (the way sentences are put together)
  • Meaning
  • Social status of linguistic features

22
Assumption 4 All spoken languages change over
time. (L-G, 199710)
  • All areas of the grammar (areas of language use)
    change.
  • Lexicon (vocabulary of a language)
  • Sound structure
  • Tone and rhythm
  • Syntax (the way sentences are put together)
  • Meaning
  • Social status of linguistic features
  • All areas of the grammar can also show variation
    (typically, only lasts over a particular time
    frame).

23
Assumption 5 Variation is natural.
  • 1) Three sources of variation in language use
  • Language-internal pressures (based on how we
    physically produce and perceive language)
  • Language-external influences (social behavior,
    the marking of group membership, peer pressure)
  • The use of language as a tool for creative
    expression

24
Assumption 5 Variation is natural.
  • 2) All areas of the grammar can show variation
    (see Assumption 4, above.).
  • 3) Variation occurs by a number of social
    characteristics in society
  • Age
  • Race
  • Gender/Sex
  • Ethnicity
  • Social Class
  • Geographic background (where you were raised)

25
  • Only some variation is stigmatized.
  • Non-stigmatized variation somebody vs. someone
  • Socially relevant variation house/happy (do you
    use an h or not?)
  • Socially relevant stigmatized variation
  • - progressive in vs. ing
  • - double negation
  • Why is only some variation stigmatized?
  • Clue Who uses stigmatized forms? And who gets to
  • say these forms are stigmatized?

26
  • Basic premise of sociolinguistics Speakers
    actively use variation in order to locate
    themselves in a highly complex, multidimensional
    social space. In other words, language is
    heterogeneous (variable). As we will see, this is
    not a problemheterogeneity has the social
    function of identifying and separating us from
    each other.

27
Class Exercise Perceptions and Reality
  • Step 1 Draw lines on your U.S. map around areas
    where people speak differently than you and/or
    differently than each other.
  • Step 2 Rate each of your areas according to how
    good the speech is in each area (1 best).
    You may add other comments as desired.
  • Step 3 Turn in your maps to me before you leave
    class today. Do not put your name on them.
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com