Unconscious Influences on Behavior - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 35
About This Presentation
Title:

Unconscious Influences on Behavior

Description:

subjects read stories that either did or did not have many words with 'u' sound. rated stories with 'u' sound as less ... published Subliminal Seduction ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:280
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 36
Provided by: OIT299
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Unconscious Influences on Behavior


1
Unconscious Influences on Behavior
2
Major Point
  • We are not always consciously aware of why we do
    what we do

3
Facial Feedback
  • arrangement of facial muscles influences a
    persons emotional state and judgments
  • Zajonc et al. (1989)
  • subjects read stories that either did or did not
    have many words with u sound
  • rated stories with u sound as less pleasant and
    less well-liked

4
Subliminal Perception
  • there have been a number of widely circulated but
    fraudulent claims of subliminal perception

5
Subliminal Advertising
  • late 1950s
  • movie theater in Fort Lee, NJ
  • advertising executive arranged to have Eat
    Popcorn and Drink Coke shown for 1/3 of a
    millisecond every 5 seconds during every film for
    6 weeks
  • claimed that coke sales went up 18 popcorn
    sales went up 58
  • executive later admitted that he had faked data
    to save his then-failing ad agency

6
Subliminal Advertising
  • Key (1973)
  • published Subliminal Seduction
  • argued that advertisers were routinely using
    sexually suggestive subliminal messages to get
    consumers to buy products
  • example hidden image of a nude woman
    superimposed on the ice cubes in a glass of scotch

7
Back Masking
  • Hutchins--early 1980s, minister in Hot Springs,
    AR
  • claimed that Satanic messages were being inserted
    into recordings of popular music
  • audible if records were played backwards
  • if played forwards, back masked messages
    supposedly entered unconscious, causing person to
    do immoral things

8
The Evidence
  • no well-conducted studies have ever found any
    behavioral effects of back-masked or hidden
    messages

9
A Caveat
  • people do see or hear what they interpret as
    hidden messages when presented with any
    relatively complex stimulus
  • I saw Satan is heard by some listeners when
    Lewis Carolls Jabberwocky is played backward,
    even though no back-masked message has been
    inserted
  • probably reflects confirmation bias

10
Question
  • If subliminal advertising and back masking dont
    work, are there other forms subliminal perception?

11
Answer
  • people can have emotional responses to stimuli
    they are not aware of having seen/heard
  • people often know more about a stimulus than they
    believe

12
Emotional Responses
  • Kunst-Wilson Zajonc (1980)
  • used tachistoscope to show subjects polygons for
    1 millisecond (subliminal duration)
  • showed subjects pairs of polygons--1 they had
    previously seen and 1 new polygon (nonsubliminal
    duration)
  • asked subjects
  • which one have you seen before?
  • which one do you like better?

13
  • Kunst-Wilson Zajonc (1980)
  • question 1 subjects picked previously seen
    polygon 48 of time
  • question 2 subjects picked previously seen
    polygon 60 of time
  • subjects liked the previously seen polygon better
  • subliminal mere exposure effect

14
Emotional Responses (continued)
  • Lazarus McCleary (1951)
  • conditioned subjects to have an emotional
    response to nonsense syllables (VUS) by paring
    syllables with electric shock
  • used tachistoscope to show subjects emotionally
    conditioned syllables and neutral syllables (at
    subliminal durations)
  • found that subjects had higher GSRs to
    emotionally conditioned syllables (even when they
    couldnt accurately identify syllables)

15
What You Think You Know
  • Blackwell (1952)
  • presented subjects with dim and very brief light
    in 1 of 4 quadrants on screen
  • asked subjects to identify location of light
  • if initial response was wrong, asked subject to
    guess again
  • probability of subsequent correct response was
    better than chance
  • subjects knew more than they thought they did

16
Summary Thus Far
  • it is possible to make accurate judgments and be
    influenced by stimuli that are below the
    subjective threshold for perception, but above
    the objective threshold for perception
  • objective threshold level of presentation at
    which subject has obtained no information about
    stimulus
  • subjective threshold level of presentation at
    which subject believes he has obtained no
    information about an event

17
Cognitive Dissonance
  • People prefer that their beliefs and behavior are
    consistent
  • When behavior conflicts with a belief, people
    find this to be unpleasant (experience
    dissonance)
  • People want to eliminate dissonance
  • In many cases, people will change a belief to
    make it consistent with behavior

18
Festinger Carlsmith (1959)
  • Method
  • subjects lined wooden spools up on tray and
    turned pegs on board
  • subjects rated interest level of task (-5 to 5)
  • 1/3 subjects were asked to create positive
    expectancy for next subject, were paid 1, and
    re-rated task
  • 1/3 of subjects were asked to create positive
    expectancy for next subject, were paid 20,
    re-rated task

19
  • Results
  • control subjects -.45
  • 20 subjects -.05
  • 1 subjects 1.35
  • Interpretation
  • 1 subjects experienced dissonance
  • behavior (telling next subject study was
    interesting) was inconsistent with belief (study
    was dull)
  • lacked sufficient justification for behavior
    (only paid 1)
  • had to revise belief to make it consistent with
    behavior

20
Zimabardo et al. (1965)
  • Method
  • army reservists asked to rate survival foods
  • rated fried grasshopper negatively
  • 1/2 soldiers are asked to eat grasshopper by
    warm, friendly, likeable officer
  • 1/2 soldiers are asked to eat grasshopper by
    cold, distant, unfriendly officer
  • then asked to re-rate grasshopper

21
  • Result
  • ratings of subjects in unfriendly officer group
    were much higher than friendly officer group
  • Interpretation
  • subjects in unfriendly officer group had
    experienced dissonance
  • behavior (eating grasshopper) was inconsistent
    with belief (grasshopper is gross) and they
    lacked sufficient justification for doing it
  • had to change belief to bring it in line with
    behavior

22
The End of the World As We Know It
  • Festinger et al. (1956)
  • infiltrated group of people led by Marion Keech
  • Mrs. Keech received messages from aliens that
    world would end on Dec. 21
  • group of believers would be picked up by flying
    saucer at midnight on Dec. 20
  • many followers quit their jobs and sold all their
    possessions

23
  • midnight came nothing happened
  • at 445 a.m., Mrs. Keech had a new vision
  • world had been spared because of the impressive
    faith of her group
  • follow-up indicated there was virtually no change
    in the acceptance of her teachings
  • only 2 of 11 abandoned group
  • degree to which group attempted to attract other
    followers substantially increased after Dec. 21

24
Justification of Investment
  • aka justification of effort
  • The more effort, time, money etc. that you have
    put into obtaining something, the better you will
    like it
  • probably explains effectiveness of Greek hazing
    and military boot camp in turning new recruits
    into loyal members

25
Necessary Conditions
  • People have to perceive that they had some degree
    of choice in their behavior
  • Belief has to have some real world consequences

26
Other examples of unconscious influences on
behavior
  • Memory
  • explicit memory knowledge that can be
    intentionally retrieved
  • implicit memories of events that influence us,
    but that we cannot intentionally recall
  • can detect implicit memory using stem completion
    task
  • Patients with Korsakoffs Syndrome
  • show deficits in explicit memory, but not
    implicit memory

27
Priming
  • Marcel (1983)
  • Method
  • presented subjects with 3-word sequence
  • example tree-palm-hand
  • dependent variable was lexical decision time for
    hand
  • Results
  • if palm was presented supraliminally, it
    increased the lexical decision time for hand
  • if palm was presented subliminally, it
    decreased the lexical decision time for hand

28
Priming (continued)
  • Groeger (1988)
  • Method
  • first showed subjects a word
  • depending on condition, word was either at
    subliminal duration (subject could obtain no
    conscious info. about word) or supraliminal (just
    long enough for subjects to obtain partial info.
    about word)
  • then showed subjects a list that didnt actually
    contain the first word
  • asked subjects which word on list was the one
    they were first shown

29
Groeger (continued)
  • Results
  • if first word was shown supraliminally, subjects
    chose a word that was similar in structure
  • if first word was shown subliminally, subjects
    chose a word that was similar in meaning
  • Found similar results for auditory stimuli
  • if first word was presented supraliminally,
    subjects chose a word that was similar in sound
  • if first word was presented subliminally,
    subjects chose a word that was similar in meaning

30
Unconscious Influences on Social Behavior
  • Lewicki (1986)
  • Method
  • during a preexperimental interview, subject was
    either insulted by the interviewer or treated in
    a neutral manner
  • subjects were then asked to go into another room
    and select whichever of two experimenter was free
    to administer the rest of the experiment
  • because both experimenters were actually free,
    subjects had to make a choice about which
    experimenter to choose
  • one of the two experimenters physically resembled
    the interviewer who had insulted the subject

31
Lewicki (continued)
  • Results
  • 80 of subjects who had previously been insulted
    chose the experimenter who did not look like the
    interviewer
  • 43 of subjects who had not been insulted choose
    the experimenter who did not look like the
    interviewer
  • in a subsequent questionnaire, almost all
    subjects indicated that their choice was
    completely random

32
Conclusions
  • Many pop psych claims about subliminal perception
    have not been supported by research
  • Research has shown that we are not always
    consciously aware of the reasons why we do what
    we do

33
Research-supported examples of unconscious
information processing
  • People can have emotional responses to stimuli
    that they are not aware of having been exposed to
  • conditioned response to nonsense syllables
  • People can know more about a stimulus than they
    think they do
  • dots of light in visual quadrant

34
Summary (continued)
  • People will often change their beliefs to make
    them consistent with behavior, especially if they
    lack sufficient justification for their behavior
  • cognitive dissonance
  • People can be influenced by stimuli they cant
    remember having been exposed to
  • implicit memory

35
Summary (continued)
  • A stimulus can have different effects depending
    on whether it is presented subliminally or
    supraliminally
  • lexical decision time
  • choice of word that is similar in meaning vs.
    structure
  • Previous experience can have an unconscious
    influence on social behavior
  • subjects who were insulted by the interviewer
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com