WP5workshop

1
WP5-workshop

• 7-9th February 2005
• Silkeborg, Denmark

2
(No Transcript)
3
(No Transcript)
4
(No Transcript)
5
Modelling of catchment
Delivery of annual results and log book with
information on time spend and missing data
Database, QC and statistical analysis of model
performance
Interview of catchment data holders and managers
on their perception of model results, their
future use of similar models and costing of
missing data for successful modelling
Reporting
6
WP 5Expected contributions from model owners
(QTs)

• Task 5.2 Application of QTs
• Finalising modelling of the WP5 catchments
  (Deadline
  15th December 2004).
• Delivery of modelling results to WP-leader in
  standard template
  (Deadline 20th December 2004).
• Delivery of log-book to WP-leader in standard
  template
  (Deadline 20th December 2004).
• Writing a short report with results and submit to
  WP-leader for inclusion in a catchment report to
  catchment data holder (Deadline 28th
  February 2005).

7
Status for WP5 modelling

• All nine QT owners except NL-CAT were confident
  that they would be able to cope with the
  deadlines for finishing the WP5 modelling. NL-CAT
  has finished the first catchment but can at first
  finish the remaining two catchments during
  February 2005.
• It is vital for the success of the WP5 meeting in
  February 2005 that QT-owners follows the
  deadlines for finishing the modelling and
  delivering data to WP5-leader for assessment of
  results.

8
Reporting procedure

• Suggestions
• Reporting of results from modelling will be done
  for main outlet stations and sub-catchment
  stations on an annual basis based on standard
  templates delivered by WP5 leader.
• Source apportionment done for main outlet station
  only in standard template delivered by WP5
  leader.
• Log book information will be done also based on a
  standard template delivered by WP-leader.

9
Reporting of results

• Annual values for flow and N, P-load (Observed
  and simulated) for the main outlet station and
  sub-catchment stations in each of the 14
  catchments.
• Annual retention for the same stations specified
  for surface waters and groundwater.
• Source apportionment as an average for a
  specified and agreed period (if possible last 5
  years) in the catchment reported with a content
  as agreed in WP3/WP4.
• Log-book (key missing input data, etc.)

10
WP5Quantification tools applied on EUROHARP
catchments

• QT 1 - ANIMO 3 catchments
• QT2 Irish method 3 catchments
• QT 3 N-LESS 3 catchments
• QT 4 - MONERIS 14 catchments
• QT 5 TRK (SOIL-N/HBV) 3 catchments
• QT 6 - SWAT 3 catchments
• QT 7 EVENFLOW 3 catchments
• QT 8 - NOPOLU 14 catchments
• QT 9 Source apportionment 14 catchments
• A grand total of 60 QT applications 4 per
  catchment

11
Models and catchments
12
Log-book list of missing data
13
Odense Å, Denmark
14
(No Transcript)
15
Odense Denmark

• Missing data for SA
• None

16
Diffuse loss of N and P 1989-2001
17
Catchment N and P
18
Log-book list of missing data
19
Zelivka, Czech Republic
20
(No Transcript)
21
Zelivka, Czech Republic

• Missing data for SA
• None
• However, problem with P - negative diffuse loss
  !!
• May be too low retention in reservoirs -
  recalculation
• with new NUTRET reservoir model needed.

22
Diffuse loss of N and P 1993-2000
23
Catchment N and P1993-2000
24
Log-book list of missing data
25
(No Transcript)
26
(No Transcript)
27
Vechte, Netherlands/Germany

• Missing data for SA
• Runoff had to be upscaled from another station
  than the TN and TP concentration data was taken.
• No background N and P losses.
• German part only point source information from
  oneyear (1999).
• No data on discharges from scattered
  dwellings/industry.

28
Diffuse loss of N and P 1993-2000
29
Catchment N and P1993-2000
30
Log-book list of missing data
31
Uecker, Germany
32
(No Transcript)
33
Uecker, Germany

• Missing data for SA
• Need to upscale daily discharge from another
  station than where N and P concentrations exist.
• No background nutrient data.
• Point source data only from one year 1999.
• No information on scattered dwellings or
  industrial plants.

34
Diffuse loss of N and P 1995-1999
35
Catchment N and P1995-1999
36
Log-book list of missing data
37
Susve, Lithuania
38
(No Transcript)
39
Susve, Lithuania

• Missing data for SA
• Only mean monthly discharge data.
• No background data.
• No information on scattered dwellings.
• No industrial discharges ?

40
Diffuse loss of N and P 1997-2001
41
Catchment N and P1997-2001
42
Log-book list of missing data
43
Vilaine, France
44
(No Transcript)
45
Vilain, France

• Missing data for SA
• Only DIN for SA.
• Only point sources from 1990 and 1996 forward.
• No background data.
• No atmospheric deposition.
• No scattered dwellings discharges.

46
Diffuse loss of N and P 1990-1999
47
Catchment N and P1990-1999
48
Log-book list of missing data
49
Eurajoki, Finland
50
(No Transcript)
51
Eurajoki, Finland

• Missing data for SA
• No background data.
• N and P from other station than discharge but
  only minor upscaling.

52
Diffuse loss of N and P 1989-2000
53
Catchment N and P1990-2000
54
Log-book list of missing data
55
Attert, Luxemboug
56
(No Transcript)
57
Attert, Luxembourg

• Missing data for SA
• Only NO3-data.
• Point sources only for 2001.
• Background only for one year (1999).

58
Diffuse loss of N and P 1999-2002
59
Catchment N and P1999-2002
60
Log-book list of missing data
61
Guadiamar, Spain
62
(No Transcript)
63
Guadiamar, Spain

• Missing data for SA
• Only DRP and NO3 - monthly average.
• No recent monitoring data.
• Bad discharge data.
• No point source information.
• No background data.
• No atmospheric deposition.

64
Diffuse loss of N and P 1981-1997
65
Catchment N and P1992-1997
66
Log-book list of missing data
67
Lough Derg and Lough Ree, Ireland
68
(No Transcript)
69
Lough Derg and Lough Ree, Ireland

• Missing data for SA
• No TP (TRP) and only DIN.
• No background data.
• Point sources only for 1998.

70
Diffuse loss of N and P 1999-2001
71
Catchment N and P1999-2002
72
Log-book list of missing data
73
(No Transcript)
74
Pinios, Greece

• Missing data for SA
• Very poor monitoring data - only one year TP and
  5 year NO3.
• No information on point sources.
• No background data.
• No atm. deposition data.

75
Diffuse loss of N and P 1999-2001
76
Catchment N and P1999-2002
77
Log-book list of missing data
78
Kapos, Hungary
79
(No Transcript)
80
Kapos, Hungary

• Missing data for SA
• Only DIN and DRP (no TN and TP).
• Monitoring data 1990-1996.
• Only point source data for 2000.
• No discharges from scattered dwellings.
• No background data.

81
Diffuse loss of N and P 1990-1996
82
Catchment N and P1990-1996
83
Log-book list of missing data
84
Rönne Å, Sweden
85
(No Transcript)
86
Rönne Aa, Sweden

• Missing data for SA
• OK

87
Diffuse loss of N and P 1989-2000
88
Catchment N and P1990-2000
89
Log-book list of missing data
90
Gurk, Austria
91
(No Transcript)
92
Gurk, Austria

• Missing data for SA
• Only DIN data.
• Only point sources from year 2001.
• No background data.
• No atmospheric deposition.

93
Diffuse loss of N and P 1992-1999
94
Catchment N and P1992-1999
95
Deliverables WP5Task 5.2

• D5.3-A report with the results of source
  apportionment of nutrient loads in the 17
  EUROHARP catchments (partly input to WP6).
• D5.4-A report for each of the 8 source orientated
  quantification tools based on the results
  obtained for the catchments modelled (partly
  input to WP6).

96
Deliverables WP5Task 5.3 and 5.4

• D5.5-A report on the applicability and
• performance of the 8 source orientated
• quantification tools on the 17 EUROHARP
• catchments which includes end-user
• evaluation of the applicability, performance,
• strengths and weaknesses of all the
• quantification tools tested (partly input WP6).