Consumers Rule - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 29
About This Presentation
Title:

Consumers Rule

Description:

The traditional communications model doesn't tell the whole story... Pepsi ad: 'This year, hit the beach topless' with a Pepsi bottle cap lying on ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:145
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 30
Provided by: mkc61
Category:
Tags: beach | consumers | rule

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Consumers Rule


1
Attitude Change and Interactive Communications Ch
apter 8
2
Communication Model
Figure 8.1
3
Interactive Communications
  • The traditional communications model doesnt tell
    the whole story
  • Consumers have many more choices available and
    greater control to process messages
  • Permission marketing

4
Updated Communications Model
  • Consumers are now proactive in communications
    process
  • VCRs, DVRs, video-on-demand, pay-per-view TV,
    Caller ID, Internet

Figure 8.2
5
New Message Formats
  • M-commerce
  • Worldwide revenue will reach 39 billion in 2007!
  • Blogging
  • Moblogging
  • Video blogging (vlogging)
  • Podcasting
  • RSS (Really Simple Sydication)
  • Flogs (fake blogs)
  • Discussion Are flogs ethical?

6
Interactive Response Levels
  • Response can be more than just a
    purchase/transaction
  • First-order response transaction (sales data)
  • Second-order response nontransaction customer
    feedback

7
The Source
  • Source effects the same words by different
    people can have very different meanings
  • Source credibility
  • Source attractiveness
  • Match between consumers needs and offered rewards
    of source
  • Match between source and type of product
  • Experts for utilitarian products
  • Celebrities for social risk/impression products
  • Typical consumers for everyday/low-risk products

8
Source Credibility
  • A sources perceived expertise, objectivity, or
    trustworthiness
  • Consumers beliefs that communicator is competent
    and provides competitor information
  • Credible source is persuasive when consumer has
    no formed opinion about product
  • Endorsement contract large profits

9
Sleeper Effect
  • Over time, disliked sources can still get a
    message across effectively
  • We forget about negative source while changing
    our attitudes
  • Explanations
  • Dissociative cue hypothesis
  • Availability-valence hypothesis
  • Discussion Theres a saying in public relations
    that any publicity is good publicity. Do you
    agree?

10
Source Biases
  • Consumer beliefs about product can be weakened by
    a source perceived to be biased
  • Knowledge bias
  • Reporting bias (hired gun)

11
Source Attractiveness
  • Perceived social value of source
  • Physical appearance
  • Personality
  • Social status
  • Similarity

12
What Is Beautiful Is Good
  • Halo effect
  • Good-looking people are thought to be smarter,
    cooler, and happier
  • Consistency principle
  • Physically attractive source leads to attitude
    change
  • Directs attention to marketing stimuli (ads with
    attractive models)
  • Beauty source of information (especially for
    attractiveness- relevant products)

13
Star Power
  • Celebrities as communications sources
  • Tiger Woods 62 million/year in endorsements!
  • Famous faces capture attention and are processed
    more efficiently by the brain
  • Enhance company images and brand attitudes
  • Celebrities embody cultural and product meanings
  • Q-Score for celebrity endorsers
  • Match-up hypothesis

14
Nonhuman Endorsers
  • Often, celebrities motives are suspect as
    endorsers of mismatched products
  • Thus, marketers seek alternative endorsers
  • Cartoon characters
  • Mascots/animals
  • Avatars

15
The Message
  • Positive and negative effects of elements in TV
    commercials
  • Most important feature stressing unique product
    attribute/benefit

Table 8.2 (Abridged)
16
The Message (Contd)
  • Selected message issues facing a marketer (full
    list on p. 280)
  • Message Is it conveyed in words or pictures?
  • How often should message be repeated?
  • Should it draw an explicit conclusion?
  • Should it show both sides of argument?
  • Should it explicitly compare product to
    competitors?

17
Sending the Message
  • Visual vs. verbal communication of message
  • Visual images big emotional impact
  • Verbal message high-involvement situations
  • Factual information
  • More effective when reinforced by a framed
    picture
  • Require more frequent exposures (due to decay)

18
Vividness
  • Powerful description/graphics command attention
    and are strongly embedded in memory
  • Active mental imagery (vs. abstract stimuli)
  • Concrete discussion of product attribute

19
Two-Factor Theory
  • Repetition can be a double-edged sword
  • Mere exposure phenomenon vs. habituation

Figure 8.4
20
One- vs. Two-sided Arguments
  • One-sided supportive arguments
  • Two-sided both positive and negative information
  • Refutational arguments increase source
    credibility by reducing reporting bias
  • Positive attributes should refute presented
    negative attributes
  • Effective with well-educated and not-yet-loyal
    audiences

21
Comparative Advertising
  • Message compares two recognizable brands on
    specific attributes
  • New OcuClear relieves three times longer than
    Visine
  • Butconfrontational approach can result in source
    derogation
  • Effective for a new product that
  • Does not merely say it is better than leading
    brand
  • Does not compare itself to an obviously superior
    competitor
  • Discuss some conditions in which it would be
    advisable to use a comparative advertising
    strategy

22
Emotional vs. Rational Appeals
  • Appeal to the head or to the heart?
  • Many companies use an emotional strategy when
    consumers do not find differences among brands
  • Especially brands in well-established, mature
    categories (e.g., cars and greeting cards)
  • Recall of ad contents tends to be better for
    thinking ads
  • Although conventional ad effectiveness measures
    may not be entirely valid to assess emotional ads

23
Sex Appeals
  • The prevalence of sexual appeals varies from
    country to country
  • Nudity/undressed models in print ads generates
    negative feelings/tension among same-sex
    consumers
  • Erotic ad content draws attention, but strong
    sexual ad imagery may make consumers less likely
    to
  • Buy a product (unless product is related to sex)
  • Process and recall ads content

24
Humorous Appeals
  • Specific cultures have different senses of humor
  • Overall, humorous ads do get attention
  • Funny ad as source of distraction
  • Inhibits counterarguing, thus increasing message
    acceptance

25
Humorous Appeals (Contd)
  • Humor is more effective when it
  • Doesnt swamp message of clearly defined brand
  • Doesnt make fun of potential consumer
  • Is appropriate to products image

26
Fear Appeals
  • Emphasize negative consequences that can occur
    unless consumer changes behavior/ attitude
  • Fear is common in advertising (especially in
    social marketing)
  • Most effective
  • Moderate threat
  • Presented solution to problem
  • Highly credible source
  • Not all threats are equally effective at inducing
    a fear response
  • The strongest threats are not always the most
    persuasive

27
Message as Art Form
  • Marketers as storytellers (allegory)
  • Using literary devices to communicate product
    benefits/meanings
  • Metaphor (A is B)
  • Similie (A is like B)
  • Resonance play on words with picture
  • Pepsi ad This year, hit the beach topless with
    a Pepsi bottle cap lying on the sand (see Table
    8.3 for full list of examples)

28
ELM
  • Receiver will follow one of two routes to
    persuasion

Figure 8.5
29
ELM Steak or Sizzle?
  • ELM research indicates that relative
    effectiveness of a strong message and favorable
    source depends on consumers level of involvement
    with advertised product
  • Highly involved consumers look for steak
  • Strong message arguments
  • Those less involved look for sizzle
  • Packaging colors/images, celebrity endorsers
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com