See movie trailers, press articles, etc. ... D. Those wit - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 34
About This Presentation
Title:

See movie trailers, press articles, etc. ... D. Those wit

Description:

See movie trailers, press articles, etc. ... D. Those with certifications like CSDP, or CSDA (discussed in an upcoming ) ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:154
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 35
Provided by: per1
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: See movie trailers, press articles, etc. ... D. Those wit


1
The State of Software Engineering Professionalism
  • October 2007
  • Timothy C. Lethbridge

2
Overview
  • Part 1 What is a profession and professionalism?
  • Types of professions
  • Attributes of professions
  • Part 2 Professionalism in software engineering
  • The conundrum
  • Development of attributes of the SE profession
  • Details
  • SWEBOK, SE2004, certification, licensing
  • Part 3 Directions forward

3
Professionalism
  • Behaving and acting consistently with the norms
    of a profession

4
What are professions?
  • A full-time, paid occupation recognized in
    society as requiring advanced knowledge and/or
    skill, with at least one association members can
    or must join, and a code of conduct/ethics.
  • Some professions are legally recognized
  • Governments have passed laws recognizing members
  • In turn, members have a legal responsibility to
    uphold the interests of society, above other
    interests
  • Others professions are less formal

5
Legally recognized professions (1)
  • I will use to mark uses where use of the term
    will be disputed
  • A. Professions with practice-restricting licenses
    in many jurisdictions
  • Practice or aspects of practice are limited to
    license holders
  • Medicine, Dentistry, Chiropractic, Pharmacy, Law,
    School Teaching, Engineering (in theory in
    Canada), Architecture
  • Some licensed professions in Ontario
    http//www.citizenship.gov.on.ca/english/working/c
    areer/
  • Licensed professions in New York State
    http//www.op.nysed.gov/title8.htm
  • Truck Driving (required training and drivers
    license)
  • Divinity (those licensed can perform marriages,
    etc), etc.

6
Legally recognized professions (2)
  • B. Professions with signoff-restricting licenses
    or certifications,
  • A licensed/certified person must approve certain
    types of work done, but may delegate most of the
    work to others
  • Anyone may do certain of the work, but members
    have a legal basis to state to others that they
    are competent
  • Engineering (in some places), Financial Analysis
    (CFA), Chartered Accountancy (CA), Certified
    Management Accountancy (CMA), Logistics,
    Electrician, Plumber
  • C. Professions with legal standing but where
    there is no legal requirement for signoff of work
  • Information Systems Professional (ISP) in Canada
  • See http//local.cips.ca/ontario/documents/pr21_fi
    nal.pdf
  • And http//local.cips.ca/ontario/

7
Professions without legal recognition
  • D. Professions with optional certifications that
    do not have legal weight
  • Software Development (CSDP), Project Management
  • E Professions not generally licensed or
    certified, but where a degree or diploma provides
    evidence of competence
  • Scientist (various types), Journalist
  • F Other professions where an apprenticeship
    model is typically followed
  • Mason
  • G. Professions where the limiting factor is
    simply that you must have sufficient skill or
    knowledge that someone is willing to pay you
    enough to do it full time
  • University Professor, Sport player (Hockey,
    Golf, Football), Actor, Artist, Musician,
    Politician

8
Key attributes of a profession
  • Public recognition Others outside profession X
    understand what a member of profession X does and
    can do
  • So outsiders know who to consult when they want
    some service
  • So outsiders can feel confident they are getting
    work done by someone competent
  • To ensure public recognition There must be
  • A. A defined scope of practice
  • B. A recorded body of knowledge (principles,
    facts, best practices)
  • C. Codes of practice and ethics
  • consequences when they are violated
  • D. Methods to educate/train, accredit education,
    and ensure continuing education
  • E. Well-understood criteria for membership
  • F. Organizations to establish and administer the
    above

9
Other attributes of many professions
  • Membership is limited / controlled
  • As opposed to de-facto
  • Self-governance
  • The profession controls all attributes described
    on the last slide
  • Members are disciplined by their organization
  • Legal recognition and responsibility
  • Includes the concept of malpractice
  • Respectability / Status / Social Privilege
  • Private practice with individual clients
  • Work autonomy
  • You are able to control aspects of how you do
    your work, even when working for an employer
  • Your responsibility to society and your
    profession comes first in case of conflict

10
Specializations / Specialties
  • Most professions have well-defined specialties,
    often with their own certifications and
    associations
  • Medicine Board-certified specialties
  • IT
  • Project management Professional
    http//www.pmi.org
  • Information security (Certified Information
    Security Manager) http//www.isaca.org/Template.cf
    m?SectionCISM_Certification
  • Hacking (Certified Ethical Hacker)
    http//www.certifiedethicalhacker.com/
  • Certified Information Technology Professional
  • Vendor-specific certifications (Microsoft,
    Oracle)
  • Database administration, UI design
  • etc.

11
So what does it mean to exhibit professionalism?
  • Obtain the required education and ongoing
    education (D)
  • Adhere to the codes of practice and ethics (C)
  • Apply the principles and knowledge properly (B)
  • Practice within the scope of your expertise (A,
    D) and defer to others when boundaries are
    reached
  • Obtain and maintain appropriate credentials (E)
  • Participate in the appropriate professional
    organizations (F)

12
Overview
  • Part 1 What is a profession and professionalism?
  • Types of professions
  • Attributes of professions
  • Part 2 Professionalism in software engineering
  • The conundrum
  • Development of attributes of the SE profession
  • Details
  • SWEBOK, SE2004, certification, licensing
  • Part 3 Directions forward

13
The conundrum in software engineering (1)
  • Almost all industrial software development is
    software engineering, in the sense described by
    SWEBOK and SE2004 (discussed later)
  • Bad development is just bad engineering
  • There is very little true computer science
    practiced in industry
  • But engineering societies define only a subset of
    SE as engineering
  • They focus on aspects of development that most
    directly impact public safety
  • Public uses of the term software engineering is
    now widely applied to developers in general
  • See movie trailers, press articles, etc.
  • Software development, computer science and
    software engineering are overlapping terms in
    many peoples minds
  • To avoid confusion, there perhaps ought to be
    just one profession with specializations

14
The conundrum in software engineering (2)
  • There are vast numbers of practitioners
  • Applying a licensing model strictly would not
    make sense
  • Applying licensure to only certain types of
    software would be confusing and discriminatory
  • There are too many fuzzy boundaries and overlaps
  • Requiring signoff from an engineer would still
    require vast numbers of developers to become
    licensed
  • In Canada, there are two legally standing
    designations for a developer
  • ISP
  • P.Eng
  • Most developers have neither and dont see much
    benefit in obtaining either
  • Those who feel they are computer scientists, but
    not software engineers (e.g. theoreticians) are
    starting to feel marginalized

15
Professional Engineering in Canada
  • Engineers Canada (CCPE) definition
  • Planning, designing, composing, evaluating,
    advising, reporting, supervising or managing
  • AND
  • Applying engineering principles
  • AND
  • Safeguarding life, health, property, economic
    interests, public welfare or the environment
  • http//www.engineerscanada.ca/e/files/guideline_pr
    actice_with.pdf
  • The above clearly applies to software engineering
  • In Ontario, economic interests is not mentioned
  • http//www.e-laws.gov.on.ca/html/statutes/english/
    elaws_statutes_90p28_e.htm
  • Most graduates of engineering programs have not
    bothered to get their license

16
Professional engineering in the US (New York
State as an example)
  • Consultation, investigation, planning, design or
    supervision of construction or operation
  • In Connection with
  • utilities, structures, buildings, machines,
    equipment, processes, works, or projects
  • Wherein
  • the safeguarding of life, health and property is
    concerned
  • When
  • such service or work requires the application of
    engineering principles and data
  • http//www.op.nysed.gov/article145.htm
  • Note that Texas specifically includes software
    engineering in its list of specialties

17
Critical information infrastructure
  • The Government of Canada has listed software for
    the the following as part of the critical
    information infrastructure
  • Energy
  • Communications (telecommunications, broadcasting,
    Internet)
  • Finance (banking, securities, investment)
  • Health care (hospitals, health information
    systems, pharmacies)
  • Food and agriculture (safety, distribution)
  • Water (drinking and waste)
  • Transportation (all kinds)
  • Government services
  • Certain manufacturing industries (e.g. chemical)
  • http//ww3.ps-sp.gc.ca/research/resactivites/CI/20
    03D022_ENG_FINAL.pdf
  • The list will likely expand as society becomes
    increasingly dependent on software

18
Development of key professional attributes in SE
(1)
  • Public recognition
  • The term is now in widespread use, and is favored
    over most other terms in the press, etc.
  • Body of knowledge
  • Defined in SWEBOK (See upcoming slide)
  • Also many other well-defined standards (e.g.
    IEEE)
  • But consequences for violation are not evident
  • Scope of practice
  • Tools, techniques, methods defined in SWEBOK
  • Also other definitions by engineering societies
  • But the application dimension needs better
    definition

19
Development of key professional attributes in SE
(2)
  • Code of ethics
  • Established by IEEE and ACM
  • http//www.acm.org/about/se-code
  • Education
  • Undergraduate programs established
  • Standard SE2004 curriculum defined by IEEE/ACM
  • http//sites.computer.org/ccse/
  • Accreditation of programs has been undertaken
  • in Canada by the CEAB and CSAC
  • In the US by ABET

20
Development of key professional attributes in SE
(3)
  • Criteria for membership
  • A subject of argument!
  • Could be
  • A. All who do development (de-facto membership)
  • Includes many people with questionable knowledge
    and skill
  • B. All with CS or SE degrees
  • But what about many Computer Engineers, and do
    all CS degree holders have key SE knowledge?
  • C. All who are licensed professional engineers or
    ISP holders doing development
  • Seen as overly restrictive by many
  • D. Those with certifications like CSDP, or CSDA
    (discussed in an upcoming slide)
  • There is concern that certifications may
    proliferate and/or have low uptake
  • E. Some combination of B, C or D

21
Development of key professional attributes in SE
(4)
  • Organizations to administer the above
  • Internationally, IEEE Computer Society, ACM, IFIP
  • Standards bodies ISO, IEC, ITU, etc.
  • Nationally
  • US IEEE USA, ACM
  • Canada
  • CIPS
  • http//www.cips.ca
  • Engineers Canada
  • http//www.engineerscanada.ca/
  • Formerly Canadian Council of Professional
    Engineers
  • UK British Computer Society, IET
  • State, provincial level Professional Engineering
    Societies or Boards (PEO, APEGGA, etc.), CIPS
    provincial chapters
  • Are there too many for a coherent profession?
  • And there are others in specialties (SPIN, AAAI,
    etc.)

22
Body of Knowledge SWEBOK (1)
  • www.swebok.org
  • Current (2004) version was the result of
    extensive consultation and review
  • Divides software engineering knowledge into 10
    knowledge areas
  • Requirements, Design,Construction, Testing,
    Maintenance, Configuration Management, SE
    Management, SE Process, SE Tools and Methods,
    Software Quality
  • Plus related disciplines
  • History ACM pulled out due to concerns they
    would appear to be backing a licensing model

23
SWEBOK (2)
  • Concerns
  • The body relies on references that are not well
    backed up by evidence
  • Initial versions of chapters were written by
    experts with widely varying styles
  • There was much overlap
  • The review process didnt clean this up enough
  • Some areas of SE were relegated to related
    disciplines
  • Clearly does not provide sufficient basis for
    determining malpractice
  • Ongoing work
  • Development of the next version is underway
  • Includes alignment of KAs with SE2004 and
    CSDP/CSDA

24
Curriculum SE2004
  • http//sites.computer.org/ccse
  • Developed between 2001 and 2004 by the IEEE and
    ACM
  • Based originally on SWEBOK KAs, but added basic
    science, and diverged during the review process
  • The next steps
  • There is a group looking at defining what is
    needed in a masters-level education in SE

25
Certification CSDP
  • CSDP
  • Certified Software Development Professional
  • The word engineering avoided for legal reasons
  • Requires
  • Degree
  • Four years experience
  • Passing of an exam
  • Ongoing professional development activity
  • lt1000 people since 2001
  • But this matches the early history of some other
    certifications
  • Currently undergoing a refresh cycle

26
Certification CSDA
  • CSDA
  • Certified Software Development Associate
  • Requires
  • Passing of an exam (can be written in final year
    of a degree)
  • A university degree or documented experience (to
    be defined)
  • Development now in beta stage
  • Volunteers needed (graduating students)
  • http//www.computer.org/certification

27
Certification ISO/IEC CD 24773
  • A standard for development of professional
    certifications
  • CSDP and CSDA comply

28
Harmonization efforts
  • The next version of SWEBOK, CSDP/CSDA and SE
    curriculum will use the same base categories

29
Licensing
  • It is becoming easier for software developers to
    become licensed
  • Some have led the way
  • Mostly among academics
  • Certain provincial initiatives

30
Overview
  • Part 1 What is a profession and professionalism?
  • Types of professions
  • Attributes of professions
  • Part 2 Professionalism in software engineering
  • The conundrum
  • Development of attributes of the SE profession
  • Details
  • SWEBOK, SE2004, certification, licensing
  • Part 3 Directions forward

31
Where do we need to go?
  • An established profession of software engineering
    clearly already exists
  • But it is not unified, and needs improvement
  • Our main objective should be
  • Improve the quality of software by improving the
    background of practitioners
  • Quality must be broadly interpreted
  • Usability, reliability, maintainability, safety
  • Not just safety, which is the traditional
    engineering emphasis
  • To achieve this
  • Convince employers to
  • Preferentially hire those with recognized SE
    qualifications
  • Upgrade the skills and knowledge of existing
    employees

32
Other objectives
  • Prevent the proliferation of certifications and
    improve their quality
  • Promote one or two, or harmonize all
  • Improve quality of SWEBOK
  • Improve lines of communication among all
    stakeholder organizations

33
Discussion
34
My background relevant to this topic
  • SE2004 committee member
  • Worked with CACS/AIC on this issue
  • CSEET steering committee chair
  • Professionalism is one of the areas of interest
  • CSDP and CSDA board member
  • Reviewer for SWEBOK
  • Participated in discussions to harmonize SWEBOK,
    SE2004 and IEEE certifications
  • Non-member participant in some IEEE-CS
    Professional Practice Committee meetings
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com