New faculty, especially those who have never taught before PowerPoint PPT Presentation

presentation player overlay
About This Presentation
Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: New faculty, especially those who have never taught before


1
Mentoring of New Faculty Members What Do We Know?
  • Studied extensively by Robert Boice
  • The New Faculty Member (1992)
  • Advice for New Faculty Members (2000)
  • New faculty, especially those who have never
    taught before, often feel lonely, isolated, and
    have time management issues.
  • Without guidance and mentoring, most faculty take
    4-5 years to bring their research productivity
    and teaching effectiveness to a level that meets
    or exceeds institutional standards.

2
Mentoring of New Faculty Members What Do We
Know? (contd)
  • The strategy and techniques that quick starters
    use can be taught to others.
  • Boice has identified a group of quick starters
    that ramp up their teaching/research much more
    rapidly within 1-2 years.
  • Informal mentoring within departments is not
    enough.  Chairs may think that mentoring of new
    faculty is effectively taking place it probably
    isnt.
  • A system involving department mentors and
    external mentors from outside departments
    appears to work well. (UT 2001)

3
Mentoring of New Faculty Members What Do We
Know? (contd)
  • Mentors should be assigned early very soon
    after a hire and communicate with the new
    faculty member even before he or she arrives at
    the  University.
  • Mentors need to be pushed a bit and monitored, at
    least initially, to assure they meet regularly
    with their mentees.
  • There should probably be regular group meetings
    of assigned mentors to keep people interested and
    updated.

4
Mentoring of New Faculty at UT
  • November 2006 Focus group meetings organized by
    Provosts Office
  • Met with nine newly-tenured faculty hired in 2000
    or 2001
  • We want all our new faculty to succeed.
  • UTs AY 2001/2 centralized mentoring program
  • Amount/quality of mentoring within departments
    highly variable
  • Annual reviews, dossier prep (binders!) helpful

5
Mentoring of New Faculty at UT, contd
  • Often very high service loads!
  • Tenure/promotion process relatively transparent,
    but criteria appear mysterious
  • Many tenure/promotion urban legends,
    considerable cynicism
  • Votes received, but not the reasons/explanations
    for the vote
  • New faculty need someone to talk to off the
    record

6
Mentoring of New Faculty at UT, contd
Promotion to Full Professor
  • Good fraction of focus group members were not
    sure they wanted to try for this
  • Expectations for full professor promotion not
    clear
  • Relatively minor rewards?
  • Perhaps tenure exhaustion speaking?
  • Nobody seems to ask them about career goals
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com