Offshore Outsourcing of Technology Jobs Impacts - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 50
About This Presentation
Title:

Offshore Outsourcing of Technology Jobs Impacts

Description:

Offshore Outsourcing of Technology Jobs Impacts – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:303
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 51
Provided by: ronh2
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Offshore Outsourcing of Technology Jobs Impacts


1
Offshore Outsourcing of Technology JobsImpacts
Policy DialogueSeptember 14th, 2004Rochester
HTBC IEEE Joint MeetingRochester, NY
  • Ron Hira, Ph.D., P.E.
  • Assistant Professor of Public Policy
  • Rochester Institute of Technology
  • and
  • Chair of Career Workforce Policy Committee
    IEEE-USA
  • rhira_at_mail.rit.edu
  • 585-475-7052

2
(No Transcript)
3
Some Definitions
  • Outsourcing Classic Make or Buy Decision
  • Procter Gamble contracts with HP for IT
    services
  • Offshore Outsourcing
  • Sending work to outsourcers who operate overseas
  • Offshore Sourcing aka Off-shoring MNC Captive
    Facilities
  • Daimler Chrysler has an RD center in Bangalore
  • On-site Offshore Outsourcing Foreign Workers
    On-site
  • Tata Consultancy Services, Infosys, Wipro,
    Accenture
  • Insourcing (media) Foreign MNCs in US
  • BMW in SC, Infosys Consulting
  • Insourcing (academics) Making Rather Than
    Buying
  • Blended Sourcing, Near Shore, Best Shore, Global
    Sourcing, etc.

4
Why Do Companies Utilize Overseas Technology
Talent?
  • Cost An Imperative
  • Exceptional Talent?
  • Shortage of U.S. workers? Ph.D.s?
  • Politics Access to the Local Market
  • Trade, e.g., China Russia Boeing engineers
  • Developing Countries Strategy
  • Tax Holidays Incentives
  • 24/7 Capabilities
  • Collaborative Engineering Technology
  • Companies Aware Of Possibility Believe It Helps
    Their Performance - Trigger

5
Overseas Engineers Can Afford To Be Paid Less
6
Offshore Expansion Abroad and Layoffs in the
U.S.
  • India Most Mentioned Destination
  • Other countries actively pursuing these jobs
  • Companies Are Re-balancing Workforce in Favor
    of Offshore Share
  • EDS 20k layoffs 20k expansion offshore
  • IBM Hewlett Packard
  • Intel CSC
  • AOL Texas Instruments
  • Unisys Siemens
  • Knowledge Transfer Forcing workers to train
    replacements should be knowledge extraction

7
How Much Work Has Moved Offshore?
  • No One Knows
  • No one in government is collecting data
  • Commerce Department has pilot study of 335k
    underway
  • Companies are reluctant to reveal their plans
  • US workers unwittingly training their
    replacements
  • Many believe it is only low-level work
  • No data to support or refute this claim
  • Estimates from Self-Interested Research Firms
  • The Forrester Report is most-cited

8
How Much Work Has Moved Offshore?
  • We Do Know it is Accelerating
  • Not Insignificant
  • Companies Are Waiting Until After Election

9
Just Low Level Work? Sample Intel India Job Ad
  • RF Simulation Engineer   (Job 274125)
  • In this position you will build various antenna,
    RF channel and PHY/MAC models for various RF
    technologies and simulate platform noise impact.
    You will also interact closely with internal
    wireless product groups to develop solutions to
    enhance RF performance in notebooks.This
    position requires a M.S. or Ph.D. in Electrical
    Engineering with experience in mobile notebooks,
    WPAN, WLAN, WMAN, WWAN and platform noise. You
    must also possess - Experience building various
    antenna, channel, PHY/MAC models, prototypes,
    test systems and simulating the impact of
    multiple radios that are integrated into
    notebooks

Go to www.monsterindia.com
10
Developing Countries Target RD
  • Singapore - 2billion Biopolis - Biotech
  • Also targeting Optoelectronics HP Agilent
  • China
  • Requires high-level tech transfer as part of
    investment
  • Attracting recent PhD grads of US universities
  • Companies locate RD closer to production
  • India
  • Wants to be the Global RD Hub
  • Drug Discovery and IT RD
  • Google, Microsoft, Texas Instruments, Intel, etc.
    etc.

11
U.S. Impacts
  • Lift U.S. Economic Development
  • Lower costs
  • Open New Markets
  • Lift Economic Development Abroad
  • Geopolitical and security advantages

12
U.S. Impacts ?
  • U.S. Competitiveness/ Innovation System
  • U.S. Workforce
  • Displace Workers
  • Downward Wage Pressure
  • Change in Mix of Occupations
  • Military Capacity Access Assimilation
  • Homeland Defense - Critical Data
  • Brain Circulation vs. Brain Drain
  • Intellectual Property

13
Developing Country Impacts
  • Best Path to Growth?
  • Comparative advantage is low cost skilled labor
  • Spillover Benefits
  • Movement up the ladder of innovation
  • Learning western business practices
  • Macroeconomic Advantages
  • Utilize Idle Labor Force

14
Developing Country Impacts ?
  • Best and Brightest Supply External Markets Versus
    Domestic Problems
  • Loss of Sovereignty to MNCs?
  • Proper Use of Scarce Resources
  • Work on male baldness rather than on malaria
  • Race to the Bottom?
  • Potential for Smoke-stack Chasing
  • Mexican Maquiladoras and China

15
Jobs Moving OverseasPredicted Impacts
  • Job Dislocation
  • Hope for quick re-employment
  • Change in Mix of Domestic Occupations
  • US workers will shift to non-tradable jobs
  • Cant compete on price
  • Will the new mix be better than the old one?
  • Downward Pressure on Wages for Tradable
    Occupations
  • No One Can Predict Future
  • Creating future competitors?

16
Domestic IT Labor Market Record
Unemployment(source IEEE-USA from BLS)
17
1983-2003 Tech Unemployment Rates
18
Job Dislocations
  • Off-shoring Makes Job Market Worse
  • Job creation becomes ever more critical
  • Re-employment? What Occupation and Wage?
  • Downward Wage Pressure
  • Silver lining according to some industry reps
  • Future Generation Receiving a Signal
  • Will best brightest shy away from technology?
  • 20 Drop in BS Comp Science enrollments

19
Occupation Mix Impact Revised BLS Projections
20
Job Dislocation During Low Job Creation
21
(No Transcript)
22
(No Transcript)
23
(No Transcript)
24
(No Transcript)
25
Is IT Unique? Harbinger for Other
Industries/Occupations?
  • IT Call Centers Are First Movers
  • Manufacturing
  • Financial Services
  • Reporting/Editing
  • Accounting Other Business Processes
  • Biotech Drug Discovery
  • Countries Trying to Attract RD

26
Unpredictable Longer-term Impacts on Innovation
Security
  • What Will Be New Occupational Mix For US?
  • Is it important to maintain a strong science,
    engineering and software workforce in the US?
  • Will the best brightest pursue these
    professions?
  • Where will future technology leaders be
    developed?
  • Who captures the wealth jobs created by the
    next big thing?
  • Impacts on Military Superiority Homeland
    Security?
  • Can economic studies predict this?

27
Creating Competition?Already Exists in IT
28
What About Insourcing
  • Claim is that foreign multi-national firms have
    6.4 million US workers
  • Therefore insourcing gains outweigh outsourcing
    loss
  • Comparing apples and oranges
  • If we believe the insourcing argument
  • Daimler-Benzs 1998 purchase of Chrysler
    instantly insourced hundreds of thousands of
    jobs
  • Tycos move of HQ to Bermuda instantly insourced
    thousands of jobs
  • Offshoring is substituting foreign labor for US
    labor

29
What About Insourcing
  • Infosys Consulting Established
  • Announced that over the next three years they
    plan on hiring up to 500 consultants
  • Purpose
  • Capture more US customers (not US workers) to
    better facilitate offshore outsourcing
  • Infosys already has 3,700 positions in US
    (according to SEC filings)
  • All foreign workers on H-1B L-1 visas
  • Good PR move but not good for US workers

30
Spate of Industry Sponsored Studies
  • ITAA, AeA, US Chamber of Commerce, Business
    Roundtable, EIA
  • All find what they are looking for
  • Off-shoring is good for the US
  • None address innovation impacts
  • None can address the dynamics of off-shoring
    (creating future competition)
  • None show unemployment rates for technology
    workers - Balanced view of off-shoring impacts?
  • Attempt to change the topic towards
    competitiveness

31
Spate of Industry Sponsored Studies
  • Economic Studies Capture Economic Efficiency
    Argument But Miss Other Important Elements
  • Technological Innovation
  • Security

32
Some (Overly?) Optimistic StudiesOft-cited by
Offshoring Advocates
  • Win-WinMcKinsey Global Institute Study
  • US gets 12-14 cents net benefit for each dollar
    spent offshore
  • Finds that US workforce loses (not highlighted in
    their press release, buried in study)
  • Before outsourcing US workforce gets 72 cents
  • After outsourcing US workforce gets 45-47 cents
  • 31 of displaced workers remain unemployed
  • Many who are re-employed, earn less

33
Some (Overly?) Optimistic StudiesOft-cited by
Off-shoring Advocates
  • Win-Win McKinsey Global Institute Study
  • Limitations of Study
  • No one has access to their proprietary data
  • The models are not explicit
  • No sensitivity analysis
  • Rosy re-employment scenario - 3.5 million net job
    creation every year
  • No accounting of impacts on innovation or
    security
  • Conflict of interest
  • McKinsey sells off-shoring consulting work and
    stands to benefit from increased off-shoring

34
Some (Overly?) Optimistic Studies Oft-cited by
Offshoring Advocates
  • Dr. Catherine Mann, Institute for Intl
    Economics
  • Thesis Lower IT services costs will drive IT
    demand up
  • Limitations
  • Will it help domestic IT workers?
  • Additional explanations exist for high IT labor
    demand in the 1990s
  • Technology paradigm shifts in 1990s Internet,
    ERP, Object Oriented Programming, Mainframe to
    Client-Server, Y2K, etc.
  • Consumer Preferences - Business Strategy
    Nicholas Carr, IT Doesnt Matter
  • Claims high wage/high skill work will not move
    offshore?
  • Uses old (2000-2010) BLS projections as part of
    the basis of her optimism

35
Misleading Statistics
  • Churn Argument Greenspan,
  • Job loss due to outsourcing is a small part of
    the normal churn of the economy
  • Misleading because
  • No correlation between churn and re-employment
    prospects
  • Net jobs matter, not churn
  • Number of jobs is small
  • No one knows how many

36
Who Wins? Who Loses?
  • Winners
  • Shareholders
  • Company executives
  • Consumers
  • Some existing employees?
  • Countries getting those jobs
  • Losers
  • Displaced workers
  • Existing employees subject to the threat of being
    offshored
  • US overall?
  • Depends on re-employment of displaced workers
  • Future technological innovation
  • National security

37
Policy Dialogue Impediments
  • Poor Data Enables Any Convenient Explanation
  • Affecting Workers, Not Companies
  • Companies no urgency to fix a problem they dont
    experience
  • Policy recommendations dont address offshore
    outsourcing
  • Companies will not speak about their plans
  • Free Trade vs. Protectionism Discussion is
    Misguided
  • Good vs. Bad rather than both Good Bad
  • Labeling - Protectionist
  • Instead, should focus on mitigating the negative
    effects
  • No Silver Bullets

38
Guest-worker Visa Policies Accelerate Off-shoring
  • H-1B L-1 Visas
  • Temporary non-immigrant visas
  • 900,000 in US
  • Intent Used Only As A Last Resort
  • Problems With Law
  • Companies can and do prefer foreign workers over
    US workers
  • Protections dont protect
  • Being used by offshore outsourcers
  • Knowledge transfer aka Knowledge extraction
  • Bring in lower cost workers on-site

39
H-1B Use That Meets Intent
Source R. Hira Analysis US Dept of Labor LCA
Database www.flcdatacenter.com
40
H-1B Examples Stretch Intent of LawOffshore
Outsourcing Companies Use Is Order(s) of
Magnitude Greater
Source R. Hira Analysis US Dept of Labor LCA
Database www.flcdatacenter.com
41
Offshore Outsourcing Companies Pay Low Wages to
H-1Bs
Source R. Hira Analysis US Dept of Labor LCA
Database www.flcdatacenter.com
42
Technological Innovation Moving FasterCreating
Need for Lifelong Learning
  • Technological innovation metaphor Creative
    Destruction Joseph Schumpeter
  • Technological obsolescence cycle times are
    decreasing
  • The half-life of a technology worker is
    decreasing
  • Creates need for more lifelong learning
  • Emphasis has been on skills rather than learning
    how to learn so students may be less able to
    adapt
  • Who pays for this lifelong learning?

43
Human Capital Paradox
  • Recognition that Human Capital is important
    Knowledge Economy but
  • Domestic knowledge workforce is at risk
  • Employers have less incentive to invest in
    employees who might leave
  • No governmental institutions to truly support
    lifelong learning
  • Current tax credits are insufficient

44
Implications for Engineers
  • Risk is Much Higher
  • Obsolescence from technological change and now
    offshoring
  • View yourself as a consultant
  • Career management is much more important
  • Find ways to re-invent yourself and search for
    skills that are not easy to compartmentalize
  • Engineering education reforms
  • Mixing domain knowledge with technical knowledge
  • Let your elected officials know what you think!

45
What Can We Do About Offshoring?
  • Acknowledge A Problem Exists
  • Dont know scale and scope, but do know process
    is accelerating
  • No Villains In This Story
  • Companies acting rationally
  • Workers acting rationally
  • Need To Work Cooperatively
  • American workers need strong and healthy
    companies that hire them
  • Do companies that sell to the US market need a
    healthy and vibrant US science engineering
    workforce?

46
Policy Responses
  • Collect Objective Data
  • Uncertainty allows too many convenient
    explanations
  • Identify types of jobs likely to stay
  • Jobs that are vulnerable
  • New skill mix that will be needed
  • 2 million study in FY05 Commerce Dept Approps
  • Reform H-1B L-1 Visas
  • Foreign guest-workers are replacing US workers
  • Accenture pays H-1B holders 25,113 for Chief
    Programmers in Houston, TX.
  • Tata Consultancy pays H-1B holders 21,460 for
    Programmer Analysts in Warsaw, IN.
  • NAM is lobbying hard against reform for
    expansion

47
Policy Responses
  • Begin Experimenting on Workforce Retraining
    Programs Immediately
  • New institutions should be created to be more
    responsive to the high Hz skills needs
  • Best way to kill a new program is to put it in an
    old agency paraphrase of President Lyndon
    Johnson
  • Human Capital Tax Investment Credit
  • Wage Insurance
  • Re-employed workers get part of their wage loss
    back through insurance

48
Policy Responses
  • Worker Notification 60 or 90 days
  • Allows workers to prepare for their layoff
  • Examine Potential Impacts on National Security
  • Begin More Comprehensive Planning Process
  • Sen. Lieberman Commission modeled after Young
    Commission of 1980s
  • Learn lessons from 1980s competitiveness debates
    voluntary quotas and industrial policy
  • Keep options on the table
  • Government procurement is 19 of consumption
    investment

49
Impacts on States Regions
  • Increased Competition for Industrial Recruiting
  • Competing now not just with the next state, but
    also India and China
  • Helping Laid Off Workers
  • What do you train them to do? Who pays?
  • States With Particular Occupation Mix May Be More
    Vulnerable
  • See Berkeley Study by Kroll and Deo Bardhan
  • A White-collar kind of Rust Belt?

50
Policy Responses by States
  • Which Technologies Do You Bet On?
  • Is IT a commodity? Nanotech? Biotech?
  • Government Procurement Reforms
  • Procurement has always been used for more than
    just economic objectives
  • Targeted Economic Development s
  • Take subsidy back if company moves work offshore
  • States As Laboratories Of Policy Innovation
  • 35 states with Outsourcing related initiatives
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com