Obtaining Physical and other Evidence - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 23
About This Presentation
Title:

Obtaining Physical and other Evidence

Description:

Must be 'tangible,' such as a weapon, drugs, cash, records, etc. ... Consent searches would be limited to the area or object consented to the searched. ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:115
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 24
Provided by: hul2
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Obtaining Physical and other Evidence


1
Chapter 14
  • Obtaining Physical and other Evidence

2
Obtaining Physical and other evidence
  • Real evidence
  • Must be tangible, such as a weapon, drugs,
    cash, records, etc.
  • Also referred to as Physical evidence

3
Examples of physical evidence
  • Weapons (guns, knives, etc)
  • Illegal drugs
  • Fingerprints
  • Clothing
  • Documents
  • Footprints
  • Hair
  • Blood
  • Grass marks or other stains on clothing

4
Obtaining physical evidence from the person of a
suspect
  • Encounters between citizens police include
  • Voluntary encounters or Consensual stops
  • The investigative stop or Terry stop
  • An arrest based on probable cause to believe that
    the person has committed a crime

5
Obtaining evidence and information by means of
voluntary conversations
  • Most persons will engage in voluntary
    conversations, however, with law enforcement
    officers.
  • If at some point they wish to discontinue the
    conversation, they may do so.

6
Free to leave test
  • The test used by courts to determine whether such
    situations are voluntary or not is the free to
    leave test , which is defined by the U.S. Supreme
    Court as follows
  • A person has been seized within the meaning of
    the Fourth Amendment only if in view of all the
    circumstances surrounding the incident, a
    reasonable person would have believed that he was
    not free to leave.

7
Terry Stops
  • The amount of evidence known as reasonable
    suspicion is needed to authorize an investigative
    detention, or Terry Stop.
  • Reasonable suspicion is less than probable cause
  • Terry v Ohio (1968)

8
Stop Frisk
  • Terry v Ohio also established the Stop Frisk
    or Pat-Down rules
  • The police must have reasonable suspicion both
    to stop someone and
  • To pat down their outermost garments for
    WEAPONS ONLY, based on
  • A reasonable suspicion their safety is in
    jeopardy!

9
Searches that can be justified during an
investigative detention
  • Consent to search would have to be voluntarily
    and clearly given. Consent searches would be
    limited to the area or object consented to the
    searched.
  • Protective search can be made if an officer who
    has made a valid investigative stop has
    reasonable suspicion to believe that the suspect
    may be armed and presently dangerous. TERRY
    RULES APPLY TO STOP FRISKS!

10
Searches that can be justified during an
investigative detention cont
  • Anonymous tips require indicia of reliability,
    that is corroborating information from the person
    giving the tip showing that person to have
    predictive information about the suspects
    behavior that allowed the police to judge the
    reliability of the anonymous stop.

11
Obtaining physical evidence during and after an
arrest
  • A search for weapons and evidence of the crime
    may be made in the search incident to an arrest.

12
Obtaining physical evidence during and after an
arrest cont..
  • Protective sweep or safety check Arresting
    officers have a right to conduct a quick and
    cursory check of the arrestees lodging
    immediately subsequent to arrest even if the
    arrest is near the door but outside the lodging
    where they have reasonable grounds to believe
    that there are other persons present inside who
    might present a security risk.
  • Note This is for PEOPLE, NOT Evidence!

13
Evidence obtained during inventory searches
  • The U.S. Supreme Court listed the following for
    inventorying property that is being held by the
    police
  • The protection of the owners property while it
    remained in police custody
  • The protection of the police against claims or
    disputes over lost or stolen property
  • The protection of the police from potential
    danger

14
Evidence obtained during inventory searches
  • Inventory searches are not searches for
    incriminating evidence.
  • They are a common and sensible police procedure
    to determine what the law enforcement agency is
    responsible.

15
Searches of Private Premises
  • Arrest Warrants vs. Search Warrants
  • In Arrest Warrants, youre looking for a PERSON
  • In Search Warrants, youre looking for EVIDENCE

16
Authority needed by police officers to enter
private premises
  • Arrest Warrants
  • Carries with it the limited authority to enter a
    dwelling in which the suspect lives when their is
    reason to believe the suspect is within, police
    may enter under the following limitations
  • Entry with an arrest warrant is limited to a
    suspects own residence and
  • Where there is reason to believe the suspect is
    within

17
Authority needed by police officers to enter
private premises
  • Search Warrant
  • if the conditions from an arrest warrant do not
    exist, law officers should obtain a search
    warrant in addition to the arrest warrant or
    they could wait until the suspect appears in a
    public place to make an arrest.

18
Searching Homes
  • Officers must comply with knock notice when
    serving arrest and search warrants
  • Absent exigent circumstances, an officer must
    have an
  • arrest warrant to justify a nonconsensual entry
    into a residence to make an arrest.

19
Otherwise
  • To enter a home you must have
  • Consent
  • Warrant
  • Exigent Circumstances
  • This is based on the Castle Exception,
  • E.g., a mans home is his castle, and should be
    protected from government intrusion

20
Vehicle stops
  • Police need at least reasonable suspicion to
    make a stop
  • Most are temporary, brief and public
  • It does curtail ones freedom of movement
  • Drivers and Occupants may be questioned
  • All occupants may be ordered out of the vehicle

21
Evidence during traffic stops
  • Plain-view doctrine may allow officers to seize
    evidence that they can see while in plain
    view.
  • This can give probable cause to search the entire
    vehicle!
  • Consent can be also used to ok a search
  • Police have an Automobile Exception to search
    vehicles that is unique

22
The Automobile Exception
  • Carroll v U.S. (1925)
  • Established the Carroll Rule, or the PROBABLE
    CAUSE rule in dealing with vehicles.
  • Essentially, because vehicles can be moved
    easily, and evidence destroyed, etc., the police
    can search the vehicle where it is, as long as
    they can articulate PROBABLE CAUSE for the
    search.
  • A warrant is not needed, nor is consent, as long
    as PC is present

23
Key Cases
  • Carroll v. U.S. 45 S. Ct. 280 (1925)
  • U.S. v. Ross, 102. S. Ct. 2157 (1982)
  • Ross extended searches to the ENTIRE vehicle,
    including the trunk as well as closed containers,
    AS LONG AS THE POLICE HAD A LEGAL REASON TO STOP
    THE VEHICLE AND PROBABLE CAUSE TO SEARCH!
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com