MODEL RISK ASSESSMENT

1
MODEL RISK ASSESSMENT

• STEVE M SMITH
• [phone]
• STEVEMSMITH_at_PEOPLEPC.COM

2
WHAT THE HOMEOWNER WANTS TO KNOW

• Do I have lead in my house?
• Where is it?
• What do I do now? or How do I get rid of it
• How much is this going to cost!!

3
(No Transcript)
4
CONCLUSIONS 2.1 Report Summary Lead Based
Paint hazards were found at this address. The
table below describes the location of these
hazards. Significant hazard reduction will occur
if existing original windows are replaced.
Window troughs tested very high for the presence
of lead indicating that these painted windows are
contributing to lead dust build-up. The kitchen
area tested positive for lead hazards primarily
in what remains of the kitchen cabinets.
Surprisingly, the kitchen floor and window sill
did not indicate lead finding above HUD approved
thresholds. The kitchen window trough was not
tested as the window would not open. Recent
renovation activities at this house do not appear
to be a major contributing factor to the lead
hazards discovered during this Risk Assessment.
5
2.2 Table of Lead Based Paint Hazards and
Recommended Corrective Action
Room / Component Location of Hazard Level of severity Recommendation Cost stimate

Kitchen Cabinet frames and sides 1 Removal of cabinets and replacement with new cabinets since the majority of the cabinets have already been removed 3500
Windows Exterior windows 1 Replace older windows with exterior peeling paint 3400
Exterior wood doors Front and side doors 2 Replace these doors with steel pre-hung units, encapsulate trim 1500
Garage All painted garage siding 2 Encapsulate or vinyl side garage 1750
Bathtub Tub glazing 3 Do not use abrasives owner refinishing 0
Play area Soil 1 Remove soil and replace with new, uncontaminated soil 600
TOTAL COSTS 10,750
1 most severe 2 very severe 3 - somewhat
severe
6
2.3 Positive XRF Readings
No Insp Flr Side Room Strc Sub Feat Cnd Clr Result Pbc Pbc error
20 SMS 1 B Bath Wall Metal Bathtub Intact White POS 5.01 1.9
42 SMS 1 C Kitchen Door Wood Jamb Fair White POS 3.41 1.03
45 SMS 1 D Kitchen Window Wood Stool Fair White POS 2.28 1.11
46 SMS 1 D Kitchen Window Wood Sash Fair White POS 1.72 0.83
47 SMS 1 D Kitchen Cabinet Wood Door Out Fair White POS 2 1.42
49 SMS   A Outside 0 Door Wood Door Intact White POS 7.35 2.53
50 SMS   A Outside 0 Window Wood Sash Ext Poor White POS 2.29 0.59
52 SMS   D Outside 0 Window Wood Sash Ext Poor White POS 5.4 2.09
53 SMS   D Outside 0 Door Wood Door Poor White POS 3.44 1.07
56 SMS   A Outside 0 Garage Wood Wall Fair White POS 2.7 0.92
57 SMS   B Outside 0 Garage Wood Wall Fair White POS 1.14 0.19
7
2.4 Dust Wipe Sample Results
Sample Number Room Location Component Area Wiped in sq/ft Pb Concentration in ug/sqft
1 Room 1 dining room Window sill 11 3/8 x 3 1800
2 Room 1 dining room Window trough 9 ½ x 4 1/8 3100
3 Room 1 dining room Floor 16 x 16 1150
4 kitchen Window sill 11 ¼ x 3 190
5 kitchen Floor 16 x 16 Below reporting limits
6 Room 2 living room Floor 10 ½ x 10 ½ 21
7 Room 4 childs bedroom Window sill 10 ½ x 3 1/8 Below reporting limits
8 Room 4 childs bedroom Window trough 9 5/8 x 4 6600
9 Room 4 childs bedroom Floor 10 x 8 ¼ 2500
HUD reporting limits floors, 40 ug/ft2, window
sills, 250 ug/ft2, window troughs 400 ug/ft2
8
2.5 Soil Sample Results
Sample Number Location Results in Parts per Million
13 Side C drip line 53
14 Side B drip line 99
15 Side A drip line 97
16 Side D - drip line 290
17 Play area 15,000
Note lead in soil is considered a hazard at
1200 ppm or greater. Play areas for children at
400 ppm.
9
KEY ELEMENTS OF A RISK ASSESSMENT

• WHAT MICHIGAN REGULATIONS REQUIRE

10
KEY ELEMENTS

• Date of inspection
• Address
• Date of construction
• Name, address, and phone of owner
• Name, signature and cert. of Risk Assessor
• Testing methods, devices and sampling procedures
  employed including quality control data and if
  used serial number of XRF

11
LEAD INSPECTION AND RISK ASSESSMENT REPORT FOR
THE PROPERTY LOCATED AT 1118 N Vermont Royal Oak
, MI 48067 Prepared
For Mr. and Mrs. Marsh 1118 N Vermont Royal Oak,
MI 48067 [phone] Report Prepared and
Submitted by Steve M. Smith Certified Lead
Inspector / Risk Assessor P 2309 Michigan
Department of Community Health Lead Hazard
Remediation Program 3423 N Martin Luther King
Blvd PO Box 30195 Lansing, MI 48909 (616)
240-3926 Date of Inspection May 12, 2004
12
APPENDIX DATA
9.12 Laboratory Dust and soil samples were
analyzed by State of Michigan Department of
Community Health Trace Metals Laboratory located
at 3335 Martin Luther King Jr. Blvd., Lansing,
Michigan 48909 (517-335-9490). The Michigan
Department of Community Health Environmental Lead
Laboratory participates in the Environmental Lead
Proficiency Analytical Testing (ELPAT) quality
control rounds and is approved by the National
Lead Laboratory Accreditation Program (NLLAP).
9.13 Soil Sampling Soil samples, if deemed
appropriate by the Risk Assessor, were collected
following HUD guidelines from areas of exposed
soil located within the boundaries of the
property, such as sandbox, play areas, and
foundation drip line. Composite samples from the
upper 1/? inch of soil were collected and
analyzed by State of Michigan Department of
Community Health Trace Metals Laboratory.
Results are reported in parts of lead per million
parts of sampled soil.
13
6.0 RE-EVALUATION AND MONITORING SCHEDULE All
painted components require periodic re-evaluation
and monitoring. Re-evaluation typically is
scheduled on a bi-annual basis but more frequent
re-evaluations may be required depending on site
conditions. All painted surfaces must remain in
good / intact condition. Painted surfaces that
are peeling, cracking, blistering or causing dust
from friction or impact must be corrected
immediately to prevent hazardous exposure to
possible lead based paint sources. All repairs
must follow HUD Guidelines for the interim
control and abatement of lead based paint
hazards.
14
KEY ELEMENTS CONT

• Specific locations of each painted component
  tested typically part of XRF
• Name, address and phone of each recognized lab
  conducting analysis
• Results of laboratory analysis
• Description of the location, type and severity of
  identified lead paint hazards
• Description of abatement or interim control (or
  both) of each identified lead based paint hazard
• Recommended maintenance and monitoring schedules
  for encapsulants and enclosures if used to
  remediate lead hazards
• Visual inspection results

15
VISUAL INSPECTION FORMAT

1. Paint Condition Form Selected Surfaces

Building Component Location Notes Paint Condition (intact, poor, not present) Deterioration due to friction or impact? Deterioration due to moisture? Location of painted component with visible bite marks
Siding Vinyl siding Intact but chalking No No Na
Exterior trim Wrapped in aluminum Intact No No Na
Exterior windows Need replacing Poor Friction / weathering Yes Na
Exterior doors Need replacing Poor Impact Yes Na
Railings NA
Porch floors Front porch Poor Friction Yes Na
Other porch surfaces NA
Interior doors Most have been replaced Intact No No Na
Ceilings Ok throughout Intact No No Na
16
2.4 Dust Wipe Sample Results
Sample Number Room Location Component Area Wiped in sq/ft Pb Concentration in ug/sqft
1 Room 1 dining room Window sill 11 3/8 x 3 Below reporting limits
2 Room 1 dining room Window trough 9 ½ x 4 1/8 3100
3 Room 1 dining room Floor 16 x 16 Below reporting limits
4 kitchen Window sill 11 ¼ x 3 190
5 kitchen Floor 16 x 16 Below reporting limits
6 Room 2 living room Floor 10 ½ x 10 ½ 21
7 Room 4 childs bedroom Window sill 10 ½ x 3 1/8 Below reporting limits
8 Room 4 childs bedroom Window trough 9 5/8 x 4 6600
9 Room 4 childs bedroom Floor 10 x 8 ¼ Below reporting limits
10 Stairway to second floor Tread 10 x 10 3/8 120
11 Room 5 upstairs bedroom Window sill 11 x 2 ½ Below reporting limits
12 Room 5 upstairs bedroom Floor 11 x 8 7/8 Below reporting limits
HUD reporting limits floors, 40 ug/ft2, window
sills, 250 ug/ft2, window troughs 400 ug/ft2
17
2.2 Table of Lead Based Paint Hazards and
Recommended Corrective Action
Room / Component Location of Hazard Level of Severity Recommendation Cost Estimate

Kitchen Cabinet frames and sides 1 Removal of cabinets and replacement with new cabinets since the majority of the cabinets have already been removed 3500
Windows Exterior windows 1 Replace older windows with exterior peeling paint 3400
Exterior wood doors Front and side doors 2 Replace these doors with steel pre-hung units, encapsulate trim 1500
Garage All painted garage siding 2 Encapsulate or vinyl side garage 1750
Bathtub Tub glazing 3 Do not use abrasives owner refinishing 0
Play area Soil 1 Remove soil and replace with new, uncontaminated soil 600
TOTAL COSTS 10,750
1 most severe 2 very severe 3 - somewhat
severe
18
(No Transcript)
19
(No Transcript)
20
CREATE A RISK ASSESSMENTTEMPLATE

• In my template 60 of the information is routine
  or simple to add i.e. testing methods,
  certifications, background info, re-evaluation
  schedules, etc.
• 40 is new data that is applied quickly to
  pre-designed tables NOTE these tables are also
  used for the field investigation

21
BOTTOM LINE

• Cost savings reduces the time needed to produce
  a Risk Assessment
• Consistency of format in terms of report data
• Easily modified to incorporate future rule
  changes
• CUSTOMER SATISFACTION ! !