AlbanyMIT PhD Colloquium Adaptive and Deliberate Change in Organizations Evidence from the New York - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 25
About This Presentation
Title:

AlbanyMIT PhD Colloquium Adaptive and Deliberate Change in Organizations Evidence from the New York

Description:

Case study: the New York Stock Exchange's move towards electronic trading and the Hybrid Market ... implemented at the New York Stock Exchange (NYSE) to a ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:89
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 26
Provided by: N166
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: AlbanyMIT PhD Colloquium Adaptive and Deliberate Change in Organizations Evidence from the New York


1
Albany-MIT PhD Colloquium Adaptive and
Deliberate Change in Organizations Evidence
from the New York Stock Exchange
April 25, 2008 Nici Zimmermann
2
Presentation Outline
  • Purpose of the dissertation
  • Methods
  • Case study the New York Stock Exchanges move
    towards electronic trading and the Hybrid Market
  • Exogenous perspective of adaptation to
    environmental forces
  • Endogenous pressures by stakeholders
  • Management influence
  • Implications for a generic institutional change
    model
  • Smaller, generic system dynamics model
  • How you can help me

3
Briefly about myself
  • Student of Peter Milling from the University of
    Mannheim in Business Administration
  • Interest Organization Theory, Organizational
    Change
  • Visiting student at the University of Albany in
    Public Administration and Policy
  • Phone call with all my Albany supervisors and
    Peter Milling
  • Goal finish the dissertation by the end of this
    year
  • Seeking your help in finishing and going beyond
  • Connection to the literature
  • Weight of the case study in my dissertation,
    importance of generic model
  • Where to publish

4
1. Purpose of the Dissertation
  • Shed light into the discussion of the prevalence
    of the environmental/ technological vs. the
    organizational imperative (deterministic
    adaptation vs. deliberate change)
  • Do this with the help of a system dynamics model
    that is able to create
  • quick organizational adaptation to exogenous
    change,
  • punctuated equilibrium,
  • and non-change and organizational death.
  • This is done by changing
  • pressures from stakeholder groups (strength and
    size through exit),
  • the degree of inward orientation of the
    management board,
  • and the degree of customer orientation.

5
2. Methods
  • Data collection
  • Literature
  • Journal Articles
  • Magazine and newspaper articles about the case
    study
  • Quantitative time series data from the New York
    Stock Exchange
  • Interviews for face validity
  • Ethnographic analysis of the NYSE blog
  • System dynamics modeling and system dynamics
    validation methods

6
3. NYSE Case Study Reference Mode
Buyer
Seller
Computer
Broker /Brokerage House
Broker /Brokerage House
The Trading Floor
Specialist(Post)
Floor Broker
Floor Broker
7
3. NYSE Case Study
  • Case study the New York Stock Exchanges move
    towards electronic trading and the Hybrid Market
  • Exogenous perspective of adaptation to
    environmental forces
  • Endogenous pressures by stakeholders
  • Management influence
  • Build up these elements step by step, showing
    that they are all necessary to create the
    reference behavior.
  • Then I change parameters to show that this
    structure is also able to create different
    behaviorsquick adaptation, punctuated
    equilibrium, and non-change.

8
3. NYSE Case Study
CHARACTERISTICSOF MARKET - Market speed - Extent
of e-trade in market
PRESSURE FOR E-TRADE - From institutional
customers and owners Deriving from relative
NYSE speed
Definesmarketshare
(B) Institutional customers dissatisfaction
with speed to execution
Changes customerand mgmt composition
MGMTs DECISIONON EXTENT OF E-TRADE - Market
share - Customer orientation - Mgmt composition -
Relative pressure
MANAGEMENTCOMPOSITION - Fraction
ofinstitutional membersvs. non-institutionals
(R) Inwardorientationof mgmtteam,CEO
selectsmgmt
(B) Customer pressures and resistance (R)
Cultural pressures from stakeholders
PRESSURE FOR FLOOR TRADE - From non-institutional
customers and owners Deriving from bad
market quality - From floor-based firms As
cultural pressure from stakeholders As
resistance from stakeholders
9
3. NYSE Case Study Exogenous perspective of
adaptation to environmental forces
  • Organization easily adapts to pressures building
    in its environment
  • Rise of institutional customers from the 1950s to
    1990s and beyond
  • Technological developments up to arithmetical
    miracles
  • ? pressure for electronic trading from
    institutional investors who want to do
    algorithmic trading

10
3. NYSE Case Study Exogenous perspective of
adaptation to environmental forces
11
3. NYSE Case StudyEndogenous pressures by
stakeholders
  • Specialist have a strong culture based on past
    successes.
  • They oppose electronic trading because it
    undermines their earning capabilities.
  • One specialist who used to be a member of the
    board now wears stickers showing his opposition
    to the changes. But he is completely powerless.
  • People with institutional interests (e.g.
    traders working for large banks)
    outweigh the specialists, so their
    opposition has no effect any more.

12
3. NYSE Case StudyEndogenous pressures by
stakeholders
13
3. NYSE Case StudyManagement Influence
14
3. NYSE Case StudyManagement Influence
15
3. NYSE Case StudyManagement Influence
Adaptation, Culture and Resistance, and Mgmt
2
1
1
2
5
5
5
1
Dmnl
4
3
2
1
3
1
Dmnl
4
5
1
Dmnl
3
1
Dmnl
2
1
4
3
0
Dmnl
0
Dmnl
0
Dmnl
2
1
0
Dmnl
3
5
5
4
4
4
3
1
1
1960
1970
1980
1990
2000
2010
2020
2030
2040
2050
Time (Year)
"Fraction of E-Trade in Remaining Market"
2008.04.24 exogenous adaptation
Dmnl
1
"fraction of e-trade" 2008.04.24 exogenous
adaptation
Dmnl
2
2
2
2
"fraction of e-trade" 2008.04.24 endogenous
pressures
Dmnl
3
3
3
3
"fraction of e-trade" 2008.04.24 base
Dmnl
4
4
4
4
4
4
"fraction of e-trade" 2008.04.24 only mgmt and
institutionals
Dmnl
5
5
5
16
Theoretical possibilitiesin the implementation
of e-trade
Fraction of e-trade at NYSE
Market share of NYSE
quick adaptation
punctuated equilibrium
non-change
17
Important Parameter Changes
  • concerning the NYSE case and the general
    implications
  • Internal dynamics around specialist culture
  • Ability of floor-based firms / stakeholders to
    exit
  • Cohesiveness of the floor-based firms / of
    stakeholders
  • Management dynamics
  • Effect of market share on customer orientation
  • Power of CEO to select management
  • These parameters are able to create
  • Quick organizational adaptation,
  • Punctuated equilibrium,
  • And non-change and organizational death.

18
Discussion
  • Thank you very much for your attention as well as
    for your suggestions!
  • Literature
  • How do I best fit this with the literature
  • Organizational Change
  • Punctuated Equilibrium
  • Determinism vs. deliberate change (exogenous vs.
    endogenous)
  • Technological/environmental vs. organizational
    imperative
  • Weight of case study
  • Importance of generic model
  • Where to publish, what audiences?
  • Other ideas to move forward

19
  • Backup slides

20
(No Transcript)
21
  • What would have happened if the specialists
    culture had been less strong or stronger?
  • If specialists had not left or had not had the
    opportunity to do so? Or had left more rapidly?
  • If the specialists had been more cohesive?

22
Conceptualization and Formulation Stages
Randers, Jorgen (1980)Elements of the System
Dynamics Method, p. 135.
23
Definitions and History
  • Specialist
  • A market maker (person) who matches buyers and
    sellers for a specific kind of stock at the New
    York Stock Exchange. When the customer orders do
    not match, he steps in with his own shares and
    capital.
  • E-Trading (electronic trading)
  • Trading in which a computer matches buyers and
    sellers. The specialist is not involved or needed
    any more.
  • History
  • E-trading was possible since the 1980s. It got
    implemented at the New York Stock Exchange (NYSE)
    to a small extent in 2001 and to a larger extent
    from 2004 on.

24
Stage 2 Reference ModeSpecialist Participation
in Trades
  • From 1960 till 1997 the participation of the
    specialist in trading declined from 16 to 9.
  • With the implementation of electronic trading in
    2001 it plummeted.
  • The increase in participation from 1997 till 2001
    may be due to the increased volatility from the
    technology boom.

25
Data Collection
  • On a continuing basisNewspaper
    articles,Journal articles if available.
  • Beginning of November First two interviews with
    students who did an internship at the New York
    Stock Exchange last summer.
  • Nov. 14 Meeting with John Malitzis, Vice
    President of Specialist Surveillance
  • Afterwards (hopefully soon) I want to conduct
    interviews with specialists and other people
    working at the Exchange.
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com