Title: More Medicare Drug Benefits Medicare Reform
1More Medicare Drug Benefits Medicare Reform?
- Tom Miller
- Cato Institute
- Hill Briefing
June 20, 2003
2Overview
- Whats Wrong with the Senate Bill
- Politics Policy Lessons
- Alternatives to Digging A Deeper Hole
3Whats Right about the Senate Medicare Bill ?
4Whats Right, Maybe?
- Transitional Drug Coverage (2004-2006)
- Discount card
- Low-income assistance
- Indexing Drug Coverage Breakpoints
- Annual percentage increase in
- average per capita expenditures
- (for covered drugs)
5Whats Wrong?
- Downpayment on an Expensive Entitlement, with a
Balloon Note - 400 Billion, 8 years
- One Mans Ceiling Is Another Mans Floor
- 36.6 Trillion
- Medicares Current Unfunded Liabilities,
without a Drug Benefit
6Whats Wrongwith Fiscal Meltdown?
- Higher Taxes, Slower Growth,
- Greater Intergenerational Burdens,
- Budget Crowd Out, Hollow Benefits,
- Price Controls on Drugs,
- Bigger Govt. in Health Sector
- Is the Pit Bottomless?
- Running out of time to roll back the
demographic/health spending clock
7Whats Wrong with Fiscal Meltdown?
8Republicans Play Follow the Leader
"It's a very fluid situation on the substance
side of this, because no one understands what the
heck this bill says or will do." Sen. Judd
Gregg, R-N.H., said after Senate Republicans
received a detailed walk-through of the
legislation by Scully and Finance Committee staff
members. CQ Today June 17, 2003
9Whats Wrong?
- Failure to Target Drug Benefits Where Needed
- Low Deductibles (275)
- Early-dollar Sweeteners (50 up to 4500)
- Shrinking Donut Hole of Zero Coverage
- 90 Catastrophic Coverage (starts at approx.
5800 - in annual drug spending)
- Not much of something, but its for everyone
- Sticker shock and buyers remorse ahead?
10Whats Wrongwith Senates Cost Sharing?
- Political incentives to fill the doughnut hole in
future years, or force tough votes - House bill imposes means testing at
- back end, instead of front end
11Whats Wrongwith Crowd Out?
- Accelerate Erosion of Employer-Sponsored Drug
Coverage - CBO 37 percent would lose (switch) employer drug
benefits - Shifting costs to taxpayer
- ER retiree plans, if qualified as at least
standard coverage, get subsidy 64.3 percent of
national premium - Beneficiaries who dont sign up initially get a
later option as soon as non-Medicare coverage is
scaled back to less than standard Part D
coverage
12Whats Wrong with Competition thats
Market-based In Name Only?
- Entry of new plans will be limited, particularly
regional PPOs (lowest three bidders) - Just the big boys can play, if theyre coaxed
into doing so by sufficiently high payments and
guarantees against losses - One-way linkage of payments Traditional FFS
eventually sets ceiling, but isnt affected by
private plan pricing - Risk Corridors for Risk-Averse Private Insurers
- In addition to, and after, risk adjustment
- Paid more to be less efficient
- Paid less to be more efficient
-
13Whats Wrong with Competition thats
Market-based In Name Only?
- HHS Sec. can exclude plans believed to attract a
healthier population - Competitive Bidding should be used to determine
subsidy levels, not who gets to offer a plan - Market Reform cant afford another discrediting
failure like MedicareChoice
14Whats Wrong with Competition thats
Market-based In Name Only?
- In fact, if you think Medicare should be
privatized, then you should oppose this bill.
- Sen. Ted Kennedy June 17, 2003
Washington Post
15Whats Wrong with Regulatory Overload
Micromanagement?
- Count the pages
- More silos, more separate payments,
- Data collection of drug prices
- A bigger version of unsustainable
- traditional Medicare means less innovation,
- lower quality, less flexibility
- Stepping down on the accelerator, eventually
hitting the brakes, and the windshield - Need a market-based transmission to change gears
16Whats Wrong with Regulatory Overload
Micromanagement?
- Stand-Alone Private Drug Plans Rigged to Fallback
to Single, Price-Taking Govt. Subcontractor - Little risk bearing, discentives for most to play
- PBMs follow orders, survivors will capture admin
servicing fees for profits, cost-plus thru-put - Price controls on drugs more inevitable, much
sooner
17Politics Policy Lessons
- More Regulatory Complexity
- Inevitable when members dont trust market
competition - Cant escape politics with a defined benefit
- New regulatory boxes but
- Meet the New Boss, Same as the Old Boss
18Politics Policy Lessons
- What Do Seniors Want?
- More, if the money is on the table
- But mostly, lower drug prices rather than complex
insurance - Drug assurance, not drug insurance
- Incumbents Can Run, but They Cant Hide (for
long)
19Alternatives Partial Fixes
- Stop at Discount Card Low-Income Cash
- Full Competitive Bidding (House) Is
- Last Battleground
- Needs to be Accelerated to 2007
- Part B FFS Premiums Float Anyway
- 100 Percent Rebates for Low Bids (Initially)
- Move the Doughnut to Front Edge
20Alternatives Partial Fixes
- Reform Individual Medigap instead
- Across-the-board catastrophic drug, more cost
sharing for other benefits - Swap benefits instead of more third-party dollars
- Stall till they run out of imaginary money, or
others actually read the bills - Sticker shock overreaching conflicts trigger
rollback in 2006 - End the pacifism in a one-sided intergenerational
war - The desired destination remains dc, but it stands
for - defined contribution