More Medicare Drug Benefits Medicare Reform - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 20
About This Presentation
Title:

More Medicare Drug Benefits Medicare Reform

Description:

What's Wrong with the Senate Bill. Politics & Policy Lessons ... Downpayment on an Expensive Entitlement, ... Sen. Ted Kennedy June 17, 2003 Washington Post ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:93
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 21
Provided by: dfi2
Category:
Tags: benefits | drug | gears | kennedy | medicare | more | of | reform | ted | war

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: More Medicare Drug Benefits Medicare Reform


1
More Medicare Drug Benefits  Medicare Reform?
  • Tom Miller
  • Cato Institute
  • Hill Briefing

June 20, 2003
2
Overview
  • Whats Wrong with the Senate Bill
  • Politics Policy Lessons
  • Alternatives to Digging A Deeper Hole

3
Whats Right about the Senate Medicare Bill ?
4
Whats Right, Maybe?
  • Transitional Drug Coverage (2004-2006)
  • Discount card
  • Low-income assistance
  • Indexing Drug Coverage Breakpoints
  • Annual percentage increase in
  • average per capita expenditures
  • (for covered drugs)

5
Whats Wrong?
  • Downpayment on an Expensive Entitlement, with a
    Balloon Note
  • 400 Billion, 8 years
  • One Mans Ceiling Is Another Mans Floor
  • 36.6 Trillion
  • Medicares Current Unfunded Liabilities,
    without a Drug Benefit

6
Whats Wrongwith Fiscal Meltdown?
  • Higher Taxes, Slower Growth,
  • Greater Intergenerational Burdens,
  • Budget Crowd Out, Hollow Benefits,
  • Price Controls on Drugs,
  • Bigger Govt. in Health Sector
  • Is the Pit Bottomless?
  • Running out of time to roll back the
    demographic/health spending clock

7
Whats Wrong with Fiscal Meltdown?
8
Republicans Play Follow the Leader
"It's a very fluid situation on the substance
side of this, because no one understands what the
heck this bill says or will do." Sen. Judd
Gregg, R-N.H., said after Senate Republicans
received a detailed walk-through of the
legislation by Scully and Finance Committee staff
members. CQ Today June 17, 2003
9
Whats Wrong?
  • Failure to Target Drug Benefits Where Needed
  • Low Deductibles (275)
  • Early-dollar Sweeteners (50 up to 4500)
  • Shrinking Donut Hole of Zero Coverage
  • 90 Catastrophic Coverage (starts at approx.
    5800
  • in annual drug spending)
  • Not much of something, but its for everyone
  • Sticker shock and buyers remorse ahead?

10
Whats Wrongwith Senates Cost Sharing?
  • Political incentives to fill the doughnut hole in
    future years, or force tough votes
  • House bill imposes means testing at
  • back end, instead of front end

11
Whats Wrongwith Crowd Out?
  • Accelerate Erosion of Employer-Sponsored Drug
    Coverage
  • CBO 37 percent would lose (switch) employer drug
    benefits
  • Shifting costs to taxpayer
  • ER retiree plans, if qualified as at least
    standard coverage, get subsidy 64.3 percent of
    national premium
  • Beneficiaries who dont sign up initially get a
    later option as soon as non-Medicare coverage is
    scaled back to less than standard Part D
    coverage

12
Whats Wrong with Competition thats
Market-based In Name Only?
  • Entry of new plans will be limited, particularly
    regional PPOs (lowest three bidders)
  • Just the big boys can play, if theyre coaxed
    into doing so by sufficiently high payments and
    guarantees against losses
  • One-way linkage of payments Traditional FFS
    eventually sets ceiling, but isnt affected by
    private plan pricing
  • Risk Corridors for Risk-Averse Private Insurers
  • In addition to, and after, risk adjustment
  • Paid more to be less efficient
  • Paid less to be more efficient

13
Whats Wrong with Competition thats
Market-based In Name Only?
  • HHS Sec. can exclude plans believed to attract a
    healthier population
  • Competitive Bidding should be used to determine
    subsidy levels, not who gets to offer a plan
  • Market Reform cant afford another discrediting
    failure like MedicareChoice

14
Whats Wrong with Competition thats
Market-based In Name Only?
  • In fact, if you think Medicare should be
    privatized, then you should oppose this bill.
  • Sen. Ted Kennedy June 17, 2003
    Washington Post

15
Whats Wrong with Regulatory Overload
Micromanagement?
  • Count the pages
  • More silos, more separate payments,
  • Data collection of drug prices
  • A bigger version of unsustainable
  • traditional Medicare means less innovation,
  • lower quality, less flexibility
  • Stepping down on the accelerator, eventually
    hitting the brakes, and the windshield
  • Need a market-based transmission to change gears

16
Whats Wrong with Regulatory Overload
Micromanagement?
  • Stand-Alone Private Drug Plans Rigged to Fallback
    to Single, Price-Taking Govt. Subcontractor
  • Little risk bearing, discentives for most to play
  • PBMs follow orders, survivors will capture admin
    servicing fees for profits, cost-plus thru-put
  • Price controls on drugs more inevitable, much
    sooner

17
Politics Policy Lessons
  • More Regulatory Complexity
  • Inevitable when members dont trust market
    competition
  • Cant escape politics with a defined benefit
  • New regulatory boxes but
  • Meet the New Boss, Same as the Old Boss

18
Politics Policy Lessons
  • What Do Seniors Want?
  • More, if the money is on the table
  • But mostly, lower drug prices rather than complex
    insurance
  • Drug assurance, not drug insurance
  • Incumbents Can Run, but They Cant Hide (for
    long)

19
Alternatives Partial Fixes
  • Stop at Discount Card Low-Income Cash
  • Full Competitive Bidding (House) Is
  • Last Battleground
  • Needs to be Accelerated to 2007
  • Part B FFS Premiums Float Anyway
  • 100 Percent Rebates for Low Bids (Initially)
  • Move the Doughnut to Front Edge

20
Alternatives Partial Fixes
  • Reform Individual Medigap instead
  • Across-the-board catastrophic drug, more cost
    sharing for other benefits
  • Swap benefits instead of more third-party dollars
  • Stall till they run out of imaginary money, or
    others actually read the bills
  • Sticker shock overreaching conflicts trigger
    rollback in 2006
  • End the pacifism in a one-sided intergenerational
    war
  • The desired destination remains dc, but it stands
    for
  • defined contribution
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com