Why do we conduct experiments anyway - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 20
About This Presentation
Title:

Why do we conduct experiments anyway

Description:

M & Ms ( ) candy corn ( ) Kit Kats ( ) Mary Janes ? ... Question: Do CIs for different study samples (conditions, groups) overlap? ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:100
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 21
Provided by: susan618
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Why do we conduct experiments anyway


1
Why do we conduct experiments anyway?
I dunno!
  • How do we conduct experiments? One answer

Independent Groups Designs
2
Other Questions???????
  • When is manipulation a good thing?
  • What makes a good experiment?
  • What allows decisions re cause and effect?

3
Experimental Control
  • Covariation of IV and DV
  • Time-order relationship IV?DV
  • Elimination of confounds
  • Holding conditions constant
  • Balancing

4
A First Independent Groups Design
  • Random Groups Design
  • Random selection versus
  • Random assignmentcomparable groups
  • A technique Block randomization

5
The Great Halloween Candy Caper
  • How many participants in each of 4 conditions
  • ( ) M Ms ( ) candy corn ( ) Kit Kats ( )
    Mary Janes ?????????
  • Block 1
  • Block 2
  • Block 3
  • Block 4
  • Block ?

1-5-6-6-4-1-0-4-9-3-2-0-4-9-2-3-8-3-9-1-9-1-1-3-2-
2-1-9-9-9-5-9-5-1-6-8-1-6-5-2-2-7-1-9-5-4-8-2-2-3-
4-6-7-5-1-2-2-9-2-3-8-7-5-0-2-4-6-6-1
6
Steps Block Randomization
  • Assign a number from 1 to 4 to the respective
    conditions, if there are 4 conditions
  • 1M Ms, 2candy corn, 3Kit Kats, 4Mary Janes
  • Use random numbers to select 4 sequences of the
    numbers from 1 to 4 to obtain 4 sequences for 4
    randomized blocks
  • Skip numbers GT 4
  • Skip numbers that repeat a number already in
    sequence
  • Result is order of testing the conditions for the
    first 16 participants

7
Order of Testing
8
Issues of Validity.Optimizing vs. no-nos
  • External?
  • Replication
  • Does random assignment produce a representative
    sample?

9
Issues of Validity.Optimizing vs. no-nos
  • Internal?
  • The problem of Intact Groups
  • Subjective subject loss versus
  • Mechanical subject loss
  • Demand characteristics?
  • Placebo controls
  • Double-blind experiments
  • Experimenter effects?
  • Double-blind experiments

10
Another Design.Matched Groups
  • Matching task (a pre-test)
  • Split-litter technique

11
A Third DesignNatural Groups
  • Correlation or causation?
  • Problems with causal inferences
  • Subject variables cant be manipulated
  • Subject variables cant be randomly assigned
  • Solution complex designs
  • E.g., 2 x 2 Age x amount of dosage
  • IV? IV?
  • DV?

12
Summary Avoiding Problems Common to All
Independent Designs
  • Eliminate confounding (internal validity)
  • Select appropriate DV (construct validity)
  • Replicate to increase external validity
    (convergent validity)

13
Analysis of Experiments
  • Descriptive statistics to summarize results,
    only
  • Inferential statistics to determine reliability,
    IV?DV
  • Null-Hypothesis Testing
  • Confidence Intervals

14
Confidence Intervals
  • Sample mean, ? ?
  • CIrange of values around ? , at ? confidence
  • Question Do CIs for different study samples
    (conditions, groups) overlap?
  • No overlap? difference between samples
  • Yes, overlap? NO difference between samples

15
Constructing CI
  • For a 95 CI
  • Upper limit (t .05)( )
  • Upper limit - (t .05)( )

16
Null-hypothesis Testing and Decision Errors
  • Focus on mean differences
  • Assume no effect for the null ( no difference)
  • Use probability theory
  • Decision errors
  • Limitations
  • Statistical significance vs. real significance
    (meaningfulness)
  • Internal validity
  • Truth of the null
  • Reliability

17
Null-hypothesis Testing and Decision Errors
  • Focus on mean differences
  • Assume no effect for the null ( no difference)
  • Use probability theory
  • Decision errors
  • Limitations
  • Statistical significance vs. real significance
    (meaningfulness)
  • Internal validity
  • Truth of the null
  • Reliability

18
Null-hypothesis Testing and Decision Errors
  • Focus on mean differences
  • Assume no effect for the null ( no difference)
  • Use probability theory
  • Decision errors
  • Limitations
  • Statistical significance vs. real significance
    (meaningfulness)
  • Internal validity
  • Truth of the null
  • Reliability

19
Null-hypothesis Testing and Decision Errors
  • Focus on mean differences
  • Assume no effect for the null ( no difference)
  • Use probability theory
  • Decision errors
  • Limitations
  • Statistical significance vs. real significance
    (meaningfulness)
  • Internal validity
  • Truth of the null
  • Reliability

20
Null-hypothesis Testing and Decision Errors
  • Focus on mean differences
  • Assume no effect for the null ( no difference)
  • Use probability theory
  • Decision errors
  • Limitations
  • Statistical significance vs. real significance
    (meaningfulness)
  • Internal validity
  • Truth of the null
  • Reliability
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com