Spotlight Case January 2004 - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 28
About This Presentation
Title:

Spotlight Case January 2004

Description:

... is the most common cause of chest pain in the emergency room ... Chest ... Crushing Chest Pain. A transesophageal echocardiogram revealed an ascending ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:57
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 29
Provided by: erinha
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Spotlight Case January 2004


1
Spotlight Case January 2004
  • Crushing Chest Pain A Missed Opportunity

2
Source and Credits
  • This presentation is based on the Jan. 2004 AHRQ
    WebMM Spotlight Case
  • See the full article at http//webmm.ahrq.gov
  • CME credit is available through the Web site
  • Commentary by Mark Graber, MD, State University
    of New York at Stony Brook
  • Editor, AHRQ WebMM Robert Wachter, MD
  • Spotlight Editor Tracy Minichiello, MD
  • Managing Editor Erin Hartman, MS

3
Objectives
  • At the conclusion of this educational activity,
    participants should be able to
  • Appreciate the challenges of diagnosing aortic
    dissection
  • Describe the Bayesian approach to diagnosis
  • Understand the benefits and limitations of
    heuristic thinking
  • List the cardinal dimensions of clinical
    decision-making

4
Case Crushing Chest Pain
  • A 62-year-old female presented with 12 hours of
    crushing chest pain. Her blood pressure was
    140/90, heart rate 110, and respiratory rate 16.
    An EKG revealed left ventricular hypertrophy with
    strain. Review of the chest x-ray in the
    emergency department (ED) revealed no
    abnormalities. She was treated for an acute
    coronary syndrome (ACS) with heparin, aspirin,
    morphine, and a nitroglycerin drip. Cardiac
    enzymes were drawn.

5
Case (cont.) Crushing Chest Pain
  • The patient was admitted to the cardiac care
    unit. Seven hours after admission, the patient
    became hypotensive, with a systolic blood
    pressure in the 80s and a heart rate in the 120s.
    A repeat EKG revealed no significant changes.
    Right-sided leads showed no evidence of right
    ventricular infarct. The first set of cardiac
    enzymes was equivocal, and a CPK-MB was minimally
    elevated.

6
Chest Pain in the Emergency Dept.
  • Chest pain is a common complaint in the ED
  • Correct and timely diagnosis is critical and
    linked to morbidity and mortality in many
    diagnoses
  • Acute coronary syndrome
  • Pulmonary embolism
  • Aortic dissection

.
7
Diagnosis of Chest Pain in the ED
von Kodolitsch Y, et al. Arch Intern Med.
20001602977-82.
8
Three Different Approaches to Medical
Decision-Making
  • Use of heuristics
  • Bayesian approach
  • Application of algorithms

Elstein AS. Acad Med. 199974791-4.
9
Examples of Medical Decision-Making Using
Heuristics
  • AvailabilityDiagnosis springs to mind because
    clinician has seen such patients before
  • RepresentativenessMental match between patients
    symptoms and characteristic symptoms of disease
    stored in clinicians memory

Elstein AS. Acad Med. 199974791-4.
10
Benefits and Risks of Using Heuristics
  • AdvantageCan reach correct diagnosis rapidly
  • DisadvantageCan lead to diagnostic error when
    correct diagnosis not considered

Elstein AS. Acad Med. 199974791-4.
11
This Case Approached Using Heuristics
  • Clinician knows
  • Acute Coronary Syndrome is the most common cause
    of chest pain in the emergency room
  • Clinician thinks
  • Diagnosis must be ACS

12
Medical Decision-Making Using Bayesian Approach
  • List all diagnostic possibilities
  • Determine likelihood of each
  • Gather pertinent clinical data
  • Adjust initial probabilities based on clinical
    data using Bayesian calculations

Sox HC Jr, et al. Medical decision making.1988.
13
Is this ACS? Bayesian Approach
Nomogram
14
Medical Decision-Making Using Bayesian Approach
  • After adjusting pretest probability by clinical
    data available in this case (lack of ECG
    findings, lack of rales, hypotension, etc.), the
    overall likelihood of ACS is less than 17
  • CONSIDER ALTERNATIVE DIAGNOSIS!

15
Medical Decision-Making Using Algorithmic Approach
  • Use of algorithms can simulate expert thinking
  • Multiple decision models available
  • Algorithms improve sensitivity and specificity of
    diagnosing cardiac ischemia when compared with
    clinical judgment

Panju AA, et al. JAMA. 19982801256-63. Goldman
L, et al. N Engl J Med. 1988318797-803. Pozen
MW, et al. N Engl J Med. 19843101273-8.
16
Medical Decision-Making Using Algorithmic Approach
  • Use of a formula based on 7 clinical variables to
    predict cardiac ischemia results in a likelihood
    of ACS of 7
  • Use of a derived prediction rule using 4 clinical
    variables (hx MI, diaphoresis, ST elevation, q
    waves) results in a likelihood of 2 of ACS in
    this patient
  • CONSIDER ALTERNATIVE DIAGNOSIS!

Pozen MW, et al. N Engl J Med. 19843101273-8.
Tierney WM, et al. Crit Care Med.
198513526-31.
17
Case (cont.) Crushing Chest Pain
  • The team re-reviewed the chest x-ray and
    discovered an abnormality in the aorta a 1-cm
    separation between the intimal calcification and
    the adventitial outline of the descending aorta
    (the calcium sign), consistent with aortic
    dissection.

18
Chest X-ray with Calcium Sign (arrow)
19
Aortic Dissection
  • Mortality rates approach 1 per hour
  • Diagnosis is missed in 25-50 of patients
  • Survival exceeds 90 with prompt diagnosis and
    management

Spittell PC, et al. Mayo Clin Proc.
199368642-51. Klompas M. JAMA.
20022872262-72. Nienaber CA, et al. N Engl J
Med. 19933281-9.
20
Aortic Dissection
  • Classic presentation includes acute-onset, severe
    chest/back pain described as tearing or
    ripping
  • Atypical presentations are common
  • 15 of patients report NO pain
  • Supportive findings include pulse deficit, new
    aortic regurgitation, tamponade, and focal
    neurological deficits
  • Majority of patients have no specific physical
    findings

Spittell PC, et al. Mayo Clin Proc.
199368642-51. Hagan PG, et al. JAMA.
2000283897-903.
21
Aortic Dissection Physical Exam Findings
Klompas M. JAMA. 20022872262-72.
22
Aortic Dissection
  • 90 of patients with aortic dissection have an
    abnormal CXR
  • Abnormal aortic contour and widened mediastinum
    are the most common findings
  • A NORMAL CXR DOES NOT RULE OUT AORTIC DISSECTION!

Spittell PC, et al. Mayo Clin Proc.
199368642-51. Hagan PG, et al. JAMA.
2000283897-903.
23
Aortic Dissection CXR Findings
Klompas M. JAMA. 20022872262-72.
24
Case (cont.) Crushing Chest Pain
  • A transesophageal echocardiogram revealed an
    ascending aortic dissection. Anticoagulation
    therapy was discontinued, beta-blocker therapy
    was initiated, and cardiothoracic surgery was
    called. The patient was transported to the
    operating room. Upon arrival in the operating
    room, the patient became progressively
    hypotensive, coded, and died. Post-mortem autopsy
    revealed hemorrhage into the pericardium.

25
Transesophageal Echocardiography of Aortic
Dissection
Video
26
What Went Wrong?
  • The patients death may be result of errors in
    each of the cardinal dimensions of clinical
    decision-making
  • Data gathering
  • Hypothesis generation/synthesis
  • Verification

27
Errors in Clinical Decision-Making
  • Data gathering
  • Staff not trained to recognize the calcium sign
  • Synthesis
  • Diagnosis of ACS assigned despite low likelihood
  • An alternative diagnosis was not initially
    entertained
  • Verification
  • Premature closure CCU team accepted diagnosis of
    ACS without re-examining the facts
  • Framing Team biased by how case was presented
  • Anchoring Team fixated on an early diagnosis

Rosman HS, et al. Chest. 1998114793-5. Elstein
AS. In Clinical reasoning in the health
professions. 199549-59. Kassirer JP, Kopelman
RI. Am J Med. 198986433-41. Graber M, et al.
Acad Med. 200277981-92.
28
Avoiding Errors in Clinical Decision-Making
  • Consider diseases you cannot afford to miss
  • Supplement diagnostic skills using a bayesian
    approach or established algorithms
  • Consider tests that will help rule in an
    alternative diagnosis rather than pursue a test
    for a diagnosis already in doubt
  • Be aware of common cognitive biasesavoid
    premature closure by re-examining the facts
  • Ask yourself, What else could this be?

Rosman HS, et al. Chest. 1998114793-5. Elstein
AS. In Clinical reasoning in the health
professions. 199549-59. Kassirer JP, Kopelman
RI. Am J Med. 198986433-41. Graber M, et al.
Paper presented October 20, 2002 Baltimore, MD.
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com