Introduction to Ethics - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 15
About This Presentation
Title:

Introduction to Ethics

Description:

Introduction to Ethics 'An unexamined life is not worth living' ... Ethics--A set of values that describe what is right or wrong, good or bad. ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:296
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 16
Provided by: georgeb57
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Introduction to Ethics


1
Introduction to Ethics
An unexamined life is not worth
living --Socrates, Athens, 5th century B.C.
2
What is It?
Ethics--A set of values that describe what is
right or wrong, good or bad. Morality--A
doctrine or system of ideas concerned with right
(human) conduct.
3
Introduction to Western Philosophy (Idiots Guide)
  • Started in Athens, 5th century B.C.
  • -Socrates
  • -Plato (Socrates pupil)
  • -Aristotle (Platos pupil)
  • -Taught Alexander the Great

4
Socrates
  • Truth ? Morality
  • -Find truth through argument and debate (Socratic
    Method--lead through probing questions)
  • Technology is bad!
  • -Writing! It destroys memory and oral skills it
    obscures the distinction between wisdom and
    knowledge

Where is the wisdom we have lost in
knowledge? Where is the knowledge we have lost in
information? --T.S. Eliot, Choruses from the
Rock, 1934
5
Plato
  • The physical world is an illusion. (But a shadow
    on the wall of the cave for what is real--the
    truth.)
  • Ideal society is ruled by a Meritocracy (rule
    by an aristocracy of merit men and women who
    rule by virtue of their education, intelligence,
    and wisdom).
  • Ethical ideals and justice are corrupted by the
    material world, which is itself an imperfect
    shadow of the real world of the mind and the
    spirit.

6
Aristotle
  • Attempted to develop a universal method of
    reasoning by which one could learn everything
    about reality.
  • -Categorization of things (e.g., biological),
    logic and methods of reasoning, physics and
    physical laws
  • Ethics--Goodness leads to the good life
  • -There is a natural desire for happiness that
    aligns with our moral selves.
  • -But the individual does not exist outside of the
    social context (including politics, the city, and
    the state (civilization)).
  • Virtue--Seek the Mean--Excellence lays balanced
    between the extremes.
  • -Egyptians--All things in proper measure.

7
Moral Philosophy ? Natural Philosophy
  • The whole world can be deduced from basic truths.
  • No idea of observation, experimentation, or
    scientific validation here
  • For example, The earth is the center of the
    universe.
  • Pythagoras (the great geometer, Greece, 5th
    century B.C.) developed ideas to describe the
    motion of the planets.
  • Ptolemy(Alexandria, 2nd century A.D.) built on
    the ideas of Pythagoras to make a more detailed
    description of sun, moon, and planets motion
    (cycles and epicycles). This was a complicated
    system, but it worked.

Ptolemys system was used successfully for
navigation till Columbus time (about 2,000
years)!
8
Ethical Systems
An ethical system should be generalizable. It
should hold for a broad range of cases. Although
generalizable, conflicts will always arise
between ethical principles.
9
Naïve Egoism
  • Not really a coherent well-developed view
  • Essentially boils down to one principal, If we
    all follow the bidding of our egos, well be
    happy. (This is also essentially the
    materialistic philosophy of Ayn Rand.)
  • -Taken to its logical extreme, this means egoists
    believe they can use others with impunity to
    realize their own ends. Might makes right.
  • But its difficult to systemize and generalize
    egoism. (Whose might? Whose right?)
  • -Some egoists try to broaden their approach by
    limiting naïve egoism by permitting contracts or
    institutional arrangements or sacrificing
    short-term interest for long-term ones.
  • -This may not be a very workable philosophy for
    individuals, but what about companies? Or
    countries? (Libertarian Capitalism?)

10
Utilitarianism
  • This is an ethics of consequences developed by
    Jeremy Bentham and other British philosophers in
    the 1700s.
  • Developed the goal of the greatest good for the
    greatest number. An alternative is the greatest
    happiness (most pleasure for the least pain).
  • -This sounds like a quantitative approach. (You
    could develop an algorithm!)
  • -John Stuart Mill developed Consequentialism, a
    type of Utilitarianism. An act is morally right
    if it produces a greater net value (benefits
    minus costs) than any available alternative. (Is
    this the only way to calculate value?)
  • -Estimates of consequences, at least long-term
    ones, by this method are hard. Without additional
    principals, we can be overwhelmed by choices.

11
Ethics by Principles
  • This system rests on a few basic principles that
    we are duty-bound to uphold (e.g., the Ten
    Commandments).
  • Immanuel Kant (German philosopher, late 1700s)
    tried to derive these principles from
    philosophical reasoning.
  • -If we have a system of a few principles that
    apply in all cases and are never contradictory,
    we have a clear and precise ethical system.
  • -But will this always be the case? Will all cases
    be covered? Will principles never be
    contradictory?
  • -(Maybe some utilitarian comparative analysis
    would be in order here.)
  • -If we have a shared cultural background, shared
    values, the Kantian approach has its most impact.

12
Ethics by Principles
  • Such ethical systems are called deontological
    systems. (They emphasize duties and absolute
    rules, to be followed regardless of the
    consequences.)
  • Deontologists argue that logic or reason
    determine ethical rules and that actions are
    intrinsically good because they follow from
    logic.
  • -Kant said, Respect the reason within you. This
    implies we are all moral beings, to the extent
    that we are rational.

13
An Ethics of Consequences and Principles
  • Perhaps we can compromise and develop an ethical
    approach based on principles that also considers
    consequences.
  • This is often done (e.g., people, or nations,
    have the right to defend themselves, even if it
    causes injury or even death to the attacker).
  • We will look both at principles and consequences
    throughout this course, and not only to develop
    ethical arguments. We will try to broaden
    principles for actions or views when possible.
    And we will look carefully at consequences.

14
Natural Rights
  • These are rights that apply to all individuals
    (natural and inalienable)
  • They can constrain utilitarianism and flesh out
    deontological systems.
  • -John Locke (British), Thomas Jefferson, Jean
    Jacques Rousseau (French), all active in the
    1700s, were philosophers of natural rights.
  • -This philosophy formed the basis of the shared
    cultural values of the U.S. founding fathers and
    thus the shared cultural values of most U.S.
    citizens today.

15
Institutional Ethics
  • Government
  • -Bill of Rights Declaration of Independence (We
    hold these truths to be self-evident...)
  • These are expressions of an institutional
    ethics.
  • Business
  • -The ethics and moral code for a business may be
    different than that of the government or an
    individual.
  • Profession
  • -A professional group purporting to represent a
    profession (who says?) makes an ethical code.
    This may again differ from the ethics of an
    individual.
  • Whose code trumps whom?
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com