The Promise of Improved Quality: Can EMRs Deliver - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 35
About This Presentation
Title:

The Promise of Improved Quality: Can EMRs Deliver

Description:

Pre/post survey of providers and data query of the EMR to examine ... Palm Pilot ... significant benefit of the Palm tool on lipid management ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:69
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 36
Provided by: denise49
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: The Promise of Improved Quality: Can EMRs Deliver


1
The Promise of Improved QualityCan EMRs Deliver?
  • Denise Bonds, MD, MPH
  • University of Virginia

2
IOM
  • The Institute of Medicine in their 2001 report on
    improving the quality of healthcare in the US
    stated
  • The committee believes information technology
    must play a central role in the redesign of the
    health care system if a substantial improvement
    in quality is to be achieved over the coming
    decade.
  • Can Information Technology deliver on this
    promise?

Crossing the Quality Chasm A New Health System
for the 21st Century (2001)
3
Objective of this talk
  • This talk will focus on the results of two
    projects conducted at Wake Forest University
  • Carilion ACE
  • Logicians Users Group

4
Impact of CHF
  • Congestive Heart Failure is a major public health
    threat
  • Incidence is high1
  • 383 men and 315 women per 100,000
  • Survival is low2
  • At the time of this project, 65 at 1 year and
    31 at 5 years
  • Survival is improved with appropriate medication
    therapy including beta blockers and Ace
    inhibitors
  • These medications are underused
  • Roger VL et al. JAMA. 2004292344
  • Wolinsky FD et al. Med Care. 1997351031

5
Carilion ACE Project
  • In conjunction with Carilion Health System, Wake
    Forest University tested the effect of an
    integrated, electronic reminder system
  • Enhanced heart failure care encounter
    documentation plus/minus a heart failure
    medication prescribing tool

6
Project Goals
  • To improve the quality of care of patients with
    heart failure
  • To increase use of ACEI, BB
  • To test the use of an electronic reminder system
    and medication tool

7
Setting
  • Integrated healthcare system
  • All outpatient clinics and medical practices use
    a single, commercially available EMR
  • Central data storage and management, allowing
    central retrieval of information and development
    and implementation of software
  • Prior to the CHF project, other reminder systems
    had been incorporated into system

8
Design
  • Randomized, controlled practice-based trial in
    primary care setting
  • Thirty-six practices randomized
  • All received
  • Formatted progress note for HF patients in EMR
  • Randomized to receive
  • Patient specific EMR reminders
  • Heart failure medication prescribing tool

9
(No Transcript)
10
(No Transcript)
11
(No Transcript)
12
(No Transcript)
13
Carilion ACE Results
AHx sheet only BHx Med reminder
14
Summary
  • Results
  • No effect on ACEI/ARB
  • Some increase in use of BB
  • Why such limited results?
  • Anecdotal evidence Providers felt they were too
    busy to use the tools

15
Dissemination
  • Based on early trend toward improvement, a test
    of dissemination was conducted
  • Three different health systems participated
  • All used same EMR as Carilion in the outpatient
    setting
  • All agreed to implement the EMR reminder in at
    least one outpatient primary care clinic

16
Implementation issues
  • Although all sites were using same EMR
    considerable variation in the availability of
    programmers and expertise at sites

17
(No Transcript)
18
Evaluation
  • Guided interview of the key personnel responsible
    for installation process
  • Pre/post survey of providers and data query of
    the EMR to examine quality of care
  • Patient information retrieved from the EMR using
    a standardized data pull mechanism

19
Results Patient Chart Review
20
Results Provider Survey
21
Summary
  • Despite existing software code and identical
    EMRs, incorporation into practices took
    considerable time and modification
  • 80 hours of programmer time, depending on the
    site
  • To obtain buy in from healthcare providers,
    modifications of the reminder system were needed
    at each site
  • Self-reported use was modest
  • In multi-specialty practices, who is responsible?
  • Overall effect was small
  • Practice with the largest increase was
    simultaneously changing from paper records to EMR

22
EMRs- can they deliver?
  • Projects to date have shown only modest
    improvements
  • Dissemination can be challenging
  • Why?
  • Time pressure on providers
  • Disagreement with recommendations
  • Lack of complete integration of all patient data
  • Ex LVEF not always available in EMR so required
    data entry by provider
  • not my job

23
(No Transcript)
24
GLAD Heart
  • Guideline Adherence for a Healthy Heart
  • Randomized, practice-based trial testing the
    effects of a palm-based decision support tool on
    adherence to ATPIII.
  • An active control arm addressed adherence to JNC
    7.

25
Intervention Groups
26
PDA Tool Screen Shots
27
Study Eligibility Criteria
  • Primary Care Practices
  • Internal Medicine
  • Family Medicine
  • Within 3-hour driving radius of WFUMS
  • At least 50 of practices providers willing to
    participate in study
  • Willingness to accept randomization assignment
  • Willingness to participate in chart audit
  • Exclusion Academic practices

28
61 Participating Practices Demographics
  • Specialty
  • 72 Family Practice
  • 23 Internal Medicine
  • 5 Both specialties
  • 23 solo practices
  • 28 gt5 providers
  • 51 gt 50 female providers
  • 33 had at least 1 minority provider

29
Chart Abstraction Methods
  • Random sample
  • Goal of 30 patients per practice
  • Baseline window 6/1/2001 5/31/2003
  • Follow-up window 5/1/2004 4/31/2006
  • Data on demographics, CVD risk, lipid-lowering
    therapy and hypertension management
  • Lipid-lowering therapy decisions assessed to
    9/30/2003 for BL and 8/31/2006 for FU
  • Collaboration with CCME (QIO for NC)

30
GLAD Heart Results ATP III
31
GLAD Heart Results ATP III
32
GLAD Heart Results ATP III
33
GLAD Heart Results ATP III
34
GLAD Heart Summary
  • Modest but statistically significant benefit of
    the Palm tool on lipid management
  • Primarily related to reduction in inappropriate
    use of LLT in low-risk individuals
  • Use of LLT declined in both groups (appropriate
    use)

35
Can EMRs Deliver?
  • Qualified maybe
  • No improvement with CHF reminder system
  • Small improvement in management of cholesterol
  • Perhaps greatest gain in improved quality will be
    through improved access to patient data and
    linkage to knowledge sources within the
    electronic medical record
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com