Title: ARIES: Fusion Power Core and Power Cycle Engineering
1Modeling Analysis of Carbon Fiber Velvet Tested
in RHEPP Ion Beam Facility
- A. R. Raffray, J. Pulsifer, M. S. Tillack, X.
Wang - University of California, San Diego
- With input from T. Knowles (ESLI) and T. Renk
(SNL) - HAPL Review
- GA, San Diego
- April 4-5, 2002
2Energy Deposition as a Function of Penetration
Depth in Carbon Flat Wall Under RHEPP Ion Spectra
- Ion Beam data obtained from T. Renk in
terms of time, voltage and current density for
each ion - - 5.11x104 J/m2
- - Energy Split
- - 16 H
- - 26 C
- - 57 C
- Energy deposition computed as a function of
penetration depth for given ion spectra - based on SRIM stopping power data
3How Does the RHEPP Energy Deposition Compares
with the 154 MJ DD Target Spectra Case for R6.5
m?
- Energy Deposition fromRHEPP dominated by C
ions - Energy deposition from DD target spectra
dominated by deuterium and tritium ions - C and H ions have different penetration depths
and energy deposition profiles - RHEPP reproduces the debris ion energy
deposition level and penetration depth within a
factor of 2
4Volumetric Heat Generation as a Function of Space
and Time in Carbon Flat Wall Under RHEPP Ion
Spectra
5Temperature History for Carbon Flat Wall Under
RHEPP Ion Spectra
- Updated sublimation model for C from Philipps
recommendation - IFE reactor-like CFC thermal conductivity as a
f(T) (235 W/m-K for T gt1800 C) - - Max. Temp. 4370C
- - Corresponding sublimated thickness
calculated as 0.032 mm per shot for 5.1x104
J/m2) - Measurement from T. Renk on POCO Graphite 20
mm after 75 shots, 0.27 mm per shot for 5.5x104
J/m2 - Not clear what grade of POCO graphite was used
but k would be much lower
6Maximum C Temperature and Sublimation Loss per
Shot as a Function of Energy Density and kcarbon
for Same RHEPP Ion Energy Level
- Sublimation model from Philipps data derived
for Tlt4000K - As expected, thermal conductivity plays a key
role and it is possible to sublimate 1 mm per
shot at energy density of 4 x104 J/m2 if k lt 100
W/m-K - POCO graphite seems to have low k and would be
a poor material to validate CFC grade armor - It is very important to conduct experiments on
well characterized material and with good
diagnostics (surface T and mass loss)
7Carbon Fiber Geometry Model
Fiber characteristics Fiber length 2500mm
Fiber diameter 6.5mm Fiber k 100-200
W/m-K 1.5 fiber volume fraction 98.5 void
fraction Fiber separation, y
47mm yeff 215mm
8Carbon Fiber Energy Deposition Model
- Penetration depth set as a function of location
in fiber based on angle of incidence and
including shadowing effect from upstream fibers - Energy deposition calculated as a function of
penetration depth and including angle effect
which effectively increase the area seeing the
ion flux
9Results for Carbon Fiber Under RHEPP Ion Spectrum
Angle Max. Temp.(C) Avg. Fract. Subl.
Loss Left Right Fiber Tip Overall. 0
4390 4390 1 0.015 5.2 4092 4352 0.
43 0.0065 10 4170 4292 0.31 0.0046 20
4213 4041 0.15 0.0023 Fractional
sublimation loss of 1 is equivalent to
0.032mm per shot Sublimation loss for
fiber based on temperature distribution at
tip Major difference with flat plate is very
low density of fiber (0.015) In agreement
with post-experimental examination of fiber
showing no visible ablation or loss of material
Temperature Contour at Time Corresponding to
Tmax for 10 Case
10Concluding Remarks from Fiber Analysis
- Difficult to model flat POCO graphite case in
the absence of fully characterized property data
and temperature surface temperature measurement - - Need to use actual material or material
closely-ressembling (in properties) reactor
grade armor - - Need to fully characterized material
properties - - Need to conduct experiments with adequate
diagnostics - Based on the fiber model (and consistent with
experimental observation), much less material is
ablated from the fiber - - Incidence angle effect on local sublimation
- - More importantly, fiber density effect on
total sublimation -