Title: Remedies
1Chapter 13
2Remedies
- Legal Remedies to compensate the other party
with money for breach of the contract, with
compensatory, nominal, consequential, punitive,
and/or liquidated money damages - Equitable Remedies Granted only when money
damages will not be adequate, - specific performance, injunction
3Compensatory
- Purpose To place the injured party in a
position as good as the one he would have
occupied had the other party performed as he was
supposed to under the contract. - Compensatory damages are all out-of-pocket
expenses including loss of value, incidental
damages, and consequential damages, minus the
cost avoided by the injured party (savings) - Loss of value is the difference between the
value of the promised performance , and the value
of the actual performance, i.e., Seller is to
deliver widgets, which are valued at 5000, but
they are defective when delivered, and worth only
3000. Buyer may then recover 2000 in damages
from S
4Compensatory Damages
- Compensatory damages flow from the wrongful
conduct of the breaching party. - Damages are intended to place the injured party
in as good a position as if the breaching party
had not breached and had performed the contract
as the plaintiff reasonably expected. - The usual measure of compensatory damages is the
amount of money necessary to compensate the
non-breaching party for the breach.
5Compensatory Example
- Harry owned a warehouse, contracted with Drew
to construct a road to the warehouse. The
contract price was 42,324. After Drew completed
the work, some cracks appeared in the road,
causing improper drainage. Harry hired another
contractor to do the repairs, costing Harry an
additional 5,000. Harry refused to pay. Drew
sued to recover the contract price. Result? - Answer Drew wins and can recover 37,324, the
contract price minus the costs of repairs. A
contractor who has substantially performed the
work is entitled to be paid, subject to any
deduction for reasonable costs of repair for any
deficiencies proved by the owner.
6Consequential Damages
- Consequential damages are special damages, which
are foreseeable and result from circumstances
outside the contract, which the breaching party
must know will cause a special damage, i.e., lost
profits - EX. Toms printing press breaks down and he
needs a new part. Tom contracts to buy the new
part which must be delivered no later than Nov 15
because if delivered any later, he wont have
time to complete a 100,000 Christmas card order.
The Seller knows Tom needs the part by the 15th,
and he told Tom it wouldnt be a problem The part
is not delivered until Dec and Tom loses the
order. Tom receives 100,000 in consequential
damages.
7Nominal Damages
- Nominal damages are awarded by jurors when a
breach of a contract is proven by the plaintiff,
but the plaintiff did not really suffer actual
damages, or cannot prove any actual damages
(loss). Generally speaking, nominal damages are
very small and sometimes as little as 1 is
awarded! In fact, several years ago the brand
new, aspiring USFL football league sued the NFL
in an antitrust suit. The jurors awarded the
USFL 1 in nominal damages.
8Example, Nominal damages
- In order to boost his acting career, John agreed
with Playgirl that it could publish a picture of
him posing naked at Lion Country Safari as the
centerfold of Playgirl magazine, without
compensation. The magazine was published, with
John as the centerfold, but no immediate career
boost resulted. In April 1974, Playgirl wished to
use the photo in its annual edition entitled Best
of Playgirl. Playgirl and John entered into a
contract whereby Johns picture was to occupy 1/4
of the front cover of the annual edition. Due to
Playboys editorial mix-up, Johns picture did
not appear John sued for breach of contract. - RESULT John received nominal damages of 100
from Playgirl. The jurors acknowledged that
Playgirl breached its contract, however they did
not believe John proved that he suffered a loss,
or reasonably certain damages. John could not
prove that even if the picture had appeared,
Johns acting career would have been boosted.
9Incidental Damages
- Damages which arise directly out of the breach.
- Incidental damages make up part of compensatory
damages - Ex Agnes employs Bob for 9 months for 20,000
to supervise construction of a factory, but fires
him without cause after 3 weeks. Bob spends 350
attempting to find comparable employment. He may
recover the 350, plus any other actual loss he
suffers for being unemployed. However, dont
forget, he must not sit around home and collect a
paycheck for not working. He has a duty to
mitigate damages and look for another job even
though he had been fired without cause.
10Punitive Damages
- Awarded to punish the wrongdoer. Usually NOT
allowed in contract cases, (except maybe if there
was fraud, or something like a willful and
malicious action, like an intentional refusal to
pay valid medical claims of an insured) - For purposes of the CPA exam, assume that
punitive damages are NOT awarded for a breach of
a contract. - Punitive damages (usually huge amounts) are
common in tort cases (i.e., awarded to victims
injured by the Pinto rear-end collisions because
Pinto knew the entire time that its gas tank was
in a dangerous place, and didnt want to correct
it)
11Liquidated Damages
- The parties to a contract agree in advance to the
damages to be paid in the event there is a
breach, instead of suing for actual damages for a
breach of a contract. - Liquidated damages should reasonably forecast the
probable loss due to a breach. - Very common in construction contracts, i.e., Sue
is the owner of a restaurant which is being
built. The contractor and Sue agree in advance
that Sue will receive 2000 a day in liquidated
damages for every day the construction goes
beyond the deadline. - Ex. An academic building is not completed on the
date as originally scheduled The builders are
currently in the penalty phase for FGCUs new
Academic Building, and are paying liquidated
damages. - Parties to a contract must choose if they want a
liquidated damages clause in the contract, or
keep their right to sue for actual damages in the
event there is a breach.
12Liquidated Damages Example Text, 2, CH 18
- Answer (a)The contention that the agreement as
to 1000 a day is a penalty is not a good
argument. This is a legitimate liquidated
damages provision. The agreed amount is
reasonable, considering the cost of the apartment
building and that damages are not readily
ascertainable. - (b) Steven does not have to prove damages. One
of the purposes of a liquidated damages provision
is to eliminate the necessity of proving damages.
13Liquidated Damages, 14
- Answer Judgement for insurance company. A
contract may contain a liquidated damages
provision, but the sum agreed upon must be a
reasonable measure of the anticipated harm. The
amount of the bond was not a reasonable estimate
of probable monetary harm or damage to the city
but was rather a penalty. The harm which the
city contends it would suffer is minimal and
speculative. Since the agreement to pay 200 a
day was actually a penalty provision, the court
will not enforce it.
14Liquidated Damages, 5
- Pam wins.The 10,000 deposited as security for
performance of all of Pams covenants in the
lease, to be retained by Louis in case of any
breach on Ps part, was a provision for a penalty
rather than one for liquidated damages. For the
slightest infraction of the lease by Pam, she
would forfeit 10,000. This amount does not bear
a rational relationship to such actual damages as
might accrue in the event of any breach of the
contract.Louis is limited to recovery of damages
for breach of contract as if the liquidated
damages clause were absent.
15Mitigation of Damages
- If a breach of contract occurs, the injured party
is required to take reasonable steps to mitigate
(reduce or lessen) damages he may sustain. - The injured party may not recover damages for
loss that he could have avoided without undue
risk or burden. - The non-breaching party must refrain from piling
up losses after a breach. - The non-breaching party must not incur further
costs, and must make reasonable efforts to limit
losses by obtaining substitute goods at a
reasonable price. EX- Sam is to buy widgets for
1000 from Bob. Bob breaches at the last minute.
Sam has a duty to look elsewhere and make an
attempt to purchase them elsewhere. If Sam can
get them for 1200 from Pat, Sam will recover
200 from Bob. There are no damages for the
aggravation that Sam suffered because of Bobs
breach.
16Mitigation of Damages, 3
- Jane may not recover the purchase price, but is
entitled to recover such damages as she sustained
not enhanced by her act in manufacturing the
second lot of 500 shirts. When Sharon notified
Jane that she could not use or dispose of the
other 500 shirts and directed Jane to discontinue
manufacturing them under the contract, Jane
should have sought to minimize the damages.
17Mitigation of Damages, 16
- Judgment for Ballard. The general rule is that
an employees damages for employers breach of
contract will be mitigated by the amount she
would earn if she found similar employment
immediately after termination. The burden of
showing the availability of such employment,
however, is on the breaching party. The
defendant (breacher) must assert that the
employee-plaintiff had a duty to mitigate,and
prove that there was other available employment.
18Mitigation, 12
- Judgment in part for Copenhaver. Although
Berryman is liable for the monetary loss
sustained by Copenhaver, C must exercise
reasonable efforts in an attempt to minimize
damages. C suffered no damages after the 6 month
period because all his equipment was in use in
other locations and was generating at least as
much income. Moreover, C failed to prove that he
could have expanded to the new locations had
Berryman not breached the contract. Therefore, C
may recover only 3525.84 as damages for losses
sustained during the 6 month period.
19Specific Performance
- An equitable remedy, awarded where monetary
damages are not an adequate remedy. Awarded when
the contract is unique,ie, rare painting , land. - Ex. A court might order a Seller to specifically
perform a contract for the sale of land if the
Seller changes his mind tells the Buyer he
wont sell. - Ex. X contracts to sell his unique coin
collection to Y for 5000. Y pays the 5000 but
X decides he wants to give the collection to his
son instead, and X offers to return the 5000,
plus 100 for Ys trouble. Y does not want the
money back - he wants the coins! Y can
successfully sue X for specific performance of
the contract and require X to transfer the coin
collection for 5000.
20Specific Performance, 6
- A. Decision for Anne. Where shares of stock
have no market value and are not on the market
for sale, money damages are not an adequate
remedy for breach of contract. For the sale of a
part of these corporate shares , the purchaser
may obtain specific performance of the contract. - B. Decision for Mary. Specific performance is
denied where the remedy at law is adequate.
Money damages may be awarded here in a lawsuit.
Shares of U.S. Steel are readily available on the
market. - Decision for Anne. A contract for the sale of
land may be enforced by specific performance.
Land is always unique, it is not the same as
another parcel. The lack of commercial value, or
its underdeveloped condition, are immaterial.
21Injunction
- A formal court order enjoining (commanding) a
person to refrain from doing a specific act. - Equitable remedy
- An employer may get an injunction to enjoin a
former employee from breaching a non-compete
clause. -
22Injunctions/Specific Performance, 4
- A. An injunction against Stuarts performing for
Elaine would probably be granted if Elaine is a
competitor of Charlottes and if Stuarts
services are unique or extraordinary. - Specific Performance should not be granted
because a promise to render personal services
will not be specifically enforced. This would
allow for involuntary servitude (slavery)
23Rescission
- Rescission cancels a contract and returns the
parties to a position they would have occupied if
the contract had not been made. - Rescission may be brought about by mutual consent
of the parties, conduct of the parties, or the
court will un-do the contract. - Rescission is appropriate if
- a mutual mistake in contract formation
- A material breach, unjustified failure to perform
- A minor rescinds contract (disaffirms)
- A unilateral mistake due to fraud, duress or
undue influence - The other party knew or should have known of the
mistake. The mistake was so obvious that a
reasonable person must suspect that a mistake was
made.
24Reformation
- When parties to a contract have an imperfect
written understanding, reformation allows the
contract to be rewritten to reflect the parties
true intention.
25Restitution
- Restitution is the act of returning the
consideration, value, to the aggrieved (innocent)
party. - The purpose of restitution is to restore the
aggrieved party to the position he occupied
before the contract was made. - Minors might have to make restitution if they
return damaged goods.
26Election of Remedies
- Parties may seek as many remedies as they like,
and may choose whatever they desire.