Remedies

About This Presentation
Title:

Remedies

Description:

Legal Remedies: to compensate the other party with money for breach of the ... Due to Playboy's editorial mix-up, John's picture did not appear & John sued for ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:83
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 27
Provided by: NeilP64
Learn more at: http://ruby.fgcu.edu

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Remedies


1
Chapter 13
  • Remedies

2
Remedies
  • Legal Remedies to compensate the other party
    with money for breach of the contract, with
    compensatory, nominal, consequential, punitive,
    and/or liquidated money damages
  • Equitable Remedies Granted only when money
    damages will not be adequate,
  • specific performance, injunction

3
Compensatory
  • Purpose To place the injured party in a
    position as good as the one he would have
    occupied had the other party performed as he was
    supposed to under the contract.
  • Compensatory damages are all out-of-pocket
    expenses including loss of value, incidental
    damages, and consequential damages, minus the
    cost avoided by the injured party (savings)
  • Loss of value is the difference between the
    value of the promised performance , and the value
    of the actual performance, i.e., Seller is to
    deliver widgets, which are valued at 5000, but
    they are defective when delivered, and worth only
    3000. Buyer may then recover 2000 in damages
    from S

4
Compensatory Damages
  • Compensatory damages flow from the wrongful
    conduct of the breaching party.
  • Damages are intended to place the injured party
    in as good a position as if the breaching party
    had not breached and had performed the contract
    as the plaintiff reasonably expected.
  • The usual measure of compensatory damages is the
    amount of money necessary to compensate the
    non-breaching party for the breach.

5
Compensatory Example
  • Harry owned a warehouse, contracted with Drew
    to construct a road to the warehouse. The
    contract price was 42,324. After Drew completed
    the work, some cracks appeared in the road,
    causing improper drainage. Harry hired another
    contractor to do the repairs, costing Harry an
    additional 5,000. Harry refused to pay. Drew
    sued to recover the contract price. Result?
  • Answer Drew wins and can recover 37,324, the
    contract price minus the costs of repairs. A
    contractor who has substantially performed the
    work is entitled to be paid, subject to any
    deduction for reasonable costs of repair for any
    deficiencies proved by the owner.

6
Consequential Damages
  • Consequential damages are special damages, which
    are foreseeable and result from circumstances
    outside the contract, which the breaching party
    must know will cause a special damage, i.e., lost
    profits
  • EX. Toms printing press breaks down and he
    needs a new part. Tom contracts to buy the new
    part which must be delivered no later than Nov 15
    because if delivered any later, he wont have
    time to complete a 100,000 Christmas card order.
    The Seller knows Tom needs the part by the 15th,
    and he told Tom it wouldnt be a problem The part
    is not delivered until Dec and Tom loses the
    order. Tom receives 100,000 in consequential
    damages.

7
Nominal Damages
  • Nominal damages are awarded by jurors when a
    breach of a contract is proven by the plaintiff,
    but the plaintiff did not really suffer actual
    damages, or cannot prove any actual damages
    (loss). Generally speaking, nominal damages are
    very small and sometimes as little as 1 is
    awarded! In fact, several years ago the brand
    new, aspiring USFL football league sued the NFL
    in an antitrust suit. The jurors awarded the
    USFL 1 in nominal damages.

8
Example, Nominal damages
  • In order to boost his acting career, John agreed
    with Playgirl that it could publish a picture of
    him posing naked at Lion Country Safari as the
    centerfold of Playgirl magazine, without
    compensation. The magazine was published, with
    John as the centerfold, but no immediate career
    boost resulted. In April 1974, Playgirl wished to
    use the photo in its annual edition entitled Best
    of Playgirl. Playgirl and John entered into a
    contract whereby Johns picture was to occupy 1/4
    of the front cover of the annual edition. Due to
    Playboys editorial mix-up, Johns picture did
    not appear John sued for breach of contract.
  • RESULT John received nominal damages of 100
    from Playgirl. The jurors acknowledged that
    Playgirl breached its contract, however they did
    not believe John proved that he suffered a loss,
    or reasonably certain damages. John could not
    prove that even if the picture had appeared,
    Johns acting career would have been boosted.

9
Incidental Damages
  • Damages which arise directly out of the breach.
  • Incidental damages make up part of compensatory
    damages
  • Ex Agnes employs Bob for 9 months for 20,000
    to supervise construction of a factory, but fires
    him without cause after 3 weeks. Bob spends 350
    attempting to find comparable employment. He may
    recover the 350, plus any other actual loss he
    suffers for being unemployed. However, dont
    forget, he must not sit around home and collect a
    paycheck for not working. He has a duty to
    mitigate damages and look for another job even
    though he had been fired without cause.

10
Punitive Damages
  • Awarded to punish the wrongdoer. Usually NOT
    allowed in contract cases, (except maybe if there
    was fraud, or something like a willful and
    malicious action, like an intentional refusal to
    pay valid medical claims of an insured)
  • For purposes of the CPA exam, assume that
    punitive damages are NOT awarded for a breach of
    a contract.
  • Punitive damages (usually huge amounts) are
    common in tort cases (i.e., awarded to victims
    injured by the Pinto rear-end collisions because
    Pinto knew the entire time that its gas tank was
    in a dangerous place, and didnt want to correct
    it)

11
Liquidated Damages
  • The parties to a contract agree in advance to the
    damages to be paid in the event there is a
    breach, instead of suing for actual damages for a
    breach of a contract.
  • Liquidated damages should reasonably forecast the
    probable loss due to a breach.
  • Very common in construction contracts, i.e., Sue
    is the owner of a restaurant which is being
    built. The contractor and Sue agree in advance
    that Sue will receive 2000 a day in liquidated
    damages for every day the construction goes
    beyond the deadline.
  • Ex. An academic building is not completed on the
    date as originally scheduled The builders are
    currently in the penalty phase for FGCUs new
    Academic Building, and are paying liquidated
    damages.
  • Parties to a contract must choose if they want a
    liquidated damages clause in the contract, or
    keep their right to sue for actual damages in the
    event there is a breach.

12
Liquidated Damages Example Text, 2, CH 18
  • Answer (a)The contention that the agreement as
    to 1000 a day is a penalty is not a good
    argument. This is a legitimate liquidated
    damages provision. The agreed amount is
    reasonable, considering the cost of the apartment
    building and that damages are not readily
    ascertainable.
  • (b) Steven does not have to prove damages. One
    of the purposes of a liquidated damages provision
    is to eliminate the necessity of proving damages.

13
Liquidated Damages, 14
  • Answer Judgement for insurance company. A
    contract may contain a liquidated damages
    provision, but the sum agreed upon must be a
    reasonable measure of the anticipated harm. The
    amount of the bond was not a reasonable estimate
    of probable monetary harm or damage to the city
    but was rather a penalty. The harm which the
    city contends it would suffer is minimal and
    speculative. Since the agreement to pay 200 a
    day was actually a penalty provision, the court
    will not enforce it.

14
Liquidated Damages, 5
  • Pam wins.The 10,000 deposited as security for
    performance of all of Pams covenants in the
    lease, to be retained by Louis in case of any
    breach on Ps part, was a provision for a penalty
    rather than one for liquidated damages. For the
    slightest infraction of the lease by Pam, she
    would forfeit 10,000. This amount does not bear
    a rational relationship to such actual damages as
    might accrue in the event of any breach of the
    contract.Louis is limited to recovery of damages
    for breach of contract as if the liquidated
    damages clause were absent.

15
Mitigation of Damages
  • If a breach of contract occurs, the injured party
    is required to take reasonable steps to mitigate
    (reduce or lessen) damages he may sustain.
  • The injured party may not recover damages for
    loss that he could have avoided without undue
    risk or burden.
  • The non-breaching party must refrain from piling
    up losses after a breach.
  • The non-breaching party must not incur further
    costs, and must make reasonable efforts to limit
    losses by obtaining substitute goods at a
    reasonable price. EX- Sam is to buy widgets for
    1000 from Bob. Bob breaches at the last minute.
    Sam has a duty to look elsewhere and make an
    attempt to purchase them elsewhere. If Sam can
    get them for 1200 from Pat, Sam will recover
    200 from Bob. There are no damages for the
    aggravation that Sam suffered because of Bobs
    breach.

16
Mitigation of Damages, 3
  • Jane may not recover the purchase price, but is
    entitled to recover such damages as she sustained
    not enhanced by her act in manufacturing the
    second lot of 500 shirts. When Sharon notified
    Jane that she could not use or dispose of the
    other 500 shirts and directed Jane to discontinue
    manufacturing them under the contract, Jane
    should have sought to minimize the damages.

17
Mitigation of Damages, 16
  • Judgment for Ballard. The general rule is that
    an employees damages for employers breach of
    contract will be mitigated by the amount she
    would earn if she found similar employment
    immediately after termination. The burden of
    showing the availability of such employment,
    however, is on the breaching party. The
    defendant (breacher) must assert that the
    employee-plaintiff had a duty to mitigate,and
    prove that there was other available employment.

18
Mitigation, 12
  • Judgment in part for Copenhaver. Although
    Berryman is liable for the monetary loss
    sustained by Copenhaver, C must exercise
    reasonable efforts in an attempt to minimize
    damages. C suffered no damages after the 6 month
    period because all his equipment was in use in
    other locations and was generating at least as
    much income. Moreover, C failed to prove that he
    could have expanded to the new locations had
    Berryman not breached the contract. Therefore, C
    may recover only 3525.84 as damages for losses
    sustained during the 6 month period.

19
Specific Performance
  • An equitable remedy, awarded where monetary
    damages are not an adequate remedy. Awarded when
    the contract is unique,ie, rare painting , land.
  • Ex. A court might order a Seller to specifically
    perform a contract for the sale of land if the
    Seller changes his mind tells the Buyer he
    wont sell.
  • Ex. X contracts to sell his unique coin
    collection to Y for 5000. Y pays the 5000 but
    X decides he wants to give the collection to his
    son instead, and X offers to return the 5000,
    plus 100 for Ys trouble. Y does not want the
    money back - he wants the coins! Y can
    successfully sue X for specific performance of
    the contract and require X to transfer the coin
    collection for 5000.

20
Specific Performance, 6
  • A. Decision for Anne. Where shares of stock
    have no market value and are not on the market
    for sale, money damages are not an adequate
    remedy for breach of contract. For the sale of a
    part of these corporate shares , the purchaser
    may obtain specific performance of the contract.
  • B. Decision for Mary. Specific performance is
    denied where the remedy at law is adequate.
    Money damages may be awarded here in a lawsuit.
    Shares of U.S. Steel are readily available on the
    market.
  • Decision for Anne. A contract for the sale of
    land may be enforced by specific performance.
    Land is always unique, it is not the same as
    another parcel. The lack of commercial value, or
    its underdeveloped condition, are immaterial.

21
Injunction
  • A formal court order enjoining (commanding) a
    person to refrain from doing a specific act.
  • Equitable remedy
  • An employer may get an injunction to enjoin a
    former employee from breaching a non-compete
    clause.

22
Injunctions/Specific Performance, 4
  • A. An injunction against Stuarts performing for
    Elaine would probably be granted if Elaine is a
    competitor of Charlottes and if Stuarts
    services are unique or extraordinary.
  • Specific Performance should not be granted
    because a promise to render personal services
    will not be specifically enforced. This would
    allow for involuntary servitude (slavery)

23
Rescission
  • Rescission cancels a contract and returns the
    parties to a position they would have occupied if
    the contract had not been made.
  • Rescission may be brought about by mutual consent
    of the parties, conduct of the parties, or the
    court will un-do the contract.
  • Rescission is appropriate if
  • a mutual mistake in contract formation
  • A material breach, unjustified failure to perform
  • A minor rescinds contract (disaffirms)
  • A unilateral mistake due to fraud, duress or
    undue influence
  • The other party knew or should have known of the
    mistake. The mistake was so obvious that a
    reasonable person must suspect that a mistake was
    made.

24
Reformation
  • When parties to a contract have an imperfect
    written understanding, reformation allows the
    contract to be rewritten to reflect the parties
    true intention.

25
Restitution
  • Restitution is the act of returning the
    consideration, value, to the aggrieved (innocent)
    party.
  • The purpose of restitution is to restore the
    aggrieved party to the position he occupied
    before the contract was made.
  • Minors might have to make restitution if they
    return damaged goods.

26
Election of Remedies
  • Parties may seek as many remedies as they like,
    and may choose whatever they desire.
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)