The New Part 226 Rules: Highlights - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 60
About This Presentation
Title:

The New Part 226 Rules: Highlights

Description:

Additional requirements outlined in the rule apply only to students who transfer ... are controlled by the 20 USC Section 1414(d) and 34 CFR 300.323(f) ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:148
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 61
Provided by: andrew383
Category:
Tags: highlights | new | part | rule | rules

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: The New Part 226 Rules: Highlights


1
The New Part 226 RulesHighlights
  • Illinois State Board of Education

2
Presentation Objectives
  • Review rule approval process
  • Provide rationale for rule changes
  • Highlight significant rule changes
  • Discuss application of new rules

3
Why This Way?
  • To reduce the number of state rules that
    duplicate Federal language
  • To highlight areas where Illinois chose to depart
    from Federal guidelines
  • To revise outdated or ineffective processes and
    procedures

4
Key Dates
  • IDEA 2004 December 2004
  • Illinois Proposed Rules April 2006
  • Public Comment April 2006 - October 2006
  • Final Federal Rules August 2006
  • ISBE Board Approval December 2006
  • JCAR Prohibition January 2007
  • ISBE Board Approval of
  • Revised Rules June 2007
  • JCAR Lifting of Prohibition June 2007
  • Final Illinois Rules June 28, 2007

5
23 IAC 226.50 Free Appropriate Public Education
  • Transfer Students, Eligibility Graduation

6
23 IAC 226.50 Requirements for a Free
Appropriate Public Education (FAPE)
  • (a) Transfer Students
  • Additional requirements outlined in the rule
    apply only to students who transfer from another
    district in Illinois
  • Out-of-state transfers are controlled by the 20
    USC Section 1414(d) and 34 CFR 300.323(f)

7
23 IAC 226.50 Requirements for a Free
Appropriate Public Education (FAPE)
  • (a) Transfer Students
  • When a district receives a transfer student from
    another Illinois district, it may
  • Adopt the IEP of the sending district without an
    IEP meeting if it deems the IEP appropriate and
    the parents indicatesatisfaction with the IEP
    either orally or in writing.
  • Develop a new IEP after providing notice to the
    parents (no later than ten days after the
    students enrollment in the new district) of the
    date of the new IEP meeting. In the interim, the
    district shall implement services comparable to
    those in the IEP of the sending district.

8
23 IAC 226.50 Requirements for a Free
Appropriate Public Education (FAPE)
  • (a) Transfer Students
  • In the absence of receiving either the students
    IEP from the sending district or verbal or
    written confirmation of the contents of the IEP
    from the sending district, the district may
    provide services it believes will meet the needs
    of the student until the IEP or confirmation of
    the IEPs contents is received from the sending
    district.
  • The receiving district MUST request records from
    the sending district within one business day
    after enrollment of the student.

9
23 IAC 226.50 Requirements for a Free
Appropriate Public Education (FAPE)
  • If the receiving district has not received and
    adopted the existing IEP from the sending
    district within ten days after the deadline for
    the sending district to transfer such records
    under Section 2-3.13a of the School Code, the
    receiving district SHALL initiate an IEP meeting
    to develop a new IEP.

10
23 IAC 226.50 Requirements for a Free
Appropriate Public Education (FAPE)
  • Eligibility Graduation or Completion of Program
  • 1) An eligible student who requires continued
    public school educational experience to
    facilitate his or her integration into society
    shall be eligible for such services through age
    21, inclusive (i.e., through the day before the
    students 22nd birthday) (see 34 CFR 300.101(a)).

11
Age of Eligibility Rule of Application
  • If the student aged-out under the old rule (i.e.,
    the age-out occurred on or before June 27,
    2007), the student is no longer eligible for
    services, even if the students age might allow
    for further eligibility under the new rule.
  • Why is this? No retroactivity is included in the
    language of the regulation or the recently signed
    PA 95-0014, which is the legislative version of
    the rule.

12
Examples of the Rule
  • a) Student A turned 21 on October 15, 2006 and
    completed the school year on June 5, 2007. This
    student would NOT be eligible to receive further
    services during the 07-08 school year.
  • b) Student A turned 21 on October 15, 2006 but,
    by virtue of extended school year, this students
    school year did not end until July 10, 2007.
    This student would be eligible to receive
    services until October 14, 2007.

13
Graduation Requirements
  • 23 IAC 226.50(c)
  • The provision of FAPE is not required with
    respect to a student with a disability who has
    graduated with a regular high school diploma.
  • A student with a disability who has fulfilled the
    minimum State graduation requirements set forth
    in Section 27-22 of the School Code 105 ILCS
    5/27-22 shall be eligible for a regular high
    school diploma.
  • A) If the students individualized education
    program prescribes special education, transition
    planning, transition services, or related
    services beyond that point, issuance of that
    diploma shall be deferred so that the student
    will continue to be eligible for those services.

14
Graduation Requirements
  • 23 IAC 226.50(c)
  • (3)(B) If the student is to receive a regular
    high school diploma, at least one year prior to
    the anticipated date of its issuance, both the
    parent and the student shall receive written
    notification in conformance with the requirements
    of 34 CFR 300.503 that eligibility for public
    school special education services ends following
    the granting of a diploma and that the parent (or
    the student, if Section 226.690 of this Part
    applies) may request an IEP meeting to review the
    recommendation that the student receive a regular
    diploma.
  • 4) Students who have participated in a
    graduation ceremony but have not been awarded
    regular high school diplomas continue to be
    eligible to receive FAPE through age 21,
    inclusive.

15
23 IAC 226.75
  • Selected Definitions

16
23 IAC 226.75 Definitions
  • Disability
  • IDEA identifies 13 disabilities as the basis for
    students eligibility for special education and
    related services. These disabilities (autism,
    deaf-blindness, deafness, emotional disability,
    hearing impairment, cognitive disability,
    multiple disabilities, orthopedic impairment,
    other health impairment, specific learning
    disability, speech or language impairment,
    traumatic brain injury, and visual impairment)
    shall be defined as set forth in 34 CFR 300.8(c).
    In addition, for the purposes of this Part,
    autism shall include, but not be limited to,
    any Autism Spectrum Disorder that adversely
    affects a childs educational performance.

17
23 IAC 226.75 Definitions
  • Developmental Delay
  • See 34 CFR 300.8 and 300.111(b). Delay in
    physical development, cognitive development,
    communication development, social or emotional
    development, or adaptive development (may include
    children from three through nine years of age).

18
23 IAC 226.75 Definitions
  • Parent
  • Incorporates language of 34 CFR 300.30 and
    defines a parent as either
  • A biological or adoptive parent
  • A foster parent (unless State or local law
    otherwise limit this authority)
  • A guardian (other than the State) authorized to
    act on the childs behalf
  • Individual acting in place of the biological or
    adoptive parent with whom the child lives
  • An individual who is legally responsible for the
    child
  • A surrogate parent

19
23 IAC 226.75 Definitions
  • Related Services
  • Adopts language of 34 CFR 300.34
  • Adopts exclusionary language of 300.34 that
    excludes surgically implanted devices like
    cochlear implants including optimization of the
    functioning of such devices
  • Duty of a local district to monitor and maintain
    devices to maintain the health and safety of the
    child is now explicit

20
23 IAC 226.100
  • Child Find Evaluation

21
23 IAC 226.100 Child Find Responsibility
  • Reminder
  • Child find now explicitly includes
    parentally-placed students who attend private
    schools in your district (per the requirements of
    IDEA 2004, Section 1412)

22
23 IAC 226.110 Evaluation Procedures
  • Procedures for requesting and conducting initial
    evaluations of children who are suspected of
    requiring special education and related services
    shall conform to the requirements of 34 CFR
    300.301, 300.304, 300.305, and 300.306. For
    purposes of this Section, the date of referral
    discussed in Section 14-8.02 of the School Code
    shall be understood to be the date of written
    parental consent for an evaluation, and screening
    procedures done in accordance with 34 CFR 300.302
    shall not be considered an evaluation. Consent
    for the initial evaluation shall be obtained in
    conformance with the requirements of 34 CFR
    300.300. In addition, the following requirements
    shall apply

23
23 IAC 226.110(a)(3) Evaluation Procedures
  • Within 14 school days after receiving a request
    for an evaluation, the district shall determine
    whether an evaluation is warranted. If the
    district determines not to conduct an evaluation,
    it shall provide written notice to the parents in
    accordance with 34 CFR 300.503(b). If an
    evaluation is to be conducted
  • a) The district shall convene a team of
    individuals (including the parent) having the
    knowledge and skills necessary to administer and
    interpret evaluation data. The composition of the
    team will vary depending upon the nature of the
    childs symptoms and other relevant factors.

24
23 IAC 226.110(a)(3) Evaluation Procedures
  • b) The team shall identify the assessments
    necessary to complete the evaluation in
    accordance with 34 CFR 300.305 and shall prepare
    a written notification for the parents as
    required under 34 CFR 300.304(a). For each
    domain, the notification shall either describe
    the needed assessments or explain why none are
    needed.
  • c) The district shall ensure that the
    notification of the teams conclusions is
    transmitted to the parents within the
    14-school-day timeline applicable under this
    subsection (c)(3), along with the districts
    request for the parents consent to conduct the
    needed assessments.

25
23 IAC 226.130Specific Learning Disability
(SLD)
  • Response to Scientific, Research-Based
    Interventions (RtI)

26
The Heart of the RtI Language
  • 23 IAC 226.130(b)
  • Provided that the requirements of this subsection
    (b) are met, each district shall, no later than
    the beginning of the 2010-11 school year,
    implement the use of a process that determines
    how the child responds to scientific,
    research-based interventions as part of the
    evaluation procedure described in 34 CFR 300.304.
    When a district implements the use of a process
    of this type, the district shall not use any
    childs participation in the process as the basis
    for denying a parents request for an evaluation.

27
The Prerequisites to Mandatory RtI
  • By January 1, 2008, ISBE must develop a plan for
    implementing RtI that is to be developed in
    consultation with stakeholder groups, including
    ISAC
  • The plan must include estimated costs and
    resources needed to provide TA to districts, as
    well as a method for identifying those districts
    that require assistance for resources

28
The Prerequisites to Mandatory RtI
  • By January 1, 2009, local districts must develop
    a plan for transitioning to the use of an RtI
    process, including identification of the
    resources to be used in implementing the plan
  • NOTE Nothing prohibits districts from
    implementing RtI now, though it is not yet
    mandatory. Remember, though, that the
    requirements at 34 CFR 300.309(b) do apply now.

29
34 CFR 300.309(b)
  • To ensure that underachievement in a child
    suspected of having a specific learning
    disability is not due to lack of appropriate
    instruction in reading or math, the group must
    consider
  • 1) Data that demonstrate that prior to, or as
    part of, the referral process the child received
    appropriate instruction in regular education
    settings from qualified personnel and
  • 2) Data-based documentation of repeated
    assessments of achievement at reasonable
    intervals, reflecting formal assessment of
    student progress during instruction, which was
    provided to the childs parents.

30
The Old Process Remains
  • 23 IAC 226.130(d)
  • Districts may continue to use a severe
    discrepancy model when determining whether a
    specific learning disability exists, but
    beginning with the 2010-2011 school year, must
    also first use an RtI process.

31
The IEP
  • IEP Team
  • IEP Content

32
23 IAC 226.210 IEP Team
  • The composition of the IEP Team for a particular
    child, and the participation, attendance, and
    excusal of the team members and other individuals
    in the IEP meeting, shall conform to the
    requirements of 34 CFR 300.321, 300.322, 300.324,
    and 300.325. The additional requirements of this
    Section shall also apply.
  • a) The general education teacher who serves as a
    member of a childs IEP Team shall be a teacher
    who is, or may be, responsible for implementing a
    portion of the IEP, so that the teacher can
    participate in discussions about how best to
    instruct the child.
  • General Education Term is interchangeable with
    regular education
  • b) For students aged 3 through 5 who have not yet
    entered the primary grades, a teacher qualified
    to teach non-disabled preschool students

33
23 IAC 226.210 IEP Team
  • Excusal of Team Members may occur when
  • The district and parent agree in writing that the
    members attendance is not necessary because the
    members area of curriculum or related services
    is not being modified or discussed or
  • The district and parent agree to the excusal and
    the member submits written input into the IEP
    development process prior to the meeting (if the
    members area is being discussed or modified) (34
    CFR 300.321(e))

34
23 IAC 226.210 IEP Team
  • By reference to 34 CFR 300.324, amendments to the
    IEP may be made outside the IEP meeting process
    if done in writing with the agreement of the
    parent and the district. The writing must define
    the changes to be made to the IEP. Members of
    the IEP team must be informed of those changes.

35
Section 226.230 Content of the IEP
  • Each IEP shall include
  • Present Levels of Educational Performance must
    include statements of academic and functional
    performance (34 CFR 300.320)

36
P.A. 95-0257 Additional IEP Procedures for
Students with Autism
  • Amends 14-8.02 of the School Code to require
    specific factors to be considered by the IEP team
    when addressing the needs of students whose
    exceptionalities fall within the autism spectrum
    according to the DSM-IV

37
P.A. 95-0257 Additional IEP Procedures for
Students with Autism
  • Factors to be considered
  • Verbal and non-verbal communication needs
  • Need to develop social interaction skills
    proficiencies
  • Needs resulting from unusual responses to sensory
    experiences
  • Needs resulting from resistance to environmental
    changes, changes in daily routines or engagement
    in repetitive activities stereotyped movements
  • Need for positive behavioral interventions,
    supports and strategies to address any behavioral
    difficulties arising from autism spectrum
    disorder
  • Other needs resulting from the condition that
    impact on progress in the general curriculum

38
Section 226.230 Content of the IEP
  • c) Post-Secondary Transition
  • Beginning not later than the first IEP to be in
    effect when the child turns 14 1/2, and updated
    annually thereafter, the IEP shall include
  • appropriate, measurable, postsecondary goals
    based upon age-appropriate assessments related to
    employment, education or training, and, as
    needed, independent living
  • the transition services that are needed to
    assist the child in reaching those goals,
    including courses of study and any other needed
    services to be provided by entities other than
    the school district and
  • any additional requirements set forth in Section
    14-8.03 of the School Code 105 ILCS 5/14-8.03.

39
Procedural Safeguards
  • Transfer of Rights
  • Consent
  • Mediation
  • Complaints
  • Due Process

40
P.A. 95-0372 Transfer of Rights
  • Adds a new Section 14-6.10 to the School Code
  • Facilitates the ability of students 18 and older
    to appoint another person to represent their
    educational interests
  • Prescribes language that students may use to
    appoint an educational representative
  • Creates an alternative to guardianship process in
    Illinois

41
Section 226.540 Consent
  • Consent is required when
  • Accessing Medicaid, other public benefits or
    private insurance (34 CFR 300.154)
  • Initial evaluations (34 CFR 300.300)
  • Re-evaluations (34 CFR 300.300)
  • Initial provision of services (34 CFR 300.300)
  • Release of information to individuals or agency
    outside of the district (34 CFR 300.622)

42
Section 226.540 Consent
  • Revocation of consent may be oral or written (if
    oral, district must memorialize in writing within
    5 days)
  • If consent is revoked
  • The revocation has immediate effect
  • The action for which consent was provided must be
    terminated immediately
  • In the case of a placement, the district may
    request due process to stay the placement and to
    challenge the revocation, but must do so within 5
    business days after the parents revocation
    occurred

43
Section 226.560 Mediation
  • Agreements are now enforceable in a State or
    Federal court (34 CFR 300.506)
  • Mediators may not be an employee of the SEA or
    LEA, or have a personal or professional interest
    that conflicts with the mediators objectivity in
    the case (34 CFR 300.506)

44
Section 226.570 State Complaints
  • Principal Changes
  • One-year statute of limitations for filing a
    complaint (34 CFR 300.153(c))
  • The party filing the complaint must also forward
    a copy of the complaint to the LEA against whom
    the complaint was filed (34 CFR 300.153(d))
  • The parties must be afforded the opportunity to
    mediate their dispute to resolve the issues (34
    CFR 300.152(a))

45
Section 226.600 et seq. Due Process
  • Principal Changes
  • Two-year statute of limitations
  • Prehearing procedures
  • Dismissal for lack of sufficiency
  • Written responses
  • Resolution process
  • Longer timelines for expedited hearings (20
    school days for hearing, 10 school days for
    decision)

46
Class Size
  • General Education
  • Special Education

47
Section 226.730 731 Class Size
  • GENERAL EDUCATION CLASS
  • When a students IEP calls for services in a
    general education classroom, the student must be
    served in a class that is composed of students of
    whom at least 70 percent are without IEPs, that
    utilizes the general curriculum, that is taught
    by an instructor certified for general education,
    and that is not designated as a general remedial
    classroom.
  • THIS REMAINS THE SAME

48
SPECIAL EDUCATION CLASSES
  • Class Size Case Load

49
Whats the Difference?
  • Class Size
  • The number of students in a special
    education classroom during any class period
  • Case (Work) Load
  • The number of students for which a special
    educator is responsible

50
Section 226.731 Class Size Provisions for 2007-
08 and 2008-09
  • In the Special Education Setting
  • A student shall be considered to require
    instructional classes when he or she receives
    special education instruction for 50 percent of
    the school day or more. Classes for such
    students shall be subject to the limitations of
    this subsection (b).
  • A student shall be considered to require
    resource classes when he or she receives
    special education instruction for less than 50
    percent of the school day. Classes for such
    students shall be subject to the limitations of
    this subsection (c).
  • THIS ALSO REMAINS THE SAME

51
Special Education Class Sizes through 2008-09
  • Disability Category Limit Unique
    w/Aide Circumstances
  • INSTRUCTIONAL CLASSES
  • Early Childhood (All Disabilities) 5
    7 10
  • Multiple Disabilities 5 7
    10
  • Severe/Profound Disability 5
    7 10
  • Traumatic Brain Injury 8 10
    13
  • Severe Visual Impairment 8 10
    13
  • Severe Hearing Impairment 8
    10 13
  • Severe Physical Impairment 8
    10 13
  • Severe Speech/Language Impairment 8
    10 13
  • Severe Behavior Disorders 8
    10 13
  • Learning Disabilities 10 12
    15
  • Cross Categorical 10 12
    15
  • Moderate Visual Impairment 12
    14 17
  • Moderate Hearing Impairment 12
    14 17
  • Mild or Moderate Mental Impairment
  • Primary, ages 6-8 12 14
    17
  • Intermediate, jr, sr. high) 15
    17 20

52
23 IAC 226.730 Special Education Class Sizes for
2009-10 and Beyond
  • Class size means the total number of students an
    educator serves during any special education
    class. As used in this subsection (b), class
    means any circumstance where only students with
    IEPs are served and at least one special
    education teacher is assigned and provides
    instruction and/or therapy exclusively to
    students with IEPs. In the formation of special
    education classes, consideration shall be given
    to the age of the students, the nature and
    severity of their disabilities, the educational
    needs of the students, and the degree of
    intervention necessary, subject to the
    limitations of this subsection (b).

53
23 IAC 226.730 Special Education Class Sizes for
2009-10 and Beyond
  • Removal from
  • General Ed limit total
    w/ aide
  • 0-20 15 17
  • 21-60 10 15
  • 61-100 8 13
  • Ages 3-5 5 10

54
Work Load for Special Educators
55
  • Case Load Work Load

56
Whats the Difference?
  • Caseload A head count the number of
    students with an IEP for which a special educator
    is responsible
  • Does not take into consideration the type
    instruction required, the amount of consultation
    with others required, the amount of IEP meetings
    required

57
23 IAC 226.735 Work Load for Special Educators
  • LEAs must adopt a plan specifying limits on the
    work load of its special educators
  • Plans must be developed with the LEAs affected
    employees and, where there is an exclusive
    representative, in accordance with the Illinois
    Educational Labor Relations Act (IELRA).
  • Plans must take effect by the 2009-10 school
    year, unless a later date is necessary to comply
    with an agreement under the IELRA in effect at
    the beginning of that school year

58
23 IAC 226.735 Work Load for Special Educators
  • Plan must be based on analysis of the activities
    for which special education staff are
    responsible, including, but not limited to
  • individualized instruction,
  • consultative services and other collaboration
    among staff members,
  • attendance at IEP meetings and other staff
    conferences, and
  • paperwork and reporting.
  • Caseload for speech-language pathologists remains
    the same no more than 60 students

59
Resources
  • www.isbe.net/rules/archive/pdfs/226ark.pdf (state
    special education regulations)
  • http//a257.g.akamaitech.net/7/257/2422/01jan20061
    800/edocket.access.gpo.gov/2006/pdf/06-6656.pdf
    (IDEA 2004 final regulations)
  • http//www.isbe.net/spec-ed/default.htm (access
    to mandated Notice Consent Forms Instructions
    and recommended IEP Forms Instructions)

60
Questions?
  • ISBE Special Education Services, Springfield,
    217-782-5589
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com