What is Product Stewardship and EPR? - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 40
About This Presentation
Title:

What is Product Stewardship and EPR?

Description:

Throughout EU, Japan, Taiwan, beginning in Canada and China, etc. ... Sears. Staples. Target. US Cellular. Verizon Wireless. Example: Thermostats. Example: ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:969
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 41
Provided by: segoja
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: What is Product Stewardship and EPR?


1
Product Stewardship and Extended Producer
Responsibility
Northwest Product Stewardship Council
2
Product Stewardship
  • Product Stewardship is an environmental
    management strategy that means whoever designs,
    produces, sells, or uses a product takes
    responsibility for minimizing the product's
    environmental impact throughout all stages of the
    products' life cycle. The greatest responsibility
    lies with whoever has the most ability to affect
    the lifecycle environmental impacts of the
    product.

3
Extended Producer Responsibility
  • Extended Producer Responsibility (EPR)
  • an environmental policy approach in which a
    producers responsibility, physical and/or
    financial, for a product is extended to the
    post-consumer stage of a products life cycle
    (OECD, 2001)
  • Often used interchangeably with product
    stewardship
  • Similar terms
  • Manufacturer/Producer Responsibility
  • Shared Responsibility

4
Related Concepts
  • Cradle-to-Cradle manufacturing
  • Design of products whose materials are
    perpetually circulated back into commerce in
    closed loops. Maintaining materials in closed
    loops maximizes material value and commercial use
    without damaging ecosystems.
  • organic nutrient stream
  • technical nutrient stream
  • Green Chemistry
  • Design of chemical products and processes that
    reduce or eliminate the use and generation of
    hazardous substances.

5
Examples of Product Stewardship
  • Manufacturers finance or provide take back
    programs for recycling or special disposal.
  • Manufacturer redesign and reformulation of
    products to make products
  • non or less toxic, such as eliminating PBDEs or
    mercury
  • more recyclable, such as using easy-to-recycle
    materials
  • easier to disassemble, such as reducing and
    standardizing types of fasteners
  • more energy efficient, such as meeting Energy
    Star criteria
  • made with recycled content
  • Etc.

6
Why is This Important to Us?
  • Much waste we are handling is manufactured
    products.
  • Most of these products are produced far away and
    globally, but the environmental end-of-life
    impacts are local.
  • Local governments in the past have been
    responsible for providing end-of-life management
    and disposal.
  • These costs are ever increasing due to the design
    and formulation of the products toxic, not
    recyclable, hard to disassemble, etc. and cost to
    properly handle.
  • Since local governments have no control over the
    design of the products, but have had the
    responsibility for financing their disposal,
    there has been no feedback loop to the
    design/manufacturing process.

7
EPR Provides Many Solutions
  • Manufacturer financing or take-back of products
    provides an economic feedback loop that then
    influences design, leading to cleaner, safer
    products and less cost for future end-of-life
    management
  • Removes program or financing burden from local
    governments (or provides financing)
  • Provides much more convenient options to
    customers than what government can provide
  • Results in greater recovery of toxic and
    recyclable materials

8
EPR Provides Many Solutions
  • EPR keeps resources circulating in commerce,
    creating jobs and business opportunities that are
    lost when materials are disposed.
  • EPR harnesses business know how and relationships
    to develop superior, more effective and less
    expensive programs.
  • Some manufacturers favor instead of prescriptive
    regulations.
  • Provides non-tax solution to problems.

9
Origin and Development of EPR
  • 1990 EPR first coined for Swedish Environment
    Ministry by Thomas Lindhqvist, Lund University
  • 1991 German Packaging Ordinance the first EPR
    program - shifts responsibility for packaging
    waste to industry DSD Green Dot system
    (essentially, producers of packaging finance
    curbside recycling collection)
  • Progressive expansion of EPR from packaging to
    other products - batteries, electronics,
    refrigerants, tires, appliances, end of life
    vehicles, paint . . .
  • 1995 OECD EPR work program commences Guidance
    Manual published 2001
  • EU electronics directive (WEEE, RoHS) January
    2003 - mandates EPR, and sets toxic substance
    limits implementation starting 2006
  • EPR spreading through Canada, Europe, Asia,
    beginning in U.S. and Americas. China adopting
    electronic standards similar to EU.

10
Many Examples of EPR
  • Voluntary and Legislated Programs
  • Both have been stimulated by legislative action
    or anticipation of legislative action.
  • Legislation usually needed to
  • Level playing field so all participate and
    finance, not just a few
  • Provide general performance standards and
    collection rates
  • Enable industry-established Stewardship
    Organizations to collect fees for financing.
  • Drive material into programs by banning disposal

11
Example Electronics
  • Throughout EU, Japan, Taiwan, beginning in Canada
    and China, etc.
  • Washington State Electronics Recycling Law
  • Passed 2006, establishes program 2009
  • Similar approach now incorporated into
    models/legislation by 10 Northeast states, 5
    Midwest states and Oregon
  • Similar approach endorsed by resolution of
    Council of State Governments (Nov. 30, 2006)
  • Dell Global Recycling Policy
  • Free recycling of any Dell product from
    individual anywhere.
  • Free recycling of similar other-brand product
    when purchasing Dell product.

12
Example Electronics
  • Hewlett-Packard
  • Key Supporter of Washington State Law
  • Operates its own electronics recycling facilities
    in partnership with Noranda
  • Target is to take back one billion lbs of product
    by 2007 with return and recycling services in
    more than 40 countries

13
Examples Electronics
  • Marcy Eastham, Northwest governmental-affairs
    manager for Hewlett Packard, said her company
    long ago concluded it was desirable to design
    products with end-of-life in mind. Older model
    laptops used a variety of screws until it dawned
    on HP recyclers it was faster to break down
    machines with one type of screw. Adhesives are
    scrutinized for their harm to the environment and
    their role in recycling. HP also strongly
    believed the cost of recycling should not be
    carried by a consumer fee, as is the case in
    California's law.
  • - Seattle Times Editorial, Nov. 14, 2006

14
Examples Electronics
15
Example Pharmaceuticals
16
Example Pharmaceuticals
17
Ex. Batteries and Cell Phones
18
Ex. Batteries and Cell Phones
  • Rechargeable Battery Recycling Corporation (RBRC)
  • Financed by manufacturers.
  • Has over 30,000 retail collection locations for
    rechargeable batteries and cell phones.
  • Examples of national retailers that participate
    in the RBRC Call2Recycle program
  • Best Buy
  • Black Decker
  • Cingular Wireless
  • Circuit City
  • The Home Depot
  • Lowe's
  • Office Depot
  • RadioShack
  • RadioShack
  • Sears
  • Staples
  • Target
  • US Cellular
  • Verizon Wireless

19
Example Thermostats
20
Example Auto Switches
21
Example Auto Switches
22
Example Paint, Etc.
23
Example Used Oil
24
Example Tires
25
EPR Programs Common in Canada
  • Used or Expired Medication
  • Used Tires
  • Used Oil, Containers and Filters
  • Used Oil Only
  • Used Electronics
  • Used Paint, Stains and Varnishes
  • Spent Lead Acid Batteries
  • Used Solvents/Flammable Liquids, Gasoline,
    Pesticides, etc.

26
EPR Programs in Canada
27
NW Product Stewardship Council
  • The Northwest Product Stewardship Council is a
    group of local, state and federal government
    agencies that works with businesses and nonprofit
    groups to integrate product stewardship
    principles into the policy and economic
    structures of the Pacific Northwest.
  • Steering Committee Members include
  • Cities of Tacoma and Seattle
  • Washington Counties of King, Kitsap, Snohomish,
    Thurston, Walla Walla, and Yakima
  • Oregon Metro and Oregon Department of
    Environmental Quality
  • EPA, Region X
  • Washington State Department of Ecology

28
(No Transcript)
29
NW Product Stewardship Council
  • In 2007, several steering committee agencies
    received grants from the Department of Ecology
    through the Coordinated Prevention Grant Program
    for 20007-08.
  • 253,000 to support product stewardship work
  • 100,000 to coordinate council activities and
    implement the NWPSC Communications Plan.
  • Subcommittee work includes
  • Electronics, Pharmaceuticals, Mercury-containing
    products, Paint, Beverage Containers, Tires
  • Legislation Subcommittee
  • Chemicals Policy Subcommittee

30
Next Steps Electronics
  • Represent governments in the WA Electronics
    Product Recycling Law rule-making process.
  • Assist local businesses (retailers, collectors,
    processors, and charities) with the transition to
    new WA electronics recycling program.
  • Assist with the expansion of Take it Back Network
    to more businesses, so they can benefit from new
    system AND provide more convenient services to
    our citizens.
  • Assisting Oregon with passage of an Electronics
    Product Stewardship law.

31
Next Steps Pharmaceuticals
  • Conduct a pilot project to collect unwanted
    medicines at pharmacies in Washington.
  • Modeled after the B.C. system.
  • Expand the pilot project to more pharmacies and
    additional locations hospice, adult care, etc.
  • Develop relationships and support with
    manufacturers.
  • Participate in regional and national dialogue.
  • Prepare for state Product Stewardship legislation
    for unwanted medicines.

32
Next Steps Mercury
  • Participate in pilot project to expand Thermostat
    Recycling Corporation (TRC) program to public
    facilities.
  • Work to find an ongoing product stewardship
    solution for fluorescent compact bulbs and tubes.
  • Expand Take it Back Network to collect
    mercury-containing devices.
  • Recruit HVAC contractors into TRC program.
  • Recruit auto wrecking yards into End of Life
    Vehicles Solutions (ELVS) program.

33
Next Steps Paint
  • Participate in current national dialogue with
    paint manufacturers lead by the Product
    Stewardship Institute to establish a national
    system to deal with excess paint.
  • Participate in regional pilots identified by
    national dialogue.

34
Next Steps Beverage Containers
  • Coordinate the Washington State Beverage
    Container Recycling Initiative to conduct pilot
    projects to test the use of incentives to
    increase the collection, recovery and recycling
    of used beverage containers in Washington State.
  • Track and provide input to the Oregon legislative
    process to amend the bottle bill to include
    product stewardship elements to increase recovery
    of beverage containers.

35
Next Steps Tires
  • Follow state legislation to ensure that tire
    funds are allocated to pursue product stewardship
    solutions for used tires.
  • Monitor developments on tire pile clean up and
    funding.

36
Next Steps Legislative Subcommittee
  • Monitor legislation in Oregon and Washington to
    support bills that are favorable to product
    stewardship programs and policies.
  • Provide an analysis of new bills and recommended
    actions to steering committee agencies and other
    local governments.

37
Anticipated Legislation
  • PBDE Ban (2007)
  • Pharmaceuticals (2008 -2009)
  • Specific or All Mercury Containing Devices (2008
    )
  • Mercury thermostats
  • Mercury switches
  • Compact fluorescent lamps and tubes (likely
    financed by fee on incandescent bulbs)
  • Tires (2009 - 2010)
  • Framework Legislation (2008 2010)
  • Paint, Packaging, Others - ?
  • Bills in WA, OR, CA and many other states

38
Additional Actions Possible
  • Develop policy statements for WSAC, WACO, NACO
    etc.
  • Establish local government resolutions on EPR.
  • Rapid new development in California
  • Bring in national/international experts for
    industry forums on cradle-to-cradle, green
    chemistry, meeting EU standards, etc.

39
Coordination Many Parties
  • The NWPSC shares information and coordinates
    activities with many parties in the public,
    non-profit and private sector.
  • U.S. EPA
  • Department of Ecology
  • Policy Forum
  • State Solid Waste Advisory Committee
  • Product Stewardship Institute
  • Product Policy Institute
  • North America Hazardous Materials Management
    Association
  • Environmental NGOs WCRC, WEC, WA Toxics Coalition

40
Contact Information
  • Contact the NWPSC Coordinator with questions and
    comments at (206) 723-0528
  • Email at
  • info_at_productstewardship.net
  • Web site
  • www.productstewardship.net
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com