Title: A New Capital Adequacy Framework Basel II Presentation by OSFI JulyAugust 2004
1A New Capital Adequacy Framework (Basel
II)Presentation by OSFIJuly-August 2004
Office of the Superintendent of Financial
Institutions
Bureau du surintendant des institutions
financières
July-August 2004
2Presentation Outline
- Overview of Basel II
- Standardized Approach
- Credit Risk Mitigation
- Securitization
- Operational Risk
- Pillar 2
- Pillar 3
3Overview of Basel II
4Pillar 1 Options
5Credit Risk - Internal Ratings Based Approach
(IRB)
6Credit Risk - IRB Key Elements
- Four variables
- Probability of default (PD) of borrower
- Loss given default (LGD)
- Maturity (M)
- Exposure at default (EAD)
- Risk weights are a function of these four
variables and type of exposure (e.g., corporate,
SME, retail)
Foundation
Advanced
7Credit Risk Standardized Approach
8Credit Risk - Standardized Approach
- Compared to current CAR (Capital Adequacy
Requirements) - Recognition of external ratings
- Broader recognition of collateral and guarantees
- Reduced capital for retail and mortgage
portfolios - Increased capital for commitments
- Increased capital for past-due loans
- Capital charge for operational risk
9Current CAR
- Under current CAR, there are four risk-weights
based on the type of asset - 0 - Cash and Government Securities
- 20 - OECD Banks and Securities Firms
- 50 - Uninsured Residential Mortgages
- 100 - Everything else
10Basel II - External Ratings
- Banks may use assessments by qualifying rating
agencies to determine risk weights for the
following exposures - Claims on sovereigns and central banks
- Claims on non-central government public sector
entities (PSEs) - Claims on multilateral development banks (MDBs)
- Claims on banks and securities firms
- Claims on corporates
11Eligible ECAIs
- National supervisors are responsible for
determining whether an External Credit Assessment
Institution (ECAI) meets the qualifying criteria - Supervisors must also assign eligible assessments
to the applicable risk weight categories - OSFI proposes to develop a self-assessment
template and work with agencies to develop a
mapping process
12Claims on Sovereigns and Central Banks
- Current CAR - all sovereigns weighted at 0
- No longer distinction between OECD and non-OECD
- Based on a sovereigns external rating
- Preferential treatment can apply to exposures
- to a banks own sovereign (or central bank)
- denominated and funded in national currency
- Sovereign risk-weight creates a floor for other
exposures in that jurisdiction
13Claims on Sovereigns and Central Banks
- Another option is to use ECA (Export Credit
Agencies) risk scores - Can use either
- the risk scores published by individual ECAs or
- the consensus risk scores of ECAs participating
in the Arrangement on Officially Supported
Export Credits through the OECD - OSFI will allow this treatment for sovereign
exposures that are not externally rated
14Claims on Public Sector Entities (PSEs)
- Current CAR - PSEs weighted at 0, 20, or 100
- Under Basel II, all PSEs will receive a
risk-weight one category higher than its
sovereign of incorporation with two exceptions - Claims on Canadian provincial or territorial
govts treated as claims sovereigns - PSEs in competition with private sector treated
as corporate exposures - Definition of PSEs remains unchanged
15Claims on Multilateral Development Banks (MDBs)
- Current CAR - receive 20 risk weight
- Under Basel II, split into two groups
- (1) Highly rated MDBs that meet eligibility
criteria receive 0 risk weight - (2) For all others, risk weight is based on the
external credit assessment of the MDBs
16Claims on Banks and Securities Firms
- Directly linked to risk-weighting of sovereign
one category less favourable than the sovereign
risk weight - Securities firms may be treated as banks if these
firms are subject to supervisory and regulatory
arrangements comparable to those under Basel II
otherwise treated as claims on corporates
17Claims on Corporates
- Current CAR - risk-weighted at 100
- Under Basel II, DTIs can choose between two
options - Use external ratings to determine the risk weight
- Risk weight all corporate exposures at 100
18Claims on Retail
- Current CAR - 100 risk weight
- Under Basel II risk weight reduced to 75
- Criteria for inclusion in retail portfolio
- Exposure to an individual person or small
business - Exposure takes the form of certain products
- Retail portfolio should be sufficiently
diversified - Aggregated exposure to one counterparty cannot
exceed 1 million (approx. CAD 1.6 million)
19Claims secured by residential mortgages
(uninsured)
- Current CAR - 50 risk weight
- Under Basel II risk weight reduced to 35
- Criteria for residential mortgage treatment
- Property occupied by borrower or rented
- Limited to 1-4 unit building
- Loan-to-value ratio cannot exceed 75
- Uninsured collateral mortgages that would
otherwise qualify as residential mortgages except
that their loan-to-value ratio exceeds 75 percent
will receive 75 risk weight
20Claims secured by residential mortgages (contd)
- OSFI proposes to modify its definition of
qualifying residential mortgages, - To include condominium residences and
- To require that the mortgage loan be to a
person(s) or guaranteed by a person(s) - Excluded are investments in hotel properties and
time-share properties - Claims secured by commercial real estate will
receive 100 risk weight
21Past due loans
- Currently, no distinction between performing and
non-performing loans - Under Basel II, unsecured part of a non-mortgage
loan that is past due by more than 90 days
receives following risk weight - 150 when specific provisions are less than 20
- 100 when specific provisions are 20 or more
- Residential mortgages (uninsured) that are past
due by more than 90 days receive 100 risk weight
22Off-balance sheet positions commitments
- RWA CCF x RW
- Apply credit conversion factors (CCF)
- Short-term commitments (i.e. up to one year
original maturity) receive 20 CCF (increased
from 0) - Commitments with maturity of greater than one
year remains unchanged at 50 CCF - Only commitments that are unconditionally
cancellable receive 0 risk weight - Apply risk weights based on the counterparty
23Standardized Approach - Credit Risk Mitigation
(CRM)
24Definition of CRM Techniques
- Techniques used to reduce credit risk,
encompassing - Collateral (cash or securities)
- Third party guarantees
- Credit derivatives
- On-balance sheet netting
25Changes to CRM framework under Basel II
- Expanded range of eligible collateral and
guarantors - Explicit guidance for credit derivatives
- Recognition of netting effects in on-balance
sheet positions - Special treatment for repo transactions
- Two approaches for determining the effectiveness
of collateral - Simple Approach
- Comprehensive Approach
26Collateral - Minimum operational requirements
- Legal certainty a bank must ensure that it has
the right to liquidate or take possession of
collateral in a timely manner - Low correlation with exposure credit quality of
the counterparty should not be positively
correlated to the value of collateral - Robust risk management process to ensure that
legal conditions are met, that collateral is
liquidated promptly and that the custodian (if
any) properly segregates collateral from its own
assets
27Collateral in Current CAR
- A short set of eligible collateral
- Cash on deposit at the lending bank
- OECD sovereign securities
- OECD non central government public sector entity
(PSE) securities - Some multilateral development bank securities
0
20
28Eligible Financial Collateral
- Under the simple approach
- Cash
- Gold
- Debt securities with, at least, a BB- rating (for
sovereign and PSEs), a BBB- rating (for other
issuers) or A3P3 (for short-term securities) - Unrated debt securities if they are (i) issued by
banks, (ii) listed and (iii) senior - Equities included in a main index
- Under the comprehensive approach
- All instruments listed above
- Equities not included in a main index but listed
on a recognized exchange
29Collateral - Simple Approach
- Similar to Current Accord substitution approach
- Collateral must be revalued at least every six
months - No maturity mismatch
- Floor at 20, except for cash and government
securities - Approach designed for banks that engage only to a
limited extent in collateralized transactions
30Collateral - Comprehensive Approach
- Adjust the exposure amount and value of
collateral using haircuts to account for
fluctuations in the future market value of each - 3 different methods are available to determine
the appropriate haircuts - DTIs using the Standardized Approach may use one
method application of supervisory haircuts
31Supervisory Haircuts
32Formula of Comprehensive Approach
- General formula of the comprehensive approach
- E the adjusted exposure
- E the gross amount of exposure
- C the amount of collateral
- Hc the haircut for the collateral
E max0, E C x (1 Hc )
33Comprehensive Approach - Example
- Step 1 Calculate adjusted amount of exposure
(E) - Step 2 Multiply the adjusted amount of exposure
by the risk weight of the counterparty - Example
- Loan of 100 to a 100 risk-weighted
counterparty, collateralised by bonds up to 80 - Risk weight of the borrower is 100 and the
haircut is 10 - Adjusted exposure 100 80 x (1 0.10) 28
- Risk weighted loan 28 x 100 28
34Guarantees and Credit Derivatives
- Contracts must be direct, explicit, irrevocable,
and unconditional - Capital treatment remains unchanged
substitution approach - Minimum operational requirements
- Eligible guarantors
- Sovereigns, PSEs, banks and securities firms
attracting a more favourable risk-weighting than
the obligor - Other entities rated A- or higher
35Guarantees Operational Requirements
- Eligible guarantees
- Guarantees provide a direct and unconditional
claim on the guarantor - The bank acquires the right to pursue the
guarantor for monies outstanding, rather than the
obligor - Explicitly documented obligation
- Covers all types of payments the obligor is
supposed to make
36Credit Derivatives Operational Requirements
- Eligible protection
- total return swaps and credit default swaps sold
by eligible guarantors mentioned above - Operational requirements
- Credit events should include failure to pay,
bankruptcy and restructuring. If restructuring is
not included, capital benefit will be discounted - In case of cash settlement, there should be a
robust valuation process - If obligation delivery, the transfer process must
be certain - Parties determining credit events should be
clearly identified - Asset mismatch between underlying obligation and
reference obligation is permissible if both rank,
at least, pari passu and if cross-default clauses
are in place
37On-balance sheet netting
- Banks may net loans to and deposits from the same
counterparty if there is a netting agreement with
this counterparty - Operational requirements
- Legal certainty of the netting agreement
- Assets and liabilities must be determinable
- Bank monitors roll-off risks
- Bank monitors and controls relevant exposures on
a net basis
38Standardized Approach - Securitization
39Securitization
- Different treatment for originating bank vs.
investing bank - Risk weight for a tranche is based solely on the
external rating - If a tranche is not rated, it must be deducted
from capital - Exceptions
- Look-through for most-senior tranche
- 2nd loss positions in ABCP
- Eligible liquidity facilities
40Securitization Risk Weights
41Securitization - Off-balance sheet exposures
- For off-balance sheet exposures, apply a credit
conversion factor and then risk weight the
resultant credit equivalent amount - All off-balance sheet exposures will receive 100
credit conversion factor (CCF) except - Eligible liquidity facilities
- Eligible servicer cash advance facilities
42Securitization - Off-balance sheet exposures
- Eligible liquidity facilities that meet criteria
may apply - 20 CCF for original maturities of less than 1
year - 50 CCF for original maturities of more than 1
year - 0 CCF to eligible liquidity facilities only
available in the event of a general market
disruption - Eligible servicer cash advance facilities
- Servicer cash advances that are unconditionally
cancellable without prior notice may be eligible
for 0 CCF
43Operational RiskApproaches
44Basic Indicator Approach
- Simplest of the three approaches
- No specific qualifying criteria DTIs encouraged
to comply with Sound Practices paper - Capital charge Gross Income x 15
- Gross Income is
- net interest income net non-interest income
- three-year average positive gross income
45Standardized Approach
- Banks must map their business activities into
eight Basel business lines (Annex 6) - Average three-year gross income used to calculate
capital charge
46Advanced Measurement Approach
- Banks can use their internal capital assessment
techniques to calculate capital charges - Both qualitative and quantitative standards
- Approach must incorporate certain key elements
- Internal data
- External data
- Scenario analysis
- Business environment and control factors
47AMA - Subsidiaries
- Non-significant subsidiary may use an allocated
AMA to determine its capital charge - Management of subsidiary responsible for own
assessment of operational risk and controls - Allocation methodology subject to approval
- Significant subsidiary may be required to
calculate a stand-alone AMA capital - Cannot incorporate group-wide diversification
benefits - May incorporate diversification benefits arising
at sub-consolidated level - AMA capital calculation needs to reflect the
risks and control environment unique to the
subsidiary
48Pillar 2 Supervisory Review Process
49Pillar 2
- Pillar 2 is based on four key principles
- Banks' own assessment of capital adequacy
- Supervisory review process
- Capital above regulatory minimum
- Supervisory intervention
- Target capital ratios of 7 and 10
50Pillar 3 Market Discipline
51Pillar 3
- Enhanced disclosure imposes discipline on
management - Imposes minimum disclosure requirements on banks
- qualitative and quantitative
- credit risk, market risk, operational risk,
interest rate risk