A New Capital Adequacy Framework Basel II Presentation by OSFI JulyAugust 2004

1 / 51
About This Presentation
Title:

A New Capital Adequacy Framework Basel II Presentation by OSFI JulyAugust 2004

Description:

Short-term commitments (i.e. up to one year original maturity) receive 20% CCF ... 3 different methods are available to determine the appropriate haircuts ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:578
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 52
Provided by: victor54

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: A New Capital Adequacy Framework Basel II Presentation by OSFI JulyAugust 2004


1
A New Capital Adequacy Framework (Basel
II)Presentation by OSFIJuly-August 2004
Office of the Superintendent of Financial
Institutions
Bureau du surintendant des institutions
financières
July-August 2004
2
Presentation Outline
  • Overview of Basel II
  • Standardized Approach
  • Credit Risk Mitigation
  • Securitization
  • Operational Risk
  • Pillar 2
  • Pillar 3

3
Overview of Basel II
4
Pillar 1 Options
5
Credit Risk - Internal Ratings Based Approach
(IRB)
6
Credit Risk - IRB Key Elements
  • Four variables
  • Probability of default (PD) of borrower
  • Loss given default (LGD)
  • Maturity (M)
  • Exposure at default (EAD)
  • Risk weights are a function of these four
    variables and type of exposure (e.g., corporate,
    SME, retail)

Foundation
Advanced
7
Credit Risk Standardized Approach
8
Credit Risk - Standardized Approach
  • Compared to current CAR (Capital Adequacy
    Requirements)
  • Recognition of external ratings
  • Broader recognition of collateral and guarantees
  • Reduced capital for retail and mortgage
    portfolios
  • Increased capital for commitments
  • Increased capital for past-due loans
  • Capital charge for operational risk

9
Current CAR
  • Under current CAR, there are four risk-weights
    based on the type of asset
  • 0 - Cash and Government Securities
  • 20 - OECD Banks and Securities Firms
  • 50 - Uninsured Residential Mortgages
  • 100 - Everything else

10
Basel II - External Ratings
  • Banks may use assessments by qualifying rating
    agencies to determine risk weights for the
    following exposures
  • Claims on sovereigns and central banks
  • Claims on non-central government public sector
    entities (PSEs)
  • Claims on multilateral development banks (MDBs)
  • Claims on banks and securities firms
  • Claims on corporates

11
Eligible ECAIs
  • National supervisors are responsible for
    determining whether an External Credit Assessment
    Institution (ECAI) meets the qualifying criteria
  • Supervisors must also assign eligible assessments
    to the applicable risk weight categories
  • OSFI proposes to develop a self-assessment
    template and work with agencies to develop a
    mapping process

12
Claims on Sovereigns and Central Banks
  • Current CAR - all sovereigns weighted at 0
  • No longer distinction between OECD and non-OECD
  • Based on a sovereigns external rating
  • Preferential treatment can apply to exposures
  • to a banks own sovereign (or central bank)
  • denominated and funded in national currency
  • Sovereign risk-weight creates a floor for other
    exposures in that jurisdiction

13
Claims on Sovereigns and Central Banks
  • Another option is to use ECA (Export Credit
    Agencies) risk scores
  • Can use either
  • the risk scores published by individual ECAs or
  • the consensus risk scores of ECAs participating
    in the Arrangement on Officially Supported
    Export Credits through the OECD
  • OSFI will allow this treatment for sovereign
    exposures that are not externally rated

14
Claims on Public Sector Entities (PSEs)
  • Current CAR - PSEs weighted at 0, 20, or 100
  • Under Basel II, all PSEs will receive a
    risk-weight one category higher than its
    sovereign of incorporation with two exceptions
  • Claims on Canadian provincial or territorial
    govts treated as claims sovereigns
  • PSEs in competition with private sector treated
    as corporate exposures
  • Definition of PSEs remains unchanged

15
Claims on Multilateral Development Banks (MDBs)
  • Current CAR - receive 20 risk weight
  • Under Basel II, split into two groups
  • (1) Highly rated MDBs that meet eligibility
    criteria receive 0 risk weight
  • (2) For all others, risk weight is based on the
    external credit assessment of the MDBs

16
Claims on Banks and Securities Firms
  • Directly linked to risk-weighting of sovereign
    one category less favourable than the sovereign
    risk weight
  • Securities firms may be treated as banks if these
    firms are subject to supervisory and regulatory
    arrangements comparable to those under Basel II
    otherwise treated as claims on corporates

17
Claims on Corporates
  • Current CAR - risk-weighted at 100
  • Under Basel II, DTIs can choose between two
    options
  • Use external ratings to determine the risk weight
  • Risk weight all corporate exposures at 100

18
Claims on Retail
  • Current CAR - 100 risk weight
  • Under Basel II risk weight reduced to 75
  • Criteria for inclusion in retail portfolio
  • Exposure to an individual person or small
    business
  • Exposure takes the form of certain products
  • Retail portfolio should be sufficiently
    diversified
  • Aggregated exposure to one counterparty cannot
    exceed 1 million (approx. CAD 1.6 million)

19
Claims secured by residential mortgages
(uninsured)
  • Current CAR - 50 risk weight
  • Under Basel II risk weight reduced to 35
  • Criteria for residential mortgage treatment
  • Property occupied by borrower or rented
  • Limited to 1-4 unit building
  • Loan-to-value ratio cannot exceed 75
  • Uninsured collateral mortgages that would
    otherwise qualify as residential mortgages except
    that their loan-to-value ratio exceeds 75 percent
    will receive 75 risk weight

20
Claims secured by residential mortgages (contd)
  • OSFI proposes to modify its definition of
    qualifying residential mortgages,
  • To include condominium residences and
  • To require that the mortgage loan be to a
    person(s) or guaranteed by a person(s)
  • Excluded are investments in hotel properties and
    time-share properties
  • Claims secured by commercial real estate will
    receive 100 risk weight

21
Past due loans
  • Currently, no distinction between performing and
    non-performing loans
  • Under Basel II, unsecured part of a non-mortgage
    loan that is past due by more than 90 days
    receives following risk weight
  • 150 when specific provisions are less than 20
  • 100 when specific provisions are 20 or more
  • Residential mortgages (uninsured) that are past
    due by more than 90 days receive 100 risk weight

22
Off-balance sheet positions commitments
  • RWA CCF x RW
  • Apply credit conversion factors (CCF)
  • Short-term commitments (i.e. up to one year
    original maturity) receive 20 CCF (increased
    from 0)
  • Commitments with maturity of greater than one
    year remains unchanged at 50 CCF
  • Only commitments that are unconditionally
    cancellable receive 0 risk weight
  • Apply risk weights based on the counterparty

23
Standardized Approach - Credit Risk Mitigation
(CRM)
24
Definition of CRM Techniques
  • Techniques used to reduce credit risk,
    encompassing
  • Collateral (cash or securities)
  • Third party guarantees
  • Credit derivatives
  • On-balance sheet netting

25
Changes to CRM framework under Basel II
  • Expanded range of eligible collateral and
    guarantors
  • Explicit guidance for credit derivatives
  • Recognition of netting effects in on-balance
    sheet positions
  • Special treatment for repo transactions
  • Two approaches for determining the effectiveness
    of collateral
  • Simple Approach
  • Comprehensive Approach

26
Collateral - Minimum operational requirements
  • Legal certainty a bank must ensure that it has
    the right to liquidate or take possession of
    collateral in a timely manner
  • Low correlation with exposure credit quality of
    the counterparty should not be positively
    correlated to the value of collateral
  • Robust risk management process to ensure that
    legal conditions are met, that collateral is
    liquidated promptly and that the custodian (if
    any) properly segregates collateral from its own
    assets

27
Collateral in Current CAR
  • A short set of eligible collateral
  • Cash on deposit at the lending bank
  • OECD sovereign securities
  • OECD non central government public sector entity
    (PSE) securities
  • Some multilateral development bank securities

0
20
28
Eligible Financial Collateral
  • Under the simple approach
  • Cash
  • Gold
  • Debt securities with, at least, a BB- rating (for
    sovereign and PSEs), a BBB- rating (for other
    issuers) or A3P3 (for short-term securities)
  • Unrated debt securities if they are (i) issued by
    banks, (ii) listed and (iii) senior
  • Equities included in a main index
  • Under the comprehensive approach
  • All instruments listed above
  • Equities not included in a main index but listed
    on a recognized exchange

29
Collateral - Simple Approach
  • Similar to Current Accord substitution approach
  • Collateral must be revalued at least every six
    months
  • No maturity mismatch
  • Floor at 20, except for cash and government
    securities
  • Approach designed for banks that engage only to a
    limited extent in collateralized transactions

30
Collateral - Comprehensive Approach
  • Adjust the exposure amount and value of
    collateral using haircuts to account for
    fluctuations in the future market value of each
  • 3 different methods are available to determine
    the appropriate haircuts
  • DTIs using the Standardized Approach may use one
    method application of supervisory haircuts

31
Supervisory Haircuts
32
Formula of Comprehensive Approach
  • General formula of the comprehensive approach
  • E the adjusted exposure
  • E the gross amount of exposure
  • C the amount of collateral
  • Hc the haircut for the collateral

E max0, E C x (1 Hc )
 
33
Comprehensive Approach - Example
  • Step 1 Calculate adjusted amount of exposure
    (E)
  • Step 2 Multiply the adjusted amount of exposure
    by the risk weight of the counterparty
  • Example
  • Loan of 100 to a 100 risk-weighted
    counterparty, collateralised by bonds up to 80
  • Risk weight of the borrower is 100 and the
    haircut is 10
  • Adjusted exposure 100 80 x (1 0.10) 28
  • Risk weighted loan 28 x 100 28

34
Guarantees and Credit Derivatives
  • Contracts must be direct, explicit, irrevocable,
    and unconditional
  • Capital treatment remains unchanged
    substitution approach
  • Minimum operational requirements
  • Eligible guarantors
  • Sovereigns, PSEs, banks and securities firms
    attracting a more favourable risk-weighting than
    the obligor
  • Other entities rated A- or higher

35
Guarantees Operational Requirements
  • Eligible guarantees
  • Guarantees provide a direct and unconditional
    claim on the guarantor
  • The bank acquires the right to pursue the
    guarantor for monies outstanding, rather than the
    obligor
  • Explicitly documented obligation
  • Covers all types of payments the obligor is
    supposed to make

36
Credit Derivatives Operational Requirements
  • Eligible protection
  • total return swaps and credit default swaps sold
    by eligible guarantors mentioned above
  • Operational requirements
  • Credit events should include failure to pay,
    bankruptcy and restructuring. If restructuring is
    not included, capital benefit will be discounted
  • In case of cash settlement, there should be a
    robust valuation process
  • If obligation delivery, the transfer process must
    be certain
  • Parties determining credit events should be
    clearly identified
  • Asset mismatch between underlying obligation and
    reference obligation is permissible if both rank,
    at least, pari passu and if cross-default clauses
    are in place

37
On-balance sheet netting
  • Banks may net loans to and deposits from the same
    counterparty if there is a netting agreement with
    this counterparty
  • Operational requirements
  • Legal certainty of the netting agreement
  • Assets and liabilities must be determinable
  • Bank monitors roll-off risks
  • Bank monitors and controls relevant exposures on
    a net basis

38
Standardized Approach - Securitization
39
Securitization
  • Different treatment for originating bank vs.
    investing bank
  • Risk weight for a tranche is based solely on the
    external rating
  • If a tranche is not rated, it must be deducted
    from capital
  • Exceptions
  • Look-through for most-senior tranche
  • 2nd loss positions in ABCP
  • Eligible liquidity facilities

40
Securitization Risk Weights
41
Securitization - Off-balance sheet exposures
  • For off-balance sheet exposures, apply a credit
    conversion factor and then risk weight the
    resultant credit equivalent amount
  • All off-balance sheet exposures will receive 100
    credit conversion factor (CCF) except
  • Eligible liquidity facilities
  • Eligible servicer cash advance facilities

42
Securitization - Off-balance sheet exposures
  • Eligible liquidity facilities that meet criteria
    may apply
  • 20 CCF for original maturities of less than 1
    year
  • 50 CCF for original maturities of more than 1
    year
  • 0 CCF to eligible liquidity facilities only
    available in the event of a general market
    disruption
  • Eligible servicer cash advance facilities
  • Servicer cash advances that are unconditionally
    cancellable without prior notice may be eligible
    for 0 CCF

43
Operational RiskApproaches
44
Basic Indicator Approach
  • Simplest of the three approaches
  • No specific qualifying criteria DTIs encouraged
    to comply with Sound Practices paper
  • Capital charge Gross Income x 15
  • Gross Income is
  • net interest income net non-interest income
  • three-year average positive gross income

45
Standardized Approach
  • Banks must map their business activities into
    eight Basel business lines (Annex 6)
  • Average three-year gross income used to calculate
    capital charge

46
Advanced Measurement Approach
  • Banks can use their internal capital assessment
    techniques to calculate capital charges
  • Both qualitative and quantitative standards
  • Approach must incorporate certain key elements
  • Internal data
  • External data
  • Scenario analysis
  • Business environment and control factors

47
AMA - Subsidiaries
  • Non-significant subsidiary may use an allocated
    AMA to determine its capital charge
  • Management of subsidiary responsible for own
    assessment of operational risk and controls
  • Allocation methodology subject to approval
  • Significant subsidiary may be required to
    calculate a stand-alone AMA capital
  • Cannot incorporate group-wide diversification
    benefits
  • May incorporate diversification benefits arising
    at sub-consolidated level
  • AMA capital calculation needs to reflect the
    risks and control environment unique to the
    subsidiary

48
Pillar 2 Supervisory Review Process
49
Pillar 2
  • Pillar 2 is based on four key principles
  • Banks' own assessment of capital adequacy
  • Supervisory review process
  • Capital above regulatory minimum
  • Supervisory intervention
  • Target capital ratios of 7 and 10

50
Pillar 3 Market Discipline
51
Pillar 3
  • Enhanced disclosure imposes discipline on
    management
  • Imposes minimum disclosure requirements on banks
  • qualitative and quantitative
  • credit risk, market risk, operational risk,
    interest rate risk
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)