The Myth of Impoverished Signal Dispelling the Spoken Language Fallacy for Emoticons in Online Commu - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 20
About This Presentation
Title:

The Myth of Impoverished Signal Dispelling the Spoken Language Fallacy for Emoticons in Online Commu

Description:

Happy Birthday, Smiley Face! 25 years and counting :-) 3. Creation of Smiley by Scott Fahlman ... Male IM conversations have more in common with face-to-face speech ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:113
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 21
Provided by: tes78
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: The Myth of Impoverished Signal Dispelling the Spoken Language Fallacy for Emoticons in Online Commu


1
The Myth of Impoverished SignalDispelling the
Spoken Language Fallacy for Emoticons in Online
Communication
  • Naomi S. Baron
  • American University Göteborgs
    Universitet Washington, DC USA Göteborg,
    Sweden
  • Emotions and ICTs International
    Workshop
  • Pordenone, Italy
  • 25-26 October 2007

2
Happy Birthday, Smiley Face!
  • 25 years and counting -)

3
Creation of Smiley by Scott Fahlman
  • September 19, 1982
  • 19-Sep-82 1144 Scott E Fahlman -)
  • From Scott E Fahlman ltFahlman at Cmu-20cgt 
  • I propose that the following character sequence
    for joke markers
  • -)
  • Read it sideways. Actually, it is probably more
    economical to mark things that are NOT jokes,
    given current trends. For this, use
  • -(

4
What This Presentation is About
  • NOT whether emoticons do or do not help clarify
    meaning in CMC
  • RATHER, we will be looking at
  • Sources of the presupposition that emoticons are
    needed to clarify CMC meaning
  • Whether the relevance of this presupposition has
    shifted over time

5
Media Reference
  • 26 September 2007
  • CBC (Canadian Broadcasting Corporation) Radio
    One, The Current
  • Interviews with Scott Fahlman, Barry Wellman, and
    Naomi Baron

6
Computing c. 1982
  • ARPANET created 1968-1969
  • First email sent 1971
  • Word processing software c. 1982 was primitive
  • Murray Turoff (NJIT) email should be only
  • one screen-worth of text (probably c. 10-12
    lines)
  • Computer screens c. 1982
  • Osborne 1 Portable Computer (1981)

7
Fahlmans Original Rationale for Emoticons
  • Specific incident joke on bulletin board
    regarding imaginary elevator malfunction
  • Carnegie Mellon University administrators assumed
    elevator should be taken out of service
  • Much time wasted explaining what was a joke, what
    wasnt
  • Actually, it is probably more economical to
    mark things that are NOT jokes, given current
    trends. i.e., much of early CMC was intended
    to be humorous

8
Fahlman on Emoticons Sept. 2007
  • Because we dont have time to write long and
    contemplative CMC messages, emoticons give us a
    shorthand for helping ensure our meaning is clear
  • Emoticons are a way of humanizing an otherwise
    cold medium
  • The alternative to emoticons is having enough
    time to write a longer and presumably clearer
    message

9
Sources of Presupposition that Emoticons Are
Necessary to Clarify Meaning
  • The Length Argument
  • Fahlmans main argument
  • The Speech by Other Means Argument
  • Without visual and verbal cues, misunderstandings
    are endemic
  • The Domestication Argument
  • When a medium is new, we overcompensate to ensure
    clarity

10
The Length Argument
  • Some short writing is very powerful
  • Haiku poetry, lines from Shakespeare
  • Long writing is not necessarily clear writing
  • Student papers
  • Most people arent clear writers offline
  • Early users of CMC were generally not noted for
    their skills in writing
  • We need more thought, not more words
  • Ambiguity is hardly unique to CMC
  • That was a terrible business luncheon

11
The Speech by Other Means Argument
  • Common assumption CMC is written speech
  • Therefore, we presumably miss the visual and
    facial cues of spoken language when doing CMC,
    and hence need emoticons to compensate
  • Challenge Is CMC really just written speech?

12
Linguistic Nature of CMC
  • David Crystal (Language and the Internet)
  • Netspeak has far more properties linking it to
    writing than to speech.Netspeak is better seen
    as written language which has been pulled some
    way in the direction of speech than as spoken
    language which has been written down. (200147)
  • Naomi Baron (Always On)
  • Analysis of IM (instant messaging) conversations
    of male and female American college students
  • Results not clear-cut, but

13
Written Qualities of IM Conversations
  • Spelling, punctuation reasonable
  • Sophisticated words substantial number
  • Contractions fewer than anticipated
  • E.g., cant rather than cannot
  • Out of 763 cases in which users could have chosen
    a contraction Only 65 were contracted
  • Compare informal speech c. 95 were contracted
    (different study)
  • Examined other issues, e.g., where broke long
    utterances into multiple transmissions
  • Isnt it nice
  • to be in love
  • Compared with corpora of spoken and written
    language

14
Written Qualities (cont.)
  • Emoticons 49 out of 11,718 words
  • -) smiley 31 -( frowny
    5 O-) angel 4 -P sticking out
    tongue, with nose 3 -) winking
    2 (plus 4 miscellaneous)
  • Abbreviations 31 out of 11,718 words
  • 16 were k for OK
  • Acronyms 90 out of 11,718 words
  • 76 were LOL for laughing out loud

15
Overall Profile of IM Speech or Writing?
  • Speech seems to be winning
  • Similar to Similar to
  • Face-to-Face Speech Conventional Writing
  • GENERAL DISCOURSE
  • SCAFFOLDING
  • average turn length yes no
  • one-word utterances yes no
  • conversational closings yes no
  • LEXICAL ISSUES
  • use of contractions somewhat somewhat
  • CMC abbreviations,
  • acronyms no somewhat
  • emoticons yes no
  • but

16
Taking Gender into Account
  • Male IM conversations have more in common with
    face-to-face speech
  • Female IM conversations have more in common with
    conventional writing
  • Examples
  • Contractions
  • Males contracted 77 of time was possible
  • Females contracted 57 of time was possible
  • Breaking long utterances into multiple
    transmissions
  • Males breaks resemble pauses in speech
  • Females breaks resemble written structures

17
Is IM Speech?
  • Bottom line
  • No, though there are enough speech-like elements
    (especially in male IM conversations) to explain
    why it is natural to talk of IM conversations
  • In the US, female writing skills in school are
    statistically better than those of males
  • The longer people use CMC on a computer
  • the wider their range of CMC styles becomes
  • the more likely that emoticons, abbreviations,
    and acronyms drop out (factors usage plus
    maturity)
  • If these lexical shortenings disappear, can they
    be necessary to clarify meaning?

18
The Domestication Argument
  • Domestication of the Landline Phone
  • 1894 Philadelphia newspaper warned readers not
    to talk by phone with ill people (could contract
    disease)
  • G.B. Shaw complained of people shouting on phone
    (cf. people shouting when dont share same
    language)
  • Domestication of Mobile Phones
  • Speaking on mobile phone vs. face-to-face louder
    on phone
  • Sweden vs. US appropriate places for using
    mobiles
  • Expanded Venues for CMC
  • Formal memos by email
  • US students see email as a formal medium
    (compare with IM)

19
Conclusions
  • Impoverished signal myth resulted from
  • Nature of early computer hardware and software
  • Nature of early users and uses of CMC
  • Mistaken assumption that CMC speech
  • Lack of domestication of medium in early days
  • Because CMC was new medium, we overlooked fact
    that ambiguities and misunderstandings appear in
    face-to-face and offline writing as well
  • Clearly of expression (especially in writing) is
    a valuable goal, regardless of the medium

20
  • Thank you!
  • Naomi S. Baron
  • nbaron_at_american.edu
  • Always On Language in an Online and Mobile World
  • Oxford University Press, Spring 2008
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com