Title: Workshop conclusions
1Workshop conclusions
2Expected workshop results
- Increased awareness, cooperation delineation of
standards activities - Scope of standards
- Confirmation Reassessment
- New topics, areas for standardization
- Revised/new Questions Work Plan
- Prioritization
- Market needs Time lines
- Other action items
3Workshop conclusions
- Session 1 - IP over Optical, Business H.
Schink (Siemens) and Market Aspects - Session 2 - Switched Optical Networks S.
Trowbridge (Lucent) Summary and Results - Session 3 - Optics in Access and
Metropolitan D. Faulkner (BtexaCT) - Networks-Outcome
- Session 4 - Optical Interfaces A.Mattheus
(Deut. T.) - Session 5 - Optical/IP Network OAM
Protection and Restoration Y.Maeda (NTT) - Session 6 - WDM and DWDM M.Tomizawa (NTT)
4Workshop conclusions
- Session 7 - Signalling and Routing A.Le Roux
(France Telecom) - Session 8 - Opt. Fibers, Cables
Components J.Matthews (Corning) - Session 9 - Optical Network Management K.Lam
(Lucent) - Session 10 - Optical Switching Equipment M.Betts
(Nortel Networks) - Session 11 - Network Performance (IP/Optical)
N.Seitz (NTIA) - Session 12 - Opt. Network Clients
Services G.Joncour (FranceTelecom) - Session 13 - Service and Network Evolution
J-Y.Cochennec (France Telecom)
5Session 1 IP over Optical, Business and Market
Aspects
- Market window for optical access starts to open
(will vary by geography), standards need to be
ready and unambiguous - Requirements for standards low cost, focussed on
business aspects of operators, value add for end
users needs to be understood - IPv6 provides additional service to end users,
network performance to be evaluated. Standards
required for implementation - Compatibility issues e.g. between FSAN(ATM) and
EFM(Ethernet) on QoS to be solved - Telephony needs to be supported, eitehr directly
or via gateway
6Session 2 Conclusions and Results
- A strength of ITU-T over many other SDOs is the
amount of carrier participation. ITU-T solutions
have been driven by carrier requirements. We must
continue to encourage continuing and increasing
participation by carriers in the ITU-T. - The work to standardize switched transport
networks is proceeding apace, with many key
Recommendations already approved. This has been
facilitated by a sense of urgency on the part of
participants, new procedures such as AAP to
increase the speed of ITU-T, and concentrating
the majority of this work within a single Study
Group.
7Session 2 Conclusions and Results (continued)
- Work that had begun independently in different
SDOs and fora has become more aligned as the
technology and specifications mature. The
situation has improved with better communications
among the organizations and more cross
participation between ITU-T, IETF, and OIF.
Appropriate roles for each organization are
becoming more clear. Participants must continue
their work to improve alignment between these
organizations.
8Session 2 Conclusions and Results (continued)
- As architecture and protocols are being developed
for switched optical networks, new requirements
have been identified. It is desirable to capture
these new requirements in G.807, however care
must be taken to avoid the need for numerous
liaisons between SG15 and SG13, or the need for
SG15 optical control plane experts to regularly
attend SG13 to keep this work aligned.
9Session 3 Optics in Access and Metropolitan
Networks-Outcome
- Promote Broadband Passive Optical Networks G983.x
series of standards - to increase understanding of business opportunity
- emphasise full-services/triple play
- show application notes with key
benefits/scenarios/timelines - In Q.2/15 on optical systems for access networks
- maintain full-services emphasis for GPON
- to differentiate from IEEE802.3ah GEPON with
Ethernet focus - P2P started with emphasis on OAM and ODN for
fibre Ethernet - liaison sent to Q.3/13 and IEEE802.3ah to avoid
duplication - Future - increased service capability, more
wavelengths and longer reach - Increase awareness of outside plant issues
- to ensure fibre access systems can be
realistically deployed
10Session 4 Optical Interfaces
- Standardization activities with considerable
market relevance - ITU-T SG15 Most important SDO for optical
interfaces (OI) - ? Optical Interface Recs G.691-G.693, G.959.1,
G.capp, G.IaDI, etc. - ? Spectral grids (DWDM, CWDM) Basis of WDM
interfaces worldwide - ? Other Recs used as basis/input for OI
specifications and Recs, e.g. - Opt. System Design (Sup.dsn) incl. new
functionalities (e.g. dispersion - compensation, various line coding, etc.), Fibre
Recs (G.652-G.655, - G.scl), Opt. Perform. Monitoring (G.optmon),
Opt. Safety (G.644) - IEC Important input for OIs, e.g. physical
parameter definitions and - measurement techniques for fibres and opt.
components, laser safety - IEEE Ethernet Interfaces (802.3) FE, GE, 10GE,
(100GE)
SG 15 on track with OI standards activities
11Session 4 Optical Interfaces (continued)
- Standardization activities (contd)
- OIF Some physical interfaces (e.g. VSR), UNI,
NNI - IETF Work on physical layer routing within IPO
working group - Multi Source Agreement (10Gig 40Gig
opto-electrical modules - for common use in various optical interfaces)
- Other standardization bodies (T1X1, ETSI, etc.)
Continued close cooperation with the various SDOs
required
12Session 4 Optical Interfaces (continued)
- Interoperability tests different vendors
NNIs/UNIs in OIF - ? Results relevant to ITU-T Recommendations
- Optical routing and interface requirements
- ? IETF has started work on physical layer
routing constraints within - IPO working group. However, this work has
slowed down in the - IETF, and IETF is not in charge of the physical
layer. On the other - hand, physical layer constraints must be
incorporated into routing - protocols in all-optical networks.
- ? How? Improve cooperation between ITU-T and
IETF in this area! - Plans and progress on standardization work in
ITU-T - can be found on the ITU-T SG 15 web page.
Interoperability results should be communicated
timely to ITU-T, e.g. via the Liaison officer
between ITU-T and OIF.
13Session 4 Optical Interfaces (continued)
- How many details shall be standardized in Optical
Interfaces - Fully standardized (transverse compatible)
optical interfaces - ? are worldwide applicable (large volume ? cost
reduction, products - available everywhere, uniform worldwide
service and maintenance), - ? have not been defined for more advanced
set-ups (e.g. for links with - several optical amplification sections) This
observation was the - starting point for G.IaDI.
- Proprietary optical interfaces
- ? have been installed extensively (e.g.
multi-span WDM links), - ? benefit significantly from standards Key
features have been (and will - be) standardized to enable a successful market
introduction. - Example DWDM grid ? basis of all operational
WDM links.
14Session 4 Optical Interfaces (continued)
- Prioritization in Optical Interfaces
standardization work - Rapid development of OI standards (e.g. 6-12
months) - while regarding
- Harmonization of standardization work in various
SDOs, - i.e. avoid different standards for the same
thing. - Example 10 Gbit/s specs at the physical layer
for SDH/OTN versus - IEEE standards (jitter, optical parameters,
spacing of WDM channels) - Technical specs (defined in the OI standards)
shall enable tofabricate low cost OIs. Example
Recent (very) short reach OIs
International standardization bodies (in
particular ITU-TSG15) will continue to push the
optical interface market
15Session 5 Optical/IP Network OAM Protection
and Restoration
- Presentations
- OTN Equipment and Deployment in Todays Transport
Networks (S. Trowbridge, Lucent), - Network Protection and Restoration (M. Betts,
Nortel) - General Principles and Requirements for OAM
Functions (H. Ohta, NTT)
16Session 5 Optical/IP Network OAM Protection
and Restoration (continued)
- Important coordination between various Questions
and other standards - To avoid duplication of work and for the
development of consistent standard. - With Q.3/13, Q.10/13, Q.2/15, Q.12/15, IEEE and
Metro Ethernet Forum - It was identified that SG13 studies general
network principles whereas SG15 studies
technology specific standards
17Session 5 Optical/IP Network OAM Protection
and Restoration (continued)
- New topics
- Ethernet on-going study on Ethernet network
architecture - with draft Recommendation G.etna in Q12/15
- and OAM functions such as defect detection and
localization, and performance monitoring in Q3/13
18Session 6 WDM and DWDM
- Increased awareness, cooperation delineation of
standards activities - Cooperation with IEC is very important in this
area. - Scope (new topics) of standards
- Anyone can propose to initiate discussions
regarding, - Super-DWDM (e.g., less than 12.5GHz spacing)
- Ultra high-speed channel (e.g.,160Gbit/s)
- Distributed/discrete Raman amplification
- Targets
- To provide industries with common terminologies
and test-methods - To realize multi-vendor configuration
- Further discussion is needed on compatibility
issues.
19Session 6 WDM and DWDM (continued)
- Prioritization
- Raman amplification is categorized as one of
urgent issues for standardization. - Safety aspect
- System requirement by using existing fibres
(splices, connectors, etc.) - Super-DWDM can be categorized as far future
issue, but possibly depending on new application
area. - Access or metro applications may accelerate the
needs for this standardization. - Ultra high-speed channel (160Gbit/s) is far
future issue. - Further studies are needed for Optical Time
Division Multiplexing (OTDM).
20Session 6 WDM and DWDM (continued)
- Other action items
- Should we limit the variety of implementations in
order to make the network performance
predictable?
21Session 7 - 4 presentations
- 1. Overview on Optical Service and Network
Architectural Requirements - 2. Call Connection control Signalling the
ITU-T SG11 status and perspectives for "New
Network control Architectures and Protocols - 3. CR-LDP for ASON Signalling
- 4. GMPLS RSVP-TE for ASON DCM Signalling
22Session 7 - Presentation 1 Highlights (continued)
- Expected benefits of IP/Optical integration in
ASON - 1. Large capacity and economical networks
- 2. Rapid and flexible path provisioning
- 3. New Optical network services
- dynamic pt-pt connexion/BoD
- Various Protection/Restoration mechanisms
- Value-Added services L1(optical)VPN
23Session 7 - Presentation 2 Highlights (continued)
- SG11 status on Signalling
- 1. Call and Bearer Control separation
- BICC for call control over ATM and IP networks
- 2. More and more separated sig. protocols
- Call, Connection, services resource control
- 3. Start addressing New Network Control
Architectures and Protocols - more separated distributed control
24Session 7 - Presentation 3 Highlights (continued)
- CR-LDP for ASON signalling
- 1. CR-LDP features
- CR-LDP is an extension to LDP, runs over TCP
- Employs the same signalling model as ATM PNNI and
Q.2931 - Recognized as a method of transporting IP over
ATM (in Y.1310) - 2. CR-LDP for ASON in G.7713.3
- Distributed call and connection management
signalling using GMPLS CR-LDP - to include Packet-switch capable (PSC),
Time-division multiplex capable (TDM), Lambda
switch capable (LSC) and Fiber switch capable
(FSC) interfaces
25Session 7 - questions/discussion Highlights
(continued)
- 3 DCM Signalling solutions in G.7713-series
- competing to cover the same requirements?
- How to ensure interworking (especially at E-NNI)
- Ensure alignment with related OIF and IETF
(GMPLS) efforts - What means call-connection separation in ASON
- ASON call differs from the legacy definition of a
call (in SG11) - relationship between call and connection
signalling protocols? - New services
- In what sense is L1(optical)VPN a true
Virtual private network - Which U- and C-plane resources can be shared
26Session 7 - Future directions in the concerned
ITU-T SGs (continued)
- SG15 G.7713 series on ASON DCM.
- Interoperability between DCM signalling solutions
(part. E-NNI) - Discovery and Routing protocols
- Separated Call and Connection control (purpose,
requirements?) - SG11 Legacy emerging signalling protocols
- BICC-SIP interworking for call control (over ATM
or IP/Optical?) - New network control architectures and protocols
- Clarify possible interactions with ASON UNI
- SG13
- L1(optical)VPN service definition and
requirements - Shared vs Dedicated resources in C and C planes
issues
27Session 7 - Specific Protocol Recommendations for
ASON Distributed Call and Connection Management
(contd)
- G.7713/Y.1704 (12/01)
- Distributed Call/connection Management (DCM)
requirements and functional model (in conformance
with G.8080 ASON architecture) - G.7713.1 PNNI signalling
- G.7713.2 GMPLS RSVP-TE signalling
- G.7713.3 GMPLS CR-LDP signalling
28Session 8 Optical Fibers, Cables
ComponentsLinkage of Standards Activities
- Reaffirm strong linkage to IEC TC86 - (Working
Well) - Emerging linkage to Laser Safety Issues (IEC) and
high optical power applications - Continued challenge of balancing architecture and
physical layer limitations - New technologies continue to offer new challenges
and possibilities - Integrated and smart components, Raman
Amplification, Broad ? G.scl Fibre
29Session 8 Optical Fibers, Cables Components
New Topics, areas for standardization (contd)
- gt40 GB/s implications
- Physical media parameters chromatic disp. and PMD
- New methodologies different from worst case
- Integration, Hybridization of Functions
Components - Reconfigurable, smart, modular, and low cost
- Packaging and functional integtation
- May need to specify additional parameters beyond
minimal set to allow integration
30Session 8 Optical Fibers, Cables Components
New Topics, areas for standardization (contd)
- Enhanced Capabilities with new amplifier
technologies - Raman, Extended band for rare earth amplifiers,
and Semiconductor amplifiers - Operational signal bands and optical power levels
continue to expand with new amplification
technologies
31Session 8 Optical Fibers, Cables Components
Scope of Current Work New Topics (contd)
- Synergistic relationship to IEC for ITU-T
applications and associated test methods - Data / telephony trend - may need better
communication beyond ITU-T and IEC on Physical
Layer needs - New components and technologies may cause
revisions to Physical Layer Standards to allow
lower cost implementations
32Session 8 Optical Fibers, Cables Components
Prioritization of Current Work (contd)
- New Lower cost implementations versus high cost /
capacity long haul applications - Operation aspects of systems with high optical
power levels - New Components with shorter lifetime, quicker to
market, more highly integrated - Need to move beyond worst case system design
- Possible flexibility needed between transverse vs
longitudinal compatible standardization - Cost / Value of installation and environmental
barriers also important for deployment of new
technologies (IEC SC86A, ITU-T SG6) - Continued value for definition, terminology
33Session 9 Optical Network Management
- Discussed the management aspects of OTN
equipment, in particular on fault management,
including alarm report control. Several issues
were noted. - Also discussed some practical ONM issues from a
network operator service provider perspective,
and covered the transport architecture and
deployment of ON services in particular is the
concern of migration and integration strategy for
interworking with the existing management
environments. - Presented an overview of service and network
configuration for Ethernet over WDM. The
operation architecture and management information
model from the NE view, Network view, and Service
view were discussed.
34Session 9 Optical Network Management (contd)
- Suggested Study Items
- Emergency Telecom Service (ETS) issues Need to
provide support for Emergency Service per E.106,
F.706, and Y.roec Special consideration should
be given to the assignment of alarm severity
levels Enhanced OTN services such as emergency
service could be best provided via Service Level
Agreements. - New services maintenance issues Need to monitor
fault isolate concatenated services and ASON
services Bridge-n-Roll for unprotected
restored connections in ASON (Re)Grooming in
ASON - (see next slide)
35Session 9 Optical Network Management (contd)
- Proposed Study Items (cont.)
- Management System Integration issues
- New services policy issues Coordinating ASON
service requests from multiple sources, Use of
TCM levels with agreed-level enforcement - Data replication between Management Plane (MP)
and CP - Resolution/correlation of multiple Names for a
resource - Function allocation between CP and MP
- Partitioning of resource control among CP and MP
instances - Interfaces between MP and CP entities
- Harmonization of demands and capacity at each
transport layer. - Management information model issues Validate the
information model with input from independently
developed implementation and with others, e.g.,
SG4, IETF.
36Session 9 Optical Network Management (contd)
- Action Items
- Maintain coordination with SG13 on its work on
OTN performance recommendations. Result will be
input to the next version of G.874, which is
target for consent in 2003. - Develop work plan on ASON management. Coordinate
between SG15 SG4 for input. - Coordination between Q12/15 and Q14/15 on the
management system integration issues. - Maintain coordination among SG15, SG4 and IETF on
transport NE information models. Give report to
SG4 in its next meeting on the SG15 progress. - Develop work plan on management aspect of
Ethernet over transport network based on G.etna.
37Session 10 Optical Switching Equipment
- Presentations on
- Optical Network Architecture/ASON
- Optical Network control protocols
- Optical crossconnect equipment
- Optical sub systems
- Optical components
38Session 10 Optical Switching Equipment (contd)
- Evolution of component technology will continue
to enable new network capabilities e.g. - Increased optical system reach
- Flexibility at the wavelength and band of
wavelength level - New challenges in the areas of
- Performance and fault management
- Connection management
39Session 10 Optical Switching Equipment (contd)
- Potential need to draw on the experience of SG 11
on signaling - Global addressing schemes need to be developed in
concert with ITU-T SG 2 - Some concern expressed over the potential of
overlapping activities on components between IEC
and SG 15
40Session 11 Network Performance (IP/Optical)
- IP/Optical networks will need to implement QoS
control mechanisms and coordinate them between
domains. - Y.1540/Y.1541 define IP packet transfer QoS
objectives for a wide range of end user
applications (including VoIP). - Needed means of signaling QoS
requests/responses among networks and relating
them to QoS mechanisms. - It will be important to provide flexibility in
QoS signaling standards and QoS mechanisms but
not too much! - Ongoing IP QoS standards work IP network
availability, packet reordering, priority setup
for emergency services.
41Session 11 Network Performance (IP/Optical)
(contd)
- SG13/SG15 should define a performance model for
OTN/IP client interactions - SG15 should advise on optical parameters and
fibre degradation impact on performance --
recommend values - SG4 should define allocation of OTN performance
limits among providers (M.24otn) - SG11/SG13/SG15 should develop mechanisms for
dynamically providing assured-quality OTN
services - SG4/SG15 should develop procedures for
restoration and localization of optical network
failures
42Session 11 Network Performance (IP/Optical)
(contd)
- ASON based capabilities can influence delivered
IP performance - ASON should support service performance levels
that translate into distinguishable performance
levels for IP (as well as other clients) - The ASON signaling protocol policy attributes,
especially GoS and CoS, should be capable of
carrying IP performance requirements - Coordination between SG13 and SG15 is needed to
- Insure ASON performance classes met IP needs
- Establish GoS/CoS component definitions that are
meaningful for IP - Determine which performance factors are signaled
across the UNI and which are in SLAs, e.g.,
blocking probabilities, dropped call
probabilities, call priority level, bandwidth
supported, call set-up time etc.
43Session 12 Optical Network Clients and Services
- SDH and, more recently, WDM (pre-OTN) transport
networks are intensively used for carrying
servicesfrom 1.5 Mbit/s to 2.5 (or 10) Gbit/s - SDH ? carrier class transport (monitoring,
protection) ? path capacity not always
right sized (for data) - WDM ? higher bit-rates ? variety of
tributary flows (transparency) ? poor
performance monitoring (transparency)
44Session 12 Optical Network Clients and Services
(contd)
- Recently standardized capabilites
- OTN more functionalities for WDM-based networks
- VCAT better granularity of the path
- GFP generic encapsulation for various flows
- LCAS flexible bandwidth allocation
( survivability/recovery mechanism) - ASTN automatic path set-up, protection/restoratio
n
These newly standardized featuresopen the door
to the delivery of enhanced or new services ?
new business opportunities
45Session 13 - Service and network evolution
- Creation and deployment of new services on a
large scale is a clear demand from market, it is
a major objective of Next Generation Networks
(NGN), thus NGN standardisation is urgent. (SG
13 on the way to formalise a ITU-T Project) - Networks operators and service providers expect
much from NGN in terms of profit, but NGN
standardisation may be complicated, because
regulatory issues come in addition to technical
issues. - Definition of open interfaces and interconnection
capabilities in NGN will be critical issues,
interoperability with legacy systems is a
blocking factor for incumbent operators
46Session 13 - Service and network evolution
(contd)
- The deployment of new broadband services has been
undertaken by Japan through the ambitious project
Hikari Hikari is based on a service approach
(i.e.generalized broadband multimedia
communication), taking advantage from current
state of standardisation - The future growth of multimedia communication has
motivated Mediacom 2004 ITU-T Project, which has
already reached maturity, coordination and
harmonisation of convergence of services is under
way. However IP transport has not the favor of
the broadcast community due to its inherent
limitations (connectionless). How (and where) to
convince them to adopt generalized IP transport ?