Constructive System of Systems Integration Cost Model COSOSIMO Workshop November 7, 2006 Outbrief - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 8
About This Presentation
Title:

Constructive System of Systems Integration Cost Model COSOSIMO Workshop November 7, 2006 Outbrief

Description:

Linda Brooks (Northrop Grumman) Jim Cain (BAE Systems) Debbie Charbonneau (Lockheed Martin) ... Abbey Turnau (Northrop Grumman) Taki Turner (Boeing) Lori ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:221
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 9
Provided by: Jesal1
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Constructive System of Systems Integration Cost Model COSOSIMO Workshop November 7, 2006 Outbrief


1
Constructive System of Systems Integration Cost
Model (COSOSIMO) Workshop November 7, 2006
Outbrief
  • Jo Ann Lane jolane_at_usc.edu
  • University of Southern California
  • Center for Systems and Software Engineering

2
Agenda
  • COSOSIMO tutorial
  • Discussion of System of Systems Engineering
    (SoSE)
  • Is it really different from traditional systems
    engineering with respect to cost estimation?
  • If so, how?
  • People talents/skills profiles?
  • New or modified processes?
  • Technology/product characteristics?
  • SoSE Survey review and comment

3
Attendees (52)
  • Aaron Ankrum (BAE Systems)
  • Rick Battle (General Dynamics)
  • William Black (Northrop Grumman)
  • Barry Boehm (USC)
  • Linda Brooks (Northrop Grumman)
  • Jim Cain (BAE Systems)
  • Debbie Charbonneau (Lockheed Martin)
  • Henry Chen (Raytheon)
  • Savita Choudhry (PRICE Systems)
  • Alan Chrostowski (Northrop Grumman)
  • Brad Clark (Software Metrics Inc.)
  • Emilio Collar (Western Connecticut State U.)
  • Bob Collet (SAIC)
  • Allison Converse (Northrop Grumman)
  • Carole Doan (BAE Systems)
  • Rich Fink (NASA)
  • John Gaffney (Lockheed Martin)
  • Stacy Gore (Raytheon)

John Rieff (Raytheon) Wilson Rosa (US Air
Force) Lori Saleski (BAE Systems) Helen Stowe
(BAE Systems) Dan Strickland (Dyenetics) Gary
Thomas (Raytheon) Abbey Turnau (Northrop
Grumman) Taki Turner (Boeing) Lori Vaughan
(Northrop Grumman) Ricardo Valerdi (MIT) Gail
Wakabayashi (BAE Systems) Gan Wang (BAE
Systems) Paul Wojtaszek (Raytheon) Steven Wong
(Northrop Grumman) Vivian Xia (HSBC Canada) Da
Yang (USC)
  • Tony Huynh (BAE Systems)
  • Jon Ilseng (Raytheon)
  • Leonard Jowers (U. of Alabama)
  • Ben Kroeter (Boeing)
  • Martha Leonette (FAA)
  • Dan Ligett (SoftStar Systems)
  • Vicki Love (Raytheon)
  • Zyg Martynowicz (Northrop Grumman)
  • Ashley Mathis (DoD/Army)
  • Kevin McKeel (PRICE Systems)
  • Chris Miller (SSCI)
  • Ken Nidiffer (SSCI)
  • Elizabeth ODonnell (Boeing)
  • Rosie Oxford (Northrop Grumman)
  • David Paulson (MITRE)
  • Tom Parr (Tecolote Research)
  • Anthony Peterson (Raytheon)
  • Thomas Pole (Lockheed Martin)

4
COSOSIMO Tutorial Overview
  • COSOSIMO Background
  • How COSOSIMO fits into the COCOMO suite
  • Methodology being used to develop model
  • Goal of COSOSIMO to complement other COCOMO
    cost models
  • History of COSOSIMO
  • System of Systems (SoS) and SoS Engineering
    (SoSE) Environment
  • What is an SoS COSOSIMO definition based on
    definitions by Mark Maier and Andy Sage
  • What is an LSI looks at typical activities
    performed by organizations responsible for
    development of an SoS
  • What is SoSE Key definitions provided by USAF
    Scientific Advisory Board on SoSE, National
    Centers for Systems of Systems Engineering, and
    Wikipedia
  • Comparison of SE to SoSE summary of differences
    between traditional SE and SoSE as well as SoSE
    challenges gleaned from recent SoSE conferences
    and workshops

5
COSOSIMO Tutorial Overview (continued)
  • COSOSIMO Tutorial
  • Current COSOSIMO Cost Estimation Approach
  • Overview of COSOSIMO 3 sub-models and their
    associated parameters
  • Planning, Requirements Management, and
    Architecting (PRA)
  • Source Selection and Supplier Oversight (SO)
  • Integration and Test (IT
  • More detailed parameter descriptions can be found
    in USC-CSE-2006-606 (see http//sunset.usc.edu/css
    e/TECHRPTS/)
  • Conclusions
  • Summarizes SoSE observations and planned COSOSIMO
    direction
  • Expected COSOSIMO availability (depends on data
    availability) Fall 2007
  • References
  • COSOSIMO-related
  • SoSE-related

6
What is Needed to Support Fall 2007 Availability
  • Participation in current SoSE surveys
  • Data from both SoS and SE programs
  • Process descriptions to help understand the
    differences between SoSE and SE
  • Effort data to calibrate COSOSIMO (either
    standalone model or special calibration of
    COSYSMO)

For those organizations that provide SoSE effort
from at least 3 SoS projects, a local calibration
will be provided
7
SoSE Discussions General Recommendations/Areas
for Further Research
  • Should consider operations costs vs. development
    cost tradeoffs
  • Can the model, via DoDAF, help you conceive the
    scope of the system and subsystems?  A raw number
    (for the size drivers) does not capture nested
    complexities
  • Need to look at Service-Oriented architectures
  • See Cancer Biomedical Informatics Grid (caBIG)
    https//cabig.nci.nih.gov
  • Uniqueness of SoSEis this simply a state of mind
    that reflects the traditional systems engineering
    discipline but packaged in a more formal way?
  • Should look at effort required to develop
    SoS-specific vocabulary

8
Review of SoSE Survey
  • New survey developed to better understand SoSs
    and SoSE
  • Key parts to survey
  • Survey participant information want to
    interview key SoSE technical managers/engineers
  • SoS program characteristics
  • SoS characteristics and properties
  • SoSE characteristics
  • SoSE life cycle model
  • SoSE process model description
  • Success of SoS
  • Reasons for success
  • Reasons why not so successful
  • What else is important
  • Recommendations from workshop attendees to be
    incorporated into the next update
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com