Parking Plan

1 / 72
About This Presentation
Title:

Parking Plan

Description:

County Building on Sherman has room for a few cars. Front & Oak where billboard is ... Restructure the management policy for the sale of off-street monthly passes to ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:113
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 73
Provided by: BobF

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Parking Plan


1
Parking Plan
  • City of Hood River
  • May 13, 2008

2
Purpose
  • Parking Plan (March 2008)
  • Council Directed
  • Foster Discussion
  • Evaluate Input to assist Council
  • Were in this together

3
Agenda
  • Introduction
  • Brief History
  • Parking Study
  • Parking Plan
  • Discussion
  • Recommendations
  • Adjourn

4
History
  • Early Parking Plans
  • Parking Structure
  • 1994 Design/Funded
  • Small
  • Not wanted
  • Not needed

5
History
  • Early Parking Plans
  • Initiatives
  • 2 Studies
  • 4 Plans
  • Chalking
  • Parking Zones
  • Meters
  • HRDBA/City Parking Committees

6
History
  • HRDBA/City Committee
  • An ordinance establishing a downtown parking
    district that prohibits employer/employee
    parking.
  • Recommend a parking study be done by a
    professional parking consultant to determine the
    supply/demand of parking now and in the future
  • Discount Tickets
  • 30 Minutes Free
  • Installation of more Courtesy Meters or
    Courtesy Spots
  • Construction Parking

7
Parking Study
  • 2005

8
Parking Study
  • Stakeholder Interviews

9
Parking Study
  • What is your impression of the current parking
    situation in downtown Hood River? Do you have any
    complaints about the current parking system?
  • What are the differences in parking occupancies
    between the summer peak (May September) and
    the off-peak (October April)?
  • What key values or guiding principles should
    shape Hood Rivers downtown parking system in the
    future?
  • In your view, what are the most important issue
    or concern to be addressed in Hood Rivers
    Downtown Parking Study?
  • What are your thoughts regarding the development
    of remote or satellite employee lots that
    would require employees to park outside the
    downtown and be shuttled in to the downtown? This
    could be a program that is only in effect during
    the peak season?
  • Would you or your business support a Customer
    First program that requires employees to park in
    designated parking areas?
  • What are your thoughts on the mid to long range
    possibilities of transitioning more downtown
    employees to alternative commute modes to free up
    customer parking (i.e., transit, ridesharing,
    bike, walk, etc.)?
  • Would a peak season shuttle between the
    waterfront and the downtown that was available to
    those parked in the Port lot be valuable in
    reducing demand in downtown?
  • What specific barriers prevent downtown employees
    from walking, biking or sharing rides to jobs in
    the downtown (i.e. lack of bike parking, work
    schedules, etc)?

10
Parking Study
  • Are there locations in downtown now that you
    believe would be feasible future parking sites?
    Please identify them.

11
Parking Study
  • Railroad site only good for east side of
    downtown, since it is uphill to everywhere from
    there
  • Lot across from the post office (multiple
    responses from stakeholders)
  • 5th and Columbia is the ideal site for customer
    access to downtown
  • Behind City Hall (multiple responses from
    stakeholders)
  • Full Sail Lot (multiple responses from
    stakeholders)
  • Small lot opportunities in the Heights
  • The City could change over several of the
    existing lots with multi-tiered parking
    structures. Also, the City could possible partner
    with several property owners in town. Why not
    approach the Elks Lodge or the Hood River News or
    the Hood River Railroad and see if they would
    want to build structures in partnership with the
    City. They could share the proceeds from rented
    spaces in exchange for long-term lease and
    perhaps tax breaks.
  • County Building on Sherman has room for a few
    cars
  • Front Oak where billboard is
  • Across from Astro
  • Build into hillside across State from Sheppards
    or City Hall. This would allow access from State
    and Sherman (above). (multiple responses from
    stakeholders)

12
Parking Study
13
Parking Study
  • Inventory
  • Conducted in July
  • Weekend/Weekday
  • On Street
  • Off Street

14
Parking Study
  • Inventory Findings

15
Parking Study
16
Parking Study
17
Parking Study
18
Parking Study
19
Parking Study
20
Parking Study
21
Parking Study
22
Parking Study
23
Parking Study
24
Parking Study
25
Parking Study
  • Forecasting

26
Parking Study
  • Demand Forecasting
  • 85 Occupancy Optimum Operating Efficiency
  • On-Street Occupancy
  • Growth Assumptions
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

27
Parking Study
28
Parking Study
29
Parking Study
30
Parking Study
  • Parking Management Recommendations

31
Parking Study
  • 8 Policy Actions
  • 20 Policy Recommendations

32
Parking Study
  • Policy Actions
  • Develop and implement minimum parking ratio
    standards for new commercial development in the
    downtown.
  • Develop and implement minimum parking ratio
    standards for new commercial development in the
    downtown.
  • Establish a Downtown Parking Enterprise Fund as a
    mechanism to direct funds identified for future
    parking into a dedicated fund.
  • Initiate a process to evaluate additional sources
    of funding for future parking development and
    parking system management.

33
Parking Study
  • Policy Actions (cont.)
  • Restructure the management policy for the sale of
    off-street monthly passes to be based on actual
    use rather than number of stalls.
  • Adopt code language that will allow for the
    establishment and enforcement of an area parking
    permit program.
  • Develop a policy that encourages private sector
    development of publicly available parking in the
    downtown to increase access capacity to the
    downtown.
  • Adopt a policy that raises monthly parking rates
    by at least the annual cost of living each year.

34
Parking Study
  • 20 Recommendations
  • Short Term
  • Mid Term
  • Long Term

35
Parking Study
  • Short Term
  • Reduce the number of on-street employee permits
    by transitioning approximately 25 on-street
    permits into the public lot at 5th Columbia.
    Continue transition of on-street permits to
    off-street locations after routine occupancy
    updates
  • All on-street employee permits should be
    consolidated to the south side of State Avenue
    and to the area on 6th Street, between Sherman
    and Cascade and on 7th Street, between Oak and
    Columbia
  • Change the existing 1-hour time zones located on
    Oak, between 5th 7th Streets to 3-hour meters
  • Change the current 10-minute zones on the south
    side of Cascade, between 4th 5th Streets to
    3-hour meters. This would leave the 10-minute
    zones on the north side of the street in place to
    serve the Post Office
  • Negotiate shared use and/or lease agreements with
    owners of private surface lots to provide for an
    interim supply of parking per desired use
  • Eliminate free parking in the no limit parking
    area on 6th and 7th Streets between Sherman and
    Cascade and replace with 10-hour parking meters.

36
Parking Study
  • Short Term (Cont)
  • Identify ideal locations for new publicly owned
    parking garages
  • Clarify the status of existing urban renewal
    funds regarding development of a strategically
    located parking structure in the downtown
  • Develop a mitigation plan for publicly available
    parking supply lost to development and/or
    redevelopment of existing City owned parking
    sites
  • Re-stripe public inventory of on-street parking

37
Parking Study
  • Mid Term
  • Consider acquiring land from the Mt Hood railway
    to develop a surface parking lot for employee
    parking and event spill over uses
  • Initiate development of new parking facility
  • Create and implement a package of incentives for
    the private development of publicly available
    parking supplies
  • Develop and implement a strategy for future
    parking pricing
  • Routinely conduct parking inventory analyses in
    the downtown

38
Parking Study
  • Long Term
  • Complete development and open new supply to serve
    priority patron uses.
  • Eliminate the ability to plug 3-hour meters for
    additional time
  • Convert 10-hour meters now on the north side of
    State Avenue, between Front and 3rd Street to
    3-hour meters, particularly if new parking supply
    is provided in the east zone of the downtown
    (i.e., east of 3rd Street)

39
Parking Study
  • Sites Studied
  • City Hall
  • Railroad
  • State Street Parking Lot

40
Parking Study
41
Parking Site
42
Parking Study
  • Summary
  • The parking study found that the current parking
    system in downtown Hood River is operating at a
    high level of efficiency, occupancy and turnover.
    Improvements can be made in the system that will
    assure that the City utilizes its supply in a
    manner that fully maximizes the assets it has.
    Nonetheless, Hood River is moving toward
    conditions that will further constrain the supply
    unless actions are initiated in the very near
    future. These actions will require that Hood
    River be more aggressive in management of its
    existing off-street supply to assure that
    visitors have maximum access to the on-street
    system. Further, the City needs to begin now to
    identify future parking sites (preferably on
    current city owned lots) and protect them.

43
Parking Plan
  • 2008

44
Parking Plan
  • Main Goals/Objectives
  • Revise Parking Management Plan
  • Devise a financial plan
  • Ensure adequate number of spaces
  • Maintain financially self-sustaining parking
    system
  • Deal with Growth

45
Parking Plan
  • Questions to Consider
  • How much of the parking problem is a seasonal
    problem?
  • How much is it a perception problem and how much
    is it a lack of facilities problem?
  • To what extent does the City have a
    responsibility to provide parking in the downtown
    area?
  • Are parking rates in Hood River reasonable?
  • Is the City Council willing to take on the
    political challenges that may be presented by
    changes to the parking system?
  • Is the business community willing to buy into
    the new plan and to what extent?

46
Parking Plan
  • Parking Management

47
Parking Plan
  • Parking Lot Permit System
  • Current status
  • Spaces Sold Waiting
  • Columbia lot 133 131 (2 HC) 18
  • East lot 35 35 31
  • Front Street lot 21 21 22
  • West lot 50 50 33
  • Reserved forever

48
Parking Plan
  • Lot Permit Management
  • Reserved spaces
  • Columbia Lot - 64 daily vacancy rate
  • West Lot 65 daily vacancy rate
  • State Street Lot 76 daily vacancy rate
  • Front Street Lot 92 daily vacancy rate
  • 85 is considered effective peak occupancy

49
Parking Plan
  • General Permit Plan
  • No Reserved Spaces
  • Oversell permits per lot
  • 20 oversell peak efficiency
  • No Guaranteed permits
  • Few vs. Many

50
Parking Plan
  • Meter Pass Management
  • 20/Month (_at_0.12/hr)
  • 120 passes
  • First Come Basis
  • Open to everyone
  • No limits on amount
  • Loss to City - 384/day
  • I dont want to walk
  • Always an open meter

51
Parking Plan
52
Parking Plan
  • Parking Meter System
  • Functions well
  • _at_600 meters
  • 0.50/hr
  • 3-hour limit

53
Parking Plan
  • Meter Problems
  • Change
  • Malfunctions
  • Fines

54
Parking Plan
  • Problem Resolution
  • Change
  • Smart meters
  • Coin
  • Credit Card
  • Debit Card
  • Regular meters
  • Cash Key

55
Parking Plan
  • Problem Resolution (cont)
  • Malfunctions
  • _at_5
  • Smart Meters
  • Bagging Meters

56
Parking Plan
  • Problem Resolution
  • Fines
  • Efficient Enforcement
  • HRDBA Program
  • Free Parking Days
  • Ticket Review Process

57
Parking Plan
  • Future Growth and Demand

58
Parking Plan
  • Growth

59
Parking Plan
60
Parking Plan
  • Additional Demand
  • Loss of two private parking lots
  • Replaced with commercial buildings
  • Art Gallery/Theater
  • Building Renovations
  • Paris Fair
  • Van Metre
  • Red Feather
  • Carousel Museum
  • Law Offices
  • Waucoma Hotel
  • Double Mountain Brewery
  • Street Intersections
  • Residential Parking Districts

61
Parking Plan
  • Conclusion New Parking Facilities are needed
  • New Facility is structured parking
  • Is this a good conclusion?
  • Alternate modes of transport
  • I need my car
  • No convenient bus service

62
Parking Plan
  • Consideration of New Facility
  • Structured or Surface
  • Location
  • Public or Private (or both)
  • Funding
  • Who Pays?
  • How Much?

63
Parking Plan
  • Structure or Surface
  • Structure
  • More Expensive per Space
  • More vehicles per SF
  • Security Concerns
  • Maintenance Concerns
  • Surface
  • Not enough available land
  • Private lots full or not available

64
Parking Plan
  • Location
  • Post Office Lot
  • Columbia Lot
  • City Hall Lot
  • Mt. Hood RR
  • East Lot
  • Other?

65
Parking Plan
  • Columbia Lot site

66
Parking Plan
  • Preliminary Estimates

67
Parking Plan
68
Parking Plan
  • Funding Options
  • Increase Permit Rates
  • Increase Meter Pass Rate
  • Special Levy for City Improvements
  • Increase Meter Rates
  • Urban Renewal

69
Parking Plan
  • Funding Considerations
  • Can it be funded?
  • Whats the best option for funding?
  • City Funded?
  • DBA Funded?
  • User Funded?
  • Combination of City/DBA/Users and what is the ?

70
Parking Plan
  • Recommendations
  • Review UR Plan as funding source
  • Direct staff to plan for a new structure over the
    Columbia Lot to include a recommendation on the
    best option for funding
  • Increase Permit Rates
  • Increase Meter Pass Rate
  • Increase Meter Rates
  • Direct staff to implement additional parking
    study recommendations immediately or as soon as
    logistically possible
  • General sale of lot permits
  • Reduce the number of spaces for meter pass permits

71
Parking Plan
  • Q A
  • Discussion

72
Parking Plan
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)