Title: 9
19
All images are from the FWS Image Library unless
otherwise noted.
2Predators and Predation
3- Predators
- animals that kill other animals to survive
4Predator Behavior and Prey Survival
- Survival mechanisms
- Co-evolution
- protective shapes and coloration
- mimicry
- alertness, swiftness
- affinity for remaining in protective cover
- specialized behavioral and physical features for
capture of prey
- speed, agility, claws, sharp teeth
- strength, keen smell and vision
- survivors form the next generation
- those traits for survival are passed on
5- Predator strategies
- ambush
- swift pursuit
- select weakened prey
- vulnerable prey
- individuals with oddity in color, behavior, or
location
- conspicuousness
- individuals outside of normal habitat
- territoriality
- ensures adequate hunting grounds
6Predation in Natural Communities
- Relationship between predator impact on abundance
and density of prey populations
- inconclusive evidence
- uncontrollable variables
- Our Vanishing Wild Life
- Hornaday 1913
- plea for protection of wild animals
- did not include carnivores
- human orientated viewpoint
- influenced attitudes against predators
- Leopold
- Thinking Like a Mountain 1949
- once had ardor for predator free environment
- understood fierce green fire dying in wolfs
eyes
- understood necessity of predators
7Figure 9-1 Distributions of Gray Wolves.
8Theoretical Predator-Prey Systems
- Predator-Prey Models
- Lokka_Bolterra equations
- assume potential rate of increase for prey in
absence of predators
- assume decline in predator populations in absence
of prey
- assume a constant food supply for prey
- assume disease, climate, other predators constant
9Figure 9-2 Predator/Prey Oscillations
10Figure 9.3 Lynx Hare Cycles
11Laboratory Studies of Predator-Prey Systems
- Studies utilized single predator-single prey
population
- Complex habitat provides advantages for prey,
helps ensure survival of prey species
- mobility
- adequate food
- suitable cover
- Predators increase in numbers may be excessive,
leading to crash, if all prey eliminated
12Figure 9-4
13Field Observations of Predator-Prey Systems
- Errington 1956
- social interactions within muskrat populations
- with the role of mink predation
- mink predation greater when muskrat numbers high
- not all muskrats equally vulnerable to predation
- due to social differences
- social outcasts almost exclusively ones killed by
mink
- walking corpses
- predation before starvation
- mortality factors compensatory
- disease, starvation, predation
14Figure 9-5 a
15Figure 9-5 b
16Figure 9-5 c
17Figure 9-5 d
18- Density of prey influences feeding behavior and
number of predators
- average predator consumes more prey per day if
more prey
- functional response
- tendency of predators to shift diets to abundant
prey
- numerical response
- numbers of predators increase with increase in
prey density
- Leopolds 5 factors in predator-prey
interactions
- density of prey population
- density of predator population
- characteristics of prey
- density and quality of alternate predator foods
- characteristics of predator
- means of attack, food preferences
19Isle Royale Map
20Isle Royale Predator-Prey Relationships
- Wolves, moose, beaver
- undisturbed environment
- 1900 moose introduction
- 1925 moose replaced caribou
- as dominant herbivore
- 1920 3000 moose
- 1930 overgrazed, crashed to several hundred
- 1936 fires renewed browse supply
- 1940s numbers increased, then crashed
21- 1949 wolves crossed ice
- 15 - 22 single large pack stable for ten years
- wolves primarily killed older, weak moose
- social dominance restricted breeding in wolf
pack
- 1969 deep snow, moose congregated,
- depleted browse in area
- proportion of calves taken by wolves increased 25
- 42
- 1980 50 wolves, 5 packs
- social strife among wolves
- severe winter, wolf numbers dropped to 30
- 1982 14 wolves, 600 moose
- 1987 15 wolves, 1400 moose
- soon moose numbers decrease as they age
- easier for wolf to attack
22- Lessons learned from Isle Royale
- ten years of study not enough to determine all
factors
- unpredictable nature of weather and influence on
wintering behavior of moose
- effects of moose on own food supply
- fire impact rejuvenated browse
- individual personalities of wolf packs
23Table 9.1
24Field Experiments with Predator-Prey Systems
- Experiments removing predators increased prey
numbers
- indicating effective predator control can
increase populations
- increased nesting success
- with fox/mallard most prey were female
- control fox, increase duck production overall
- remnants of linear cover have potential to be
predator lanes
- ease of predators to find prey when concentrated
in small area
- some studies show predators do not control prey
populations
- Public perception of predators vary widely
25Figure 9-7
26Alaska Wolf Control
- Justification in some areas to enhance recovery
of moose and caribou populations
- prey populations increased
- wolf predation was primary cause of moose
mortality
- hunting also contributing factor in moose
decline
- recommended reducing hunting
- severe weather a factor in moose decline
- low moose numbers caused slower decreases in wolf
numbers
- moose populations would eventually recover
without human intervention
27- 1985 Alaska Policy
- determination of desired level of wolf and prey
population in each management area
- permission for air hunts only if Board of Game
determines prey population severely depressed and
game harvest below long-term averages
- scientific evidence indicates the cause of low
prey populations is wolf predation
- alternate management methods are not likely to
bring about recovery of prey
- must act in public interest
- consumptive and non-consumptive uses of wildlife
- hold public hearings
28Predation on Domestic Animals
- Natural selection of wild
- herbivores
- alertness
- agility
- speed
- stealth
- Domestic animals
- products of artificial selection for food
products
- 1960s concern for wildlife and ecology
- role of predators as selective agents on prey
- inhumanity of some predator control methods
29- Extent of Predator Problem
- coyote damage to sheep in western states
- 20 lambs on 10 ranches
- 14 million loss of lambs/year
- 5 million loss of ewes
- 19 million total loss of sheep per year to
coyote predation
- Control Methods
- trapping
- den hunting
- shooting
- poisoning
30- Leopold Report 1964
- all native animals are resources of inherent
interest and value, and responsibility of
government
- local control of wildlife populations is an
essential part of management policy where crops,
livestock, human health and safety are damaged or
jeopardized - Cain Report 1971
- Nixon prohibited poisons for predator control on
federal land
31- Effectiveness of Control Methods on Coyote
Numbers
- 1931 Animal Damage Control moved to Department
of Ag from dept. of wildlife
- concerns aligned with ranchers/farmers
- kills 70,000 - 85,000 coyotes /yearly in 13
states
- 18 - 29 coyote population killed
- increased reproduction and pup survival
compensate for losses
- produce larger litter 7 pups vs. 3.6 with no
control states
- Effects of Coyote Control on Other Animals
- other animals killed in course of coyote control
- 25 bobcats killed
- other animals killed by poison Compound 1080
- secondary poisoning, when animals scavenge on
killed coyotes an issue also
32Table 9-6
33- Public Policy and Predator Control
- public acceptance important in determination of
acceptable methods for managing wildlife
- non-lethal methods preferred over lethal
- guard dogs
- repellent chemicals
- birth control
- of the lethal methods, most acceptable
- shooting from ground
- fast acting poisoning
- pay for losses next preferred, but after above
methods
- most unacceptable
- aerial gunning
- denning
- pay ranchers not to raise sheet
- traps
- slow poisons
34Figure 9-10
35- Federal policies in US (Cain 1972)
- animal damage control designed to ensure
maintenance of native wildlife and habitats
- selective depredations
- control goals
- human health and safety from wildlife borne
disease
- economic losses in residential and industrial
situations
- forests, range, ag crops, livestock protected
from direct damage and wildlife borne diseases if
offset all costs of control
- animal-control program conducted when/where
demonstrated need as determined by US
Fish/Wildlife Service
- Annual work plan developed fro animal control in
each state
36- Wildlife Society Policy
- support only those animal control programs
justified biologically, socially, economically
- encourage continuing research designed to improve
methods of
- accurately assessing wildlife damage
- measuring effectiveness of damage control
programs
- recommend that efforts of control be minimum
required to bring damage within tolerable limits
- recommend efforts of control be the minimum
required to bring damage within tolerance limits
- support use of only the most efficient, safe,
economical, humane control methods for
depredating animals, advocate lethal control only
when all other methods unsatisfactory - urge all control programs closely regulated by
state/federal laws
37Summary
- Predator-prey systems
- effects of predators dependent on community
complexity
- effects of severe weather and hunting additive
- Controversy surrounding predator control
- Compound 1080